Specific information about rare form of lightning already given to UFO contactee by extraterrestrials in 1989

Swiss UFO contactee Billy Meier claims to still be in face-to-face contacts with the Plejaren extraterrestrial human beings for more than 74 years. His over 1,200, stunningly clear, still irreproducible, pre-digital era, UFO photos, films and video are the best physical evidence available, some were recently used in the new season of X-Files television shows, etc.

Even more amazing are the 26,000+ pages of information Meier’s published, containing large amounts of specific, prophetically accurate, scientific and world event related information. Despite well over 150 corroborated examples of his preemptive scientific accuracy, anti-truth, anti-scientific vested interests have consistently worked to suppress the Meier case; there have also been 22 documented attempts on his life for his trouble.

While Meier was the first person to specifically warn about unnatural, manmade climate change and global warming in the 1950s, even so-called “environmentalists” have shied away from his information, preferring the limelight of resource-wasting conferences and acting as if they’re the first to discover that we’re actually in some kind of trouble here on Earth.

Like a Bolt out of the Blue

A major, “new” scientific discovery about how certain very powerful types of lightning strikes begin during a thunderstorm was just published. As you can read, it was previously thought a “negative breakdown” of charge, which moves upwards from the ground, caused the initial sparks. “However, a rare type of lightning* called narrow bipolar events (NPE), which can be far more powerful than typical lightning strikes, is caused by the flow of positive charge. It typically occurs when charge jumps from the positive top of the storm clouds to pools of negative charge on the ground.” So they concluded that the narrow bipolar events (NPE) are the result of “positive breakdown” of charge moving downwards through the cloud, rather than upwards. (NOTE: “Previously thought” means that science – and scientists – periodically get upgraded, as actual new, factual knowledge is discovered and confirmed.)

Perhaps what Ptaah told Billy Meier, in 1989, will seem familiar and even…helpful, now that our scientists have learned a little more:

68. The positive cloud-to-ground lightning originates from the lower, positively charged area of the flash.

69. Positive cloud-to-ground lightning flashes, which originate from the upper, positively charged center, are *relatively rare.

70. Such flashes of lightning occur almost exclusively at the end of a respective active phase of a thunderstorm cell.

71. The positively charged center only builds up when the negatively charged center is nullified.

72. Such a positive discharge results, then, through a single and very powerful lightning flash, which descends to the ground.

73. It is also to be noted that ground-to-cloud lightning flashes with branches shoot up into the clouds, whereby leading flashes of lighting shoot up from the Earth – from mountain tops, towers, and other tall buildings, etc. – into the clouds.

74. With cloud-to-ground lightning, a cylindrical tube shoots down to the ground from the negatively charged center of the thundercloud, which is filled with the cloud’s charge.

75. In addition, the tube varies in its diameter and can exhibit several tens of meters.

76. Moreover, connected to it is a very thin and approximately one-centimeter thick, highly ionized plasma core.
77. This leading flash of lightning shoots down to the ground in a jerky and zigzagging manner, and indeed, at a speed of about 300 kilometers per second.

78. The jerky pre-shootings of the leading flashes of lightning occur in steps of several 20-meters, whereby the interim times of a step move to others within the range of a microsecond.

79. Once the tip, the head of the leading flash of lightning, has reached a distance of between ten and several hundred meters, the electric field strength of the objects that are stationary on the ground – such as buildings, towers, and trees, as well as mountain tops – increases in such a way that the electrical stability of the air is exceeded, and then, so-called “catching discharges” go out of the objects, and the head of the leading flash of lightning shoots toward and meets with these.

90. Positive cloud-to-ground lightning also transports in itself a much greater energy charge than what is the case with the negative surge current.

91. This is also the reason why positive cloud-to-ground lightning is much more dangerous than just negative cloud-to-ground lightning.

(Please also note that scientists use the words “narrow bipolar events” while Ptaah describes a “cylindrical tube”. Scientists mention “pools of negative charge on the ground”, Ptaah speaks of “the electric field strength of the objects that are stationary on the ground”.)

It’s the Funding, Stupid

Don’t be concerned that it’s been enormously difficult to find scientists not only intellectually curious and honest enough to take notice of the Meier case but who’ll shout it from the rooftops. We won’t wait for “scientists” at ASU CSI because they’re too busy discussing Looney Tunes, Daffy Duck, Buffy the Vampire Slayer and zombies. The party-goers at SETI don’t want to know, certainly the corporate shills at MUFON are too busy reporting to the CIA and State Department, the paper tigers are too meek and the “futurists” prefer to appear trendy and important, rather than risk soiling their pants by confronting the real thing. For all of the aforementioned, money is a bigger consideration than the truth.

Fortunately, one courageous scientist has opened the door to critical inquiry. And maybe a few more will push their way through and examine the historical, singularly authentic contacts between Meier and the Plejaren. It could lead to helping us assure our own very threatened future survival – which is the reason for the contacts – if we’ll just get off our egos long enough to pay attention and do the necessary work ourselves.

Of course for this to happen, lightning would have to strike – in many places – more than once.

 

See also:

How MUFON Helped the Spread of ISIS

SETI Sent Evidence of ET Contact by They Fly Productions

Echoes of The Future from Billy Meier’s Past

Apophis: Let’s Try This Again

The Universe Has no Place in the University

 

 

 

 

36 comments on “Major “New” Scientific Discovery Published by Billy Meier 27 Years Ago

  • Bravo Michael,

    Folks are always saying about the Meier case… why don’t they show us some proof… well here it is… about the NPE lightning… but you will see… they do not see the forest for the trees… and just ignore the proof until they re-cognize it themselves… it says a lot about where Science is in this day and age… Salome

  • Both articles are talking about different things, wiki is just mentioning the various types of lightning (cloud to ground negative, cloud to ground positive, etc), while the daily mail is only talking about a specific and rare type of lightning and how it’s initial spark starts.

    In the dailymail article the “discovery” is that in these rare type of lighting the cause of the initial spark are the result of positive breakdown moving charge downwards through the cloud (instead of how they used to believe: negative breakdown which moves upwards through the cloud).

    You got it wrong here: it was previously thought a “negative breakdown” of charge, which moves upwards from the ground, caused the initial sparks.” It has nothing to do with the ground.

    It’s just a total mess, the wiki isn’t collaborating at all the daily mail article, at all! You’re just “linking” similar words together. Believe causes that btw.

    • Hi Karl,

      Please make sure to use your last name too when commenting. Also, address the person you’re responding to, as it may not be otherwise apparent when your comment posts.

      Thanks.

  • Does THIS species sound familiar?
    This is my understanding from within . On topic as Priority
    Nature has a countermeasure against any life forms that are overpopulating a world starting from the the spread of disease or mental illness , leading to the destruction of the overpopulated life form either through sickness or taking its own life., in order for the UR creational existence and survival of the earth/world that it is inhabiting ,In order for that earth/world to continue its “own” course of evolution, it cannot survive in this matter with an “overpopulated species dominating over others soaking the goodness out of it for its overpopulated greed , being the “Mother Earth /World ” of the offspring that reproduces on it in abundance on that earth/world..well this is where The law of the cosmos and the natural law of all things come into play ,regulated by Creation itself. Disease death and destruction for the overpopulated, trying hard to regulate the balance in equality of all species .
    Salome ….Wayne Sunter-Smith

  • Sorry Wyatt, typo problem. I read and saw the two article with the yellow car but the window is really in the back not on top of the car which means the Bay area earthquake won happen yet as Billy has predicted but the people there don`t want to move out. that`s what I heard on c2c. Sorry Wyatt. As for Sant Barbara, The leaking methane might be the same outgassing there and is STILL going on! But I might be wrong?

  • MH, Could the huge methane gas leak outside of Santa Barbara also be detecting craters down below there as well ad of the coast of Norway and near the Bemuta Triangel too?

  • Also, for anyone here still doubting Billy Meier there is a video I just got done watching that should be watched. I have never seen this entire video about the investigation done by Lee,Brit Elders, Stevens, ?etc. It goes into fine details of all of their analysis’s and findings. Using what looks like the best technology known at the time.
    Very interesting! Amazing that I have never seen it in its entirety. It is called- Contact
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dCk9EBdQO6o&feature=youtu.be

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *