Donate Button
Thursday, March 28, 2024

The Billy Meier UFO contacts singularly authentic ongoing for 80 years the key to our future survival

The Energy Ships: A New Report and Analysis by Prof. Rhal Zahi and Chris Lock

Prof. Rhal Zahi and Chris Lock have done a new, in-depth investigation of another of Billy Meier’s most unusual and controversial UFO photos, those of the so-called Energy Ships:   Energy Ship   One of his conclusions, that a particular Energy Ship photo is an in-camera triple exposure:   Triple-X   …echoes exactly what Ken Solomon, a photographic and movie special effects expert told me in 2006. This information was presented in rebuttal to claims that David Biedney made that the photo was a deliberate double exposure, hoaxed outside of the camera by Meier.

When I relayed information from Ken that he wished for his name to be removed from the Paracast site to protect his privacy, naturally these buffoons accused me of authoring the request and refused to honor it. These are the same people who freaked out when I told them, “There’s only one of me…and I’ve got you all surrounded.” Speaking of which, with his analyses of the WCUFO, the Pendulum UFO and now the Energy Ships,

Prof. Zahi has quite nicely surrounded all of the various skeptics and deniers with clear, logical, scientifically prepared and presented documentation supporting the authenticity of Billy Meier’s photographic UFO evidence. Maybe now they’ll finally surrender…to the truth.

 

See also: The Billy Meier UFO Case: Now You Can Prove It to Yourself

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

65 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Chris L

Just a piece about my and Rhal’s areas of respective focus so you will have a better idea of who might be best to answer specific questions. Rhal has a better scientific and software focus than me IMO (though I’ll leave it to him to talk about himself, of course).
I have a focus on visual imagery and pictorial analysis. I have had a lifelong interest in visual imagery, from picture cards and badges as a child, to photographs and art, and movies later on and many forms of pictorial representation presently. I did some photography in Art School and later in Architecture School but I had no teacher and so was self-taught. I have always been a little weaker on the science side, therefore, despite my love of science, and much more deeply involved in the visual imagery itself. Just after 2000 I decoded some imagery in some WingMakers paintings. I published three papers on the wingmakers.com website after having them published in Osaka University of Arts and Osaka University of Arts Junior College. Those papers are now free downloads at both OUA and wingmakers.com (slightly different versions). About the same time I finished a PhD at Pacific Western University, a non-accredited university, in the field of “Applied Linguistics with Emphasis in Semiotics.” My field of semiotics was/is the semiotics of visual imagery, for which there is a strong iinterest in the UK and Western Europe, where I started life.
Basically, “Applied Linguistics with Emphasis in Semiotics.” just means: the usage and meaning of images and signs in language and culture.
In a paper like this one, both areas of science and imagery are very impotrtant. The importance of visual imagery is vastly underplayed in our academic fields. Decades ago physics and mathmatics genius Roger Penrose impressed upon the young Steven Hawking, before Hawking earned his PhD for his proof of the Big Bang, words to the effect that pictures are more important than maths. Maths and science cannot show you the picture, they merely give you certain proofs. You have to see the picture. Shorty thereafter Hawking PICTURED the universe receding or going backwards to the point of singularity, and the rest, as they say, is history.
I think the reason progress has been so slow on finding or realizing just what these pictures and photographs of the Energy Ships are showing is that research has been limited to scientists and the scientific approach while what the pictures are actually showing and telling us in their own right has been largely ignored or unrecognized. I see this as an example of science blinding itself with its own science. It gets stuck in a one-eyed view. It only, for example, takes a basic and practical limited knowledge of photography coupled with visual analysis to realize what is happening in the three shots in the triple exposure of #720. Yet no researchers to date have recognized what this imagery has been clearly showing for the past forty years. I am not fauty anyone on this; we all have our personalities and areas of interest or focus, and everyone is different in these respects. It also took me some time to work it out; but once you see the PICTURE it all jumps into place.
I am reminded of when, I think it was Quetzal talking about Apophis, said to Billy that the Plejaren do not believe in being purely scientific, because it alone cannot supply all the answers. Billy had remarked on how unscientific Quetzal’s reply was. Science is crucial for demonstrating and providing calculations and proof, but true understanding requires more than science alone. Rather than science being half the picture I would say science merely proves and quantifies the picture; but the picture has to be seen first. Without a sense of vision or the PICTURE science just cannnot get started; it has nothing to get into. We don’t need to ask Quetzal to confirm this; we can just ask Penrose and/or Hawking, or Einstein.
I think one reason Zahi and I were able to work together so well on this together was that we both recognized the others area of ability in which we ourselves were a bit lacking. Neither of us could have written this paper alone; it took both a scientific and a visually pictorial approach to unravel what we are really looking at in these photographs.

Chris L

BTW this spring I was awarded an Honorary Fellowship (HonFSAI) for my photography but perhaps more for my contribution to the Society of Architectural Illustration (SAI) itself in the UK. If you want, you can visit the forum there at http://www.sai.org.uk (try: http://www.sai.org.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=28&t=853&p=5223#p5223 but you may need to sign in which should be freely open for anyone) and under the Photography thread you can ask me any questions about the photographs in the paper as I have linked to here from there via my Facebook page. Anything posted here will not come up there, though. You have to enter any questions or comments there. Please try to keep any comments or questions relative to the photographs so the thread stays on topic. Thanks!

Carolyn

I keep yakking about the Sirians and their ships. I believe these are Sirian light-ships.

Carolyn

OK, OK, I believe you Michael!

Carolyn

My infinite wisdom. . . . . I think I remember you from somewhere, Michael, and not on this planet. . . . .and no I do not presume to disagree with anything you say in this forum, just adding a few of my own odd thoughts to keep the conversation moving in a useful direction, or something like that!

Carolyn

Also, sorry for the second post. . . I believe if you ask the Plejarans they will admit that the Sirians possess greater technology than the Plejarans.

Silvana

On the Energy Ships:
For what I recall reading those beings are part material, part spiritual, they are very advanced in their evolution, they are in the process to leave incarnation.

Carolyn

These people no doubt can incarnate and dematerialize at will. . . . . .so for them death as we know it does not exist at all. . . .

Matt lee

Carolyn there is the other side of life and then there is the other side to life.
They are a bit different to each other.
According to the spiritual teachings the whole process of incarnation or reincarnation happens according to Creative laws or Creational laws and this no human being can control.
Dematerialization according to Billy’s information does not equal death as the spirit is still intact to the dematerializing human being via technical means.
Apparently death as what we understand it as happens for every human being in the material universe and also for all other lifeforms.

Pleiaden

For truth what Billy is saying is true everyone should listen for the time is now for I to have been contacted and I was told the same as Billy the humans of this planet better wake up. ..the ship’s are real the pleiajern are real. .I have been in one of the craft my self. .please awake from your slumber.

Michael Leathers

Hi, my name is Michael, its nice too meet you.
Please contact me about your experience with the Pleiajern at my interent address. I have been studying UFO’s and Billies contacts for a considerable time.

thank you,
Michael R. Leathers

Pleiaden

The humans of earth need to partake not of the seven sins then and only then Will the earth human learn the true ways of peace …

Pleiaden

As do I extend a courtesy to you of forgiveness for speaking of that which you do not know for they speak not of my contact with anyone for my mission here is not to prove anything as profit but to Baer witness when the time is come

Pleiaden

Peace compassion and spiritual growth needed for human evaluation.

Pleiaden

As to the craft and there method of propulsion one must understand the true physics of energy and that the whole of the universe is that of an atom of energy and thought think of the earth as a ship floating in the sea of electrons. .

Pleiaden

Those that try and claim that Billy faked the photos have not been educated in the true spirit of our connection to all things and have a deep rooted fear of the truth so they choose to debunk the truth rather then except it….

Chris L

I am dropping this in here from The Friends of Billy Meier Facebook page (https://www.facebook.com/groups/120741434651785/) because it contains a little additional information not in the paper. The longer one looks at these photos the more one continues to find corroborating they are genuine. The full discussion can be found at the Facebook website:
There are many problems with the DE (double exposure) hypothesis for this photo: As before stated to you [the person doubting and asking about the possibility of a DE], the background has a high dark/light contrast in the center and very little at the sides. This means there was some very bright light in the scene, or the camera was taken to a darkroom, the film removed and the center of just this shot exposed to more light, then the film put back in the camera and wound on to exactly the right spot with no bleeding over borders, and two more shots of lights added. That is just in the HOPE of achieving the required background. If the lights were two shots superimposed onto the background the background would be virtually black with probably no mountain details at all, and certainly not with the light/dark divergence of contrast we see. The vertical “scanning” lights (note the plural) do not disperse as ordinary light does; they remain with vertical edges fairly clearly defined, a bit like laser light except these gradually fade out at distance. So how do you construct those lights to get on your DE of the negative — note, not the print? Sure, a sophisticated developing lab or Hollywood might be able to create that, but there is zero evidence of such being available near Meier’s place. Believing that is what took place is stretching credulity, IMO. I am not interested in convincing skeptics. People doubt whatever they want. Some doubt the world is round. All we are doing is presenting our case and research for anyone to consider. People can make their own conclusions about our findings.

Chris L

Carolyn,
If death no longer exists for them they will be beyond incarnating in the physical, and reincarnation.

Jae Salas

Hi MH:

Thank you for all the work you do for the Meier case. I bet it is exhausting that after 30+ years, there are still people doubting Meier and ONLY focusing on the UFO’s. Imagine how much better off these people would be if they got over themselves and focused on the REAL reason/core of the Meier case?! Anyways, just wanted to say thanks for this site and for the abundance of work you do.
Jae