Donate Button
Thursday, May 2, 2024

The Billy Meier UFO contacts singularly authentic ongoing for 80 years the key to our future survival

Will Elon Musk’s Satellites Be Used to Bio-Chip Everyone?

Exploring the possibility that Billy Meier’s 1958 prophecy could be dangerously close to fulfilling  

While many people may be led to believe that Elon Musk’s mega-satellite extravaganza is intended to be some boon to online-hungry human beings, Billy Meier was told that something else, a bit more unpleasant, if not nefarious, may actually be in the works.

In 1958, Meier published 162 specific, mainly dire, warnings  in his Warning to All the Governments of Europe/Prophecies and Predictions.

Of particular interest is number 40., which in part says:

the citizens of all member countries will finally be brought under total control through biometric data in identification devices and in the form of small data chips in the head or body inserted in a ‘biometric identification system that would be overseen and controlled through a ‘central data bank’ whereby finally the whereabouts of every human can be exactly determined to the meter. “

Nano Na-Nu?

Recently, a friend of mine from the aerospace industry gave me some interesting information. Referring to what was recently published by Meier about nanoparticles in vaccines, he said he was introduced to similar ultrafine, nano-like chips to track specialized equipment – and people – in around 2001. This process, which was used for security purposes and for equipment that was unlawfully removed from a designated location – and which could also identify the perpetrator – is now…old technology from 20 years ago.

The chip-particles, he was introduced to were not in an injectable serum or vaccine form but were ultra-fine, like dust, and required a special instrument to detect them. They were made of a material that would adhere to most materials without an adhesive, not so much as what science calls physisorption, but more like a van der Waals force that we all have experienced, like an electrostatic attractive force commonly called Coulomb’s law.
These dust-chips were not like the visible stain detection powder applied to objects that were likely to be stolen or tampered with. Some of them also had a slight radioactive signature and also had extremely small cyphers on them.
My friend pointed out that it was first back in 1985 that electron beam lithography was used by Thomas Newman at Stanford University to reproduce the first page of A Tale of Two Cities, by Charles Dickens, on a microscopic scale. The accomplishment won him the Feynman Prize, a challenge set in 1959 to produce written text at 1/25,000 scale.
Knowing how unlimited the dark and delusional urge to do harm, rather than good, is among the aggressively-minded, perhaps the agenda and outcome warned about by Meier and the Plejaren could be what is suggested above: The use of the satellites, in conjunction with nanoparticles in vaccines to effect the bio-chipping and control of the masses.
Should this not be the case, don’t worry that we’ve given anyone a new idea. More than likely it was long ago considered and dismissed because they came up with something even more deadly to life, love, peace, freedom and harmony.
Transparent?
Of course, to the fans of the anti-human transhumanism persuasion, this might sound like a really great idea, a way to skip the bothersome process of actually becoming a true, self-responsible human being.
They may even welcome being permanently online, wired for sound and video, and getting endless entertainment-on-demand…or perhaps becoming the endless entrainment for those who can pull their electronic strings. New Agers could bypass going into 5D and simply merge with 5G.
Think of the endless possibilities.
Should it really be the case, I guess we could consider Elon Musk as the parent apparent of transhumanism. Who knew there’d be yet another good reason to avoid the vaccines?
See also:
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

32 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Greg Dougall

I heard a story about the military using experimental chips injected into some soldiers in order to track them via satellite. This was operational at least a few years before 1995.

Ella

And in distant times………………………………….hope rises forth through the darkest of shadows on humanity’s journey.

Sheila Clark
Patrick Parker

Good question Michael! Thanks for pointing out this possible threat. Effectively, and if Starlink Internet access was just part of the project and the other thousands satellites be used to worldwide track RFID-chipped soon (2028?) to be implanted human-beings of US/EU/CH ? Craziness, irrationality, absurdness, illogical and destructing behaviors of world leaders have no limits particularly when seeing what happened in the last few months concerning the Corona vax/pass/tracking absurdity.

Shiva Balu

People spying on others even before the days of CCTV and GPS etc did not have pleasant reasons or endings ..Intrusion of privacy iby biochipping is a total and unnecessary waste of time and money and the government s intention to keep people anxious robbing their liberty.
While overpopulation
facilitates this kind of decisions the possible biochipping is one more reason to reject the vaccines.

Matt lee

Great insight with high probable chance of being right Michael.
One thing that has stuck with me about what Billy stated was the possibility of Dark Order using deliberately engineered pandemic to exterminate the overpopulated masses in the future.
He could’ve been referring to this one by the looks of it with the possibility of 500 million people dying from this pandemic underscoring that point but not exactly in the way that most of us thought.
They may just be conveniently exploiting an accidentally caused pandemic but making it much worse with a contrived means through genetically engineered vaccines with a kill switch to exterminate the masses which by definition conforms with what Billy and the plejaren stated.
I can’t think of any time in human history where so much enthusiasm and emphasis was placed on innoculating the mases than now which makes you even more suspicious of the manufacturer’s intentions beyond profit motives.
Why didn’t they react the same for SARS.

Robert Stewart

Hi Michael,

Thanks for the post.

The obvious weapon regarding the satellites is the microwave beam they all have.

If you consider the 5G technology of beamforming. So two sets of waves radiate out and where they meet creates peaks and troughs in an amplifying way. This creates a strong signal to your phone from two weaker signals.

Now if there are a number of satellites. Can the same principles not provide a stronger microwave beam. Rather than the 40 Watts of a 5G repeater the satellite is 1000s of Watts. I suspect I haven’t found a rating.

So roll forward a few years. Your foe is carrying a mobile giving a position to within a few meters. Twenty satellites can hit that position. A campaign of pulses can be sent over time gradually debilitating your foe. However you can also have an accident hackers, sun spots etc. It was 30 minutes before we realised unfortunately a plane went down or a building buzzed.

With the chips I doubt they need to stoop so low. The current trend of booster vaccination and testing need only continue for another year. Sprinkle in some restrictions and privilege. The masses will form queues to have the chip. The filthy unchipped getting the blame for any outbreak or loss of test data.

Now it may well be a question about which friendly corporation gets to fit the chip. Then we may well start to find other experiments. The small print can kill..

Salome

Tom Ebner

The implanted chip on pigs, so they can play video games, also come to mind. Those could have special features for paying customers, with access to the internet. For everybody else, the standard one. Just think of how easy it would be for the killer robots to find anyone.

rose ann

i dont understand how the starlink satellites can biochip us from above with all the atmospheric barriers and other factors therein?

i think the title is misleading.

Melissa Osaki

Hi Rose,

How is a question misleading?

But to answer your question, the Starlink wouldn’t actually be doing the bio-chipping.

“small data chips in the head or body inserted in a ‘biometric identification system‘ that would be overseen and controlled through a ‘central data bank’ whereby finally the whereabouts of every human can be exactly determined to the meter.”

“The use of the satellites, in conjunction with nanoparticles in vaccines to effect the bio-chipping and control of the masses.”

Stuart Brutsche

Melissa,

I don’t doubt the intent of the powers that be to carry out such a plan, i.e. if if it was actually feasible to implant a functional nano-scale device that could return a signal to a satellite network, they would do so.

However there are some fundamental issues associated with this hypothesis.

For one, nanoparticles are relatively trivial to produce. Functional nano-scale devices are not, assuming they could someday be powered, posses sensors, act as a unit, etc. Referencing top-down approaches such as lithography and also the general tendency of nanoparticles to adhere to surfaces (i.e., interact with the surface energy of the substrate) does not to me make that jump in logic (and a very big jump this would have to be).

Also, the Starlink network is currently situated at 550km altitude and equipped with 5kW transmitters. Even if appropriate nano-scale devices did exist, the very low incident PFD of the starlink network (maximum ~ 10’s to 100’s of picowatts/cm2, by my calculation) implies that currently existing ground based 5g technology would be far more suited to the task. In either case a power source located in proximity (within a few meters) of the person would possibly still be required to power the devices.

It seems to me that much larger, more powerful, and lower altitude Starlink satellites would be required for this plan to come to fruition. This probably explains line 58 of CR 733, where Ptaah states that for the time being, the Starlink network really does just provide internet.

58. “To this I also explained that for the time being this satellite network is to provide wide area fast and at the same time low cost internet access in the USA, but that if the whole enterprise can be carried through to the end and completed to the last, something very unpleasant will result from it, as I explained to you privately on 1 January 2017.”

Considering Musk’s intent of spinning off Starlink as a separate company (https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/24/elon-musk-says-starlink-will-ipo-when-cash-flow-is-more-predictable.html), it seems that the actual identity of the masterminds of this plan might also as of yet unknown.

In any case I think there are lots of things to watch for regarding this danger- genuinely viable nano-scale devices, larger and lower flying starlink satellites, and unknown future ownership of the network, among other things.

Melissa Osaki

Hi Stuart,

It’ll definitely be interesting to see what method and excuse they use. I don’t doubt that it’s been in the works for quite some time, but the how, what and when remains to be seen.

I think Michael is on the right track even though it may be a few years down the road. We’ll have to watch for the indicators and see how it plays out.

rose ann

hi, it was misleading to me since i took it in its literal sense. excuse me but english is just my 2nd language. thanks for clearing it up.

on the otherhand, elon musk no doubt is a genuine person. same way i see mr. edward. at first read, the title is kind of attacking him. his products may surely be used by others against us but his objectives are for the advancement of our people. he doesnt give bad apples to our world.

Melissa Osaki

Hi Rose,

I understand why you took it as misleading, but to me, a question isn’t a fact, or a piece of data, it’s simply a request for more information.

I don’t think it matters how Elon Musk really thinks and feels because he won’t have a say in the matter if those at the top want to use his satellites for more nefarious purposes. If you haven’t already done so, you may want to look at Billy and Ptaah’s discussion from contact 733.

Ptaah:
“To this I also explained that for the time being this satellite network is to provide wide area fast and at the same time low cost internet access in the USA, but that if the whole enterprise can be carried through to the end and completed to the last, something very unpleasant will result from it, as I explained to you privately on 1 January 2017.

Billy:
“according to SpaceX boss Elon Musk, 500 satellites should be enough for this project launched in the USA. However, between 800 and 1200 satellites should then be enough to make worldwide coverage possible. Each additional satellite, however, would enable an even greater bandwidth for individual internet connection, which means, in other words, that the more satellites would be launched into the sky and orbit, the faster a connection to this satellite network would be for individual users. On the one hand, this is what is said, but on the other hand, something else. So here, too, as with the Corona plague, lies are being told, including that in summer 2020 the number of 500 satellites will be reached and will be sufficient to start operations in the USA and to provide Americans with high-performance internet connections from space.”

salini

do you think the satellites can be used to stage an alien invasion hologram type thing? It’s smart for the true elites who are private not publicly known to use ‘Elon musks’ satellites to do what they want because if they did it privately sending up so many something would be suspecious. But if something bad happens Elon gets the blame.

Melissa Osaki

The thought did cross my mind, but I don’t enough about the capabilities of his satellites to give a good answer. It seems that the unpleasantness they are referring to would affect the whole planet, so it has to be something massive in scale that would either scare, startle or hurt people. I guess it will remain a mystery for now because Billy was adamant about remaining quiet for his own security.

Stuart Brutsche

The article Billy is referencing here appears to be the best he could find on (non-english) wiki.

“A satellite is supposed to require a long preparation time, about 14 months from order to positioning in space, and the high technical effort and the production of the satellite is supposed to cost more than 100 million euros. SpaceX is supposed to be able to launch 26 or 27 satellites per rocket, whereby the requested number of satellites per orbital plane always corresponds to a multiple of 25 – whatever this somehow crazy statement is supposed to mean. In addition, there is always a spare satellite, whereby 27 satellites with a mass of 386 kilograms each are supposed to weigh just under 10.5 tonnes, which is just under the maximum load capacity of the currently largest payload adapter in the Falcon 9 in the rocket’s User Guide – where it is also not explained what this explanation, which is incomprehensible to a layman, is all about.

In total, 177 launches would cost 11 billion US dollars if sold at the commercial launch price of a Falcon 9 rocket that could not be reused (62 million US dollars per launch). By reusing the first stage of the rocket, the commercial price of a Falcon 9 rocket is expected to drop by about ⅓ to around 40 million US dollars. Future development stages of the Falcon 9 should be able to be reused more frequently, which would then bring the cost down even further. So that is what I could find on Wikipedia on the internet.

However, as far as the other numerous objects are concerned, some of which are circling around in the night sky in completely different orbits and even join the satellite convoys in isolated cases, these have nothing to do with these SpaceX satellites.

Ptaah:
59. That is correct, but you know that …
60. All that should be said here is what can be said, consequently, we should …

Billy: That’s good, I just wanted to clarify things a little bit, although it has not been said what the final unpleasantness will be with regard to the satellite programme, or what will happen behind the other …, well, what we will just keep quiet about.”

Also most of the information presented in that passage is incorrect, since F9 Starlink launches have been flying with 60 satellites at a time since May 2019 (almost a full year before this contact). These can be seen (and counted) in pictures of the integration facility and during deployment. So I am not sure from which article (ostensibly in German?) the numbers referenced by Billy came from. And Falcon’s have been flying nearly once a week this year, already. “Future development stages” of the Falcon have been flying since 2018, so I suspect the article that Billy is referencing must have been substantially out of date. Understandable since he seems like a busy fellow.

Unfortunately, Ptaah’s clarification in line 59 appears to have been cut out. I also noticed that the term “SpaceX satellites” was afterwards replaced by “the satellite program”- which might allude to the future spinning off of the Starlink program from SpaceX itself. Like him or not, Musk’s primary goals do not appear to be situated in low earth orbit.

Ptaah’s earlier statement from line 58: ” …but that if the whole enterprise can be carried through to the end and completed to the last, something very unpleasant will result from it…” seems to me to simultaneously vague and oddly specific- “very unpleasant” can mean a lot of things, There could be unforeseen consequences from that many satellites, or something else we haven’t thought of yet.

And you are correct Melissa, no matter what us Earth Humans produce, it will be abused in some fashion for the foreseeable future. The only other mention of internet satellites I’ve found, CR 466, also mentions this in regards to Terahertz radiation and associated technology, starting after line 21.

http://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_Meier/Contact_Report_466

Interestingly, the inevitability of the internet being carried predominantly through satellite is also mentioned.

Andrew Grimshaw
Ned Duke

ELAM!

Andrew Grimshaw

G’Day Ned,
This term is new to me, are you referring to Musk’s personnal life?
https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-relationships-2017-11?r=AU&IR=T
He has five sons from his first marriage and has been divorced three times

Terry Carch

Question? Why would anyone want to do harm to human being using Bio-Chips to track us all down and tell us what to do and what not to do? “We are human beings with free will! We have a right to our own bodies and to do just what we want to do with our very own lives and not to be treated like babies and children, as a matter of fact I won`t even use wifi on my computer and the internet! I use the airplane mode and VPN which issafwe than gering your brain scambled with wifi and 5G!

Terry Carch

Also Bio-Chipping human beings against their free will is “immoral and ethical!!!”

Gregory Dougall

You’ve already been chipped.
It’s just on the outside for now.
I posted this on my blog on August 18, 2019:

“I’ve just received my new card in the mail. It must be better because they are telling me it’s better (even though it only does the exact same thing as my current card). Back in the stone age, a few years ago, you actually had to swipe your [chipless] debit or credit card though a little slot in order to use it. Then they chipped almost all the cards, so now you have to stick it in a little pocket and wait an eternity for the transaction to process. But no more! Without me even asking for it, the company who owns Marshall’s / TJ Maxx, sent me a “contactless” card. All you have to do is wave it like a magic wand, and you get a bill in the mail a few weeks later. The weird thing is, I don’t want anything to do with wireless devices or radio waves near my body. Another thing that struck me as odd: My current card doesn’t expire for more than 2 years from now. So I cut up the new card and they can track where my plastic garbage goes. Maybe it will end up here. (link) Make no mistake. We’ve already been biochipped, just on the outside.”
——————————————

So what has a chip? Credit and Debit cards? Driver’s license? Passport? Car keys? Car? Cell phone? Laptop? Anything with wifi?

Terry Carch

How about my chipped Hercules card I use when I do my laundry once a week or there-abouts etc since I lie in a co-op apartment etc?

Sheila Clark

Hi Pawel, you might want to research this:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Particle_beam
“In all cases, the beam is steered with dipole magnets and focused with quadrupole magnets. With the end goal of reaching the desired position and beam spot size in the experiment.”
“The general idea of such weaponry is to hit a target object with a stream of accelerated particles with high kinetic energy, which is then transferred to the molecules of the target. The power needed to project a high-powered beam of this kind surpasses the production capabilities of any standard battlefield powerplant,[3] thus such weapons are not anticipated to be produced in the foreseeable future.”

https://www.dutchsinse.com/9-16-2020-dept-of-defense-secretary-mark-esper-confirms-directed-energy-weapons-dew-in-space/
It appears we’ve already reached the “foreseeable future”.

Brigitte de Roch

It’s really too bad Michael that NONE of the 1,500 astronomers to whom you sent Billy’s information did not respond to you. Soon, they may be getting themselves out of job because apparently with the 1,300 satellites launched (soon to be 13,000) they are no longer able to observe the dark sky. “The effect of the satellite constellations is like painting graffiti on a World Heritage Site. But not just graffiti in one particular location — graffiti that can be seen the world over”.

https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/22396388/space-x-elon-musk-starlink-too-bright-astronomy-stars-pollution

What are they going to do now?

Melissa Osaki

Hi Brigitte, I’m not surprised by their lack of response. Many scientists are only trained like animals to respond and perform certain tricks.

Now they may have the opportunity to see how well those tricks work for them under different condtions.

Greg Dougall

“BIG tech companies could end up meddling with our minds and manipulating our decisions and views within ten years, leading brain scientists have warned.

A group of top American neuroscientists are demanding regulation before technology takes the next step – with brain chips potentially replacing smart phones as our main access to the internet.”

https://www.the-sun.com/news/us-news/3288870/big-tech-control-minds-warning-2/

Shiva Balu

The Giza intelligence did the same ,driving masses towards religious faith and beiief ,even before the days of brain chips.
Corporates and the military always meddle with others decision to their advantage.
I guess with brain chips ,it would be easier.