UPDATE May 31, 2014: Here’s another prediction of the upcoming L.A. quake that’s close to the same overall window as Tony Vasquez has stated.
UPDATE April 7, 2014: While most of the information pertaining to the coming earthquakes centers around Billy Meier’s predictions and astrological information, I think that information like this, which appears to be updated regularly at Suspicious0bservers may also be of interest. Perhaps the more scientifically minded among us will comment as to why, or why not, this information may be credible.
UPDATE: July 14, 2015: Please also see this link.
——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————–
As you may imagine, in light of all of the recent earthquake action, some of which has already been quite severe, I asked Billy Meier to comment on information published on one of my blogs pertaining specifically to information posted by Tony Vasquez about a specific window of time in which Tony foresees a mega-quake hitting the Los Angeles area.
In my question to him, knowing that Billy usually doesn’t respond to such requests, I stated the following:
“What may be different now than even some years ago is that more people have come to accept Billy’s authenticity and respect his information. So if he says something like, ‘That astrology information is all foolish nonsense.’ it will relieve some people of the imminent concern…but it doesn’t negate the underlying advice to start moving away from the coasts. It’s up to the individual. And some people may think it won’t happen in their lifetime.
I just received the following response, forwarded to me by Christian Frehner:
“Billy said that he gives no specific answer to your question except that the bad happenings on the world (earthquake-wise) are now getting really worse, as can also be seen in the recent happenings (tremors) in Chile.”
I will leave it up to people to decide and/or interpret the answer for themselves. Some may say that it’s obvious – which could then be an answer itself as to what to do. Some may notice that he didn’t pointedly dismiss Tony’s information, a possibility that I suggested, and thereby also wasn’t giving people any reason to think that the information was inaccurate. Some may say that they see no answer. And then we remind them of the old saying, “No answer is often a clear answer itself.”
We will know in the very near future if the window of time that Tony predicted was accurate or not. But one thing seems more certain to me now. It is only a matter of time before Los Angeles, and other places, are hit by mega-quakes. They’re already happening “over there, to someone else”. That isn’t going to be the case much longer. For all we know, Tony’s predictions could be…late.
Please let us remember that since 1951 Billy Meier has been tirelessly trying to warn the people of Earth. And Did They Listen?
As always, self-responsibility is the order of the day.
See also: Prophecies & Predictions
To me.. Belief and knowing are different and if I gave you the impression that they are one in the same, sorry about that..
Most information I get is usually read form a book or hearing a lecture via youtube or someone has told me face to face, and if I choose to think what these sources are saying is correct, I believe it, I don’t know it, because to know something one must have an experience of their own about a certain thing..
I have experienced the Universal laws working so I know those to be true and that is a beautiful thing to observe,I have not died and come back so I can only believe there is life after death..
I know not believe that most of us humans are believing things rather then knowing them and that does not seem like the right thing to do. I use that rule and it helps me to stay grounded and it acually enables me to experience more things and that is what we should want, experiences rather then beliefs..
You are right Maurice, there is a big difference between believing and knowing. My whole life my mother had been able to feel my pain and when she died I was able to feel hers and knew that she had died because whatever she had sent me, made me know that, a pain in the base of my brain. When we arrived at the hospital she was already in a coma with little brain function and was later taken off life support and physically died. I’ve never been able to determine what that was all about and was only able to find hocus pocus and mumbo jumbo. I’ve been searching for the answer for 12 years. I found it in Billy’s material concerning the 6th and 7th Senses. Never before had I come across something so in depth and understandable and it totally made sense to me. But that seems to be the way with all of Billy’s material. So yes I do believe it because I know in my heart it’s true. Plus my mom never came to see me when she was dead so I know she is no longer living and believe me, she would have if she could 🙂
Here’s a link for you to read:
http://ca.figu.org/FIGU_Bulletin_Number_78.html
“Believing and Knowing” Those are 2 different things and yet are so close together that its hard to tell them apart..
I read things and they make sense to me so much that I know it has to be the truth, but really “I don’t know”, I’ve never experienced that.
Experience is knowing, we can never forget that..
Sorry about your Mom, it sounds like you had an experience so you can put that in the “Know” section in your mind, and thank you for the link, there’s lots of info to read..
Thank you again Sheila,I like that name,it sounds beautiful…
This may belong to this thread:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/10978030/Los-Angeles-awaits-earthquake-that-could-be-the-Big-One.html
Well….. July came and went….. no catastrophic earthquake in Los Angeles.
It is August 22, 2014 at the time of this writing…. and so far… no catastrophic earthquake in Los Angeles. And I think we’re safe for the rest of August as well.
September… October…. for the rest of 2014…. there will be no catastrophic earthquake in Los Angeles like Vasquez was talking about.
If you think about it, that’s a good thing…. no one would want him to be right.
🙂
Rina,
Due to the limitation of the blog software here, most people are no longer following older posts. I just happen to be ready to update it for “historical purposes” and noticed your post.
It is rather interesting as you post arrived 1 day before the Napa Valley (Northern California) quake.
Since you mentioned specifics, and the specifics have been updated by Tony Vasquez in the astrology post at:
https://theyflyblog.com/terrestrial-astrology-science-or-superstition/01/28/2014/comment-page-10#comments
That is the only old post that seems to be followed still by some people.
6.0 Earthquake in Northern California on 8/24
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/24/california-earthquake_n_5703959.html
6.9 Earthquake in Peru
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/usb000s5x1#summary
Thanks for putting back the “page #” buttons. That helped to locate some older posts more quickly for me.
Thanks for that go to Nate the Great, I’m clueless about how to do that stuff.
Perhaps Nate can modify the blogsite so it will show posts from the last 24-hours in “recent posts” instead of a short list, up to, say 100 posts? This way people who don’t have time to visit the site throughout the day can visit just once a day and play catch up by reading that list. 🙂
10-9-14 14:32 M7.2 – Southern East Pacific Rise
Three 6.0 or greater quakes one after another. Interesting….
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I knew it!!!! I knew this Tony character was wrong! I am a little late to the party with regards to posting about him being wrong and all. Oh well, so much for his astrological nonsense, hahahaha.
No 9.0 hit LA… my relatives, who live in LA, wrote me an email (which I just read only just a few minutes ago) chewing me out for warning them about a 9.0 earthquake hitting sometime in September 2014.
Now that nothing has happened, they’re looking at me like I cried wolf or something. 🙂
On a more positive note, i think we can all agree it is much better that Tony Vasquez was wrong… I would not have wanted him to be right.
Hey, wait a minute.. didn’t someone say he also predicted that Miley Cyrus is going to be murdered? That doesn’t sound like an astrological prediction. That sounds more like wish-fulfillment, hahaha.
Hey, Mr. Horn… I almost regret you banning Tony from this blog… you know, because if you hadn’t done that.. I would’ve LOVE to see him try to do damage control.
Billy Meier and his special friends from above know when these events will go down.. and that’s enough for me. 🙂
Rina
10-13-2014 M7.4 – Offshore El Salvador
M6.0 – COLOMBIA-ECUADOR BORDER REGION
Revised to M5.6 – COLOMBIA-ECUADOR BORDER REGION 10-20-2014 19:33:21 UTC
Please remove the last post since this overrides it. Thanks.
Hey Rob just one question
Are you trying to valididate or invalidate Tony’s prophecies or doing us a favour by being the earthquake meter?
“When you live on a round planet, there’s no choosing sides.” — WD
The information comes from USGS. Anyone can subscribe to the service. Seeing as this topic is about “The Coming Earthquakes” it might be useful to observe patterns of quakes that USGS considers significant (>=M6.0). 🙂
“Knowledge is neutral and has no bias in and of itself.” — RoK
“When you quote someone — unless that person is JFK — use that persons full name, not their initials. ” — AV
Sorry, just a little joke. I’m in a bit of a combative mood, I have been blog battling some climate change deniers for the last hour.
But I have no idea who WD and Rok are…
And are you going to be able to interpret these patterns for us???
Hi Andy,
Now that things have quieted down a bit here, I will try to answer your other question about why the initials when quoting someone back on this thread where it started … though I am completely uncertain if this entry will be seen by you, but that matters not at this point … I think it improper to leave specific questions addressed to me unanswered — as I have no way of privately emailing you a response. Once you have read the following, you may find agreement in my postponement of the response….
If you recall from my other posts before, you would know at some point (the date is irrelevant) I’ve decided not to put full name of the source of the quote. This was prompted from an introspection of another incident …
As you correctly stated, part of my reason was that “the message is more important than the messenger.” Someone a little over a year ago asked me where I got “a quote” written in poetry format (not on this blogsite) that the same person happens to agree with. I did not provide the source as it was mainly my own creation, mixed in with sayings from Lao Tse when I initially wrote it. Since I was asked, I gave the answer, and then reflected on the question. Why is it important to know where a quote is from? What motivates any person to ask this question? Do I have a strong need to know where the source is from when I am in agreement with it?
Out of those questions, the motivation was of most interest. Deep down inside I think a person is looking to revere another person, thinking that the other person better than the self, or at the very least, “worthy of associating.” Of course, upon learning of the “identity/name” of that person, if that person happens to be “Hitler,” “The Pope,” “the bum on the street,” or someone else one disagrees with intensely over “action,” “some parts of morality,” “religion,” “lifestyle,” or some other systems of prejudice, does that make the quote less agreeable?
From this introspection, I’ve decided not to provide sources of short quotes beside just the initials. The initials from my quoted sources would only serve to acknowledge that I am aware I am not the originator of it. However, what the receiver/reader of the quote thinks of me is not important. This raised a new question to me … what if someone, myself included, came up with a quote that is nearly identical to another famous/infamous quote, but that someone honestly did not know it was already said by someone else? Should we hold that person “responsible” for the apparent plagiarism? Is it everyone’s job to search diligently if someone else had said the same/similar thing before saying it? Can we assume that just because Gandhi said, “Be the change you wish to see in the world,” and everyone else after started quoting him because of his public notoriety, that this exact phrase was never mentioned by others “before” him in a smaller, perhaps “inner circle” of people? Or even by himself (in some future time) after he reincarnated — by himself/herself through some kind of impulsation from his/her own storage bank without knowing it was already said by him in a previous lifetime? Questions, questions, and more questions.
I apologize for the delay in answering you, as I was hoping that people would reflect deeply on points without being spoon-fed someone else’s introspection. After observing my own family members and others around me, it became, sadly clear, that the saying “things that which are free, has no value” is multi-dimensionally true….
Sincerely.
I think this approach is a bit presumptuous and even arrogant. If someone takes the trouble to…quote someone then it’s obviously only correct to attribute the quote.
Let’s not worry that the person who actually would like to know who the author is, is actually just a stupid, authority worshipping dolt who only is interested in the quote because some noted person said it. After all, is that why…YOU were impressed by the quote? Is it possible that other people may be equally (or even more intelligent, and/or) benefited by the quote?
You also have the choice to simply plagiarize it, not quote, etc. And of course there’s the possibility that by properly attributing the quote that the reader may find another author whose work is of interest to, or best avoided by, him.
So, I suggest not overthinking, fearing “spoon-feeding” others, or second guessing…everyone. It may actually make it easier for you to learn, and also allow others to learn whatever you may wish to teach them.
To each his/her own.
I’m not here to teach, by the way. I’m only here to share when the relevance comes up, or when I am being asked a direct question. Perhaps the difference is not obvious. 🙂
Incidentally, I have quotes from “anonymous” authors that I happen to agree with. Those will be noted as such, or as “sayings,” or something near equivalent. I also have quotes from people I don’t even know who they are, and I don’t care to find out.
“The messenger does not make Truth any more or less true than it is. It is what it is.”
This whole exercise still appears presumptuous as Michael said.
Is egoism getting in the way perhaps or can wisdom be found to just let things be and let things go sometimes.
‘Silence is golden’ om
“‘Silence is golden’ om”
And this is coming from the person who posts the most, and rarely causes a stir. What are you up to 1300 on the figu forum; and now here on TheyFly in the dozens, more or less on every blog?
Please Mr Lee. If there was ever a person on these boards who could benefit from the old adages, “less is more” or “think before you speak” or “sometimes the best answer is no answer,” etc. it would be YOU.
Cheers! 🙂
Hi Matt,
Please send me detail on where in OM “Silence is golden” is mentioned. I know this saying goes back with many roots, including Buddha, but I do not recall reading it in OM for my research project.
A search on the FIGU EN forum turns up the closest reference on a Q&A here:
http://forum.figu.org/us/messages/12/6520.html#POST21760
“…I suggest not overthinking, fearing “spoon-feeding” others…”
Michael, why are you working?! Aren’t you supposed to be on vacation? You know like reincarnation… vacating for a while to come back new and fresh?
You are wrong here, MH. People need puzzles and riddles to learn how to unlock things, thus learning to think. Any upright dolt that can fog a mirror can google a quote or something. People should be more concerned with the content, rather than the bleeping source. You should be encouraging people to see the truth AND nonsense in EVERYBODY, not just a few ‘experts.’ People NEED to be taking their own initiatives and learning to walk by themselves to see value for themselves in things; not being spoon fed with every dot connected to the treasure!
The secrets (laws and directives) of the Creation are not being spoon-fed; NO they are riddles and patterns for the thinking person to figure out. This Mission you are banging on…. it’s main goal if you are to boil it down to just one thing, it would be in my opinion… “thinking for oneself.” I am with Rob on this one. Give and make every reason to get us dolts, morons and phonies to think!!!
Cheers! 🙂
Thanks Mr. Iama,
I wish I didn’t find working so irresistible. And remember, no one is prohibited from thinking!
Thanks Anthony much appreciated.
Do let me know what your qualm is, if there is one, to the content of my post rather than how many I have clocked up that way we can get to the meat of the issue or more importantly the idea and the intention behind them.
Cheers
Hi Andy,
Not so long ago it dawned on me that it is better to leave just initials when I quote. Perhaps someone would let me know if they share this perspective, before I share the reason. The truth is, you can always find out who said it if you really tried.
As far as interpreting earthquakes go, occasionally I would offer my opinion, as a non-expert. I also look to people to offer their own interpretations. This is part of the reason for being on this blogsite community. 🙂
Rob,
If I’m not mistaken the RoK is quoting yourself, no? I think Andy was inquiring about this also.
Indeed — messages worth repeating will be repeated.
They are archived at the RoK.