Peer Review of Billy Meier’s UFO Evidence and Information

May all of our peers peer deeply into the truth before we disappear

Here is a combination of definitions of peer review:

The evaluation of work by one or more people of similar competence to the producers of the work (peers). It constitutes a form of self-regulation by qualified members of a profession within the relevant field. Peer review helps validate research, establish a method by which it can be evaluated, and increase networking possibilities within research communities. Despite criticisms, peer review is still the only widely accepted method for research validation.

We have two elements to consider. The first is that Billy Meier’s physical evidence was reviewed, analyzed and authenticated by experts whose knowledge and experience in their respective fields, as well as access to respective technologies, far exceeded Meier’s. Meier wasn’t their peer in terms of formal education, technical knowledge and expertise, etc. He had no training, education or background in photography, sound recording, or metallurgy, the three main categories of his physical evidence, nor did he have any experience in model making or special effects, the means that he was accused of employing in his photographic evidence, etc.

The peer review premise is quite correct in some ways, i.e. that there are scientific experts who know more about certain matters than non scientifically trained individuals who are not their peers in this regard.

Meier’s evidence was, and continues to be, authenticated by experts using the state-of-the-art technologies of the day, all of which exceeded that which was proven to be available to him, as was established both by the nearly decade long, on-site investigation by Lt. Col. Wendelle Stevens and his team of professional investigators and by author Gary Kinder’s own independent investigation. While it must be noted that Meier certainly didn’t have access to the technologies used in authenticating his evidence decades ago, neither did the majority of other people.

The Latest Analyses

Conversely, while the technology used in the latest analyses done by Rhal Zahi and Chris Lock to authenticate the WCUFO, the Pendulum UFO and the Energy Ships is far beyond what was available to anyone in the 1970s and 1980s, it’s now available to almost anyone who wants to test the evidence for themselves. This makes relying on peer review irrelevant, as the protocols used by Zahi and Lock are noted and reproducible by any interested parties.

Of course one only needs PhotoShop to do this test on one of Meier’s 35mm film photos. It’s so easy that even a…scientist from SETI can do it, leaving them to debunk themselves when they get the same results that any 10-year-old with a computer can.

In terms of his information, especially what is referred to as his prophetically accurate scientific and world event related information, traditional peer review is in one sense impossible…simply because Meier has no peers. None of the scientists, or any other human beings in the world, have his experience in terms of contact with extraterrestrial human beings, being on board their craft (since he was five years old), venturing into space, traveling in time, etc.

However, due to the existence of the internet it is now possible for anyone to conduct a very accurate form of peer review of much of Meier’s prophetic information. The democratization of access to information, to finding and examining the pieces of the puzzle, doesn’t guarantee that people will necessarily understand everything, or see the big picture. But they certainly can validate the existence of much of the information prior to “official discovery” or occurrence of the foretold events and they can do it as well as any “expert”.  A copyright is a copyright, whether you’re a PhD or not. If they don’t have considerations such as fears of loss of employment, tenure, income, “reputation”, or their egos, experts can not only perform as well as anyone in informational searches, they‘ll reach the same inescapable conclusions.

Almost Extinct

Meier doesn’t point to the ongoing corroborations of his prophetically accurate scientific and world event related information, nor try to profit in any way from it. All of this runs completely counter to the known patterns, motives and behaviors of human beings who make what are called extraordinary claims. And of the oft repeated “extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence”, while Meier’s evidence is more than extraordinary because it’s also authentic, it’s only necessary to apply already existing, standard scientific methodology in evaluating it. There is no “paranormal”, nothing requiring “special” standards; things are indeed either hoaxes or conform to laws of science that we haven’t yet discovered, or recognized.

But comprehending this requires something that’s becoming almost extinct, the ability to think. Then we are faced with the realization that all of the specific, complex, consistent and so far unerringly accurate information, as well as the physical evidence, originated with this one man, in pre-computer times. This already escapes the understanding of a generation that is absolutely ignorant about the realities and additional challenges this posed, thinking that they were themselves birthed from CD drives, which are of course also now becoming extinct.

Occam’s Razor

Since the core of the Meier case has to do with complete self-responsibility, no one needs to rely on the “experts” to determine the truth about Meier’s physical or informational evidence – and thereby the case – for themselves.

While inept skeptics may try to claim that Meier “backdated” information, or plagiarized it – always without factual substantiation and only through mere supposition – those interested parties who actually think their way through, evaluate and weigh the known and proven circumstances, means, motive and opportunity, etc., will be faced with one of the skeptic’s most frequently referred to rules or principles, Occam’s Razor, and for the skeptics the truth may be the cruelest cut of all.

No Precedent

If you search for most famous photographic hoaxes you’ll find things like this and this…where one notices that the foolish person who included one of Meier’s famous, authenticated UFO photos simply couldn’t grasp the difference between the actual, primitive hoaxing attempts and a stunning, full color broad daylight photo like Meier’s. She was apparently also unaware that unlike every other example she (or anyone else has ever) posted, Meier had presented not merely one, or even a few, photographs but hundreds and even films, video, etc.

There is a complete lack of precedent for Meier’s evidence, spanning as it does multiple categories of physical evidence and volumes of informational evidence. People are quick to accuse someone of a hoax but when in all of history has anyone come forward with hundreds of pieces of supposedly hoaxed evidence which, when examined by independent experts, has been authenticated?

Actually, when has someone accused of hoaxing evidence in one category also presented, and been accused of hoaxing, evidence in several other categories, which also have been independently authenticated? And when has someone accused of hoaxing a variety of physical evidence come forward with voluminous amounts of specific prophetically accurate scientific and world event information?

Add to the questions why Meier, a partially disabled man who lives in a remote part of Switzerland, has never sought to publicize, promote or profit from his evidence and, in fact, has let it be the responsibility of other interested parties to dig through all of it and authenticate it themselves.

Peer Deeply

For the relatively few people left on earth who have a real sense of ethics, integrity, honesty, logical thinking, professionalism, etc., such operations as SETI, its counterparts in the UFOCI such as MUFON, etc., are seen as the unfortunate testaments to the cynicism, greed, suicidal stupidity and materialism of these times. Most likely within a generation, or less, people simply won’t know (or care) about such things as finding and living in truth, peace, love, freedom, harmony and wisdom, etc.

Having succumbed to their insatiable desires for irrelevant distractions, techno toys, entertainment, celebrity worship, using their bodies as billboards for other people’s art, and becoming pierced and punctured walking hardware stores, the inevitable and willing surrender to being bio-chipped will most likely occur, as Meier foretold. Later, as people look to attain “singularity” with their toys will be the ubiquitous condition, followed by the overthrow of whatever is left of the human beings by their independent robotic creations. Those who seek transhumanism as the next trendy thing will ultimately, and all too late, wish that they’d first taken the time to become…true human beings.

May all of our peers peer deeply into the truth before we disappear.



With this item now in the news about an area near Stonehenge where ritual human sacrifices occurred, perhaps a review of the information Meier published years before this “new discovery” would be of interest. Please note that Florena told Meier that Stonehenge was built in “several phases” and she mentions “Stonehenge and other related Kraftorte”, i.e. places of power.

Recent discoveries pertaining to Mars were also superseded by Meier…decades ago (UFO Skeptics Throw in the Towel – How Did Meier Beat NASA by 32 Years?). More detailed information can be found here pertaining to what occurred on Mars and another planet known as Malona or Phaeton, which was destroyed by its own inhabitants and remnants of which are now to be found in the asteroid belt.


See also:

Cutting through the Peer Review Dodge and Distraction








45 Replies to “Peer Review of Billy Meier’s UFO Evidence and Information”

  1. Good stuff
    Unbelievable to me that people still question the facts. I’m so happy I stumbled into the truth when I did.

  2. I think its worth another visit on what Rupert Sheldrake had to say about science delusion.
    It resonates with what you are conveying here Michael.
    I think Dyson had written something about this many years ago on his website I can’t remember.

  3. A very seemingly scientific and logical approach. I applaud you on your attempts, even though I’m allowing you to trace me, which means you will not allow such opinions on your precious blog. No matter, you will read it none the less. My words are short. You have continuously ignored certain aspects, certain inferences, and this makes your case extremely shallow, even though in your conscious mind, you truly believe you are doing right. There will be no explaining to you that your approach is absolutely delusional and beyond material reality, I know this now. You simply do not know enough yet, although you feel you do. You point out the obvious nonsense, but are literally blind to what is actually here. You must have stopped looking. This is all I have to say, strictly as theory mind you: If they REALLY wanted us to know, they would distribute messages within vast number of groups, small at first, but vast and quietly. Your beliefs and assumptions carry you beyond reality. You’re close but you yourself are caught up in something you will never be privy to and you will never put your ego aside long enough to understand anything I’m saying. I feel it necessary to follow your progress as you seem to know little of what is occurring, although few do. Believe it, don’t believe it, I care not. Just a reminder for you. Have a good day.

    1. We have analysts working feverishly to decipher the hidden meaning in this post. With any luck we should be able to clarify the matter within mere weeks, months at the most.

      1. Those analysts will need all our support Mike 🙂 Thomas – Could it be that they “…REALLY wanted us to know…” and did, “…distribute messages within vast number of groups, small at first, but vast and quietly”, but, too many people were too dim to recognise that? E.g.,

      2. Have the million monkeys, oops I mean “analysts”, come up with “One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest” yet, or maybe the common core syllabus, foreign policy, fractional reserve banking “laws”, anything? Bueller, Bueller, Bueller!

    2. Thomas ,you wrote ” I applaud you on your attempts”
      Michael didnt even have to try as he passed with flying colours the First time !
      There “was ” NO attempt

    3. Thomas . Please read Michael’s “Peer Review” again and you will duely note that in comparison to “your” post Michael’s is structured , well researched , Thorough and decipherable , looks like it came out of the book of life !
      and your post looks to be written inside the confinement of an egotistical luny bin

    4. Thomas rynehold, Michael does not have to provide this blog to anyone. You are more than free to start your own, But would you be able to have human beings from 13 years of age to 100 in a retirement home with nothing else to do from and each from around the globe. And most just having only what is on the internet to form a thought from. I know from my own need to grow this blog is only a tiny part of the work Michael provides, Yes it may seem to you he just putting random logs on the fire. But the fire is still glowing even after many have given up on even trying to find the knowing ones. Below your name is a space you can put your own blog site, just above the little comment box. If your knowledge has transcended into great wisdom and you can control your fear of mistakes. I would be happy to learn from anyone.,But since you trashed the basic respect of another, you may find being on the other side different than you can do year after year. And anyone that is taking in BEAM’s materiel and are adding to this learning from what ever they have to when finding the truth in ever paragraph. Peer Review by the system that is controlled by status, unions, tenure and grants will not be complete., In doing my own peer review surprises are being found every where.
      Peace to you
      Billy Wilson

    5. Thomas, the only thing here you’ve said relating to the Meier case is –

      “This is all I have to say, strictly as theory mind you: If they REALLY wanted us to know, they would distribute messages within vast number of groups, small at first, but vast and quietly.”

      and this shows, clearly and without a shadow of a doubt, that, You have continuously ignored certain aspects (of the case), certain inferences, and this makes your seemingly peaceful rant extremely shallow, even though in your conscious mind, you truly believe speak the truth. There will be no explaining to you that your approach is absolutely delusional and beyond material reality, You simply do not know enough yet, although you feel you do. The only point you make is well-explained by Meier himself, as well as the Plejaren, but you are literally blind to what is actually here. You must have stopped thinking logically because of some far from the reality and its truth factor that you have accepted as fact. This is not all I have to say, strictly in truth, mind you: You’re close but you yourself are caught up in something you will hopefully figure out some day and will be privy to through your own efforts, if you put your ego aside long enough to understand the immensity and importance of the mission. Believe it, don’t believe it, your belief is your responsibility and choice and you will reap the rewards thereof as well as the lessons of your mistakes, if you so choose. Good luck.

    6. It’s generally more polite for those present to shout “SPEECH!” BEFORE one has been made. However…

      Thomas, In your ‘short’ speech you use 239 words to say nothing. Pretending to know things that nobody else does. Billy has written extensively about feelings of self-importance. Wanting to be seen to be greater than one actually is. We’ve all done it (I’m partly doing it now!), and one simply ends up looking like a plonker rather than a transcended-master-living-inside-a-light-beam-knowledge-portal(TM).

      I’ll risk saying Welcome.

      1. Darcy,

        You have a number of comments I’m not posting because I can’t see that they relate to the topic.

        I’m asking everyone to please…stay on topic.

  4. Well Gday folks !, Yes ive always been here in the background keeping myself informed on these matters .
    I’m all blogged out , ironic as it is , blogging comments on sites that seem to be slanderous against us here and Billy and the authenticity of the case . Well i think i turned a few heads so to speak. For the better .steered a lot of people on the right course. Some though are hell bent on collision . Anyhow . I was blogging about the very facts you had just described within your “Peer Review” content Michael Horn !
    Cheers everyone ! Keep it up
    Good work Michael !
    Salome Wayno

  5. Ahh! Had to chuckle when I read the SETI comment. Here’s a funny coincidence. I just finished posting this comment on YouTube in a “debate” with a “skeptic” who loves using the extraordinary evidence argument:

    – – –

    …And there you go AVOIDING a logical explanation as predicted.

    extraordinary claim, extraordinary evidence

    Just because it’s catchy does not make it true. But let’s analyse this excuse for avoiding logical debate:

    First of all, whether evidence is “extraordinary” or not is entirely irrelevant if the evidence is proven to be reliable. Just because they are not interested in landing on the White House lawn does not mean they don’t exist. The scientific analysis you continue to avoid has proven Meier’s evidence to be reliable. Multiple times. Reliable evidence has backed up his claim whether you feel it is “extraordinary” or not.

    Second, if you were to go beyond the casual, SUBJECTIVE use of the term “extraordinary”, it actually means “out of the ordinary” or “beyond ordinary”, correct? Physical evidence of extraterrestrial contacts which have yet to be explained or duplicated IS out of the ordinary, unique, extraordinary. Can you show me one other UFO case that has this? No. It does not exist.

    – – –

    I also left Miss Emily Temple a comment:

  6. MH,
    You say:
    “Most likely within a generation, or less, people simply won’t know (or care) about such things as finding and living in truth, peace, love, freedom, harmony and wisdom, etc.”.
    “…or less..” are the key words, I must say. Perhaps there are those in your generation and maybe a few of those in between, who uphold these values. However I am 23 and I must also say that those are dead last on the list of priorities of those of my Generation, and seemingly those younger. The dark times have already begun for us as. All anyone really covets now are Comfort, entertainment, material things and money. It both disgusts and sickens me quite literally. I try to be positive and I do follow the spirit teaching and am working on developing a Neutral-positive-attitude but I am so incredibly frustrated with, and repulsed by, Earth humanity. Most especially, this is the case with Americans and the people that move here, thinking it’s the “greatest country in the world”. It seems harder than ever to be genuinely good and it feels as though I’m the only one my age even willing to try to make a serious, positive effort. Using my best educated guess, I’d say we’ve got less that 10 years before the western world starts feeling the extra harsh truths of the laws of causality. Any comments, advice, encouragement, opposition or addition to these claims, etc. by anyone will be greatly appreciated.


      1. I couldn’t watch that. Wow… Not even a minute into it I turned it off… How in the hell could anyone in power, regardless of what side, not choose peace over war after watching something like that is beyond me. To see what weapons do to actual human beings is so very disturbing. This is what my kids are going to inherit? Sometimes I feel it’s all pointless… How do you tell someone to forgive whoever did what horrors come from war to live in peace after holding a blown up body of their child in their arms?

          1. I know what you mean MH. Yes to me religion,politics, corporatism IS pointless to me period. It`s high time we STOP waving stupid flags cheering stupid politicians who say one thing then turn around and do the exact opposite.

      2. No adequate words indeed… I had to sit and watch the whole video as not be shielded by our harsh reality, or theirs rather, it has yet to come to this side of the world to that extent, though only a matter of a few ticks separate us now.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.