It would be wiser to heed the warnings freely given, which ask nothing of anyone other than that they protect themselves and others from this very deadly, ongoing pandemic
My most recent blog was actually in error, because an article with the information about 4/5 of COVID deaths are among the vaccinated, in the same publication I quoted, came out the day before Billy Meier published his information. So, let’s use the opportunity to look deeper into when Meier was actually first warning about the vaccines and their often deadly consequences. This will also address the often repeated claim by skeptics that he’s backdated his information.
When Meier was 10 years old, in 1947, he published information pertaining to the situation with the deadly vaccines and the vaccinated not being protected from the variants of the disease:
“Also the vaccines themselves, which will be untried and untested and will without knowledge of the peoples be trialled on the abundant masses of overpopulation, will cause many deaths. The vaccinated ones will not be protected from further infections by the constantly newly emerging new variations of the epidemic, just as they will also continue to be impulse carriers of the epidemic virus and spread the epidemic to others. They will become less ill from further variations but eventually still in a dangerous way and, however, it will take a long time before this truth will be recognised by the scientific community.”
Young Meier also foretold the discrimination against the unvaccinated and gave the first hints as to who the hatred-filled American was. However, while he didn’t mention a figure, such as 4/5, and while the article containing the 1947 predictions was first published on August 26, 2021, certainly skeptics will try to discredit it.
So, let’s point them to the articles containing even earlier information about the danger of these vaccines.
This article, published on July 29, 2021, links to information ultimately said to have been published in 1952. But, before going there, it may be good to look at the information verifiably published in April and May of 2021, as well in October 2017.
And now let’s go to the article that contains the 1952 information. It was verifiably published in November 2020, still many…months before these very issues regarding the vaccines began to be discussed. And this is what Billy Meier stated then:
“This is done in such a way that whole parts of the population are abused as guinea pigs, without their knowledge that they have to serve as test figures, whereby they are not informed about the fact that they can suffer severe late effects with regard to health damages already after the vaccinations and after a recovery already after 2 or 3 months and possibly have to struggle with it for the rest of their lives. This on the one hand, while on the other hand by these forthcoming actions also influences on the virus arise and this can lead to a new transformation, as you clearly said. And this in addition to what we talked about the other day, that – since now the plague is in full swing and moreover since July a new dangerous mutation is on the way, but if I remember correctly what Sfath and I observed at that time – it was the month of December that was talked about when the new species was discovered.”
So, Meier also appears to be saying that the vaccines themselves can lead to a new variant. Here is another paragraph, again, allegedly originally from 1952:
“Eduard, however, was very attentive and listened to my explanations with great concentration, as always, so that he put everything into his memory and will always have it present. He was particularly affected when we observed that various vaccinated persons … became ill for a short or long time due to vaccines, suffered or partly died, which will be so when the time comes. We also observed how, despite vaccination, various people fell ill with the Corona epidemic, others did not become immune and consequently, despite vaccination, carried on the epidemic virus and infected many other people. This, as it also turned out, what we also found out, that in case of people suffering from the virus, despite one or more correctly performed tests, no positive results will be obtained, although they were virus infected and consequently transmitted the epidemic to other people.”
This paragraph also mentions those who may have been/be asymptomatic. and/or who didn’t/don’t test positive. We first published the comprehensive warnings, on February 25, 2020 and published this information in November 2020.
Featured prominently in the February 25 information was:
- Spread by asymptomatic people; through air, breath, clothing, etc.
You’ll notice, in our New Online COVID Test, that item number 6. shows that the CDC didn’t confirm asymptomatic spreaders until June 30, 2020.
Of additional importance is number 3., pertaining to airborne transmission. You’ll see that Meier published it in two different February articles, one on the 3rd and the other the 25th, while the NIAID announced it on March 17.
Meier’s information about spread on clothing, surfaces, on February 25th, also precedes the May 17 information by the CDC.
So, while I apologize for the error in the December 18 blog, I truly hope that, in addition to trying to play gotcha and hunt for evidence that Billy Meier is trying to “fool” people, those who still spend their time doing so will stop fooling…themselves.
It would be wiser to heed the warnings freely given, and which ask nothing of anyone other than that they protect themselves and others from this very deadly, ongoing pandemic.
In that light please take this to heart as well:
787th Contact: Stupidity Kills, Not Wearing a Mask Is Stupid
For those who only trust the mainstream news, perhaps you’ll understand just how painfully accurate Billy Meier’s information has been all along, about the disease and the vaxtastxophe, when you read this from…CNN:
Cornell University reports more than 900 Covid-19 cases this week. Many are Omicron variant cases in fully vaccinated students
That’s OK; we all make mistakes…That is part of being human!
Making the same mistakes; again and again (and again?)…Or lifetime after lifetime. That is what we strive to avoid.
As for the skeptics. There’s a principle called Logical Super -Imposition:
Simply Compare what Billy writes; with any other source…And you have your Answer….
-rex resa
Good work sir,
We all make mistakes, but good work always mends any tears in the fabric it weaves.
Much love
That info from the UKHSA’s report, “COVID-19 vaccine surveillance report – Week 50” was actually published earlier in Week 45 on Nov 11th 2021:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1032859/Vaccine_surveillance_report_-_week_45.pdf
Click on “+ show all updates” under “Details” for publication dates: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/covid-19-vaccine-weekly-surveillance-reports
I don’t think 17 days will change anything. The big picture is being overlooked by folks who can’t see the forest for the trees.
Your response isn’t congruent with highlighting the words “the day before” in this blog and claiming that the publication dates are the basis of “stunning” information in previous blog. Count the trees: It might not be a forest.
Perhaps you’re unfamiliar with…links in articles, which is exactly what is the case with “the day before”.
You may also be unfamiliar with the voluminous amount of specific, error-free prophetic and other information, provided by Billy Meier and the Plejaren to the people of earth, in the hope that they/we are capable of, and interested in, doing the necessary amount of study to perceive both its accuracy and their intention to help us not destroy ourselves.
Perhaps you can show us something from before February 2021, February 2020, or 1952. It’s definitely the forest. Sometimes it takes getting away from the computer to see it in all its beauty.
Perhaps you are unfamiliar with… your own use of links, which are always used to illustrate argumentative positions you are taking, some of which are correct and provable and some of which aren’t, as is the case here and that you seem to want to be very defensive about.
In this context, it’s obvious you were making the point that being published “the day before” would undermine the counter argument from the sceptic that this information was available before Meier’s contact, as we can all work out that Meier, being a Swiss resident, could not have had access to that information if it had been published “the day before”, but the fact is that it wasn’t: It had been published weeks before. That only means you were wrong, not Meier.
Widening the argument to whole-case whataboutisms, when Meier never made the claims you are making on his behalf, suggests you feel uncomfortable with having your errors (not Meier’s) pointed out and are more invested in projecting an idea about yourself as a know-it-all than accepting simple facts.
It’s interesting that you only reply to me when Michael was the one to challenge your link theory. You’re wrong of course, but you obviously haven’t read the Meier material, or you would know that. Meier has always published before any of the official sources. It’s not that hard to see or figure out. Maybe you also think he has the luck of a leprechaun?
https://theyflyblog.com/2020/09/new-online-covid-19-test/
What happened to people’s ability to THINK? It saddens me.
Melissa, It’s not interesting if I just hit reply without realising who it would be replying to.
“You’re wrong of course, but you obviously haven’t read the Meier material, or you would know that”
Please can you explain, and putting all the non-related info aside for a moment, how I was wrong in my comment, e.g., is there an even earlier publication date for the 4/5s info I missed?
“Meier has always published before any of the official sources.”
That’s false, biased and unscientific. Meier doesn’t support that position at all.
I suggest looking at the bigger picture and going back to the beginning of the Meier material.
At no point does Mr Meier say that he is right about everything and that he always publishes info before official sources, so maybe follow your own advice.
Please show me where I said that Meier stated that he is always right and always publishes before official sources. Maybe try some reading comprehension. He has published the COVID info before official sources. That’s a simple fact that can’t be disputed.
SMH. That was a direct quote from your earlier post: “Meier has always published before any of the official sources”.
Please show me where I said that Meier stated that he is always right and always publishes before official sources.
Maybe try some reading comprehension.
How sneaky and dishonest you are. Its no wonder Flenko didnt reply to you, your dishonesty is brazenly apparrent and one wonders how stupid you must be, to believe youre taken seriously by anyone reading this exchange. Poor thing.
Where is the sneaky exchange? Are you talking about the exchange that is obviously open to the public? Maybe you didn’t understand what was said? If you need some clarification, don’t hesitate to ask.
Actually, you’re not accurately describing what I intended and thought was clear.
Let me spell it out. I stated that my previous blog was in error, I linked to it to be clear as to which blog I was talking about.
The skeptic pointed out that the information had been published earlier, before Meier, so I was in error for relying on the information I received and not checking it out first. It was late at night for me and because Meier does have an impeccable track record with prophecies and predictions, including with the COVID info, I leapt to a wrong conclusion.
At no time did I say that Meier made the claim. Once I learned of the other, earlier article, I set about to compose the new blog. I wasn’t uncomfortable doing that because everyone makes mistakes AND it gave me the opportunity to include all the other info.
You seem to not care about the real matter, i.e. the information, warnings, etc., with all their life-saving information.
Since you want to attribute motives to me, I’ll offer this. You appear to be exactly the kind of petty, unforgiving, envious person who wants to fault others but who is too stupid (unthinking) to grasp the entirety of the matter and who projects their own questionable character on others who freely admit their errors and seek to correct them.
Considering how much you may have to do on your own character, motives, etc., perhaps get moving on that. The new blog holds much information of real value, if that’s what you’re really interested in.
MH. Fair enough re. the first part (However, “the day before” info is still there on the blog and incorrect, but anyway…).
“You seem to not care about the real matter, i.e. the information, warnings, etc., with all their life-saving information”
Please point me to where I addressed all the information from Meier in my comment? Mr Meier did not make those false claims, you did.
“Since you want to attribute motives to me, I’ll offer this. You appear to be exactly the kind of petty, unforgiving, envious person who wants to fault others but who is too stupid (unthinking) to grasp the entirety of the matter and who projects their own questionable character on others who freely admit their errors and seek to correct them.”
Disagree. Errors are just errors. No sin has been committed that requires forgiveness. I was just pointing out a simple fact. It won’t happen again if that’s the way you deal with it.
Sorry, still don’t get what’s bugging you.
So:
I left the blog with the incorrect info up and linked to it so peopple would know what I was referencing in the newer blog.
Meier’s info wasn’t incorrect. I was incorrect in the blog stating he published it first, as already acknowledged.
However, the real fact is that this disease, the vaccines and consequences of both have long been foretold by Meier. The essence and numerous specifics, which keep on being corroborated.
I suggest contemplating the importance of that reality.
Nothing is bugging me. You don’t seem to want to acknowledged that the 4/5s info was available “weeks before” and not “the day before” Meier’s contact report as you claim in the subsequent correction and not sure why that would be such an overblown issue, but anyway…
As the claim in the previous blog, which you, rightly, acknowledge was incorrect in this subsequent blog, was about showing first copyright for the 4/5s info, I took that to mean you were actually interested in first copyright for that specific info, not the apparent devastation associated with your referencing error feature. Clearly, the real point is how we are all going to get over your error and the implications for the world and conspiracy theories, etc. Anyway…
We all appreciate your work Micheal .It was a small error which was pointed out and which you set right in another blog. I don’t understand why this is blown out of proportion and which infact helps to strengthen the Meir case. Also please do not feel bad that an error was made that it had to be pointed out.(Flenko doesn’t seem to be
a skeptic) We all DO see the forest for the trees.
Sadly, many don’t see the forest.
I think FLenko originally was just pointing out that the information didn’t come out “the day before”, the information came out even earlier.
Thus “the day before” shouldn’t be a link, because “the day before” was incorrect.
It was just pointing out a correction to the correction, while not blaming Michael for doing it on purpose as he was already admitting to a mistake.
And not blaming Billy for claiming he published the 4/5 information before anyone else.
Because only Michael mistakenly claimed that, not Billy.
I have no prior experience reading FLenko’s posts, but I don’t think he was looking for a fight.
He or she was probably pretty surprised that he or she was being attacked for pointing out a correction to the correction that was still needed.
That’s my take from the outside looking in.
Hi Tim,
I was rushing to straighten out the error and it seems that after I posted the blog, there was more info about it even earlier. I left things as they were because anything earlier invalidated my claim, i.e. whether one day or three weeks.
I may be missing something here but I actually don’t understand what the fuss is.
Let me state this again and then anyone who doesn’t understand it can hopefully let me know why:
As soon as I realized there was an earlier publication, which I initially thought was a day before Meier’s article, I posted the blog. I basically left it at that and didn’t bother to go farther because, as I said above, it was sufficient that there was the one-day earlier article to invalidate my claim. Since I’ve been publishing so much of Meier’s information that is always published before any “official sources”, as soon as I realized I was in error by citing his recent information, I owed it to everyone to point out my error as soon as possible. And quite obviously Meier himself wasn’t making any such claims.
As for Ms. Clow’s comments, it’s a shame that she feels that way about the participants in the blog. She’s also clearly unaware that I subscribe to the idea that blame and praise are two sides of the same coin and that…blame (being in error) is the one that should warrant one’s attention. Having one’s errors pointed out, and then acting to correct them, is better for one’s evolution that focusing on any praise.
In this case, I acted in accordance with that concept.
If it’s still unclear, let me know.
Further, I think Melissa does an excellent job keeping the blog running and responding to questions, challenges, etc. The purpose here is to present Billy Meier’s information, research on, and comments about, it, etc., and to promote discussion among readers for the benefit of all. So, the strange comments about “forum overlords” and “teacher’s pet” are strange fantasies from Ms. Clow.
Youre quite astute and probably wasting your time here. This blog is not for independent thinkers. Its packed with bleeting fauning sheep full of praise for their forum overlords.
If you step out of line the hords will descend upon you, each trying to out do the other in order to be teachers pet.
Your critique of Horn is right on the money.
Michael is one of the smartest and most stand-up men I know. And if he makes a mistake, he will be the first to admit it. However, you still can’t see the forest for the trees because you are too busy chasing a conspiracy theory. Nothing can change the fact that Meier has published a mountain of verifiable evidence long before official sources. No one is that lucky.
Maybe you should look again from the very beginning of the Meier material. I would hate to think that you are just another stupid (unthinking) brain-amputee, but it’s not looking too good for you. If you need some help, there are many folks who are willing to guide you with the Meier material. If you read it in-depth, it’s impossible to come away with your illogical thinking. My advice has always been to start from the very beginning and come back when you have a better understanding.
Oh my! Permit me to help take an empty saucepan from a hot element, to have some fun with published song lyrics, inspired by the above exchange, and, by the adage, “can’t see the forest for the trees”
‘The Trees’
Rush [yep, same musician trio with song lyrics such as: “And the men who hold high places, must be the ones who start to mold a new mentality closer to the heart . . .”
“There is unrest in the forest
There is trouble with the trees
For the maples want more sunlight
And the oaks ignore their pleas
The trouble with the maples
And they’re quite convinced they’re right
They say the oaks are just too lofty
And they grab up all the light
But the oaks can’t help their feelings
If they like the way they’re made
And they wonder why the maples
Can’t be happy in their shade
There is trouble in the forest
And the creatures all have fled
As the maples scream “Oppression”
And the oaks just shake their heads
So the maples formed a union
And demanded equal rights
“The oaks are just too greedy
We will make them give us light”
Now there’s no more oak oppression
For they passed a noble law
And the trees are all kept equal
By hatchet, axe, and saw.”
Ha! I love it!! Thanks, John.
John Webster – that is very good! I like this poem!!!
Salome
Diane Grebe
“too busy chasing a conspiracy theory” Eh? What are you talking about? Anyway….
“In this context, it’s obvious you were making the point that being published “the day before” would undermine the counter argument from the sceptic that this information was available before Meier’s contact, as we can all work out that Meier, being a Swiss In this context, it’s obvious you were making the point that being published “the day before” would undermine the counter argument from the sceptic that this information was available before Meier’s contact, as we can all work out that Meier, being a Swiss resident, could not have had access to that information if it had been published “the day before”, but the fact is that it wasn’t: It had been published weeks before.”
———————-
I replied to Michael with my view of how things played out.
After rereading the above it seems FLenko also made a mistake in his or her projection of Michael’s motives for highlighting “the day before.”
Is my assessment correct, FLenko?
Everybody makes mistakes.
That’s how we learn.
Hi Tim, I think that’s a fair assessment. It was a bit of a trial to get a simple point across and makes the “Welcome all challenges” message seem a bit hollow: ‘Will come hard at all challengers’ would be more accurate.
However, Michael is very careful with his blogs and 99.9% of them are very insightful and well written but there are some traits that I find annoying and contradictory in him and others here sometimes, like the care he takes in his own blogs but then the lack of attention to detail in checking out other things he’s not personally invested in that are important to uncovering facts about this case and I wonder if there’s a link to seeking personal praise or recognition, i.e., indicating that a general roundedness may be lacking that is often a trait I’ve found in people who are not used to working in traditional jobs, taking orders, or for others. I would recommend anyone who hates traditional work to get a job and work at at, even if for a day a week, e.g., ranting at someone doing a simple desk job to organise your presentation suggests a disconnect to that reality. As important as you may see this case, it’s not the be all and end all. No information is a replacement for actual experience and if Billy hadn’t have been here, the truth will still out as it cannot be stopped.
Over defensiveness can also be learned behaviour, dealing with dangerous people or arguments over many years where an attack of any threat becomes the knee-jerk response, but a true person should never become closed to different people or afraid to swim in the shallow or deep end of ideas and stop exploring. For me, there is much in this information that I understand, but sometimes only on a shallow level, not fully and other things I fully understand, already knew as well as new things that spark the imagination but’s this information is not to save humanity or assure it’s future survival as Michael often states and the Plejaren addressed that in a recent blog and clarified that it was incorrect to think of their work and the mission that way and I think may even explain some of the more negative things that happened here as it can be damaging to have that idea and can lead to extreme actions or ideas or an over defensiveness and overzealousness about the information.
You do realize that it wasn’t a challenge, right? It was a simple error that Michael readily admitted to. Being the well-rounded person that he is, he’s allowed to make mistakes. It may be best to take the advice from others here and drop it. This is hardly something that needs psychoanalyzed. You seem to be very critical of what you think Michael should and shouldn’t be doing. What are you doing to help humanity besides judging someone unjustly over an error?
Regarding: “As important as you may see this case, it’s not the be all and end all. No information is a replacement for actual experience and if Billy hadn’t have been here, the truth will still out as it cannot be stopped.”
What is of comparable importance to the people of this world?
What “experience” would supplant/replace the information provided to humankind, on every conceivable problem and situation we face?
Since it’s said that this mission has been ongoing for at least 13,500 years, with the people of earth still being collectively as dumb as dirt, why do you say “if Billy hadn’t been here, etc.” that “the truth will still out”?
just how, when, and how long would it take for that to occur without the current contactee/prophet and the extraterrestrials assisting him?
“What “experience” would supplant/replace the information provided to humankind, on every conceivable problem and situation we face? / just how, when, and how long would it take for that to occur without the current contactee/prophet and the extraterrestrials assisting him?”
Simple answer: Merlin or Myrddin or others, but probably a longer or shorter time. It’s not unprecedented for others to be contacted by the Plejaren to share the teaching, or parts of it, or for this to be linked to consciously, apparently, and published in parts, even if piecemeal and with many bumps due our religions and power greed.
Meier is certainly the only one with the characteristics and “experience” (see, even he needed that experience too) to spread the information now and certainly has done this with aplomb and success and brought this to us much faster than would have happened otherwise, but, often, according to the info, the speed, urgency, factor is not the result of anything naturally evolving Earthlings have had anything to do with, despite the often-seeming keenness to blame Earth people for everything over people with more technological power, but has been due our cousins out in the Universe’s comings and doings, if that is, in fact, a thing, which we are yet to discover.
Maybe, Earth humans aren’t going to need a wave-emitting orb to force them to change, or maybe they eventually will but we would then not be the only ones who needed that then, would we?
In which case and either way, there are two additional examples of alternative types of experience which could replace the info as we would develop, according to the information and if correct and if we don’t wipe ourselves out, the tech to eventually be like the Plejaren ourselves and go looking amongst the stars for those who have the ability to teach or to teach ourselves.
Not going to respond to Melissa. Don’t need to justify myself to anyone, but I have wondered a few times how difficult would it be, really, for intelligence services to infiltrate theyfly just to keep an eye and start saying things like we shouldn’t think deeper (psychoanalyze) unless she’s specifically interested, and then throw compliments to throw the scent off. Not very.
So my suggestion still stands. Everyone who’s only used to working for themselves, has loads of money, or is very comfortably off, and is intimately working with this material: Go get a ordinary job (even one day a week). What, scared? There’s a risk you could become an unbearable arse and start hassling ordinary people for your own shortcomings.
Thanks for your answers, responses, opinions and conjecture.
As for your “suggestion” to people, your arrogance and presumptuousness reveal your own inadequacies. It’s ok, as we’ve recently seen, everyone makes mistakes, commits errors. Let’s see how quickly you admit, and seek to remedy, yours.
Throwing the scent off? Is that like James Bond type stuff? Or how about not having a scent at all?
I’m also pretty sure most people here already have a job or two, so I’m not sure why you keep throwing that around. Maybe you should get back on the trail of the scent and scope out the weasel. I’m sure the cute little guy is around here somewhere.
Right, Melissa! I sense the weasel is perfectly tucked into its natural environment . . maybe ‘the forest’ . . not too far behind ‘the trees’. [(-;]
Ope. You got me! Bermunda must have been sifting through British health report PDFs in her space ship for the last several months, looking for information to plagiarize and pass along to Billy.
The bigger picture still eludes the so-called skeptics , in the 1940’s and early 1950’s Billy foretold – a lung disease released through the fault of CHINA. He foretold 2 wars with Iraq the second led by the son of a former president. Years before actual events happen, Billy knew about MUFON before it was created. He foretold credit cards, cell phones, internet, climate change, aids, crystal meth, immigration crisis, etc, etc . The modern day scribes and pharasees cannot see the forest for the trees. How many predictions has Lue gotten right ? Or Steven Greer ? Or Tom Delong ? Where is their sound recordings ? metal samples ? Laser holes ? Can they start the day clean shaven and 30 minutes later return with a six month beard ? If I can find the truth , everyone can . I am starting to think they prefer conflict over harmony .
Great comment!
I emailed a friend that news article and got this back as a response.
Deaths: if you look at the death rate, mostly the vaccine helps persons under the age of 60 years.
It makes it look like the death rates are the same e.g., age 40-49 deaths per unvaccinated 51 vs vaccinated 46, age 50-59 deaths per unvaccinated 108 vs vaccinated 121, look like about half and half deaths for vaccinated vs unvaccinated. But this article failed to state that about 90% of people over 18 are fully vaccinated. The unvaccinated only make up 10% of the population. So the deaths in the unvaccinated were 9 times higher
Tell your friend who are classified as “unvaccinated”. First jabbers are classified as unvaccinated. Second jabbers are classified as unvaccinated unless 14 days have passed after vaccination. This is a fact.
My question would be have they now included double vaxxed as “unvaccinated” until they get their booster?
A lot of the stats and studies are falsified
Michael Horn is doing great work by putting this information out there. So are several other individuals. I would say that is what our task is, so don’t get too worked up over the sceptics and/or naysayers. Just keep putting the info out there while we are able to do that.
Shallow 6.2 magnitude earthquake, off Northern California coast, felt from Oregon to San Francisco. Depth of 9.3 km.
Watch out San Francisco, California may be next? Keep eyes and ears peeled for San Francisco?
My God! Let dead dogs lie (no pun intended). Michael freely admitted his mistake. Damn, let it go! Is it productive to continue this? What does this guy Flenko want? Perhaps an affadavit?
Lol, Good one Mark!
I have a hard time grasping how billy with his old energy spirite fell to addiction for cigars for so long…someone like him you would think couldnt and wouldnt get addictions.. secondly that he believed in a religious god as young …. I guess every material human can succum to it.