NOTE: Please see update posted at end of article below.*

It’s been many years since numerous scientific experts authenticated Billy Meier’s UFO photographs, films, sound recordings and metal samples. Nonetheless, many people have neither understood, nor accepted, the validity and significance of these findings.

Their skeptical cry for access to now long gone negatives, etc., has been used to try to cast doubt on the evidence, as well as the honesty and character of Meier and all concerned. Such accusations and demands were part of the subterfuge employed, usually by the most technically incompetent people, who were essentially claiming that if they themselves hadn’t personally analyzed the evidence it must be hoaxed. Of course this attitude invalidates accepting as true most of…human history, since none of us have personally witnessed, observed, or tested more than 99% of it.

This skeptical tactic has been parroted and echoed by every online armchair expert for whom the reality of the Meier case is simply too threatening to their belief systems.

Quite recently, Rhal Zahi provided new authentication of 63 of Meier’s most controversial photographs and five-minute video of the WCUFO, from 1981, using state-of-the-art technology. He also authenticated Meier’s first 8mm film of the so-called “Pendulum UFO”, from 1975, which reveals two instances of the craft “jumping”, i.e. actually appearing in two separate places within one frame of film!

Many people who’ve taken the time to examine and think through the evidence also realized for themselves that Meier’s 8mm film of the Hasenböl UFO with two lights flashing in broad daylight, from 1976, was certainly no clever, remote controlled model. Similarly, a film interview of Meier, by NTV (Nippon TV), showing Meier and the film director walking up to the tree immortalized in the famous “Sunlight UFO” photographs also taken at Hasenböl, easily settled the authenticity of that photographic evidence. Add to the amazing photographs the one of the cross in the sky, taken in India in 1964 with an old Kodak bellows camera, as well as UFO photos taken by other witnesses, including a Swiss skeptic, and mountains of other information and one may just recognize the genuineness and authenticity of the Meier case.

However, Rhal Zahi authenticated another one of the WCUFO photos that skeptics long accused of being just a model against a black curtain. Remembering that Meier took these 35mm photos in 1981, long before home computers, digital effects, PhotoShop, etc., and that he never drew any attention to them himself, this one simple result is not only amazing in itself but it can easily be duplicated by anyone, by…you, right at your own computer. No longer will the disingenuous cries for negatives of the original photos carry even the slightest weight or concern. After all, even if negatives were presented at this time, only a relatively few people would have the technical ability to authenticate them themselves, so once again we’d have to rely on outside expert analysis and opinion.

Now, in keeping with the theme of self-responsibility at the core of the Meier case, any and all of us who want to see the truth come alive before our very eyes, the truth that was hidden in plain sight for over 32 years, only have to do what Zahi himself did – put the photo (which you can grab off of this page) into PhotoShop and increase the brightness and contrast*. You will find yourself looking down from above the WCUFO at a road next to a grassy path, etc.:

WCUFO extended cupola

WCUFO extended cupola

(See more about the extended cupola here.)

WCUFO brightness and contrast enhanced by Savio

WCUFO brightness and contrast enhanced by Savio

WCUFO with Halo

WCUFO with Halo

 

Only the most desperate, intellectually dishonest skeptics (am I repeating myself?) would be dwelling so deeply in denial as to not consider and admit that there is absolutely no likelihood that Meier somehow figured out, more than three decades ago, how to “trick” 21st century technology, that hadn’t been invented yet, into revealing that which wasn’t apparent on a 35mm  film photograph.

While I maintain that the even “higher standard of proof” is in Meier’s voluminous, prophetically accurate, scientific information (of which you’ll find plenty on this blog as well as here) being able to authenticate Meier’s WCUFO photos yourself should be sufficient to end any doubts about their authenticity and Meier’s truthfulness, once and for all.

Of course, now that you know the truth about the most important true story in all of science and human history…what will you do about it?

UPDATE: The following is from a new translation of questions to, and answers by, Billy Meier courtesy of Bruce Lulla.

Reader’s question
Dear ladies and gentlemen, I would like to put the question to you, if Mr. Meier still has contact with the extraterrestrials, why he takes no pictures of the spaceships in this day and age? His recordings come from the 1970s and 1980s. Just one question.
A. Winkler, Switzerland

Answer:
The photographs made by me in the 1970s and 1980s of Plejaren beamships was allowed and I could make them only with explicit mandate and absolutely only with the permission of the Plejaren. Thus I was assigned by them, to make plenty of photos as evidence regarding the existence of the Plejaren and their beam ships, which for me was not only a difficult task with respect to my photographic ignorance but also regarding the varied and sometimes difficult-to-reach places for the photographic work.

Now then, during the years when I had to produce the photos in a task of the Plejaren, there were still no privately-owned computers with which the recordings made by me could have been constructed and manipulated, that is to say, faked. In foresight or through a future-look and so forth, of the Plejaren, they knew however, that computer services for residential folks would come up and boom in the course of the 1980′s, therefore they were keen still, that photographic-evidence be produced before this technology begin to take hold. As a result it should be avoided, that I could be accused of falsifying the photos through computer manipulations. Unfortunately, the Plejaren, however, did not expect the malicious earthlings in the form of know-it-alls, the envious and adversaries, which nevertheless maliciously accused me of trickery and forgery and still do to this day. And ever since the second half of the 1980′s, computers can be privately bought and used by any human being, if this is wanted, thus since then UFO photos can be prepared in any number of ways and presented, and these days these can be made so perfect that a forgery as such, can no longer be recognized or hardly at all.

That I can make no more photos of Plejaren beamships in the present time, that is simply because the Plejaren no longer allow this and consequently also no longer visibly position themselves for recordings. On the one hand they have themselves felt very affected by the malignancy of the know-it-alls, slanderers and adversaries of all kinds, which accuse me of fraud, forgery and charlatanry, etc., and on the other hand, leads the Plejaren to the fact that the photographic-evidence I created is more than enough, in order to prove, for reasonable human beings of the earth, the existence of the Plejaren and that of their beamships. More is probably not to be explained in addition to that.
Billy

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

* Guy Guilbert has suggested that, not surprisingly, I got it wrong about PhotoShop, “Increasing both the brightness and the Contrast by sliding them to the right keeps the background black and makes the cake brighter. Contrast must go the the left-decreasing the black and letting whatever else is there appear. To the right INCREASES lights AND darks. It works best if you run it through twice.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright 2011 - All Rights Reserved. Please do not copy or reproduce the content on this blog for re-publication without the author/s written permission. Thank you.

14 comments on “The Billy Meier UFO Case: Now You Can Prove It to Yourself

  • This is a significant new find, Michael. Well done Savio!

    BTW Zahi and I have finished the paper on the Energy Ships. we are now just waiting for Zahi’s final approval before he puts it online. He has been away and upon returning his mother died. So he is, of course, busy with various personal matters there right now. This is just to let you know that once these persoanl matters have been taken care of his next paper, co-authored by myself, will be out SOON.

  • There’s such an abundance of evidence in this post. Michael, the “UFO photographs” link doesn’t lead to anything. Maybe its just me or it needs to be edited. I’m happy to see the documentation on Marcel Vogel’s patents because people seem to deny his analysis because of the claims against him. I don’t know what the actual claims were other than he lied about his patents. How I could find the majority of the evidence posted here long ago and the “UFO Experts” couldn’t is mind-boggling.

  • http://beam2eng.blogspot.com/2014/05/readers-questions-excerpts-from-577th.html

    Reader’s question
    Dear ladies and gentlemen, I would like to put the question to you, if Mr. Meier still has contact with the extraterrestrials, why he takes no pictures of the spaceships in this day and age? His recordings come from the 1970s and 1980s. Just one question.
    A. Winkler, Switzerland

    Answer:
    The photographs made by me in the 1970s and 1980s of Plejaren beamships was allowed and I could make them only with explicit mandate and absolutely only with the permission of the Plejaren. Thus I was assigned by them, to make plenty of photos as evidence regarding the existence of the Plejaren and their beam ships, which for me was not only a difficult task with respect to my photographic ignorance but also regarding the varied and sometimes difficult-to-reach places for the photographic work.

    Now then, during the years when I had to produce the photos in a task of the Plejaren, there were still no privately-owned computers with which the recordings made by me could have been constructed and manipulated, that is to say, faked. In foresight or through a future-look and so forth, of the Plejaren, they knew however, that computer services for residential folks would come up and boom in the course of the 1980′s, therefore they were keen still, that photographic-evidence be produced before this technology begin to take hold. As a result it should be avoided, that I could be accused of falsifying the photos through computer manipulations. Unfortunately, the Plejaren, however, did not expect the malicious earthlings in the form of know-it-alls, the envious and adversaries, which nevertheless maliciously accused me of trickery and forgery and still do to this day. And ever since the second half of the 1980′s, computers can be privately bought and used by any human being, if this is wanted, thus since then UFO photos can be prepared in any number of ways and presented, and these days these can be made so perfect that a forgery as such, can no longer be recognized or hardly at all.

    That I can make no more photos of Plejaren beamships in the present time, that is simply because the Plejaren no longer allow this and consequently also no longer visibly position themselves for recordings. On the one hand they have themselves felt very affected by the malignancy of the know-it-alls, slanderers and adversaries of all kinds, which accuse me of fraud, forgery and charlatanry, etc., and on the other hand, leads the Plejaren to the fact that the photographic-evidence I created is more than enough, in order to prove, for reasonable human beings of the earth, the existence of the Plejaren and that of their beamships. More is probably not to be explained in addition to that.
    Billy

    • Thanks so much Bruce. I’m actually going to add this to the post so that people who read it can consider it too.

  • Hello. Michael.
    I am slowly returning to my work. If anybody from MUFON or anybody else would like to check the WCUFO or Pendulum UFO Investigations (or soon the Energy Ship investigation I am doing with Chris Lock) we can contribute or help them to check our findings. These finding are clear and obvious, and anybody can do it by themselves. I think having experts saying the evidence is real it is not as impacting as investigating it by yourself, and concluding Billy Meier have been in contact with space friends.

    Rhal Zahi.

    • Thanks for this Rhal. A great contribution to the mission. It ought give Michael some great stuff for upcoming MUFON presentation and others.

      Michael, I assume you sent Rhal’s work over to folks at the Paracast and the others who were adamant about the pictures being faked? Probably no word, huh?

      • I haven’t bothered with them, you’re free to do it.

        However, I have been stirring things up with a whole bunch of skeptics, so-called scientists and the “UFO experts”. Look for a blog or two in the very near future.

  • MUFON members, and anyone else, there is a mountain, A MOUNTAIN, of evidence that the Billy Meier case is real, and the most important UFO case in modern history. Just do the work!

  • For myself, when I first saw these photos maybe two months ago, I had no doubt whatsoever that they are “real”. . . even Quetzal’s funny-looking craft made me laugh, but I had no doubt as to it’s authenticity. In fact, in my own imagination, I had often imagined ships like this, and in fact seen flying in my dreams sometimes, so that these pictures cheered me up enormously. So, I thought, that’s who they are! And I have had dreams about larger ships, silver coloured with rotating orangy lights underneath flying overhead, and with a bit of mist around them, like a light morning fog, so that they were a bit shrouded. These ships might be, oh well, a couple hundred meters in diameter, I’m not really sure. . . . Anyway, for those who have eyes to see, and ears to hear, Billy’s evidence is indisputable. I have no doubts whatsoever that he’s telling the truth. It reminds me of something I once read in C.S. Lewis’s Narnia series. The old professor in the story asked one child whether his sister (I think it was Lucy) usually told the truth. Why yes, the child exclaimed. Then the Professor said, that most likely Lucy was telling the truth about Aslan and Narnia as well, and that he shouldn’t doubt her story. . . . Billy, if anything, doesn’t seem to me to be a “liar”. Most Swiss farmer-type people aren’t. If anything, the Swiss are more likely to be truthful than other types of people. . . . No one should accuse him of “making it up”. That is a grave insult to the man, even if he’s only an “ordinary” Swiss citizen.

    • One’s personal experiences might lead one into certain conclusions. No one is in any position to judge another, particularly when it comes to out-of-the-ordinary life-experience. One person’s proof is another person’s fiction. I’m afraid we cannot change that. Just remember, if you deny it, it won’t help you when the time comes that you might need its help!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *