Science researcher claims publisher of Arizona Daily Sun censored most accurate information & now responsible for 500,000 cases, 8,400 deaths in state
(RSAAPR) December 28, 2020
With COVID-19 having spread to every county in Arizona, and a 33% increase overall in cases, science researcher Michael Horn says there is evidence that it was all preventable. He claims there’s been a scandalous suppression of life-saving information by governmental and medical officials and especially one newspaper, the Arizona Daily Sun.
Horn says he began sending the most accurate COVID-19 information, from his Swiss source, on March 5, when there were only five cases in a state that now has almost 500,000 cases and over 8,400 deaths.
A record of Horn’s emails shows that, in addition to Gov. Ducey, Cara Christ, and numerous other officials, reporters Kaitlin Olson, Scott Buffon, Adrian Skabelund, Svea Conrad, editor Chris Etling and publisher Colleen Brady all received the specific, previously unknown information about how to contain and control the disease. However, according to Horn, Colleen Brady has repeatedly suppressed the information, despite its proven accuracy and publication before the CDC, WHO, etc.
“During our phone call, Ms. Brady said she relies on the CDC and WHO for her information and wasn’t going to allow our information to be published. She refused to investigate or report it. So we went from only five cases in the state to 500,000 cases and over 8,400 deaths. You need look no further than the Arizona Daily Sun to see how that occurred, the pain and suffering is on them,” said Horn.
Horn says the unheard of censorship by the newspaper not only led to a statewide catastrophe but prevented widespread media attention and scrutiny, throughout Arizona, the country and beyond, adding to the unnecessary and ever-growing toll in human lives.
“If what I’m saying now and in the coming documentary isn’t true and accurate, I expect that Ms. Brady will be suing me for defamation. So far, just like the investigation I’ve called for, that hasn’t happened yet.”
Am I a ‘conspiracy theorist’? I think it’s quite possible, maybe more than likely, that some U.S. states, supposedly represented by ‘objective’ newspaper journalism, or, more realistically, MANY U.S. states have been ‘bought’, and/or have been purposefully created to report misleading views, and/OR, have in one way or another, simply ‘sold their soul’, so-to-speak, to the highest bidder for the purposes of controlling what the public MUST consume, based on bias. Here in Canada, a country with a publicly-subsidized CBC radio /television media, supposedly ‘objective’ in whatever media is released for public consumption, it may very well be displaying similar symptoms of suppressed truths, such as what is described in this particular blog post. At this point in time, it’s awkward for me to accurately describe, as a consumer of Canadian media, but as citizens, we supposedly have a ‘safety valve’ … an avenue to communicate with what’s called a CBC ‘ombudsman’. It’s a construct that supposedly is in place for the [maintenance of Journalistic Standards and Practices / code of ethics and practice.] Speaking for myself, as a Canadian resident, I have my doubts that ‘regularity’ [of such] is as rock solid as it’s made out to be! All of what I offer here, is simply a collection of thoughts on my part, nothing more, nothing less.
The Ombudsman only cares about his cushy job, so that’s a waste of time. The CBC receives a $1.4 billion yearly subsidy from Canadian taxpayers. Canadian Media received $600 million from the federal government before the last election to ensure they didn’t dare write about this: https://buffalochronicle.com/2019/10/10/trudeau-accusor-lands-a-seven-figure-nda-to-keep-quiet-about-his-west-grey-departure/ And no one has. Days after this article was released a CBC goof interviewed the editor of the Buffalo Chronicle and there’s an article about it at the Buffalo Chronicle but not a thing at the CBC. I routinely downvote CBC’s stupid articles, it must be a shock to them that they receive more downvotes than upvotes. Apparently the CBC only has a 3% viewership, I guess the citizens have already spoken. CTV and Global are no different. They have been protecting Trudeau for the last 5 years and will continue to do so because they are paid to. It’s not a conspiracy, it’s a fact.
Michael is not the only one who sent the information to Colleen Brady.
In other news, 6.4m earthquake in Croatia, 4.6m earthquake in northern Italy, 5.7m earthquake of the coast of Oregon.
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/map/?extent=-70.49798,-255.9375&extent=79.36637,126.5625
Volcano activity around the world: Fuego volcano, Klyuchevskoy, Popocatépetl, Shiveluch, Dukono, Reventador, Sangay, Sinabung
https://www.volcanodiscovery.com/volcanoes/today.html
Wait until you see today’s blog, coming soon.
Am I a ‘conspiracy theorist’? I think it’s quite possible, maybe more than likely, that some U.S. states, supposedly represented by ‘objective’ newspaper journalism, or, more realistically, MANY U.S. states have been ‘bought’, and/or have been purposefully created to report misleading views, and/OR, have in one way or another, simply ‘sold their soul’, so-to-speak, to the highest bidder for the purposes of controlling what the public MUST consume, based on bias. Here in Canada, a country with a publicly-subsidized CBC radio /television media, supposedly ‘objective’ in whatever media is released for public consumption, it may very well be displaying similar symptoms of suppressed truths, such as what is described in this particular blog post. At this point in time, it’s awkward for me to accurately describe, as a consumer of Canadian media, but as citizens, we supposedly have a ‘safety valve’ … an avenue to communicate with what’s called a CBC ‘ombudsman’. It’s a construct that supposedly is in place for the [maintenance of Journalistic Standards and Practices / code of ethics and practice.] Speaking for myself, as a Canadian resident, I have my doubts that ‘regularity’ [of such] is as rock solid as it’s made out to be! All of what I offer here, is simply a collection of thoughts on my part, nothing more, nothing less.
The Ombudsman only cares about his cushy job, so that’s a waste of time. The CBC receives a $1.4 billion yearly subsidy from Canadian taxpayers. Canadian Media received $600 million from the federal government before the last election to ensure they didn’t dare write about this:
https://buffalochronicle.com/2019/10/10/trudeau-accusor-lands-a-seven-figure-nda-to-keep-quiet-about-his-west-grey-departure/
And no one has. Days after this article was released a CBC goof interviewed the editor of the Buffalo Chronicle and there’s an article about it at the Buffalo Chronicle but not a thing at the CBC. I routinely downvote CBC’s stupid articles, it must be a shock to them that they receive more downvotes than upvotes. Apparently the CBC only has a 3% viewership, I guess the citizens have already spoken. CTV and Global are no different. They have been protecting Trudeau for the last 5 years and will continue to do so because they are paid to. It’s not a conspiracy, it’s a fact.