UPDATE: Here’s an interesting new online news type show. A new interview with me – where I did get to express what I had to say – begins at about 59 minutes.
And now, our featured complain:
Well I almost got through my presentation for the online event but they disconnected me:
…for being politically incorrect.
In presenting the information about and from Billy Meier and the Plejaren, I firmly stated that there are no other proven UFO contactees, that those who claim to be in contact with any Pleiadians are lying and of course have the burden of proof, etc. I also managed to get in how accurate Meier’s prophecies and predictions were and how unrealistic all the New Age, escapist stuff was, etc.
I was told to “not present your beliefs only facts”. Of course this is hysterical because not a one of the other presenters have any actual facts to back up their loony claims. “New Age” censorship is alive and not so well.
So I set a rather…uncomfortable tone for the event and unfortunately I won’t be able to see the rest of it, as I the organizers of the event…disconnected me.
If anyone did record it I would be interested in seeing it myself.
Here’s some correspondence from immediately following the presentation:
…………………………………………………………………………………..
Neil,
You just did what every other intelligence group and member of the UFOCI does…you censored the information and the presentation.
Of course that means that you know better and that giving the “politically incorrect” answers isn’t allowed.
If you – and your other presenters – can’t take the heat then you have no business in the kitchen.
The real problem you are faced with – as your archives will show – is that none of your presenters will be able to present facts and not anecdotal, subjective, unsubstantiated opinions.
You’ve shot yourself in the foot…and the truth along with it. And really, you did it for popularity and…profit.
Authorized American Media Representative
The Billy Meier Contacts
…………………………………………………………………………………
Not at all Michael.
I gave everyone your email and website. We just do not feel that talking shit on everyone by name is going to help awareness spread. We aren’t censoring. We are attempting to cultivate positivity with truth… not denying the truth but approaching it from a balanced perspective. I will also give you your payment. I love what you have to offer and read and watched everything. By attempting to call people out on their own belief systems is not the way to approach a situation and spread awareness of it. Everyone for the most part was becoming closed off because of the way you were conveying you message. I apologize for what occurred and am all for informing everyone about the Billy Meier case. Another moment when you told everyone how dare you say… I feel there were times when what you said was not called for and was deregotary to the audience. I apologize for this entirely… I accept and agree with your in regards to the Billy Meier case. I am sorry that we aren’t in alignment with the way we see fit to convey it.
Neil
…………………………………………………………………………………
Neil,
The truth is harsh and you apparently misunderstand the purpose of the mission that extends back thousands of years through the prophets and the Plejaren.
We’re not concerned with people “feeling uncomfortable” about their “belief systems” being criticized. Since when was belief ever equated with truth?
I have ZERO respect for anyone’s “belief systems”…including my own. And what happens if someone just happens to…change a belief, what are we supposed to do with the one’s that they no longer respect?
This shows an utter lack of respect for people taking responsibility for determining the truth for themselves.
In fact, let me know if any of your other speakers present anything other than beliefs, even an iota of objective, verified, credible substantiation for their claims.
This is just spineless, namby-pamby, moral weakness and New Age Nazism, plain and simple. People are indeed responsible for what they say and you should have had the courage to challenge, not censor me.
MH
What are we gonna do? What should I do about this whole situation? Who will listen?
What will Michael Horn face next…
(…)
THE SILENT REVOLUTION OF TRUTH…
AS THE TIME FULLFILLS…
DID THEY LISTEN?
WHAT WILL BE NEXT? 🙁
Honestly, it’s just an indication of how dopey New Age nonsense still has traction with people in the overall UFOCI, which shows how lost people are. No different in a way than the skeptics who refuse to deal with the truth in front of their noses.
I commented, but I don’t know where my comment went…
It’s there.
You answered my question…disclosure…and then you were gone because you were not touchy/feely. I was quite disappointed that you were cut off….just when it was getting great! I agree, the ufo community tends to make a business out of their stuff. I never put together why the Billy Meier case was not always a part of the programs presented by others in the ufo community. I’ve been reading ufo materials for decades now and it’s a circus of repeats.
I appreciate your dedication to Billy Meier and look forward to more. Thank you for your presentation on the Starseed Summit.
Thanks Toni, I’m glad I got that in before they cut me off. I encourage you to share your viewpoint with the event’s organizers too.
I often refer to the UFO community and industry because that’s what it is, a disinformation, profit-oriented industry. And the touchy-feely New Age escapists want to live in their pretend little world, with liars and frauds who “channel” information from…imaginary beings. I wonder if they held the other presenters to only present facts, or was it just allowed to proceed with fantasies and fraudulent claims?
Thanks again.
Well Michael I guess Stuart Robbins didn’t approve of my comment either. I respect this blog a lot because you allow other people to confront you on this blog. I don’t know or think that you delete anyone’s comments. Seems like Mr. Robbins is running, running, running………and then there’s that ditch!
We have to keep it open and only restrict under the most extreme circumstances, i.e. like profanity, etc. Even…incoherence gets posted but there’s a limit on that too, though I haven’t found and acted on it yet.
Stuart should know that we all know he’s dodging being confronted with the truth.
Michael,
I guess it was just too much Truth being shared and not enough fantasy. If they’ve been following the way you do things why would they expect any less? I’ll be looking forward to seeing your presentation if they do post it somewhere.
That is exactly the outcome I had expected, Michael. These people are in it for the money first and foremost. They don’t care in the least about the truth.
G’Day Michael,
These circus clowns that you try to impart the truth to aren’t shooting themselves in the foot (for they may hit their wallet on the way past) , but they are shooting themselves in the face (for they may hit their brain on the follow through, hence improving on their self-inflicted lobotomy).
Can you do me a favour and ask the clowns in the future, “How much filthy lucre does it take to run the Universe?”
And one more favour, revisit Jeremia and Elia’s “PREDICTIONS” and seriously consider moving Down under!
‘Til then,
Andrew.
G’day, Mate.
You know they’ll just say it’s all about “not judging”, etc.
Good idea to consider but can ya do something about that…Vegemite stuff?
That Vegemite stuff offends even my Aussie taste buds, I much prefer Promite.
Following are three (3) sayings/statments that I have coined and hereby grant you permission [: )] to use and/or improve at your leisure:
1) I am convinced of your conviction of your self-righteousness, by your condescending sanctimoniousness.
2) It SEEMS that your purpose in life is: To see what you can get away with.
3) If my station in life is so low, then why do you feel so superior to me whilst you act beneath me.
Alternative 3) If my station in life is so low, then why do you feel so superior by putting me down.
If these only cause you to smile on the inside, I too find joy.
‘Til then,
Andrew.
I certainly appreciate your efforts Michael . That outcome is rather shocking . I would imagine by doing so they had done more damage to themselves by taking away the audiences choice and just thinking for them . Its a pretty fearful and snap reaction . I would venture to say , although they say they have read all the material on the Meiers case it seems like a contradiction . Firstly , you cannot have possibly read it all , because its all not available nor finished transpiring! But one usually plans out an event with outs for troubles . In this case since the material was not understood and based on the guidlines you were given , you have to wonder .
These days the new age movement is seemingly quest for a new place to find ones self or balance or just explore the world further . In any event the aim for peace seems to be prevalent . When you start reading Billy its sobering . Its not warm and fuzzy .
In alot of the healing facets of the new age , the accreditation is seemingly given to the one performing the healing . As we now know its really based on the seeker believing enough in the master that he finds healing within ones self by ones self . In light of this it only stands to reason the guru’s and masters’s would be uptight whenever their flames are not being fanned or in some instances their feathers being rustled .
So you were on task , and the crosshairs or the laser scope are uncomfortable . I picture one in the dark mashed in a corner with their backs to the wall with several laser dots on them , sweating profusely and shrinking as they slide down the wall covering their eyes as they cry . Nobody wants to get caught in a lie , its expensive no matter how you tally it up .
Afterwards I was thinking . If each of us could peak the interest of one new person a week on the Meiers material that would be a start . It could be an exponential growth . Also , I was thinking of strategies to do so . Matt Drudge started his massive internet news sight with a desire to do so and an E mail list . So it can be done . I use to send out teaser E mails to my friends a while back when getting into the case . For instance , I shot a few cool crop circle pics out . A few nice beam ships , the 1958 note from Billy to the world , stuff like that . A couple exchanges that mirrored current times from the contact reports . Just to pique some interest . It worked pretty good actually . I also sent alot of jokes too , jokester am I . But something to maybe work on . An approach to reach out a bit like an octopuss . ;>)
Some people (i.e. general public) are allergic to the truth and break out in delusion and idiocy. The truth is like the sun, it will ALWAYS shine behind the darkest clouds!
Way to go Michael! You are doing the right thing! The truth is the truth! Beliefs and disinformation just cloud the mission and needs to be called out. It’s people like them that start religions and we all know how well that turned out for us. You know you’re doing the right thing when everyone is trying to shut you down. Keep on keeping on, Michael!
Well okay, why not, I needed a little….challenge.
Hey Michael, I’m truely sorry things turned out the way they did, truely I am. You are a man on a mission and you stop for no walls ahead of you, which is commendable. You and many of us know the truth of the this case. I’m unclear as to why to you chose this particular venue, but nonetheless it seemed appropriate. I agree with your assertion that no Humans have been directly contacted by the Plejaren, this part I firmly recieve as fact. The part that people in general have a problem with is when they voice their experiences, many call them psychotic or somehow weak in consciousness. This may be a mistake in some instances. I’m fully aware of the charlatans and silly channelers and the like, they are clearly materially motivated. But sometimes things really do happen to people and when they feel attacked, they will either respond in kind or fall off the map. I’m here to tell you certain people DO have contacts with certain “things,” although it does not compare with Billy’s experience, at least not that I know of. Many of these experiences comprise a visual effect and a deeply unknown sense of reception that effects the individual in a profound emotional way, which of course is unexplainable. I know you are basically concerned about this case and its merits and you should be, because it is the most amazing case in history, at least our history. I don’t expect a promise from you in any way, only that you contemplate on the words of some who approach you with differing experiences and keep them in your personal thoughts. There are countless lives that have been changed in secrecy that cannot be brought to the forefront.
For those looking for MH’s recent interview — the non-cutoff one — click on the link given above, then show archives, then July 25 episode…59th minute, as mentioned.
Ouch!
How others see us, is not who we are.
We are ‘all in the same boat’.
Michael, “Stick to your phsers and don`t let those bozos turn you down,if they can`t stand the heat,tell them to just put up or get the hell out of your way! You deserve to be treated better,just tell them the truth,look what is already going on here on Earth,wars,crime, diseases,religions,politics,you name itIf these bozos can`t stand the truth,just give it to them! Sealds up and please stickto your phasers and please don`t ever give up hjope sooner or later they will all find out just who is telling the truth when ww111 hits them in the gut”!
No worries, Terry, things like this don’t get me down. Of course they don’t exactly make me feel hopeful about a segment of the population that is lost in delusional fantasies, considers no proof to be the same as mountains of it, react like trapped rats when someone offends their “beliefs” and generally wants to pull the covers over their heads.
If I hadn’t done my own, let’s call it research, beginning in 1986 for several years, into all the nonsense channeling, New Age escapism, and voluntary, self brain-washing I might have a tad more patience with this crap that’s still running today.
“I often refer to the UFO community and industry because that’s what it is, a disinformation, profit-oriented industry. And the touchy-feely New Age escapists want to live in their pretend little world, with liars and frauds who “channel” information from…imaginary beings. I wonder if they held the other presenters to only present facts, or was it just allowed to proceed with fantasies and fraudulent claims?
Thanks again.”
Did you not get paid for the event ? It is in the message you just shared. What you share is JUST opinion. Not all facts. So your gut is better than others ? You are getting paid for your time. So shouldn’t the other ” Liars and frauds ” get paid too ? YOU turn it into money but your making yours. Don’t you sell T- Shirts Mugs right on the front page of your blog ?
Are YOU gonna sensor that ? I have screenshot of it now .
I find it mildly curious that you came to comment here and actually expected your rather inane, amateurish comment to be censored. You’re obviously confused.
I’m the one who’s censored for showing what fools many people are.
You’re the guy who’s published here…so that people can see that for themselves.
Not yet but I’m told that I will. Because you are obviously unaware of many things, I’ll explain.
I do all my work voluntarily (all interviews, articles, blogs, presentations, correspondence, production and travel, etc.) and am only paid very infrequently for any interviews, etc.
I make money from the production of films, etc., which I produce at my own expense and/or risk. There is no guarantee, though I work seven days a week because it’s my chosen work and mission.
I share information based on scientifically proven, authenticated evidence and corroborated information. You really should become familiar with it before commenting.
I do have my own opinions based on not only all of the aforementioned authenticated evidence but decades of my own experience in researching, investigating, etc. – none of which you have.
Whether my opinions are valid or not, censoring them – when I’m also the only person in that event with any credible documentation, evidence, proof, research,etc. – is a sign of mental and moral weakness, belief driven intolerance for the harsh truth, infantile denial of facts as well as for the process of healthy debate, etc., etc., etc.
And now maybe you can answer a question or two for me. Just what is it about you and others that actually chooses to attack and criticize rather than first try to determine if my positions have merit?
What is it about your own thinking and perceptions that, when shown something of the magnitude of the Meier case, you don’t drop everything and rush to find out the truth about it?
Why would you instead prefer to take offense and effectively try to defend the indefensible, dopey, phony, substance less New Agey nonsense?
Does something about Billy Meier actually being the only scientifically proven UFO contactee bother you?
Lastly, why aren’t you concerned that people who can’t present anything but beliefs and tall stories are paid for doing so?
I was there. I believed ALMOST EVERY word you said. I do NOT think you should have been pulled either. BUT to assume that the “New Age” People are all proof-les is a joke too. What you present I DO BELIEVE. BUT I believe it BECA– — — USE of my GUT. NOT the “Proof” that you gave me. The PROOF you have is never going to be 100% true. Truth is only a perception. When you see a car crash, it is the SAME car crash and yet dozens of people see different TRUTHS. Your truth is NOT any better or worse than anyone else’s. I know some presenters there besides you. I follow their work. They get paid shit and mostly live off of their second job. They do their work because they have their OWN TRUTHS. What I did NOT like, wasn’t your truth. It was your disdain of others truths and the efforts they put in. When you say you are the ONLY one with truth, then you look JUST like these Christians who know it all. It is OK to say, I know this is MY TRUTH. And let others live. That is what the “new age” is about. Love and let live. Truth is all relevant guy. I could sit all day and show you evidence that what you said was false. That Billy Meier is not truth. And how would you take it ? You do NOT accept it because it is NOT your truth. THAT is why you got kicked out. Fair or not, it is. That was THEIR TRUTH.
We’re not real big on…BELIEFS,nor do we rely on our GUT for things that require that we use our…HEAD first.
Actually, I never got a chance to engage the other presenters – none of whom I referred to personally in any way – and what I actually said and stand by is that I am completely unaware of any credible evidence for any channelled information, claims of other contactees, etc., etc. Feel free to start deluging us with it all.
No, there are accepted standards of evidence, which lead to the truth. There is capital T Truth, as is found in the spiritual teaching, the laws of Creation, etc., which one must investigate for themselves. It’s quite different than subjective opinions and feelings, though in some cases they can align with the Truth. In the cases of the New Age nonsense, channeling, phony contacts, etc., those feelings, claims, wishes, delusions, etc., don’t align with the Truth.
And you still fall into the trap of justifying, even for others, that censorship is alright if people – who weren’t even being personally attacked – are “uncomfortable”, as well as incapable of presenting evidence to the contrary. So instead of beating around the bush and misrepresenting what I said, please rebut my position with actual, credible evidence.
It would also help if you familiarize yourself with all aspects of the information and evidence, as well as the spiritual teaching, in the case.
Jason,
I would LOVE to see the “evidence that what you said was false. That Billy Meier is not truth”. Just for my own personal satisfaction because honestly I’ve been waiting for someone with some certified evidence to combat this case. So please just don’t let that statement sit, act upon it and prove yourself. I’ll truly love to see you do so.
Dear Jason,
You are confusing the word ‘truth’ with ‘belief.’ People DON’T have individual truths, only beliefs. Take for example; a person has jumped from an airplane without a parachute. The truth of the matter is that this person is falling to his death. If this person was to think that he was flying, because it is his own truth, he would be wrong. The truth is the truth, (like gravity) and often what people think or perceive about a fact can be incorrect. So we say this person ‘believes’ he is flying.
I would hit the like button on that comment Anthony if only I could 🙂
This man CLEARLY, and with MUCH PROOF, has totally debunked you , IN THEIR TRUTH. So does this mean you are false ? NO. It means that you have your truth, and they have theirs. See. You have your truth, they have theirs. Live and let live guy.
Quote ” I pointed out that Meier had not put forward a single scrap of new photographic evidence in well over 25 years. Why not? I also reminded Meier and Horn that their metal alloy samples came back from the science laboratory with an official report. This report concluded that the samples were 100% terrestrial in origin, and could be very easily replicated by simply melting down some metal alloy and adding some glass, crystals and quartz. ” in article
http://www.nmsr.org/ufocomp.htm
Not at all. Meier’s photographic evidence was proved authentic. Tony’s was easily revealed to be just what it was, models, etc.
You need to learn how to…think.
Ok. Like I said. Live your truth.
And feel free to present something of substance to support your perceptions, evaluations, etc. Now that you’ve come in here flailing…back it up.
P.S. So if someone has “their truth” and that “truth” is that YOU’RE a dangerous terrorist that should be attacked, shot, etc. – does that little “live and let live” thing still apply, you know, let them have “their truth”?
Or, assuming that you are not in any way such a person, do you think that maybe you’d want the…Truth to be discovered very quickly, etc., guy?
Nonlocality of Quantum Consciousness Proven by Science
Science has proven quantum nonlocality and quantum consciousness via experiments by showing that the signals of two human brains can synchronize, even when one of the two people is sequestered inside a Faraday cage, which is impervious to electro-magnetic signals. Read what quantum physicist, Dr. Amit Goswami, wrote about one of the quantum nonlocality experiments:
“Quantum objects are able to influence one another instantly, once they interact and become correlated through quantum nonlocality…
“Grinberg, in 1993, was trying to demonstrate quantum nonlocality for two correlated brains. Two people meditate together with the intention of direct (signalless, nonlocal) communication. After twenty minutes, they are separated (while still continuing their unifying intention), placed in individual Faraday cages (electromagnetically impervious chambers), and each brain is wired up to an electroencephalogram (EEG) machine. One subject is shown a series of light flashes producing in his or her brain an electrical activity that is recorded in the EEG machine from which an “evoked potential” is extracted with the help of a computer upon subtracting the brain noise. The evoked potential is somehow found to be transferred to the other subject’s brain onto the EEG of this subject that gives (upon subtraction of noise) a transferred potential (similar to the evoked potential in phase and strength)…
“The experiment demonstrates the nonlocality of brain responses to be sure, but something even more important–nonlocality of quantum consciousness. How else to explain how the forced choice of the evoked response in one subject’s brain can lead to the free choice of an (almost) identical response in the correlated partner’s brain?”
Thanks but please respond to the points that…you made. Show me where my position was wrong and in any way deserving of censorship. And since it appears that you support the kind of claims that I said were New Age nonsense, i.e. channeling, other contacts, please present evidence for them.
So far, I don’t think any of the other speakers, who presumably make those claims, have come to complain, or offer evidence, let alone to debate me, etc.
Yes. Even if Their Truth is poisoned. YES. Let them eat themselves with Poison. They will pay for their acts eventually. Karmically they will pay it all back. So why not. “New Age” belief says all things are agreed upon. Even the “BAD” stuff. Why not let them have their truths. Hitler had his truth. And the world grew from it. It made people see what they did NOT want to be their truth. So why not ?
People can carry on about having their truths…but don’t expect me to not express my point of view, nor to accept being censored for doing so.
Just what is it that you appear to be so…sensitive about, what you do find so distressing about another human being daring to say unpopular things?
The TRUTH of mine is, I can NEVER take anyone’s truth from them. Nor would I EVER want to. If they feel me to be a terrorist and “bad man” and wish to kill me. So what ? Let them rave like lunatics. It is so far from my truth, it can not affect me.
Really? So when that person decides to act out their “truth” on you, violently, it “can not affect” you?
And, if today I was “raving like a lunatic” and it’s “so far from” your truth, and it “can not affect” you, why, I ask again, are you so distressed that I spoke “my truth”?
NEVER once did I agree with their censorship. What I DID say, coming from similar beliefs, I understand why they did. NO ONE should be censored. I agree 100% with you.
I LOVED the fact you spoke your heart. You misread all of my words. I only tell you why you were not received so well. I loved your whole presentation. I accept your truth. EVEN when you do not accept mine. 🙂 Thank you for stimulating my mind AND HEART today. I hope you do not have to go through censorship again.
I already understood why I wasn’t well received. The touchy-feely, rather spineless folks were “uncomfortable” with what I was saying, with having their beliefs threatened. And if the censorship itself helped to awaken people to the fact that they’re off in some happy New Age dream while reality is descending upon us, soon in full force, well then let ‘er rip, censor away.
As I recall Anthony claimed that the type of metal sample with all those elements was rampant in nature…but he was unable to find another one…which pretty much says it all. Now you’re saying it has to be manufactured? Well didn’t you just prove Anthony is full of crap?
If you didn`t get paid,tell you want you rmoney or else give those bozos a BIG FAT LIP1 Hell what they don`t know when a very bright flash hits them with nuclear radiation from a nuclear bomb hits ,they will ALL be dead or dying from radiation poisoning. Nuclear bombs are sovery very bright,much brighter then our own sun as Michio Kaku once stated on Coast with George Noory.
ve
Well let’s not get too grim, real life is challenging enough.
Now That we all see truth. WOW. Relax a little Terry. Thank you for this guy.
Humm… very disappointed that you were disconnected. By looking at the presenters, it was evident you were very different. One can imagine it was going to be an open conversation respecting other people’s ideas in a diverse environment. It seem to me the organizers, as you say, did not do their homework, and they must investigated more on your style and what you think about the UFO and UFOCI (I am learning!). What they were expecting from you? They could disagree but not censor you. Disconnecting you it is a clear censorship action.
Yes, in fact I had told them in advance that I would speak very frankly about the whole topic. Here I will include first my email of April 21 to them:
Hi Neil,
The presentation is called:
UFOs: What’s the Point?
In this presentation Michael Horn presents overwhelming evidence that the Billy Meier UFO case, sitll ongoing in Switzerland for over 70 years, is the only scientifically proven, UFO contact case and that it’s the real reason for the entire UFO cover-up
Michael will show that depsite any doubts or challenges, that there is zero evidence for any other claims of contacts with any extraterrestrials. Further, he will show that the actual reason for the Meier case and its spectacular, still irreproducible physical and prophetically accurate scientific information is to help us help ourselves to assure our own future survival.
Michael will also explain why the various channeled information and claims by so-called contactees, etc., is part of the deliberate disinformation promoted by the main opponents of the truth, i.e. the “UFO industry” itself.
You don’t need to believe. You need to know.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Then Neil responded on June 24:
Hi Michael.
Thank you for your email with the write up. We are presenting 5 different speakers on this webinar, who all speak on various topics. We are wondering if you can solely speak on the Billy Meier case and not mention why other speakers are incorrect in relation to your evidence. We have many beliefs and have created a platform for everyone to speak on their unique perspective. The main theme of all of or events are in relation to spirituality and empowerment. We are in alignment with the Billy Meier case; however, we wish to only provide the facts and allow our viewers to make their own informed decisions. I understand there is a lot of BS out there… we have personally viewed their videos and looked at their documentation to select them. with that being said, I understand you may have differing opinions on the information we are backing. Please let me know if this will work for you, because we truly admire your work and would love to show case it in this event, as well as future ones
Neil Gaur
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
To which I answered:
Hi Neil,
I think we have to start realizing that we are leaving the Age of Beliefs for the Age of Truth and Knowledge. It will also be helpful for you to read my latest blog, as well as many before and those yet to come. I don’t live in any kind of politically correct world and what’s unfolding in this world will make it very impractical and irrelevant to do so.
Considering that the Meier contacts are still ongoing for over 72 years, that Meier’s been the target of 22 assassination attempts, relentless attacks on his character, family, etc., how is it even possible to compare the idea, let alone the seriousness, of different “beliefs” with proven facts?
I have absolutely no problem with anyone speaking on anything, including their beliefs, but certainly the people should be willing and able to substantiate their claims for the sake of their own credibility, wouldn’t you agree?
However, if people are unable to substantiate their claims, they can still speak on whatever they wish but the one person who can substantiate their claims certainly shouldn’t be required to not make and support them. I could give a lesser care about anyone’s career, incluuding my own, when we’re talking about the most important information in human history.
The burden of proof is now on anyone who makes extraordinary claims. It’s simply not possible for me to worry about people being uncomfortable about making and supporting their claims. I suggest that everyone make their presentations and let the audience decide what they find credible.
Best,
MH
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Neil again:
I agree and am saying what you are saying. I am simply asking you to speak facts and not about individuals or organizations. We don’t like to make attacks in our events. Instead stay on topic. We want all the facts and to let the audience decide… But not any claims about other individuals. Are you able to make a presentation soley on the facts?
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
And me again:
Sure, but part of the facts is that so far no one has submitted credible, factually substantiated evidence to back up any claims of extraterrestrial contacts other than Meier. There’s nothing in my promo or in my presentation that is actually attacking anyone. To be clear, stating that there’s credible no evidence to supoort other claims that I’ve ever seen, or that has been sent to me, etc., isn’t attacking anyone.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
So when asked about disclosure, when it will come, etc., I pointed out that people like Stephen Greer and Stephen Bassett, two of the biggest so-called advocates of it, along with the (unnamed) members of the UFOCI, were the biggest opponents and suppressors of the Meier case and the truth.
I actually didn’t mention any of the other speakers by name, I simply posed challenges to the idea that people believe information from sources that can’t substantiate their claims, etc.
Regardless of my own personal experiences, which are mine and mine alone, I would have to agree with Michael. He really has tirelessly tried to conform to logic and the scientific method and the “new age movement” has quelled yet again an essential truth of our day. I may have been slightly brash in previous comments regarding Michael but that is only due to my personal experiences and how I discerned them, but that in no way detracts from the absolute factual information being offered via Michael. He has followed all the appropriate scientific protocols and continues to present infallible evidence. I think this is a good test for the new agers to take, and they will, for many of them really are seeking truth. Some common awareness is in the process of occurring and we’re all trying to find the truth, although some people seem to be deliberately left searching where as others seem to grasp certain concepts with relative ease. I’m just glad it is happening, although at a slightly acute angle. This will turn out to be more of a success than failure, it always does.