…and they’re often the ones who think they’re the smartest
We all know that today children barely able to walk and speak are already playing with computers and even cell phones. Kids 10 years old and younger know how to operate computers but of course it doesn’t mean they understand everything that they have access to.
But willful stupidity on the part of adults who use computers is another thing. Case in point, you guessed it, the brilliant skeptics who attack the Billy Meier case. But wait, am I not talking about a real scientist, Stuart Robbins, and his sidekick, the anonymous “Nereid”, who simply also must be some credentialed scientist?
Yes, precisely. These two have raised a lot of commotion in yet another vain attempt to discredit the authenticity of the Billy Meier case, specifically his information (and my claims) pertaining to Jupiter, its rings and its moon Io. In this Orwellian doublespeak, kangaroo court spectacle, where I – and anyone else who dares try to insert reason and supporting evidence into the discussion will be told, overtly – or just by being censored – that their contributions aren’t “pertinent”.
Because these blogs can get simply too complicated, I’m going to offer a few “thinking person’s” suggestions. Then, if there’s enough interest, I’ll explain more and, perhaps, Dyson and others will chime in.
Since I am no scientist, I had to learn to think my way through the information I was finding. So, today’s suggestion is that you read the information here and notice a few things, including:
- The copyright dates on the page for A Preliminary Investigation Report
- That Wendelle Stevens had the October 19, 1978 115th Contact notes as of March 9, 1979
- His focus on the specific predictions that were contained within the 115th Contact
- The information about the two at the time still undiscovered planets beyond Pluto
- His mention of the moons of Jupiter also being in this same contact
- His specifically not referring to any information about Jupiter’s rings, Io, etc.
Now, also find the information here regarding the 10 predictions from Contact 115 that were ultimately fulfilled.
We’re going to put some pieces together using the very “common sense” that Nereid derides (hmmm, a lot of the same letters in those two words.
Now I know that there are some scientifically minded folks that read this blog and they may want to know that this has to do with answering those “tough” challenges posed by the skeptics. And they may want to know why I’m so willing to engage these obvious scientific geniuses in a true, open and very public, live debate on the Meier case and this information.
They may also perhaps wonder why the skeptics have gone to such great lengths to try to impose ridiculous restrictions on the evidence I would present.
So, please take a look at the information and the suggested points of contemplation. And see if you can start to put the pieces of the puzzle together yourself.
And please also review Dyson’s truly brilliant contributions, which are deservedly thus referred to, as they explain many things in detail that the skeptics are simply too stupid and inept to have found and for considered themselves, as well as information pertinent to putting the puzzle pieces together.