An invitation to find what you’re seeking
Dear Prof. Jason T. Wright & associates,
While this is an open letter and not a scientific paper, the information within it should serve as an invitation, provoking sufficient interest to warrant further examination, certainly before concluding that it’s… outré.
That’s not the Way It’s Supposed to Happen
Regarding your association with SETI, our team suggests that while scenarios such as contact through a form of mathematics, radio waves, cryptic signals, or rarified scientific language is fitting for a science fiction movie, we should allow the possibility that space traveling extraterrestrials from a Type III Civilization would be intelligent enough to learn, and reach out to us, in one of our own terrestrial languages, utilizing their advanced versions of language learning technologies such as we already possess.
While that’s not the way it’s supposed to happen, according to SETI’s assumptions that they would be the de facto choice for such contact, we suggest that an advanced and benevolent extraterrestrial civilization would communicate in a way that was equally accessible, and understandable, to scientists and lay people alike.
Conveying the Science
A most elegant, and non-invasive, means for a Type III Civilization to effect such historical contact would be for them to convey specific scientific information in a clear and unambiguous manner – well prior to our “officially” discovering it. Once we confirmed its accuracy, through subsequent corroborating discoveries, we could go about ascertaining the reason* a far more advanced race would seek contact with a demonstrably far more primitive and warlike one.
The time between the provision and corroboration of the information would allow scientists, governments, leaders, etc., to prepare for this unprecedented development and, quite possibly, actual, subsequent direct contact.
SETI has its preconceptions, including that searching for extraterrestrial life is the means by which contact will be established. But, since the advanced race would determine the terms of contact, it could even be with a lay person, ego-deflating as that may be.
Can we really say just how this event would occur and proceed?
Skeptical? Of course, but please read on.
In 1978, a nearly 10-year-long preliminary investigation was led by a USAF Lt. Colonel, and his team of professional investigators and scientists, concerning several categories of physical and informational evidence provided to them by “Billy” Eduard Albert Meier, in Switzerland. Meier claimed that as a five-year-old boy, in 1942, long prior to SETI’s inception, he was first contacted by representatives of a human space traveling race. The contacts are claimed to continue to this day, more than 75 years later. Over the past 40 years, the varied evidence has been independently examined, analyzed and authenticated by respected scientific experts and is freely available to you for your own evaluation, testing, etc.
Regarding advance knowledge of soon-to-be scientific facts, it has been – and continues to be – provided in abundance. To date we have over 200 specific examples, the majority established as ironclad by the existence of copyrights and verifiable publication dates, all well prior to “official discovery”, in fact, often decades earlier.
No information is ever presented as theoretical and, to date, there has been no erroneous information. The only revision of estimates, etc., comes from organizations like NASA. (More articles about Apophis here.)
Credible international reporting on Mr. Meier and his photographic evidence dates back to 1964.
But how could this, arguably the most important event in human history, possibly have occurred, yet gone unnoticed by respected scientists, such as you and your associates?
SETI’s Rigorous Avoidance
The attempts to present this evidence and information to numerous scientists around the world span decades. A few courageous scientific experts risked the opprobrium of their associates – and loss of funding, tenure, reputation, etc. – and looked through the proverbial telescope.
As indicated, your own professional analyses, questions, challenges are welcome. Hopefully, they would be more credible – and scientific – than what Mr. Robert Muir received from Seth Shostak, on June 15, 2015, in response to his suggestion to investigate the Meier material:
Thanks for the email. The SETI Institute doesn’t investigate UFO phenomena — it’s not our field of research. I might also note that the majority of people that I’ve talked to consider the Meier evidence to be faked. Certainly looks that way to me. And there’s an important point to be noted: We’ve learned nothing from it.
Dr. Seth Shostak
Senior Astronomer and Director of the Center for SETI Research
189 Bernardo Ave.
Mountain View, CA 94043
A Piece of Pluto, Please
So, unlike defense industry aeronautical engineer, Dr. David Froning, Seth Shostak “learned nothing from it.” But Prof. Lisa Chien at NAU (Northern Arizona University) was consumed with curiosity as she perused hundreds of Meier’s clear, primarily daytime UFO photos (all taken on 35mm film, pre-computer, pre-digital era). Conversely, professor and Department Chair of the NAU Physics and Astronomy Department, Dr. Stephen Tegler, wouldn’t deign to look through the proverbial telescope.
Expressing that he had “no interest in seeing photographs; bring me a piece of a bumper from one of the things”, Dr. Tegler was nonetheless unable to produce a piece of Pluto to demonstrate the same evidence-in-hand requirements.
We do rely on various kinds of photographs of Pluto; the closest were taken 8,000 miles from it. Meier’s closest photos of the WCUFO were taken within…15’. Please see this 74-page analysis, using today’s state-of-the-art computer technology, which also includes the protocols used by Mr. Zahi, so that you can reproduce the testing.
He also discovered that putting one of Meier’s 35mm film photographs, from 1981, in Photoshop and adjusting brightness and contrast settings, revealed what has been hidden, not quite in plain sight, for 33 years. Please feel free to perform this simple experiment yourself, as many people around the world have now done.
The internet has not only “democratized” access to information but also modalities of testing that now allow a 10-year-old child to attempt to determine certain things for themselves, without relying on outside experts.
In fact, it was at about that age that Marcel Vogel synthesized the chemicals that produce bioluminescence in fireflies.
The Benefits of Skepticism
While skepticism is expected, rather than directly confront the claims and voluminous evidence anymore, the tactic has been mainly to ignore it and pretend that it’s the same as…no evidence at all. Fortunately, Prof. Scott Antes, a skeptical professor, demonstrated rare intellectual honesty and facilitated two, historic presentations at NAU.
Determined skeptics seeking to debunk Meier’s information on Jupiter, etc. – including the fact that Io is the most volcanically active body in the solar system – instead corroborated that he published it five months before the Voyager probe arrived.
As we said, this is not a scientific paper so much as an invitation, amply supported with an abundance of un-dismissible evidence. To date there are over 26,000 pages of information, five categories of still irreproducible physical evidence, 125+ eyewitnesses and five photographers other than Meier.
It is hoped that you and your associates will be curious and gracious enough to…look through the telescope and respond with your comments, questions and/or challenges. Hopefully our discussion would be more enlightening than the way the media deals with this topic, which could make it easier for astronomers to “discuss the possibility of alien life”.
My team and I, as well as our readers from 192 countries around the world, will be most happy to hear from you at your earliest convenience.
Michael Horn, Authorized American Media Representative
Matthew Wieczkiewicz, Nasa Aerospace Engineer (Ret)
Kenneth Smith, Director of Operations at Orbital Launch System Group (Ret)
*Regarding the reason they came here, let’s see how we do with this step first.
Please see also:
- Scientists Stunned – Billy Meier Predictions Right Again!
- Scientists’ ‘New Discovery’ About Moon’s Surface Already Published by UFO Contactee… in 1987!
- Scientists Corroborate Billy Meier’s 1946 Moon Information
- The Origin of the Earth’s Moon
Official Contact Report 220, Wednesday, December 2, 1987
Billy: …why does the density ratio of the Moon on the front and the back vary so much?
Quetzal: The whole thing is founded in the mass and the attractive force of the Earth. Through the Earth’s attractive force, the Moon, during the course of its existence as an Earth satellite, has shifted the focal point of its mass away from the Earth, by what means its geometric center has shifted.
Moon’s bulge linked to early orbit’, August 3, 2006
“Planetary scientists have proposed a solution to the centuries-old problem of why the Moon’s far side bulges at its equator. Ian Garrick-Bethell and colleagues at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology say that the bulge was caused by the Moon being much closer to the Earth early on its history and moving in a much more eccentric elliptical orbit than it does now. This would have allowed the bulge to “freeze in” as the still-molten Moon began to solidify, the researchers say.”
NOTE: It is well known that there is no life in the Pleiades constellation and why this term was originally used is explained in the documentation.