Robbins neither apologizes for calling me names, nor does he qualify his statements with anything as non-accusatory as “In my opinion, Michael Horn is…” or “Meier may have, etc.” nor does he substantiate his accusations. Having stated that, and the fact that Robbins liberally allows his own supporters to also violate his own stated rule regarding not allowing any defamatory remarks, it came as a surprise to find that the pseudo-scientific skeptic is now playing crybaby and painting himself as the offended party.

How? By complaining to my web hosting company that my article calling him out as a coward and fraud was defamatory.

What’s that quote about the heat in the kitchen and getting out if you can’t take it?

Well, as you’ll now note, I put in a qualifying comment in that article that it was an opinion piece. In fact, all of my commentaries are obviously opinion pieces. But should there be any need for further clarity, I’ve included that notification on the home page of my site and I’ve put it up on this blog too.

Robbins demanded answers and didn’t like them when he got them, so he neither acknowledged nor responded to them. He was offered amazing, ironclad evidence and refused to examine and/or comment on it. And, while he was acting like a wimp (that’s my opinion) he was also continuing to do exactly what I had called him out for, i.e. censoring comments not because they were “off topic”, etc. but because he really never expected that people who had more knowledge, and more balls, than him would take him to task, as well as apart, for his shallow, snide and incorrect remarks. Apparently he thinks that his opinions, as flimsy as they are, are not fair game. And fair isn’t the way Robbins wants to play the game.

To support these assertions of mine, I reproduce below a comment that was quite on topic that Robbins didn’t not allow to be posted. In the past, when his underhanded, devious little ploys were pointed out, he tried to fix things up by suddenly allowing the “disappeared” post to magically reappear.

So here is the post that wasn’t allowed from a person named Bruce. Will it too magically reappear now that Robbins has been outted – again?

…………………………………………………………………………………….

Stuart, your little chastisement doesn’t explain your lack of effort and thinking in your apophis/red meteor complaint. Labeling Meier’s use of dates for the rocks rendezvous with earth, a ‘retrodiction’, is an erroneous assumption (not scientific examination of facts). Considering Meier has had monthly contacts with his ET contacts/friends for nearly 70 years, the mention of the red meteors date with earth, could have been revealed much much earlier than in one of the english translations. Since you don’t read German or have the ability to search the German contact reports, you cannot conclude that the date appeared out of thin air and was retrodicted. That is a non-scientific assumption. With the incomplete evidence you looked at, one could only consider the case open or inconclusive, unless one had a bias against the case to begin with.

What if your giant leap of an assumption is incorrect? Then maybe just maybe, Meier is in contact with humans whose civilization is perhaps hundreds of thousands of years more advanced than ours and has the technologies to travel through time and space among other things we couldn’t begin to imagine.

Do you think we humans of earth are alone in this universe or other universes? Do you think we will eventually be able to conquer the great expanses of space? and to do that we’d have to solve the riddle of time. Pay attention to the news. http://kykernel.com/2011/10/03/particle-may-travel-faster-than-the-speed-of-light/ All this talk of particles traveling faster than the speed of light is the beginning of eliminating the time factor. Meier spoke years ago of Einsteins theory of relativity undergoing revisions; did any of the brain trust here think of this without the benefit of hindsight?

From the news today. http://www.space.com/13162-asteroid-vesta-giant-mountain-craters.html “Giant Asteroid Vesta Has Mountain Taller Than Anything on Earth” Where do you scientists stand on the origination of the asteroid belt?

Billy’s friends say it was originally a planet named Malona or rather Phaeton, destroyed in war. http://futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_Meier/Malona perhaps that would help explain why Vesta has such mountains.

Where do all the know-it-alls around here stand on the formation/origination of the asteroid belt?

Comment by Bruce — October 4, 2011 @ 3:36 am | Reply

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

In the rough and tumble online world, as I mentioned in my article, there’s no shortage of hostility, defamation, attacks, etc., usually from anonymous parties. I’m not shy about speaking my mind, giving evidence for my opinions and I’m anything but anonymous.

While there are at least 200 pages online attacking me that I know of, I’ve never threatened legal action against anyone. Only in the case of Kal Korff’s death threats and defamation did I point it out to the web hosting companies involved, who saw fit to remove the clearly harassing and threatening material.

So, if one is going to put themselves up as some kind of an authority and attack the honesty and integrity of others – without a single word of qualification that they are merely expressing their own opinion, and then go and complain about others calling them out for their cowardly and fraudulent behavior, for being spineless wimps, poseurs and crybabies – it’s not only hypocritical, it’s pathetic. (And notice that I didn’t even call him a…jackass.)

Other than that, go ahead and offer your own…opinions.

Copyright 2011 - All Rights Reserved. Please do not copy or reproduce the content on this blog for re-publication without the author/s written permission. Thank you.

Were the Words “Coward and Liar” too Strong to Describe Stuart Robbins’ Behavior? originally appeared on They Fly on October 4, 2011.