Calls that Church Change Depend on Public Action

Charlatans figure it’s better to endure relatively short notoriety, than risk letting little things like integrity and honesty compel them to act accordingly

It’s interesting how words, in fact, much of our entire language has taken on some bizarre twists, corruptions and bastardizations often resulting in rendering things confusing and impotent. Speaking of impotence, I’m concerned about the stench of cowardice coming from some people involved in the UFO topic.

So blatant is their desperation that only by defaming and attacking the Billy Meier contacts do they feel they can be significant. In fact, it’s actually surprising that, at the mere mention of Meier, people like Jimmy Church suddenly lose their composure…and apparently control over certain bodily functions. Hence, if the vague rumors are true, it’s understandable that he’s sponsored by Depend® – or should be. Perhaps it’ll take some kind of public action to get him to…clean up his act and change, as the title of this article suggests.

More Skeptics Wave White Flag

Speaking of words and diapers, I invited a couple of skeptics to substantiate the attacks they made in my latest interview. Weir talking about people who are Brandon themselves as qualified investigators but who are far more concerned with promoting shills like Daniel Sheehan, and themselves, than acknowledging the truth they claim to be searching for.

But instead of doing so, it looks like they borrowed one of Church’s dependable assets and are using it to wave the white flag of surrender. Please consider that the real, underlying reason these people rather have me call them out as liars, phonies, charlatans, profiteers, etc., is they figure it’s better to endure the relatively short notoriety, than risk letting little things like integrity and honesty compel them to act accordingly.

An Interesting Politically Incorrect Coincidence

I’ve been preparing for an upcoming presentation, in which I’m going to discuss some things that are irritating about the political Left and Right. One of the things about the Left that I find particularly counterproductive is what I refer to as the new “alphabet soup” pertaining to all the pretentious and divisive, newly fabricated, politically correct, gender terminology.

While alphabet soup has long been a real thing, the term was used last century to describe various governmental agencies which, as you can read here, were created to “attempt to alleviate the disasters that faced American citizens.”

I found there’s even something called the Alphabet Soup Fallacy:

“A corrupt implicit fallacy from ethos in which a person inappropriately overuses acronyms, abbreviations, form numbers and arcane insider ‘shop talk’ primarily to prove to an audience that s/he ‘speaks their language’ and is ‘one of them’ and to shut out, confuse or impress outsiders.”

While I’ve been tempted to refer to myself as LSMFT, unfortunately the joke would be lost on the majority of people, especially the precious little snowflakes on the left, who probably don’t know that it was an acronym for, “Lucky Strike Means Fine Tobacco”, used as a slogan to promote that brand of cigarettes, beginning in 1945. I can only imagine the outrage should they realize my sarcasm and that it’s connected to…smoking, something I don’t partake in.

It also turns out another writer spoke about the word association several years before me.

But coming back to addressing this contribution to thought-control by the freed-hating Left, fortunately, it was recently addressed with sensibility and eloquence by Bernadette Brand of FIGU, in her response to a question from someone named Stefan:

“Salome Bernadette

Recently, I have been confronted with the issue of gender and gender-appropriate language through the media and now also in my company where I am employed.

Here’s what I have to say about this – please respond:

More and more, institutions such as public authorities, universities and schools, as well as companies, are being asked to use gender-appropriate language. For some years now, there has been the additional requirement to use gender-equitable language, since the gender “diverse” is now also taken into account by law in Germany and in Austria. People who see themselves as neither male nor female define themselves as ‘diverse’.

To ensure that all genders feel addressed in language use, the Binnen-I* was invented for German written language with regard to gender-appropriate language, and the colon or ‘gender asterisk’ was invented for gender-appropriate language. According to surveys, girls and women feel addressed predominantly when the words ‘employees, pupils, students, teachers, doctors, musicians, artists, actors, etc.’ are used in the plural or in the plural. Of course, this can also be historically conditioned, because without explicit mention, the female gender has always been meant; i.e. in the sense of a group of people or persons. In the German language, should the female gender be explicitly addressed in the plural with additional words such as employees, teachers, students, etc., if both genders are meant in each case?

What is to be thought of the Binnen-I, the colons and asterisks, which are built into the written language and strangely alter the typeface and make reading more difficult? It is even questionable how the whole altered typeface is to be pronounced in everyday life.

In order to avoid the indented I, the colon and the asterisk, it is also considered gender- and gender-appropriate if instead of teachers now teachers, instead of students now learners, instead of employees now employees, etc. are said. What is to be thought of this?

Feeling discriminated against or actually being discriminated against are two different factors. Can something be said about this as well?

Kind regards Stefan”

Reply:

“Salome Stefan

Thank you for your mail, which I can only confirm in terms of content.

Already in 2008 I wrote something about this in an article about the German language, when there was no talk of gender-just language at all, and already then the same could be seen as today: gender-just language goes in a completely wrong direction by focusing precisely on the gender identity of people instead of the human being and being human as such. While gender identity is an important part of any human personality, it is not a feature or quintessence of personhood, which is, after all, in some sense and to some degree gender-neutral, and which should outline the core of connectedness between people. Gendered language is therefore ignorant, stupid, and nonsensical because it divides people into groups and thus negates and divides the interconnectedness of all people. And by taking into account unimportant and mimosa-like sensitivities or by creating them in the first place and putting them in the focus, it does not connect people, but separates them in the wrong opinion, thus creating understanding and acceptance for people with other than the so-called normal gender orientation. In doing so, it achieves exactly the opposite of what it strives for. By emphasizing the separation resp. by calling attention to the natural differences, it creates new aspects and possibilities for prejudices and animosities through the language, instead of emphasizing the connecting and equal between people and putting this in the foreground, by which it goes a completely wrong and unnatural way, which instead of understanding and acceptance only evokes rejection and prejudices as well as an unnatural and inappropriate sensitivity. First and foremost, men and women are human beings, and this should actually be a matter of course, but this is no longer expressed by ‘gender-appropriate’ language, because it explicitly points out the differences by means of the indented I, gender asterisk or colon, and thus discriminates against both sexes by making the existence and the fact of another sex into a special feature, which is virtually pointed out with the index finger.

All the artificial spellings, which make the written language so unaesthetic and reader-unfriendly and which not only make the comprehensibility of the language more difficult and partly even impossible and which are also not speakable, clearly show which wrong and unnatural way, determined only by imagination and wrongly understood humanity, has been taken with it.

Just to create a connection between language per se and discrimination is fundamentally wrong and shows that behind the whole thing there is not a reality orientation and sober factual thinking, but a form of believing delusion and completely irrelevant speculative view of a so-called ‘reality’, which does not exist at all and is a pure fantasy product. Through gender-equal language, the equality and equal rights of all people are negated in a perfidious and manipulative way, instead of emphasizing them and bringing them into focus, which is what creates the sensitivities that lead people to feel completely unjustly discriminated against and to believe they can recognize discrimination where there is none.

I hope that is enough of an answer for you.

Dear greetings and stay healthy,

Bernadette”

U-A-P-K-E-Y

I don’t know the political composition of another precious group, those who consider themselves to be “experiencers”. This means they’ve supposedly had “experiences” with UFOs, meaning who-knows-what, and most likely really means that they’re fantasists, escapists, bored men and women who want to feel important, etc. In simplest terms it could mean someone who has, or thinks they have, seen a UFO, now politically correctly called UAP, or unidentified aerial phenomenon.

Not unlike the self-righteous gender re-definers, this group has a high percentage of nasty and angry people who react with, shall I say, a distinct lack of appreciation for facts and evidence, preferring instead to belong to a club that embraces goofy Mickey Mouse claims. Not surprisingly, they are among the many who populate the chat and made their comments during and after the latest interview.

New Translation

See also this new, unofficial DeepL translation, which will also contain some errors:

About side effects of Corona Vaccinations

Extract from the 772nd Contact, Friday, 30 July 2021

See also:

TO BE OF EQUAL VALUE

*The way this lunacy that has also affected the German language is explained more here.