Donate Button
Thursday, March 28, 2024

The Billy Meier UFO contacts singularly authentic ongoing for 80 years the key to our future survival

British Newspaper Publishes Billy Meier Apophis Warning

UFO contactee scooped NASA –  again – by 23 years 

The Express newspaper published this interview with me pertaining to Billy Meier’s warnings about Apophis, which he published 23 years before NASA “officially discovered” it.

Perhaps because Apophis will hit between the North Sea and the Black Sea -unless deflected as per the advice from the Plejaren – Europeans may be just a bit more concerned about it coming to their neighborhood than their American cousins.

And maybe the good folks at Asteroid Day will want to make a…T-shirt about Billy Meier now.

See also:

US GOVERNMENT CONFIRMS EXTRATERRESTRIAL UFOS

NASA Fatally Wrong about Asteroid Apophis

Harvard Prof. Avi Loeb’s Search for ET Is Over

How Did He Know BEFORE the Scientists?

Brain Damage from Space Travel and Bad Attitude

Alien Life? Look Through the Telescope, Prof. Wright

The Now Unstoppable Environmental Destruction

The now unstoppable events fulfill as they must, because of the unreasonableness of humankind for far too long. For those who wish to remain alert and clear-headed in the extremely demanding coming times, nothing is more important than learning how to think. Our thinking determines everything about how we live our lives and our thinking is what forges our destiny.

The Way to Live

Please see more books by Meier here.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

31 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Melissa Osaki

This is such fantastic news!

Arnoud Schutte

Great!

Scott Reed

Hello Michael and all. I just seen the article from Daily Express, came up on my Google news feed 11hrs ago. Good job.
Salome, Scott.

Bill

Well done, Michael!

Joseph Darmanin

Michael Horn is not a scientist.

Joseph Darmanin

You can say what you want Michael, but you are not a scientist. I have never heard you in the past call yourself a scientist because you know that you are not and you also know that the article you posted is not really accurate in describing who you are. You, Michael, are the American Media representative of the Billy Meier UFO case. Nothing more, nothing less. And that’s how the Express article you posted should have described you.

A research scientist is somebody like Marcel Vogel.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcel_Vogel

Melissa Osaki

It’s a bit patronizing that you think you know Michael better than he knows himself. Michael, who has researched the Meier case for many years, has referred to himself as a research scientist on more than one occasion, you haven’t been paying attention. I also think that Michael knows far better than you what he spends his time doing — and that’s a lot more than many other research scientists. Maybe start worrying more about the severe climate catastrophe, the monstrous overpopulation and the worldwide anarchy that is racing towards us and less about Michael’s job title.

Peter

Michael>

Actual scientist here, just to let you know that you by no standard meets any criteria pertaining to “scientist” or “research scientist”. Let me remind you that the word “research” is used differently in the scientific community to the public, just like e.g. the word “theory” is. To be a researcher you need to do more than just look stuff up on google, and you need expertise to evaluate what you find. Journalists are not researchers, bloggers are not researchers, and neither are you.

Joseph Darmanin

Michael,

Anyone can be a science researcher. But that doesn’t necessarily mean that you are a scientist researcher. These terms are rather wrong and misleading. Because people can be misled into thinking that you are a real scientist when in fact you are not. You might argue by saying that they are basically the same, but they are not. If I were to do some research in Chemistry, then would that automatically make me a Chemist? I mean a qualified Chemist? No, I don’t think so.

In my opinion, the way you have described yourself “Science Researcher” in the link you have provided “About Michael” sounds correct. But the way the author from the British tabloid express.co.uk described you as a “RESEARCH SCIENTIST” is rather wrong and misleading. Again, you might argue by telling me that they basically mean the same thing. But I beg to differ.

Don’t get me wrong. I don’t hate you. As bizarre as it might sound, I actually respect you.

Melissa Osaki

Joseph,

I’m just curious, do you think someone has to have a degree in a certain field in order to practice or contribute in said field?

What criteria are you using for the basis of your assumptions?

Matt Knight

Sorry, Michael Faraday, William Herschel, Gregor Mendel, Srinivasa Ramanujan: Peter’s decided you’re out.

“Knowledge that is acquired under compulsion obtains no hold on the mind.” ~ Plato

Xila Clark

We know that Michael Horn is an independent scientist who does not rely on grant money. Look at other so called scientists, the SETI goofs who have been listening actively for 10 years for alien noises at $10 Million per year and have heard nothing. They were given the Billy Meier information but their lack of response proves they don’t know how and cannot handle a “contact” even if it fell into their laps.

Barry Smith

it’s not about a person, it’s about the information. it’s not about labels, researcher, scientist, analyst, is irrelevant. The evolution of consciousness of the earth human being is the goal. I can see why the plejaren say it will take 800 years before we become peaceful, rational thinking human beings.

Ian Perry

MH, just ignore Joseph Darmanin. He is a nobody and likely that is not his real name.

Luis Sanchez

What would be good is too take the advice provided respectfully by Ptaah (with regards to implementing sun sail drift method) and preventing a catastrophe…time is pressing.

David R Mccrea

That’s good that a reputable journal from here printed that. At least it can inspire some to research..

Matt Knight

Here’ today’s second instalment of Michael’s interview with the Express:

express.co.uk/news/weird/1187996/Asteroid-NASA-latest-warning-news-God-of-Chaos-Apophis-update-Earth-impact-99942

Matt Knight

Welcome.

The Express is really the only UK newspaper who has stood by Brexiters through all this uncovering of how bent our EU member political system is, so really pleased they were the ones to cover this.

Xila Clark

I liked the first version better. As it’s quite obvious Elon Musk knows nothing about Apophis.
I wonder if he’s corrected the Pi calculation yet?

Joseph Darmanin

For some reason I can’t reply directly under Michael Horn’s answer to my post. But it doesn’t matter.

Michael,

A science researcher is a person who researches anything to do with science. This can mean that you are a scientist, but not necessarily. Yes, even if, as you have said, have done many years of research in science, you should not call yourself, or even allow others to call you either a scientist or a scientist researcher because people might be misled into thinking that you are actually a scientist when in fact you are not. However, on the other hand, to call yourself a “science researcher” as you have claimed in the “About Michael” link which you had provided is certainly more appropriate than how the journalist of the Express website had described you by calling you a “RESEARCH SCIENTIST” because like I have just said, it can lead people to think that you are an actual scientist when really you are not. The terms “science researcher” and “research scientist” are maybe perhaps similar to one another, but they are certainly not the same.

Melissa Osaki,

You had asked me if I think someone has to have a degree in a certain field in order to practice or contribute in said field. I think the answer is, for the most part yes because when it comes to let’s say chiropractors, dentists, medical scientists, optometrists, physicians and so forth I would expect them to have some sort of qualification to back their claims. However, on the other hand, in this case, a science researcher, which shouldn’t be confused with a research scientist, can have a certain knowledge in science, but not necessarily have the qualifications of a scientist. Also, when you think about it, the word “scientist” can be a little vague because there are obviously various types of scientists.

Again, don’t get me wrong. My intention was not to mock or ridicule Michael Horn. The problem with the Express website is that for every credible article they would publish about UFOs would then be unfortunately followed by several other articles about UFOs that are not so credible to put it mildly. But at least it is a step in the right direction for the journalist of the Express website to post information about the Billy Meier UFO case.

Matt Knight

My view is that Title doesn’t impact one’s ability to recognise, or, express the truth, so no need to claim one, or, anything else if it doesn’t fit completely, or, comfortably. Title is rarely an indicator of expertise, but, true experts do often have titles, but, nothing can supplement years of hands-on experience.

We need a few more titles / levels for this specific study described under Jschwjsch (like 50 levels down from that and keep going until you hit ‘able to breathe’) for those not liking being ‘(spiritual teaching) people’. Thought ‘people’ meant carrion-eaters, or, something anyway?

Xila Clark

Joe…in a university hospital I got more knowledge, advice and truth from a PATIENT at the hospital than all the doctors and nurses combined. I now call him Dr. John Pepper. The last Doctor I talked to told me there are no diseases that can be transferred from animals to humans. I now call her the pretend doctor who has no clue. Having a degree does not mean someone is smart.

Ian Perry

Most research scientists with titles are bought out or are too afraid to speak the truth in certain areas.