Donate Button
Thursday, March 28, 2024

The Billy Meier UFO contacts singularly authentic ongoing for 80 years the key to our future survival

Everything Happens for a Reason

Well, yes and…no.

We do frequently hear that “everything happens for a reason”. This is usually expressed with the implication that no matter how difficult the situation, the outcome is practically preordained to be a positive one. So the focus is on the event as an opportunity, or even evidence, that the “universe” is somehow bringing us a blessing in disguise.

While this perspective, a form of positive thinking, isn’t the worst attitude that we can have when faced with unexpected difficulties, it unfortunately misses the mark in terms of accuracy. In fact, everything does happen for a reason, i.e. that there is an actual cause that has resulted in the event, that is rarely perceived or understood.

The positive thinking paradigm is extended to include the idea that the “universe has provided this opportunity”, or that it “wants us to learn this lesson”, etc. The obvious mistake here is that the universe doesn’t have any personal investment in, or intention towards, any of us. The universe is neutral. It has already established its laws of operation in this Creation, which govern everything in it, with cause and effect being one of the central, immutable laws. Of course not only has everything come into existence through the miracle of the Creation but its laws also govern the duration of existence of its various elements…and so many other things.

While we may not be cognizant of exactly what we, and others know and/or don’t know, may have done that have resulted in a bite-your-tongue “opportunity”, we can be sure that there is indeed a causal trail leading to the event. Contributing factors could include unconscious, conscious, correct and mistaken thoughts, feelings and actions, which have led to the event.

We should understand that our admirable optimism, expressed as “everything happens for a reason” is not to be taken as a guarantee that the positive resolution of the situation is a foregone conclusion. The situation should be seen as an opportunity to reflect on the possible causative actions and to perceive, and learn from, them as best as possible.

The intention to see things as they are, even in a reflective mode, also known as neutral-positive thinking, can be helpful to strengthen our attentiveness and understanding, determine what corrective actions need to be taken and perform them. It can also lead us out of the overly positive, New Age, mystical type of thinking that reinforces the idea that outside forces are responsible for these so-called lessons in life and that they are administered by “God”, “spirit”, “the universe”, etc., for our personal benefit.

Depending on the level of confusion about this in one’s mind, one may feel that they are “blessed”, or especially “worthy”, because what amounts to some imaginary god or tin god has “chosen to bestow” this “cloud with a silver lining” on us in the guise of an otherwise challenging or unpleasant situation.

Of course the aforementioned reflection on the actual causes of the situation is to be done as soon as possible without diverting one’s attention from the task at hand. Sometimes we will find that our intention to do so causes such perceptions and insights to occur spontaneously, sporadically and intermittently with and/or during our corrective work. This can occur more easily if we are approaching our task with a relaxed, as well as attentive, state of mind, thereby assisting rather than impeding our progress.

Depending on the actual complexity of the causal circumstances we may or may not be able to get a complete picture that immediately allows us to understand all that brought the situation about.

So it isn’t in itself either positive or negative that “things happen”. Nor is it some hide-the-candy trick by a universe that in any way “intends” for us to find the candy. The universe didn’t “do” anything to, for, or against us. The immutable laws of cause and effect are unfailingly at work and there has been no magical, mystical, capricious – personal – positive or negative intercession by the Creation.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

26 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
robert e gillespie

try this on for size… if you want to use logic…only

(my take is that: you want to dismiss almost everything you can’t explore with ONLY “logic/reason”…my take is that some people have “SUPER direct experience,” (the person with an IQ over 200 obviously has a different experience of many things in life, etc.

also, …living or visiting “some remote area” in the Amazon… which “can never be proven” to someone…”who refuses to get “in the canoe…” (I got “dragged into the canoe” …but just at first…then they showed me “what I didn’t know…and could never have “found out about” using reason… I KNOW THESE PEOPLE (well, I don’t know you could call them people, etc.)…but THEY HAD ABILITIES…no version of my “puny subconsciousness” could have “fantasized”…

…just like Meier asks “us to believe” things that “are beyond human technology”…that could “all be fantasy, too”…though I “know” it’s not… because I have had “direct encounters also,”
so you view “Meier as if “he is the only one” with the only “true knowledge”… (not necessarily true)…

so YOU expect us to take MEIERS stuff on faith… yeah, I know he’s got photos…and me personally (I more than know we are being visited “both physically” and “higher material dimensions (if you like)…so that’s not the issue WITH ME…but it “should be” for “most” who are “only taking your Meier’s System on the BASIS OF FAITH…like any other “religion,” etc…

anyway, “try your logic on this!” …by the way…I “know” the answer to this “apparent conundrum” which “still confounds” western scientists and philosophers… and I didn’t get it by “using reason!!!”

Now to begin…

The next time you want to “confound a scientist…” ask him this about the mechanics of “visual perception.” (this ALSO applies to your other senses.)

(I like to “do a number” on scientists and their so-called scientific method, because they like to sweep inconvenient issues, like this, “under the rug” so-to-speak. They don’t like to discuss issues that “threaten” the underpinnings of just about all of their science, their credentials, and the bucks, attention, and authority they get by claiming to be experts, etc.)

so here goes: “the mechanics of visual perception!”

1. you look out at the world… and we all take for granted that pretty much what we see is what most other people see if they are standing near us.

2. an optical physicist would probably say something like this:

a. light bouncing off objects enters your eye, hits the back of your retina – IS CONVERTED INTO NERVOUS SYSTEM ELECTRICAL IMPULSES that then travel along pathways in your nervous system, and end up somewhere in your brain where an image of the external world is produced…

b. Now, if you think carefully about this, a PARADOX becomes apparent. Go back to the ‘CONVERTED TO NERVOUS SYSTEM ELECTRICAL IMPULSES’… and ponder this point a moment.

Isn’t this saying that the “supposedly real external light rays” that entered your eye… end their journey at the back of your retina, and ARE NOW CONVERTED INTO some kind of “nervous energy pulses,” and THAT THEY ARE NO LONGER THE “ACTUAL EXTERNAL LIGHT RAYS” that originally entered, but some kind of substitute.

this would mean: that you are NOT REALLY EXPERIENCING “the supposed external reality” DIRECTLY, but rather an “artificial replication” of it.

Kind of like WATCHING A BALLGAME ON TV. You are not REALLY VIEWING A LIVE REALITY, but a replication produced on the “screen of the TV,” with electromagnetic energy pulses being transmitted through the airwaves, into your TV circuitry, and thence to phosphor activation on the screen of your TV, and there producing a replication of the ballgame.

It is, to be sure, a very good representation/replication of the actual live game being played at a distant location from you… BUT NONE THE LESS… this is a REPLICATION and YOU ARE NOT DIRECTLY EXPERIENCING THE GAME!

The ultimate conclusion this should lead you to, is that:

ALL OF WHAT YOU HAVE PREVIOUSLY THOUGHT OF AS “YOUR EXPERIENCE OF EXTERNAL REALITY” is a REPLICATION…(because of the step where the external light rays are converted to “internal nervous energy pulses,” means YOU ARE NOT EXPERIENCING the actual reality.)

Think a little more about this, and you should realize that, based on this concept, what you think of as THE EXTERNAL UNIVERSE IS SOMEHOW “INSIDE OF YOU!”

that means, that: the “farthest stars,” the telescope, too… EVERYTHING YOU PERCEIVE WITH YOUR SENSES is a FACSIMILE /REPLICATION, and somehow “IS ALL INSIDE OF YOU!” You, must be PRETTY BIG, if the “whole universe” is inside of you… including the whole world… and all those other people (6 billion, or so)… AND ALL THIS IS INSIDE YOU… THE SUN, MOON, STARS, AND GALAXIES…”and ALL THE OTHER PEOPLE…UFO’S, …EVERYTHING “IN ANY/ALL SYSTEMS!”

…and especially, in ones which posit that things are “mostly just subtler levels of matter/energy!” …that are products of mind/brain manipulation and fantasy…

FLASHROB

…something to think about, huh!

PS. I’m familiar with a lot of the Maier stuff…and I am also familiar with the “theory” that much, if not all of the “angelic, alien, demonic stuff, etc.” could all JUST be “a product” of the “physical brain” – including the “physical brains of more advanced beings out there in the universe – CREATING A KIND OF “thought form super collective dream” by “the collective thoughts “of all beings in the universe” affecting varying subtler states of physical matter…”

So, the Maier stuff seems “to be of this persuasion,” and since a “lot of this may be the case” (a lot, but perhaps not all) is why I’m interested in the Maier material…

Sheila

Just two questions Robert, are you an American living near a military base? Did either of your parents work for the government?

Duke

Depending on the might, or lack thereof, that someone put into one’s own thoughts, you will eventually dream of those same thoughts at some point.

Well explained article on the “The Deadly Might Of Thoughts And Feelings”:
http://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_Meier/FIGU_Special_Bulletin_55