You know you’re not about to joust with a journalistic giant when your invitation to discuss the Billy Meier case is met with such cartoonish comments as, “I eat scam artists like you for breakfast.” But you can safely predict that this blustering cereal killer’s gonna have a bad case of indigestion before lunch.

There’s no shortage of flaming blowhards online so it’s also no surprise to encounter yet another glorified gossip columnist who lives to defame good people who, by virtue of their accomplishments and character, tower high above him. Case in point, one rude dude, a rube called Dube. There’s so little available information on Ryan Dube that one has to guess if he’s the dishwasher, the IT guy, the domestic abuser, etc. Whoever he really is, he apparently seeks to gain significance through being a “top secret writer”, a manufactured tough guy persona whose actual spineless, nasty attacks are anything but the mark of a rugged, manly male, the kind who is willing to risk a lot to reveal the truth.

In fact, the pretensions of this hack conspiracy writer are comical in comparison to the real life adventures of Billy Meier. Meier not only broke the story about the NSA scandal before Snowden – and dare I mention before Dube knew anything about it – but was known as the Phantom in the Middle East and apprehended serial killers and mass murderers, living the kind of life that wannabes like Dube only hesitatingly dream of..and then go and get a change of underwear.

So when I get a challenge to “answer” allegations in three so-called articles, from a guy who’s all about “top secret” and spends his time attacking the biggest secret of them all, one that is safely hidden in plain sight, of course I accept. Two of the articles were from Dube and one from another identity deficient entity calling itself Seamus Coogan. His article starts out with “When I got this assignment…” a statement intended to give the impression that we’re about to read something substantial from a respectable, credible writer or reporter. Instead we get the equivalent of a grammar school student’s paper that would have been quickly returned with a failing grade.

The sum and substance of all this slop is an attempted hatchet job on the Billy Meier case, his UFO photographs, prophecies and predictions. As I experienced in my brief email exchange with Dube, he’s neither capable of citing, nor responding to, specifics other than to regurgitate the already long demolished claims of various other skeptics, poseurs and celebrity seekers who would love to carve a notch in their online gun belts at the expense of Meier. It just never turns out the quite way they imagined though.

As far as the attacks on Meier’s UFO evidence, we get gems like this from Coogan:

“Furthermore, the Meier UFO’s have dated considerably in appearance in comparison to what filmmakers now consider alien type craft.”

In other words, this empty-headed scribbler thinks that filmmakers are the “experts” for what constitutes so-called alien type craft! Coogan also raised questions about forced perspective imagery, UFO forgery, the “rubbish bin cover, and the “Dean Martin singer/dancers” which, as one can see, have long been answered and dismissed. And Shameless Seamus, effete coward that he is, also stated, “The endorsement from a crazy ex-government employee gave Meier a lot of credibility and support.”

Typical of such sniveling bottom feeders, he attacks someone he never knew, whose work he can’t refer to or criticize specifically. Instead he refers to the opinions of other people. In fact the only “footnotes” provided are from skeptics or other third parties and none from his own research or experience. Big surprise there. And anyone who endorses Derek Bartholomaus’ thoroughly incompetent, bumbling “research” – which he himself retracted and that has been further demolished by all of Rhal Zahi’s analyses – is an even bigger bumbler than Bartholomaus.

The attacks on Meier, especially by Dube, are replete with claims about him being the leader of a “cult”. Characteristic of course of wimps and ethical weaklings like Dube, he produces not one specific piece of evidence for his claim. Here we have an online, armchair expert who’s never taken his sprawling posterior to investigate the matter for himself. Heck, by his own admission he’s never even read any of the actual onsite investigative reports by Wendelle Stevens or Gary Kinder. Dube is also quick to pile on the late Lt. Colonel Wendelle Stevens for being incarcerated. But he’s strangely dismissive of the information that Stevens was set up and punished for his unrelenting investigation into the Meier case.

What happened to our “conspiracy investigator”, why does he unquestioningly accept the government’s version of the truth? Why didn’t he try to contact Lee and Brit Elders, the private investigators who knew and worked with Stevens for over 20 years? Isn’t that the least that one could do before contributing to the attacks on a man who was officially tasked – by his government – to investigate UFOs starting back in…1947?

Dube freely hurls the terms “cult” and “cult leader” around, trying to smear Meier and anyone interested or associated with him, with no evidence to support a word of it. Should we be asking Dube if he stopped beating his wife, if in fact he’s that Ryan Dube? Certainly such an “insider” as Dube would understand that character assassination is one of the more obvious tools when, in Meier’s case, actual assassination attempts failed to take down their target.

And, being a faithful tool, Dube shows himself to be far removed from decency, good character, common sense and clear thinking. Of course any buffoon who bolsters his flimsy ego with a site titled “topsecretwriters” and who is so painfully unaware of the real methods – and not so secret ones at that – of the intelligence agencies, etc., is obviously hungering to be accepted for something far more substantial than the fawning, posturing little bully-boy that he is.

Dube has made a big deal – and staked his (pardon the expression) reputation – on declaring that Meier’s prophetic and predictive information is all bogus, retrodicted, backdated, etc. Dube tries to get specific regarding the Pacific Tsunami Prophecy. As you can see he clearly states that, “Unfortunately for Horn, it’s very difficult for a non-technical person to fake publication dates. Even his own website has the publication date for this claim as 2008. Every Pro-Meier website out there also lists a publication date of this claim on or after 2008, when Horn began distributing the claim.”

Now let me be very clear. Mr. Dube is not only an incompetent, rivaling the likes of Derek Bartholomaus, he’s a stone cold…liar.

As can be seen here, the actual date of the information as conveyed to Billy Meier by Ptaah was indeed June 25, 2005.

Next, Dube relies on the very ethically and factually challenged Stuart Robbins to try to discredit Meier’s information regarding asteroid Apophis, aka the Red Meteor. You can read Dube’s and Robbins’ comments. And then you may want to read these, especially the last one:

Apophis: Are the Russians Reading Meier’s Warnings?

First the Russians, now the Chinese…When Will NASA Get It?

Suddenly Phil Plait Echoes Billy Meier

NASA Corrects Apophis Information, Size Is almost exactly what Billy Meier Foretold

Obviously, our poor excuse for a “researcher” will have to claim that it’s all a coincidence, etc., etc.

Since we’ve now established that Dube is not only a phony but a liar, let’s look at his next claim attacking about the Jupiter information Meier published before NASA. Dube deliberately and of course incorrectly claims that Meier had plagiarized and backdated information and he specifically attacked Meier’s report that Io once had water. Unfortunately for this dilatant pseudo-researcher, the information at and linked from this page thoroughly debunks the IIG report…and Dube’s dubious, scurrilous attempts to again discredit Meier.

As for the four heads of state, that was my incorrect conclusion, not Meier’s. We don’t know if that prophecy will occur or not. As for the power plant in France, there indeed were issues with its safety. Things like the pterodactyl painting come under the heading of manipulations to discredit Meier. As previously stated, if you can’t kill the man you attempt to assassinate his character, something that wimps like Dube just love to do.

Pertaining to riots in France and Paris ultimately being destroyed, Dube lied when he said I removed my newsletter. It’s here. Read it for yourself, see and draw your own conclusions.

Dube concludes his “series” by stating that, “The fact that he also deleted that page from his website speaks volumes as well.” But since that page has never been taken down, the volumes that are spoken here leak from the filthy mouth of an essentially anonymous defamer who uses other people’s incompetent, incorrect, unsubstantiated, long refuted and debunked bunk as ammunition to spew his verbal fecal matter freely at people who are clearly much better, more honest and more accomplished than he. And with no excuse for immodesty, I include myself among them.

It’s well known that there are over 100 credible witnesses to the craft. I have been within 20’ of a small monitoring craft myself. There are five other photographers, including a Swiss skeptic. But who will vouch for lowlifes like Coogan and Dube? Where are their resumes, biographies, accomplishments, etc.?

As for Meier’s specific, prophetic accurate, scientific and world event related information, there’s tons of it:

Corroboration & Evidence (over 100 examples)

as the time fulfills (55 specific examples, spanning 22 minutes)

Prophecies & Predictions (plenty to go through spanning 63 years)

Atomic Energy: Human Insanity Knows No Limits (Fukushima and Meier’s verifiably prophetically accurate information, given to him within days of the event by the Plejaren)

5,100 Year-Old Iceman Proves Meier UFO Contact Case True! (Another impenetrable, irrefutable proof of information from the Plejaren)

A Sampling of Billy Meier’s Prophetically Accurate Published Evidence (Meier’s ironclad evidence that he published about Mercury’s core long before NASA’s “official discovery”)

…and volumes more at my blog.

The internet is filled with parasites and defamers like Ryan Dube, Seamus Coogan and their sorry ilk. That they try to call themselves researchers or investigators is sadly also all too common. You’ll never see these fools get up in a live public forum and try to take on something like the Meier case. They won’t engage in a legitimate debate because they know they are incompetent and completely unqualified to do so.

Weasels like these scurry about in the shadows of truly great, historically significant people and resent those who are far greater than they are, loathing themselves for their own insignificance. They need to try to make themselves out to be something far, far more important than they can ever hope to be. These are the kind of parasites that pump their putrid poisons out online thinking they’re immune from accountability. But life has its own way of returning unto them the real spoiled fruits of their nefarious labors.

Certainly I can be criticized for dignifying them at all by taking the time to do a quick, general debunking of these losers.

Dube promised to post my response to his, er, “challenge” to me. Of course not doing so will “speak volumes” about him and his already established, absolute lack of character, credibility, integrity and ethics.



54 comments on “Who Is this Rude Dude this Rube Dube?

  • Savio,

    I would love to meet Billy and visit SSSC some day like you and others have. I think it would be an excellent experience to remember! I hope Billy is still around in a few years time when I’m able to go there.

    btw, did Billy tell you anything about yourself when you met him? I heard he used to do this but then stopped doing it.

    • I certainly understand how much people would like to meet Billy and the Plejaren too. But I think that considering how few people will even be able to meet Billy, we can really “meet” them best through all of the information and teaching that they’ve provided.

      Well the last time I was there I’d let my hair grow out long (for me) and he said I looked like a mad scientist.

      • Hi Micheal,

        Is this the hair you had in your latest film “And Did They Listen”? 🙂

        It be funny to hear Billy call you a mad scientist! It’s good to see he has a good sense of humor, such as in the Contact Notes with the Plejaren.

        • It was longer than that…and it’s back to being much shorter now. I may grow it back once I decide on what new scientific invention I am about to create.

  • The gull of our fellow brothers and sisters!!! Skimming through this ‘top secret writers’ once again proved how much work was put into their ‘researchers writings’ about Billy and others.
    Any which way Billy’s case is far from secret! At least it should be. Though I know that a lot of people have been exposed to it(Because of Michael and others) yet, internally burn themselves with its utter differing TRUE reality. Where is this evidence that states what Billy and Michael are stating is so horrible and earth shattering wrong? What within this reality is so scary and creates such outlandish claims and thoughts? When the evidence is examined, thought about, slept on for years, mulled over, analyzed, cross referenced, seen within the world one lives, what is left to ‘freak out’ about?
    Though I know the answer:)
    These clowns have soiled the entire meaning of it all and only focused on the easy and wrong earth ways out. Turning around and using exactly what they are as evidence. Once again only helping prove how ignorant and lazy they are and right Billy and Michael have always BASICALLY been… ones again!
    By the looks of their comment sections… they aren’t much for comments/criticism. Though they are just fragile earth children in need of ‘getting it all right’. How wrong they are! At least as far as I see it:)
    Is always amazing how individual we really are and how so few people care to see. Always hitching a ride on others to gain the individuality that resides within the self. We all need to use others momentum and insight ones and awhile. As well as a good ‘wake up call’ as well!
    We really have become weak, spineless, know it all’s on this planet. The internet has released the reality of our human world onto itself. The ambiguity of peoples internet ‘lives’ has shown how far our mental state is slipping and in need of realization. Even listening to people talk about a subject like Fukushima(Enenews site), They ALL hide! all their names are hidden; Aftershock, ontological, obewanspeaks, Sol Man, etc, etc. Where is Bob Lesterfoot, Carl Higgins, Cindy Crawford, and Yohaan Middleton? Where are these humans fighting to change the reality of our world? Does being anonymous really make that much of a difference? Does not saying that which the person that one is not resonate within the self? Isn’t it what makes us who we are as individuals here on the net… It is a lesson in self realization to become the person that one is, anywhere they are! It isn’t an easy think to realize as obvious as it is. Go figure.
    I suppose I have nothing left to loose… there is nothing that can hold the person of Philip Brandel back any longer. Only I with myself is capable of doing that which holds me back. The person I have become here and now, will be tomorrow, and everyday after.

  • I know this is off-topic a bit, MH, but do you know of any information from Billy or the Plejaren about the missing Malaysian flight? Like I said, off topic…

    Best Regards,

    • I don’t think we’ll hear anything from Billy about this until after the facts are known already. Unless of course there’s something extremely significant on a much broader scale, such as the info on TWA flight 800 that they authorized Billy to publish years ago.

      This is just the stuff of which earthly dramas are made and, again, unless there’s a much broader importance, I don’t think they’ll say anything.

      • This is something I’m also curious about. Having read the “official” bullshit story and the contact report about TWA flight 800, it does certainly raise a few questions about what’s going on with this Malaysian flight. Knowing what the NSA is capable of getting into computers, they must be able to easily make it look like terrorism or whatever they want. I just find it a bit odd that their PM came out with an official story of a crash before even having officially found any evidence. Sounds like pressure from above rather than pressure from below if you catch my meaning.

  • Damn, Rube Dude just pulled a Phil Langdon and blocked my comments. They don’t like being questioned about anything and will outright lie so as not to make themselves look so stupid. Too late, they’ve already proven what a useless bunch of tools they really are. They thought I was you Michael LOL. Which proves that they are incapable of investigating ANYTHING.

    • Ryan Dube said:
      Nope – NASA beat Meier by 3 years. Sorry. The finding in 2005 was “350 meters”, which is precisely what Meier “predicted” in 2008. Now you’re trying to say the updated finding in 2013 “proves” Meier…which is completely absurd. Meier didn’t predict anything, he simply reported what was already published about Apophis at the time (3 years prior actually).
      “Based upon the observed brightness, Apophis’s diameter was initially estimated at 450 metres (1,480 ft); a more refined estimate based on spectroscopic observations at NASA’s Infrared Telescope Facility in Hawaii by Binzel, Rivkin, Bus, and Tokunaga (2005) is 350 metres (1,150 ft).”
      I would like to thank you for providing us with another excellent example of Meier’s technique of retrodiction.

      I said:
      Wikipedia can be changed or updated at any time and everyone knows that. How disingenuous.

      Ryan Dube said:
      Yes, but actual NASA history and records confirm it. Meier was wrong. Case closed.

      I said (they wouldn’t post this):
      I was just on the NASA site a year ago when they had upgraded it to 325 metres. Wikipedia doesn’t have copyright dates LOL.

      • Apparently Rubey thinks the burden of proof should be greater for Billy Meier than for NASA. Which proves how smart he thinks he is.

        They wouldn’t post this either because they would actually have to question themselves and their high regard for 3 letter entities: Dumb dumb, it took the CIA 11 years to prove that Meier was a hoax. Ask yourself if they are stupid or if they are lying? I don’t believe they are stupid so why did it take 11 years to figure out something that could have been figured out in 2 years maximum? The case is not closed, but your mind is.

        • He is a coward and a disinformationist. Considering just how much info and evidence I directly referred him to, it’s obvious that he’s inept, frozen and immobilized.

          I should also add irrelevant.

          • All very true. Doesn’t seem to be very many posts on there from you. Did you get banned from the site too?

          • If you mean me, they certainly don’t want to hear from me. First requirement, they have to post my rebuttal that they promised to. Not holding my breath.

  • Some more evidence to establish the absolute lack of character, credibility, integrity and ethics of this glorified gossip columnist: The following is a message sent to Ryan Dube, founder/owner of Top Secret Writers and self-proclaimed journalist.

    SUBJECT: Journalistic Integrity

    May I ask why my two most recent comments have been continually blocked from the following page?

    I have used no profanity, hate language, made no insults nor accusations. TSW has no comment policy that I am aware of. Did I miss it? I have stated facts supported by quotes from the original lead investigator or from the comment section itself and asked perfectly reasonable questions of other commenters. The only reason remaining is solely due to the fact that I disagree with the author, the subject of the article(BMUFOR) and the founder/owner of the site.

    Do you believe this type of biased reaction is consistent with journalistic integrity?

    You have stated on your About Us page the following:

    “Here at Top Secret Writers, we bring all of these secret worlds to you, backed with evidence and supported by the scientific discovery process.”


    1. BMUFOR is not a scientific group.
    2. You knowingly suppress the established scientific work which contradicts your opinions.

    Do you believe this is consistent with your stated claims?
    Do you believe this is consistent with impartiality?

    Once again I ask, why have my two most recent comments been continually blocked?

    This message as well as the following unpublished comments of mine will be posted elsewhere for others to judge Top Secret Writers’ integrity for themselves.

    – – –

    (Reply to Mahesh Karumudi)

    Refusal to discuss a few photos out of many hundreds is not evidence beyond reasonable doubt indicating fraud.

    Can you please cite a reference for Wendelle Stevens stating that the computer testing revealed double exposures? His comments from the Preliminary Investigation Report you’ve referenced yourself appear to be in direct contradiction:

    “Everything indicated a single exposure under ambient light conditions at the time and place of the incident as alleged. No reflected images, double exposures, montages or laminations could be detected.”

    “Then the print, color copy negatives, and color separation black and white negatives were carefully examined for evidence of double exposure, photo paste-up, model at short range suspended on a string, etc., and nothing was found to indicate a hoax.”

    The scientific analyses were infinitely more extensive than any “deconstruction” claiming to provide proof of hoax. And until they have been scientifically refuted, they remain valid. I think it’s safe to paraphrase the following statements from Steven’s UFO Contact from the Pleiades to be interpreted as the hoax hypothesis being as ruled out as humanly possible with such a complex and voluminous UFO case:

    “The possibility that Eduard Meier alone, or even with confederates, could have hoaxed all the phenomena we have seen and faked the hundreds of excellent photos of the spacecraft, UFO photographs of every kind and style we have known, landing tracks of several different kinds, recorded the highly peculiar sounds of the alien ships, and the other evidence we have examined and tested to our satisfaction, is as unbelievable as the basic premise of visitation by extraterrestrial human beings itself, perhaps even more so.

    Meier is handicapped both physically (fysisk handikap med kun en arm) and materially in such a way that for him to carry this out alone would be patently impossible. He could have had confederates and financing sufficient to pull off some of the events, but it would have required a great deal more than that to stage some of the other phenomena observed and recorded. Yet, in all this time, we have found no evidence of collaborators or financiers of any kind anywhere.”

    The following quotes also from UFO Contact from the Pleiades appear to be the “conclusive statements”, in print, you suggest they “have never made”:

    “We have found no evidence of deliberate deception or fraud on the part of Meier or any of those friends and associates around him there in Switzerland.”

    “Having spent 8 years on this case, 7 trips to Switzerland and 81 days on site, interviewing 29 eyewitnesses, 5 photographers, 4 recorders of the spacecraft sounds, and dozens of observers, I feel that I am as qualified as anybody in these United States to draw some conclusions from what I have learned.

    Somebody not of this Earth is indeed visiting Switzerland, and those extraterrestrials were contacting Eduard “Billy” Meier living in Hinterschmidruti.”

    (Reply to Ryan Dube)

    Are you suggesting that photogrammetry is a pseudo-science? Can you please cite a reference since my understanding is the opposite: Photogrammetry is a well-established scientific discipline.

    I have never made any false statements nor used deceptive phrasing and lies. You appear to be twisting my words without supporting these accusations. I have never stated that

    “Meier’s photos have never been proven to be hoaxed”

    Some of them were of course hoaxed but never proven to be hoaxed by Meier himself. My actual statement was

    “photogrammetric analyses completed by Dilettoso then independently verified by Davis which concluded Meier’s UFO images free of hoax.”

    This is not a “wide-reaching” statement and is in fact very specific. There is ZERO scientific proof that Meier’s UFO photos were hoaxed by Meier or anyone else. This is fact.

    • Taro, mate, sport, cobber, friend, digger, pal!
      I sincerely hope that you put all this time into these fools only for your own joy.
      Goblet of The Truth:
      Chapter 26
      14) Very many amongst you, you human beings of Earth, with regard to your belief and its exercise, are bigots, fanatics and other zealots, hypocrites, boasters and deceivers as well as slanderers, haughty fools, swaggerers and megalomaniacs, which you entirely also carry over into your inner and outer life, thereby creating hatred and jealousy, unpeace, unfreedom, torture, war, death penalty, disharmony, criminality and all evil, terrible things and Ausartungen in the world.

      And that’s only one (1), open your pdf of GOTT and search for fool.
      These parasites are just that and that’s all they’re ever going to be.

      • Thanks, Andrew I know. But you need to understand, I’m not doing any of this for them. I’m not trying to convince people like Dube. That’s a waste of time. But he does have readers that may be just on the verge of thinking logically for themselves. For one thing, I hate BS and it is bountiful with respect to dismissing the Meier case. Also, this is an intellectual exercise for me. It helps me sharpen my thinking skills dealing with all the slippery tactics many of these “skeptics” employ. So, yes. It is in fact for me. But mainly, I prefer to be part of the solution rather than the problem or to just sit idly by while the planet slowly circles the drain. The logical argument is something I know I can offer and even if it falls on deaf ears it benefits me either way. And best case scenario, it tilts the balance for those minds that are on the fence. This is precisely why people like Dube block the logical argument and people like Bartholomaus restrict it altogether. They know they cannot match it and they are afraid of the power it can have over their readers.

        • Nice!
          I apologize if I sounded as though I doubted your reasons for your actions and wanted you to stop them, I kinda expected you to say what you have said. You have your abilities in these areas whereas I do not, yet.
          Like I have said before: GREAT work, LOVE your work, KEEP IT UP!

          • Thanks, Andrew. No apologies necessary at all. I don’t mind you pointing out perfectly reasonable considerations. I just wanted to let you in on my own thinking process. It may not be perfect. It may not be right for you. But this way it’s out in the open for anyone else to consider for themselves or to find the flaws I may not have considered myself. No harm, no foul.

      • I really hate that BS too. Feels like a knotch in my belt to respond to those BS generators and their hate tactics without getting into a huff anymore. Probably wouldn’t matter if they laughed me outta there, and probably wastes time to even bother, but.. the experience of thinking on my feet and staying calm to deal with a challenge.. that felt valuable.

        • Exactly. Especially considering the high probability that those very same “hate tactics” come from a very short list:

          1) They are blissfully uninformed, ignorant and happy to keep it that way.
          2) They want to pick a fight with anyone that disagrees with them, regardless of the topic.
          3) They are aware of(or at least fear they’re wrong about) the truth of the matter but are attempting to employ intimidation tactics to shut you down.

          All results of a limited mind. And you’ll notice the ones who are smart enough to completely AVOID debating the Meier case because they know they’ll only look like a fool in the end. And those who are dumb enough to only realize it halfway through.

          • The other factor is that they all post…anonymously. These people are – choosing my words carefully – self-loathing cowards who’ve accomplished NOTHING of importance in their own lives.

            Through anonymity they have the very TEMPORARY satisfaction of unloading their venom towards others of whom they are envious, hateful, etc. BUT – without fail – this energy comes back to them and impacts and assaults their own psyches, trapping them and bringing the unavoidable realization of their own insignificance and completely wasted lives. This is the actual testament to their lives, the expression of ugliness towards their fellow humans and those who would try to offer insight and recommendations, etc. As real people they willingly become forgotten, irrelevant and lost.

            When people have the luxury of posting anonymously (I’ve already covered the situations in which it must be done to protect them from actual harm) those who resort to it so as to avoid standing up for themselves, their points of view, etc., actually…regress. They hide the truth of who they are and their failings from those around them, not only strangers but often family and friends. It weakens not only them but the society.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *