Controversial UFO authenticated; corroboration of Billy Meier’s prophetic warnings continue to increase

With the publication of the new photographic analysis of the Wedding Cake UFO (WCUFO) photos taken by Billy Meier, by Rhal Zahi, a professor with expertise in the use of state-of-the-art technology, image processing, web animation and computer modeling,  a stunned silence is the only response that can be detected from the ranks of the top professional skeptics worldwide.

An additional supporting visual aid, in the form of a short but easily understood video, nicely augments the published documentation. (A more comprehensive video can be found here.)

The self-styled experts, who’ve set themselves up as the arbiters of what is real, are suddenly muzzled, mute and frozen like the proverbial deer in the headlights.

From James Randi, Michael Shermer, Derek Bartholomaus, Stephen Novella, Phil Plait, Stuart Robbins and even model-maker Phil Langdon himself, who tried in vain to duplicate Billy Meier’s famous WCUFO evidence, we hear…nothing.

Any remaining skepticism  about the authenticity of Billy Meier’s UFO evidence is evidence in itself of a belligerent denial of factual reality, which in this case is synonymous with the skeptics themselves.

Rather than include the growing list of corroborations of Meier’s specific, prophetically accurate scientific information, I suggest that you start to read the nearly 200 posts at this blog.

Perhaps now that we have your attention, which was the intended purpose of  Meier’s fantastic UFO evidence all along , we can relegate the entire UFO phenomenon to a supporting role.

The actual reason for Meier’s – singularly authentic – contacts with the Plejaren extraterrestrials, ongoing over 70 years, is to help us help ourselves to assure our own future survival. (For those who have been paying attention, please pardon the repetition but it’s obviously still quite necessary since there’s so much evidence that we, humanity, continue to fail to recognize the severity of our self-created, dead end situation.)

Please also go the Spiritual Teaching section and begin to read and understand the deeper meaning – and what is essentially the “how to” message – behind the Billy Meier contacts.


For the eBook of the 63 color photographs of the WCUFO, including reports by Wendelle Stevens, dating from October 1980 to August 1981, please click here. This is a true, historical collector’s item!


38 comments on “Stunned Skeptics Suddenly Silent as WCUFO Proved…Real

  • OK, try this one:

    You have a group of professionals who are great at doing their jobs. You ask them to volunteer their time, energy and expertise to help lesser people and radically improve their lives.

    Now, do you first ask the disadvantaged people to help themselves, by, say, learning a new philosophy and possibly a new language? Do you say, “Only when you improve yourselves spiritually can we come in an give you the help you need. As a matter of fact, we will only tell one of your villagers this story, and ask him to spread the word about our organization to the rest of your peoples. Not until the entire community understands and accepts and utilized our new paradigm will we bring you the help you so clearly and desperately need”.

    Would you think this was a good way to spread your good deeds and intentions? I don’t think so, and neither does Doctors Without Borders,
    or The Peace Corps,
    or Send a Cow,

    Do you know who insists that the underprivileged take on their philosophy first? The Church of Scientology,
    and even the Salvation Army,

    So, how are The Plejarans helping us again?

    • You have absolutely no understanding of the information or teaching in the case. It would help if you actually evolved beyond the extremely childish level of understanding that you continue to express.

  • MH, please educate me. And see how I gave actual and factual web sites to the information I was trying to impart?

    I would appreciate the same courtesy in return. Telling me to “evolve” is not at all helpful. Please provide me with succinct and distinct quotes or passages(and direct links) from our superiors to elucidate and enlighten me.

    You are the professor in this instance and I am your eager student. Telling me I am stupid is not the way to engage my interest in your field of interest. Provide me with a few choice tidbits of wisdom that will entice me to learn more from you, Mr. Meier and the true masters of us all.

  • Instead of quoting other websites in support of your uneducated understanding of the Meier material, you’re again advised to do your homework.

    This “professor”, and all the others that participate here, have quickly realized that you’re lazy and want pre-digested knowledge and wisdom.

    We take the time to think things through for ourselves. Once we’re really involved in that we can then actually discuss the content of the Meier material. We’re informing as best we can…not trying to recruit “believers”.

    So you’ve come to the wrong place to be “enticed”, we’re a bit busy realizing that this badly damaged world of ours is the result of thoughtless and ill-thought out human actions. If you’re not enticed enough perhaps this isn’t the place you’re looking for.

  • How about a course description, Professor? Make me want to take your classes.

    Or, have you already judged me unfit for your education process? If this is how you conduct your business, company or church, it’s no wonder why it’s made no progress in 70 years.

    I came to you for enlightenment and education and all you seem to want to do is insult me. This is no way entice seriously interested individuals.

    Education works both ways, the student has to want to learn and the teacher must want to teach.

    As I understand it, Mr. Horn, you are the official U.S. spokesman for Billy Meier and FIGU, are you not? If you have no desire to work with me, which is entirely your decision I assure you, than I would like to speak to someone else who is in charge. Perhaps your superior.

    Thank you for taking the time with me, I appreciate it.

    • The course is freely available at http://www.theyflyblog and http://www.theyfly, as well as the sites linked from them. You set the course direction, curriculum, hours, test yourself and you give yourself your own grades. You can even cheat if you want…just don’t catch yourself.

      And since it’s free, there’s no “business” to conduct. But if you don’t think it’s made any progress in 70 years…why bother?

      You really came here to figure out ways to sound like you’re issuing intelligent challenges. We’ll let others decide how well you’re doing with that one. But maybe, MAYBE, now you’ll get that no one cares to “entice” you – don’t you pay attention to the responses that people take the time to give you?

      It’s a good thing that you give yourself your own grades because things wouldn’t be looking too good for you if anyone else was. And with htat short an attention span, I said with that short an attention span don’t set your goals too high at first.

      So, if you have nothing better to do than joust – when you’ve been pointed directly to the vast school library – maybe you’re really looking to join a debating club.

      Good luck!

  • Let me look over the posts from this last week where I asked several legitimate questions and see the responses I got:

    MH says::
    BTW, try using your real name, it’s a sign of courage such, as Meier espouses and demonstrates.

    Dyson Devine says:
    Those are the sorts of stupid and attention-seeking remarks we’d expect from a fictional character like yourself.
    And I think “narcissistic almost to the point of solipsism” sums up the tone of your contribution to this forum quite succinctly.

    MH says::
    (as your uninformed comments clearly show)

    Again…if you’d take the trouble to actually do some research into the abundant, free information on my blog, my site and those linked from it, you’d see how lazy your efforts appear to date.
    Please, separate yourself from that herd!

    theneuromatrix says:
    Is your logic that of a child’s or a mature and rational adult? Why do you keep using argumentative retorts and presumptions grounded on science fiction references which are not representative of reality but merely meant to entertain us?

    Are you truly serious about the topics discussed here and the search for truth?

    MH says:
    You have absolutely no understanding of the information or teaching in the case. It would help if you actually evolved beyond the extremely childish level of understanding that you continue to express.

    This “professor”, and all the others that participate here, have quickly realized that you’re lazy and want pre-digested knowledge and wisdom.

    It’s a good thing that you give yourself your own grades because things wouldn’t be looking too good for you if anyone else was. And with htat short an attention span, I said with that short an attention span don’t set your goals too high at first.
    ALL of you insulted me without really answering any of my questions. Did you notice that I did not do the same to you, that I was merely asking questions, questions that may seem simple to you, but I was truly curious about what you all seem to know that I do not.

    These ad hominen attacks on my person show me the true colors of you, whom I presume, are the “enlightened” children of The Plejarans.

    You had better take a good look in the mirror if you wonder why your philosophies are not being taken seriously by the rest of humanity. From here, you look like a bunch of jerks.

    Thank you for your time this week, gentlemen, I think I found what I was looking for.

    Good luck.

    • Ah, petulant pouting…instead of one single bit of evidence that you took the repeated advice to do what all the rest of us have been doing – for years and decades – homework.

      So you will go away mad that your demands haven’t been met, that you didn’t dictate the course of the conversation, or our responses and that you succeeded in avoiding the freely offered information in which most, and possibly all, of the answers to your questions could be found..with just a little sincere effort on your part.

      Sure, continue to blame others for what you don’t wish to do yourself, which, being the antithesis of self-responsibility, is also evidence of your being right about how the level of the success of the mission and its teaching is still so small…among the small minded.

    • there was no attack on my post just a comparison or easy analogy. The philosphies are not taken seriously because people’s minds are more focused on more on how they can make more money and buy more things to make them happy. Also when you consider that the majority of earth’s populations still believes in a god or gods, then you can see where the true teaching of the spirit cannot be heard or leaned. For example, try convincing a Christian that Islam is much better to believe in and the only religion or vice versa, how would these people handle that? Religion is apart of humans upbringing and growing kids (minds) do not have an option otherwise to not be influenced by its incorrect ideology. Whether you are religious today or not, i’m sure there was apart of your upbringing that involved religious beliefs.

      How can most of the world believe in their gods/beliefs when there is no definite proof besides revised holy books and statues? Have you asked any religious people to prove that there is a god? And what proof do they have?

      THe difference is in Meier’s accurate prophetic information. Whether it be prophecies or predictions, these have yet to fail, which is why most of us here state, read his information.

  • Wow, what different and interesting week this has been!

    Frustrated by my efforts at getting some answers here, I went over to the Independent Investigations Group (IIG)
    The Billy Meier Case
    and found out a lot of pertinent information!

    When I contacted the IIG, Director James Underdown wrote me back within a few minutes and he was very helpful. He even suggested I visit CFI in Hollywood, and I took him up on his offer. He was a very pleasant and well-informed man. Not once in my e-mails with him or in my face-to-face meeting did he insult me in the slightest. He, like myself, was only interested in getting to the truth about Meier. He patiently listened to all my questions and gave me some very satisfying answers.

    I also spoke on the phone with Derek Bartholomaus, creator of The Billy Meier Case web site, and he was as nice as can be, spending more than an hour discussing the case. He was not dismissive or offensive and treated me like a curious adult. We discussed various aspects of the claims and he pointed me to the Phil Langdon models, photos and films. Derek also offered to meet up with me in person in case I had any further questions. Another model of kindness and patience in dealing with my curious (and open) mind.

    Seriously, Mr. Horn, if you want to convince people of what you are trying to say, being nice and friendly goes a long way than being snarky and disrespectful of the curious.

    Good luck on your efforts, you will surely need to step up your game if you want people to listen to what you have to say.

  • “You bet they’re glad to give you their time to make their silly unsubstantiated claims.”
    Mr. Horn, might I remind you that YOU and MEIER are making the claims. Unsubstantiated ones at that.

    I could mention to you the minor TV stars, Michelle DellaFave and Lindsay Bloom, being touted as Plejarans?
    What about physicist Ivan Alvarado-Rodriguez and the modern day testing of “extra-terrestrial” metal?
    The “prophesy” of the Bugey nuclear power station in France?
    “Photos” of dinosaurs that turn out to be paintings from a children’s book?
    “Inaudible” sounds being recorded by a 1980s cassette tape recorder?
    An increasingly inexact number of the moons of Jupiter?

    I could go on and on.

    By the way, when you post a link to try to substantiate your claim, it’s best to point to some other source other than your own web pages. It reminds me of the people who claim the bible is true…because the bible says it’s true. Circular reasoning and all that.

    Recently, I have been able to retire, due to an inheritance left to me by the death of a close family member. I have decided I will devoting a lot more of my time, my efforts and my money, to these fine organizations, listed again:

    I feel these people are better equipped to deal with reality than you seem to be. I really hope you are right, Mr. Horn, and the aliens are here to help us. If that day actually comes, I will welcome them as brothers.

    • You “could mention the minor TV stars”…but then it would show that you didn’t do your homework:

      As for all the rest, the answers are easy to find…if one actually does as they were instructed to do, i.e. their own homework.

      The articles I link to on my site also contain links/and or directions to where the information referred to can be found…on a wide variety of sites. The fact IIG effectively corroborated Meier’s Jupiter information is simpply that…a FACT.

      Yes, you “could go on and on” and please do – with the people that you think will baby sit you. I’m sure these “fine organizations” will be glad to receive your money too, since that’s what a lot of them may be far more concerned about than the truth.

      Go try and buy someone else off, we’re NOT interested.

  • And I suppose you could show me YOUR U.S. 501(c)(3) statement as a non-profit entity, as do the organizations I listed above? Or, do YOU profit from your organization, Mr. Horn?
    I just gave to Doctors Without Borders, a fine non-profit as well, just in case you think those people are “in it for the money”.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *