Irrefutable scientific and legal proof beyond a reasonable doubt, which means the skeptics will be baffled, attack and lie as always
NEW VIDEO!
Once again, Billy Meier has scooped the scientists with specific, prophetically accurate information.
In May, scientists analyzing images from NASA’s Cassini probe “discovered” (emphasis added):
“The giant hexagon-shaped storm raging atop Saturn’s North Pole is made out of frozen hydrocarbon ice suspended in seven hazy layers stacked on top of one another, according to a study published in Nature Communications on Friday.”
However, the fact is that the scientists didn’t “discover” anything, they merely confirmed what Billy Meier verifiably published in 1993…27 years before them:
“According to the statements of the Plejaren, the last occurrences of such white spots were ice crystal storms around 1900, then around 1870 and around 1840, 1810 and 1780, according to which it is easy to calculate that the next thrust of ice crystal storms and white spots on Saturn will take place in 1990, so the next one will be around 2020. And as the Plejaren explain, the usual norm of large white spots is to be broken, because the meteorological investigations of the Plejaren scientists have shown that besides a number of smaller ice crystal storms also a gigantic one is to be expected, which could assume gigantic dimensions.”
Original German text from 2014 Edition Existentes Leben im Universum:
Ironclad
The latest date of publication of Meier’s Existentes Leben im Universum is 2014, which is still a year prior to the “official discovery” of the theorized ice crystals and six years before the predicted gigantic ice storm would occur.
Copyright page of Existentes Leben im Universum:
Billy Meier is on record as stating that he wrote the book in 1978. Further, the translation date (of the German version of the 1993 contact) is given as October 2019, which is still before the gigantic ice crystal storm was reported, in 2020:
From Contact 246, June 19th, 1993:
It’s logical to assume that Meier indeed had the contact, and received the information, in 1978 (or earlier), since he says, “the next thrust of ice crystal storms and white spots on Saturn will take place in 1990”. And, having established an approximately 30 year cycle, Meier correctly indicates that the next one after 1990 – a gigantic one – would occur in 2020, as was recently confirmed.
So, not only does Meier accurately foretell the ice crystal storms but also that there would be one of extremely large proportions that would be outside of the norm in 2020.
This is the kind of ironclad, specific, precise, unambiguous, documented information that constitutes proof beyond a reasonable doubt, which is also easy enough for even a scientist or lawyer to understand.
However, most skeptics* either lack sufficient logical thinking abilities, or quickly override them when their rigid, religiously-tinged beliefs are crushed by such irrefutable evidence.
Why the Prophecies Will Fulfill
For those people who are now ready to join with other like-minded people, the spiritual teaching people, here’s information about our new web seminar:
If you’d like to help us promote this event please contact: support@theyfly.com
*NOTE: The Billy Meier UFO contacts have been relentlessly attacked and/or suppressed by skeptics for decades. Among them of course are Michael Shermer, CFI, Lawrence Krause, the University of Arizona, etc.
Many of the skeptics also share another distinction: they are accused of sexual misconduct, rape, abuse, etc., by a number of women, and/or systemic cover-up of the alleged behavior.
This Firebrand Atheist Was Just Fired After Allegations Of Financial Conflicts And Sexual Assault
Summarizing the Current Allegations Against Richard Carrier
Why Are Secular Skeptic Communities Failing To Address Sexual Crime?
GREAT FIND Luis Sanchez!
Thanks. Glad to help.
It’s certainly an interesting find, but, no dice on this being provably published before scientists, I’m sorry to inform.
Ptaah did say that the Coronavirus details were rare releases of info before we had ascertained those facts in contrast to their usual strict adherence to the non-interference rule, especially in regard to things that are within scientists grasps and where the necessary effort has already been made. Of course, one then has to think about how Billy could have known all the things he did each time and publish these as facts, often, just days and months after the, often-obscure, research, like the following, had been published and also account for the impossible odds of the fact that he is always proven right by later peer reviews.
Kidger, Mark (1992). “The 1990 Great White Spot of Saturn”. In Moore, Patrick (ed.). 1993 Yearbook of Astronomy. 1993 Yearbook of Astronomy. London: W.W. Norton & Company.
In summary, he found, presumably earlier than the 1993 publication date, that…
“Saturn’s usually bland atmosphere occasionally exhibits long-lived ovals and other features common on Jupiter. In 1990, the Hubble Space Telescope observed an enormous white cloud near Saturn’s equator which was not present during the Voyager encounters and in 1994 another, smaller storm was observed. The 1990 storm was an example of a Great White Spot, a unique but short-lived Saturnian phenomenon with a roughly 30-year periodicity. Previous Great White Spots were observed in 1876, 1903, 1933, and 1960, with the 1933 storm being the most famous. The careful study of these episodes reveals interesting patterns; if it holds, another storm will occur in about 2020.”
https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Saturn
Nope, we’re not talking about “white clouds” but rather ICE CRYSTALS and a specific, unusually (not normal) GIGANTIC storm. And, based on the copyright dates, as well as Meier’s language about storms that WILL occur in 1990 and 2020, he was writing from an earlier time perspective, i.e. 1978 or earlier.
Eduard provided detail of the atmospheric effects (specifically ice crystals) and conditions as well as the magnitude of the event in 2020 on Saturn with a date prior to 1990’s.
We can assume he wasm but we can’t prove that. “ICE CRYSTALS” on Saturn were known about, at least by 1979…
Sept. 4, 1979: “Like Jupiter, the largest planet, Saturn is completely enveloped in clouds in various bands of color running parallel to the equator. The clouds are ammonia ice and are mostly pale yellow.”
https://www.nytimes.com/1979/09/04/archives/saturn-discovery-and-disappointment-flight-to-saturn-discovery-and.html
In 1990, by the Hubble Space Telescope which “imaged an enormous [can we say gigantic?] white cloud near Saturn’s equator that was not present during the Voyager encounters, and in 1994 another smaller storm was observed”. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturn]
If you read Meier’s text again, it does not give a specific date for the gigantic storm, but, that “one” is “to be expected”, which could have be gleaned from the observations by Hubble and Voyager.
They knew the storm / white spot appeared in 1990 and hence why they were able to estimate the 30 year interval and the 2020 forecast.
Again, Meiersays, “…the next thrust of ice crystal storms and white spots on Saturn will take place in 1990, so the next one will be around 2020. And as the Plejaren explain, the usual norm of large white spots is to be broken, because the meteorological investigations of the Plejaren scientists have shown that besides a number of smaller ice crystal storms also a gigantic one is to be expected, which could assume gigantic dimensions.”
As mentioned, when he says the “next…will take place in 1990”, then he’s writing and projecting this from an…earlier time. He did say he wrote the book in 1978, but that also means that the Saturn information could’ve come from an even earlier contact as well. So, 1978 is the date that the book was written, if we assume that Meier was being truthful. Considering his track record, that appears to be a reasonable assumption.
And of course for the skeptics who might try to put it in doubt, then we have to ask them to establish Meier’s means, motive and opportunity, how and why he found the information and chose to create his specific, accurate statements, etc.
Hi MH Wasn`t there also a white spot just above just to the right above the red storm on Jupiter too at one time if so is or was that white spot on Jupiter also made up of ice crystals too? Thanks Salome
Again, Meier’s info about Saturn is impeccably accurate but I can only repeat my earlier posts in response to yours in terms of what we can prove, i.e., that the expected storm area was forecast by Mark Kidger in 1992/3 to occur again in 2020 and that this was calculated from the “ENORMOUS” storm observed by Hubble in 1990 that was “…not present during the Voyager encounters” [Wikipedia] from 1980 and 1981, well before the 1993 earliest publication date we can prove to a third party.
MMO arguments cannot advance this specific argument as if you believe Meier is lying then you can assume he did have possession of all that info in 1993 ad that he is making up having it in 1978, but, if you believe/know he is telling the truth then you will say he did know this in 1978 because he is truthful person and we no need to question him on this [unless you are a skeptic, which I’m not], but still have no evidence to support that in regards to this specific contact report information. Otherwise, please share the copyright date for Meier’s 1978 info?
See comment to Karl.
Thanks a lot Luis for the find of the prophecy. If you find more, let Michael Horn know about it, please!
Thank you mh.tried to go too the web support page and wasn’t able??.just wanting to help.
What web support page are you referring to?
Support @theyfly.com
Hi Daniel,
That’s an email address. Salome
Daniel – Perhaps you are looking for this web seminar page –
https://calendly.com/theyflyblog/webseminar
This page: https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Saturn as already quoted:
“The 1990 storm was an example of a Great White Spot… with a roughly 30-year periodicity. Previous Great White Spots were observed in 1876, 1903, 1933, and 1960…”
Meier’s book mentions that these “white spots” will take place in 1990. This, in fact, is what Hubble saw in 1990.
But scientists saw this storm in 1876, 1903, 1933, and 1960 and from those dates, you can see it occurs every 30 years. Hence even if you lived in the year 1933 you could predict it will happen again in approx. 1960, 1990, 2020, 2050, 2080, and so on.
So I don’t see any prediction here.
That same page says “storm with a great white spot” and Meier’s book says “white spots were ice crystal storms”, so both are talking about the same thing.
Both your and Rocky’s comments have merit course.
The key in terms of credibility is having the confirmation/evidence of the 1978 information, so that no one has to accept that Meier published the information without substantiation. I’ve written to Switzerland to try to get the info. From what I learned from Marc Juliano, this book is largely compromised of articles that Meier originally published in the Wassermanzeit, beginning back in the 1970s.
Hopefully I’ll receive the info and be able to post it. Otherwise I’ll remove the article and video.
There’s so much info that has already been corroborated that anything that can’t be needn’t be posted and act as a target for the skeptics, etc.
Great stuff MH. Hope something turns up as we just need to pre-1990 data about a 2020 forecast to then confidently say we have the weight of evidence on our side. You know, I did wonder if this Saturn info may have bee included in your ‘under the bed’ copies of CRs from the 80’s?
Hey Rocky,
I don’t think that info was in those early transcripts. I don’t have them any more but perhaps Scott baxter can take a look, as I think he still has them.
We’ll just have to see if FIGU still has them. If not, as stated, I’d remove the article/video. We aren’t lacking for evidence/proof; all that’s lacking is sufficient intelligence in most people to comprehend what has been freely and openly provided to us.
Even if you have confirmation that he wrote this stuff in 1978 it won’t matter much I think. Because this storm was already known as far back as 1876, and by the year 1960 (or before) scientists could deduce it happens every 30 years:
1876, 1903, 1933, and 1960
So I’m not surprised if someone writes that there’s going to be a storm and it happens in 1990, 2020, etc.
They could have read about this in some science journal or something. That might be unlikely but if we are to be as scientific and serious as possible we can’t just ignore that possibility.
That’s how I see it and I might be wrong of course.
This is just my opinion about this prophetic information.
I’m not a skeptic against Meier, in fact, I trust he’s telling the truth based on the other evidence especially the eyewitnesses. And I’m also learning German just to prove that.
Thanks!
Hi Karl,
It’s a point well taken. But one that is almost never contemplated is, why would a “simple” man, living in rural Switzerland in 1978, be writing about such things at that time anyway?
Those of us who are familiar with Meier’s voluminous, specific, prophetically accurate, scientific information also have the luxury of not over-focusing on information which, while accurate, may be criticized in that way. The most amazing thing is that more people aren’t absolutely amazed by the entire situation, his diverse knowledge, etc.
I agree 🙂
Hi Karl. I don’t think that’s right either. The earliest date I’ve found for when Saturn’s storms were found to have a 30-year interval is 1992, unless you can find an earlier date?
Those earlier years – 1876, 1903, 1933 – quoted by Mark Kidger in 1992 don’t hit the 30-year interval mark exactly, suggesting there was no data from the correct years 1870, 1900 and 1930 for anyone to be able to recognise that pattern yet.
With more powerful telescopes observing Saturn after the mid 20th century, the storm start date could be identified accurately as 1960, with Hubble, possibly other observations, then sealing the deal when the storm was observed to start in 1990.
I was wondering if these storms have any effect on planet Earth and the people here because Saturn’s transit through the 12 zodiac constellations takes
roughly 30 yrs.
FRAUD ALERT:
A new fake channeler bashing and trashing the Billy Meier case:
https://youtu.be/gLToELMwYAg?t=728
from 12:00 to 21:00
This fraud needs to be exposed.
Hi Greg,
I posted this:
“Another delusional fraud with ZERO evidence of anything except spreading disinformation. There are NO “Pleiadians”, as this charlatan still hasn’t learned. Of course there’s no shortage of imbeciles who will follow and believe quacks like this, now quite possibly at risk to their lives, since the COVID-19 information from the actual Plejaren has already proved to be more accurate than “official sources”. BTW, this phone mispronounces Meier’s name as “Mayer” and, while she also lies about his photographs, (among other things) she naturally has not even ONE of her own. As I said, only fools will fall for this utter garbage. Read this comment while it’s still available and, as I’ve done, take a screen shot for the record.”
If anyone has an extra minute or two, please go ahead and call this phony out, demand evidence, photos, films, predictions, etc.
She deleted your comment already. I re-posted it for you. lol
“Nothing screams fraud like deleting someone’s comment. You deleted Michael Horn’s comment because you know he’s right.
“Another delusional fraud with ZERO evidence of anything except spreading disinformation. There are NO “Pleiadians”, as this charlatan still hasn’t learned. Of course there’s no shortage of imbeciles who will follow and believe quacks like this, now quite possibly at risk to their lives, since the COVID-19 information from the actual Plejaren has already proved to be more accurate than “official sources”. BTW, this phone mispronounces Meier’s name as “Mayer” and, while she also lies about his photographs, (among other things) she naturally has not even ONE of her own. As I said, only fools will fall for this utter garbage. Read this comment while it’s still available and, as I’ve done, take a screen shot for the record.”
You have zero evidence for any of your claims, but have the nerve to make accusations about Meier, who has mountains of evidence. He not only has the evidence, but it’s been scientifically analyzed, and proven authentic, by some of the best in their fields. It’s because of people like you that some of his photo’s were stolen and altered. You can only fool people for so long with your charade because eventually, the truth will prevail.”
Thanks Melissa. I hope people will flood this cynical, profiteering fraud with comments.
You mean, 5D isn’t evidence?
I couldn’t find a website with any sort of proof that she has contact with E.T’s. The only page she has is a paypal page to receive donations.