In 1987, Billy Meier knew the Mars probe would be called “2001 Mars Odyssey”
Many people familiar with the Billy Meier UFO contacts have long known about Meier’s unparalleled record of hundreds of specific examples of his error-free, prophetically accurate scientific and world event related information, from my site as well as from my blog and my film, as the time fulfills. But many more people – scientists especially – don’t know that Meier has consistently preempted so many of the most important scientific discoveries, from a few months to years and even decades before “official discovery”.
I’ve often referred to this information as the higher standard of proof because, while people still may want to try to dispute Meier’s independently authenticated UFO photos, films and other evidence – despite it no longer being debatable due to the various independent analyses and authentications done over the past 40 years, as well as USAF OSI investigator Joe Tysk’s definitive recent analysis – there’s simply no arguing with copyrights. Not only is Meier’s scientific information always impeccably accurate, coming as it does from the more advanced Plejaren extraterrestrial human race, but so much of the information is published in copyrighted, dated books and documents. That makes the date of their publication…ironclad.
The often unacknowledged fact is that even scientists who openly profess interest in the possibility of extraterrestrial life, and those who are presumably “searching” for it (“it” can surely find us…if it wants to) have absolutely no expectation that they will find it. And they are absolutely certain that nobody else, including a modest, reclusive Swiss man will either.
So, it’s a somewhat daunting task to offer Meier’s ironclad informational evidence, let alone the physical evidence, to scientists who have many of their own preconceptions and even prejudices about being provided with it. In fact, not only will they be reasonably skeptical but they may also quickly disregard such evidence, even when it’s more easily proven than many things they take to be indisputably factual.
For instance, none of us can really prove that various probes have been sent into space, that moon landings occurred, or even that there are Rovers on Mars, etc. We – and even the scientists – have to rely on what we’re shown and told to be true in this regard. Because technology today allows for so much fakery and deception, can we say for certain that images from Mars ostensibly of and/or taken by the Rovers on Mars are absolutely “real” and not created/manipulated through high-tech means? What about photographs of Pluto or the other planets, can we be sure about these too?
I for one do take most of the claims of scientists in these situations to be factual and accurate. But, as I pointed out to Prof. Tegler,* head of the astronomy department at NAU, if photos of objects that are thousands to billions of miles away are good enough for science to draw all sorts of (perhaps not always accurate) conclusions about, what about objects that are a mere…15’ – 20’ away and that have been analyzed with today’s state-of-the-art equipment and that anyone can perform a test on themselves?
Do the standards and goal posts get changed and moved because the claims are supposedly “extraordinary”? Wasn’t Galileo’s claim extraordinary at the time? As I’ve already told a few scientists, even though we have the mostextraordinary evidence, all that’s required is that scientific methodologies are applied to testing it. And, over a 40-year period, that testing has authenticated Meier’s UFO evidence and absolutely ruled out trickery, hoaxing, manipulation, models, special effects, etc.
In my opinion, all of the UFO photos and other physical evidence were the eye candy, initially intended to get our attention and propel the UFO controversy forward. The prophetically accurate scientific information served to raise the standard of proof to a much higher level and to also point out that there indeed are farmore advanced and knowledgeable human beings in the universe than us. Beyond that, it was intended to encourage us to use deductive reasoning so that we could utilize many of the inherent warnings to help us to assure our own future survival.
One of the greatest obstacles though, in these times when almost 32,000 imbeciles calling themselves “scientists” deny climate change despite ever-mounting irrefutable evidence, is our resistance to taking complete self-responsibility and determining the truth for ourselves, through logic and reasoning. And that applies to laymen and scientists alike.
So, in Part 1 of this series, I’m presenting some of Meier’s prophetically accurate information about Mars below, verifiably published by him longbefore“official discovery”. If any reputable, credible scientists, university professors, etc., wish to take issue with this, please do so that we may move this discussion along to its hoped for next, important steps which, as I pointed out above, are intended to help us to assure our own future survival.
As Prof. Scott Antes stated:
“Provoking thought is what universities are about. It is all too common today for people who think they know better to automatically dismiss alternate views. People who aren’t willing to listen are directly or indirectly responsible for the sad condition our planet is in today.”**
So, in addition to all of the other information below, did Billy Meier really know – in 1987– that the Mars probe would be called “2001 Mars Odyssey”?
What do you think?
Water, Rivers, Ice, South Pole, 2001 Mars Odyssey
Official Contact Report 210, Wednesday, June 11, 1986
Billy: While visiting Mars, Ptaah explained to me that Mars had larger amounts of water led into its rivers, which are now partially filled-in by dust and volcanic ash, than what was ever the case or what is still the case with the largest rivers on Earth. In addition, he talked about thousand-fold more water than what is found in the largest rivers on Earth. That seems to be somewhat fantastic to me, which is why I think that I misheard or didn’t listen properly.
Quetzal: You shouldn’t doubt your attention because you properly understood everything that Ptaah explained to you. The information about the enormous quantities of water, which were led into the Martian rivers, corresponds to the facts, as well as the watercourses that are partially filled-in by sand, dust, and volcanic ash, which are generally called “canals” on Earth, but which were truly enormous rivers that were dozens and even almost a hundred kilometers in diameter and that were thousands of kilometers in length.
Official Contact Report 219, Tuesday, June 16, 1987
Billy: Then we can still exercise some patience. Let’s talk about something else. Although we’ve already talked about this several times, I would like a specific answer from you. As Ptaah said and showed to me, there is a lot of water on and also under the surface Mars in the form of ice, mostly very close to the surface of Mars, whereby the South Pole is of special importance in this regard. As Ptaah explained, however, not all ice consists of water but also of other materials. Now, the question about this is whether you have foresight as to whether this water can one day be used by the Earth people, once they eventually colonize Mars and can, so to speak, bring it back to life. And in the coming time, will the fact of the presence of the enormous canyons and black sand dunes and water on Mars be discovered by probes, if such should be sent to the Red Planet and reach this at all?
Quetzal: That will be the case several times in the coming time in reference to the water, namely that large occurrences of water in the form of ice and snow can be proven by probes on Mars. But the final certainty will first be attained at the beginning of the third millennium, and to be sure, by a Mars probe that will be called “2001 Mars Odyssey,” as our look into the future has revealed.
“Scientists may have discovered the largest flood channels in the solar system on Mars where a system of gigantic ancient valleys, some as much as 200 kilometers wide, lies partly buried under a veneer of volcanic lava flows, ash fall and wind-blown dust in Mars’ western hemisphere…The best explanation is that they were formed by catastrophic floods that at their peak potentially discharged as much as 50,000 times the flow of the Amazon River, Earth’s largest river, Dohm said… At sustained peak discharge rates, floods through the valleys would have filled a large ocean (96 million cubic kilometers) hypothesized for northern Mars in about 8 weeks, and a smaller ocean (14 million cubic kilometers) in the same region in about 8 days, according to the scientists’ calculations. The large ocean is equivalent to about a third the volume of the Indian Ocean, or more than three times the volume of the Mediterranean Sea, Caribbean Sea, South China Sea and Arctic Ocean combined. The smaller ocean is equal in volume to the Arctic Ocean.”
Mars Odyssey detects evidence of water ice, March 2002
“In its first major discovery since entering orbit, NASA’s Mars Odyssey spacecraft has detected evidence of extensive amounts of water ice below the surface of the Red Planet, scientists announced Friday.”
Mars’ South Pole Ice Deep and Wide, March 2007
“New measurements of Mars’ south polar region indicate extensive frozen water. The polar region contains enough frozen water to cover the whole planet in a liquid layer approximately 11 meters (36 feet) deep.”
“By melting icy soil in one of its lab instruments, the robot confirmed the presence of frozen water lurking below the Martian permafrost. Until now, evidence of ice in Mars’ north pole region has been largely circumstantial.”
“The area in blue shows where the ocean would have been. The yellow, red and green belt below it is where scientists found the valleys. They believe these were caused by water running from the south towards the ocean in the north.”
“The Red Planet just got quite a bit bluer, with scientists announcing the discovery of what they believe is a lake that’s about 12 miles across and hidden below a mile (1.6 kilometers) of ice at the south pole of Mars…The radar signals that MARSIS produces bounce back to Mars Express in different ways depending on what material they hit. And the team behind the new research said the signals MARSIS picked up over the south pole of Mars can be explained only by a large underground pool of liquid water.”
Mars Had Big Rivers for Billions of Years, March 2019
“The team’s work suggests that Martian rivers flowed intermittently but intensely over much of the planet’s 4.5-billion-year history, driven by precipitation-fed runoff. The rivers’ impressive width — in many cases, more than twice that of comparable Earth catchments — is a testament to that intensity…“The ancient Mars rivers didn’t flow in just a few favored spots; rather, they were distributed widely around the planet, Kite and his colleagues found.”
New evidence of deep groundwater on Mars, March 2019
“In mid-2018, researchers supported by the Italian Space Agency detected the presence of a deep-water lake on Mars under its south polar ice caps. Now, researchers at the USC Arid Climate and Water Research Center (AWARE) have published a study that suggests deep groundwatercould still be active on Mars and could originate surface streams in some near-equatorial areas on Mars…The study, to be published on March 28, 2018, in Nature Geoscience, suggests that groundwater might be deeperthan previously thought in areas where such streams are observed on Mars…For Heggy, an advocate for water science and water science education in arid areas, this particular study is not about colonization. But he says these rare and puzzling water flows on Marsare of big interest to the science community.”
Official Contact Report 219, Tuesday, June 16, 1987
Billy: And how does it stand with the storms on Mars; will these also be investigated then, and will it also be discovered that there are something like flashes of lightning up there? And since we’re already at it: through the powerful flashes of lightning on the good old Earth, which shoot vertically into the air at around 100 kilometers per second, radio waves arise with such high frequencies that through these, the very sparsely settled air molecules are brought to radiating illumination. Is this a specific feature that only appears on Earth, or does this phenomenon also occur on other planets?
Quetzal: This likewise applies to other worlds, both those that are of the same nature as the Earth and those that are of a different nature.
First direct evidence of lightning on Mars detected, June 17, 2009
“In 2006, using theoretical modeling, laboratory experiments and field studies on Earth, a group of planetary scientists suggested that there was no direct evidence that lightning occurred on Mars. This new research refutes those findings…For the first time, direct evidence of lightning has been detected on Mars, say University of Michigan researchers who found signs of electrical discharges during dust storms on the Red Planet.”
Official Contact Report 59, Thursday, July 8, 1976***
Meier: Well – then your earlier answer does not exclude (the possibility) that any other life of floric or faunic form can exist there, or even does exist. You then told (me) expressly, that life does not exist there, while logically you had addressed only the human planetary life. What do you think now, Will the Americans discover low forms of life with their sonde sent to Mars?
Semjase: They will meet with surprises in many respects, as in the fact that Mars has much more water than earthly science had assumed until now. But there are also surprises in the character of the ground and the nature of the microworld. The floric and faunic world can absolutely be found on Mars when the scientific instruments of these sondes are well enough to evaluate and store the concerned results?
Meier: Then “life on Mars” could prove true for our science?
Semjase: It is in the compass of possibility, that the analyses could verify this, when the scientific instruments are good enough, because faunic and floric forms of life are existing on Mars, even though this “planet destroys other forms of life” by its contrary to life nature.
Scientists: Martian Soil May Contain Detrimental Substance, November 2008
“NASA’s Phoenix spacecraft has detected the presence of a chemically reactive salt in the Martian soil, a finding that if confirmed could make it less friendly to potential life than once believed.”
“In July 1976, the Viking 1 probe touched down on Mars and failed to find traces of life – but now, three decades later, scientists think the experiment was flawed.”
*The graphs referred to have disappeared but the points about them should still be understandable.
**Please also listen to this interview and especially the last few moments when Clyde Tombaugh, the man who discovered Pluto, in 1930, speaks about the need to be open-minded regarding things pertaining to other intelligent life in the universe.
***The only available English translation for this contact is in the Message from the Pleiades series, Volume 3, pages 122 and 123. Earlier translations, in document form, were available in the early 1980s. Due to the fact that several translations had to be made prior to this published book version, and also considering that book publishing/self-publishing in the pre-computer era was a far more time consuming process, Volume 3 was published a number of years after the translation project was undertaken.
This can also be seen in the information from Volume 1, pertaining to the copyright dates, which begin in 1979, when the translation process for the first 1,800 pages of the Contact Reports began, under the direction of Lt. Col. Wendelle Stevens (USAF) and Lee and Brit Elders.