CR 870: Earth-foreigners, Giza Renegades, Hitler-like Netanyahu, and the Origin of the SARS Coronavirus

Eight Hundred Seventieth Contact
Tuesday, 14th November 2023, 19:16 hrs

Billy:
Ah, you are back safe and sound, my friend. It took a little longer than you told me, but it is a good thing. But better later than never. So welcome back, Quetzal.

Quetzal:
Greetings also, Eduard, dear friend. Yes, it took a little longer because more has come in than was intended.

Billy:
That can happen, because things do not always run like clockwork. But before we turn to our conversation, I would like to show you a few things here on the computer that I think you will find interesting. Look here, this article I got from Michael, and this one I got from Bernadette:

Public Conversation between Amy Goodman
of ‘Democracy Now’ and General Wesley Clark

on 2nd March 2007, (0:00-2:04 minutes)

Wesley Clark: Right after 9/11 (2001), about ten days after 9/11, I walked through the Pentagon and I saw Secretary of Defence Rumsfeld and his deputy Wolfowitz.

I went down the stairs to greet some of the people, the Joint Chiefs of Staff people who used to work for me, and one of the generals called me and said, sir, you need to come talk to me. I said you are too busy. He said no, no. He said we have made the decision that we are going to war with Iraq.

That was on or around the 20th of September. I said we are going to war with Iraq, why? He said, I do not know, and further, they probably do not know what else to do.

So I said, well, have they found anything and gathered intelligence linking Saddam to al-Qaeda? He said, no, no. He said there is nothing new. They just made the decision to go to war against Iraq, he said. I guess it is like we do not know what to do about terrorists, but we have a good military and we can overthrow governments, and he went on to say, I guess when the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem must look like a nail to pound on. I came back to him a few weeks later and by that time we were bombing in Iraq and Afghanistan and I said do we still want to go to war with Iraq and he said oh, it is worse than that. He reached on his desk and picked up a piece of paper and he explained, I just got this from upstairs from the office from a meeting with the Secretary of Defence and he explained this is a memo (reminder letter) describing how we are going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and finally Iran.

I said, is it (the memo) classified? He said, yes, sir.

I said, do not show it to me. And I saw him again a year ago (2006) or so and I said to him, do you remember what we talked about? He said, I am sorry, sir, I did not show you the memo. I really did not show it to you.

Amy Goodman: Excuse me, what was his name?

Wesley Clark: I am not going to tell you his name.

Amy Goodman: Name the countries again.

Wesley Clark: We start with Iraq, then Syria and Lebanon, then Libya, then Somalia and Sudan and then back to Iran.

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Knt3rKTqCk&t=178s

Dear FIGU mailing list colleagues 😉
Regarding the mailing list, I wanted to ask which MEPs you are sending this to?

I assume that each of us looks after our own country or our own people in the country, i.e. Switzerland, Germany and Austria respectively.

I myself always send out to …

• Federal government in Austria (all government departments)
• Members of the National Council in Austria
• Members of the EU: Delegation Austria
• Ukrainian and Russian embassies in Austria, Germany and Switzerland
• In BCC to many journalists, TV and newspaper media
• In BCC to other people in the public who think “FIGU-like”; I also always have Sahra Wagenknecht and her staff on my BBC mailing list

For example, do you also send out to MEPs from other (non-German-speaking) countries?

If we send out a little overlap, that is probably not a problem. The only question is whether we leave out any people who we should have with us …

For sceptical people who are unlikely to open a PDF attachment straight away, I also always provide an excerpt directly in the email. I select/copy certain parts of the text from the PDF, remove the line breaks in an editor using a macro and then insert the text passages (usually two) directly into the email. How might you actually do that?

Stefan Hahnekamp

Salome Bernadette

A few days ago, I read in the 868th contact report that Billy received a death threat via a phone call at 22:40 hrs on the 26th of October.

Threatening to kill a truly wise human being who stands up for the truth corresponds to absolute impudence and cowardice!

I have often read on the FIGU website and in the contact reports that you run a night watch. I would like to volunteer my services for a night watch at least once a month at the weekend if you need me.

Best regards and Salome

Quetzal:
Interesting, I did not know about that. But it really is a good thing.

Billy:
So these are the letters. This one, this has happened 2x more since then, where I have been rung out of bed at 2 o’clock in the morning.

Quetzal:
I guess it never ends.

Billy:
Exactly, that is what I also think. Unfortunately, there are always crazy people around. And with regard to the primitive accusations, I think they came about with the guy from Zurich because he’s mad as hell at me because I told him the truth about Darwin’s tweaking, which he did not like and he took it the wrong way. But the other thing: Bernadette also thinks we are doing something smart regarding the distribution of contact reports to governments.

Quetzal:
That is also correct.

Billy:
Yes, I know that, and the reports are also read by various governments, as evidenced by the responses, most of which are gratifying. In between, there is probably a response from those involved in the government who grumble because they do not agree that the truth is being told.

Quetzal:
I do not think that can be changed. But what you mentioned earlier about the phone calls, I should inform you that the interception of your phone calls with the help of the Sonaer has been perfected to such an extent that …

Billy:
We should not really talk about that, because here I have another question that I actually want to answer during our conversation, so that for once it is clear what is fact. Here, have a read.

Quetzal:
… You are really not a clairvoyant. What is with this lowly intelligent question?

Billy:
Exactly – as it says here. Someone wants to know how to become a clairvoyant like me. In my opinion, I think it is necessary to state that I do not involve myself in clairvoyance and I am not a so-called clairvoyant, therefore I cannot invent anything clairvoyant for the future. My predictions, which I have given and mentioned since I was a boy, are based on the fact that, together with Sfath, I have seen and experienced certain events and happenings in the future and therefore know that they will inevitably happen and therefore come true. I already made such predictions when I was a boy and thus only said what Sfath and I experienced in the future. I have also mentioned various things that threaten to happen but can be changed and avoided if behaviour is changed for the better. So all in all, it is clear that I have nothing to do with clairvoyance, although it should also be said that clairvoyance is usually based on fraud and deception, especially in the case of those ‘clairvoyant talents’ who offer themselves in the newspapers with clairvoyant abilities – usually for money – and then fantasise about things from heaven that are so ashen and stupid that even chickens have to laugh at them. This, while however the psychic believers are so lowly intelligent and simple-minded that they believe these ‘psychic’ lies and scams. However, this ‘clairvoyance’ has nothing to do with when an honest human being has a true vision through some energetic circumstances and events and sees what will happen in the future sooner or later. However, this human being will most certainly never allow himself to be paid for revealing what the vision has revealed to him. This is also the case with the warning that this and that will be the result and the goal if people continue to think or act in the same wrong manner. Such a human being also has nothing to do with clairvoyance, but only with clear logic, clear understanding and clear reason. And it is safe to say that a human being who announces something threatening in this wise is also not clairvoyant and will never be paid for his or her advice. Only ‘clairvoyants’, who are truly liars and deceivers, allow themselves to be paid for their lies and deceptions conjured up from the heavens, and moreover it is people who look for the lowly intelligent and simple-minded in newspapers and magazines or on the Internet who believe their ‘clairvoyant’ nonsense, their lies, deceptions and fantasies and pay dearly for them.

So that is one thing, and at the beginning of the year Arlion told me via Ptaah that … But that is a good thing, because nothing can be spied on, tapped and recorded that should not reach their ears. These … also have nothing to do with anything relating to Switzerland or its security or anything else. It is simply the case that everything relating to this is purely a private matter that is nobody’s business and should therefore also remain private. That is why Arlion and his crew have also set it up so that … not even … can be registered. But that is really all we should talk about.

Quetzal:
I suppose that is correct, but perhaps it was good that I brought this up after all, because … … ….

Billy:
No, that really cannot be changed, because the spying also just goes on, we have realised that again in the last few days, because … But that is not the stuff we want to talk about. It will probably just go on like this for as long as I am still alive. But that is something we should not really talk about, because there are other things that need to be clarified. For example, I was approached about this and asked about the theatre with the Giza twerps …

Quetzal:
… unfortunately I cannot say anything about that, because I do not know any facts about it. But if you want to talk about it, then I am a good listener and I will learn more about what happened here on Earth. But what we have been talking about at the moment, it is probably good if you recall some of this and write it down at least in a wise way so that some of the … can think about it. Maybe then it might help to finally put things to rest.

Billy:
But you are probably waiting in vain. But perhaps it is good if I recall and list some things.

Quetzal:
I also think so. But what can you tell me about everything you mentioned earlier?

Billy:
I can only tell you what I inevitably know from Semjase and Ptaah, so to speak, because I do not usually ask for more details. It is not my place to want to know something if it does not directly affect me. I have kept it that way all my life and it has been good for me. What I do not know does not make me hot, and it is also the case that I am told yes if something is important to me. Therefore, I am also only aware that all of the Giza twerps were renegades from somewhere in your Federation. They were just small groups of criminals, like we also have on Earth. But the twerps ran away in your universe, came to Earth and settled here. Your security forces then ‘collected’ them and brought them back, where they were settled somewhere on an uninhabited planet and deprived of all the means that would have given them the opportunity to fly out into space again. There was also this Ashtar Sheran guy and co, but he was from the DAL universe, but he and his people behaved in the same manner as the others, whose 5 or 6 such groups were. Somehow it happened and resulted that an Earthling learnt Ashtar Sheran’s name – how, I really do not know – who then worked around with it, but how, what and where, I also do not know. Perhaps the name was invented by the Earthling person, dreamt up or otherwise managed, I do not know. Somehow the name became known, as various things or even a story were also attributed to it. But that is all I know about it. As you Plejaren have found out – others than you – all these groups have done unpleasant work on Earth and caused damage, but they had no contact or connection with Earthlings. All these groups also kept their distance from the foreigners, against whom they also shielded themselves and did not want to get in their way. But that was probably for security reasons, because the foreigners probably would not have handled them with kid gloves. In any case – and I know this – none of these little guys are still in this universe resp. in our cosmos. And I do not know why it was tolerated for so long that these groups could remain here on Earth and then also get up to their confusing mischief. Only then, when they began to cause damage in the Centre and even endangered my life, did you Plejaren intervene and catch the twerps and take them back to the Ankar universe. Here on Earth, the security forces wait just as long for action to be taken, at least when it comes to large organised crime groups or criminal organisations. Small criminals, on the other hand, are apprehended very quickly, so the saying reveals a certain truth when it is said: “The little ones get caught, but the big ones are let go.” This is what needs to be said, and the following is also relevant: when it is said that emigrants are from the Plejaren or the Federation, they did not emigrate to this universe, but remained resident in the Ankar universe. This is also the case when artificial dimensional gates were created in the ‘vicinity’ of us in solar systems known here. Only beyond our Milky Way have some from your Federation settled, but I have only minimal knowledge about this, except that this was hundreds of thousands of years ago. And another question related to the UFOs of foreigners, but I have nothing to say about them because they do not belong to the Plejaren and therefore also have no connection with you. There is probably nothing more to explain with regard to what has been said. But if you want to know more, it is up to you to ask Semjase or Ptaah about it.

Quetzal:
I will do that. But now I want to fill you in on what I am seeing in the Middle East….

Billy:
… we do not really want to talk about that anymore.

Quetzal:
I guess we have, and it is true, but I still want to say something, because it gives me a lot to think about. This Netanyahu is no better than Adolf Hitler was, as I have learnt from records of what happened around him during the World War from 1939 to 1945. I also see that in the overall reporting of the war between Israel and Hamas, everything is held in the same manner as it is in the Ukraine war, namely that there is only one-sided and biased reporting. With regard to Ukraine, only the entire actions of the Ukrainian army are publicised by the media, but not what is happening on the Russian side. Similarly, in the Middle East, only Israel is reported on, but not the other side, which means that the media also takes sides here, and only in favour of Israel, which also rages much worse than the attackers. I also saw how Israeli military personnel hid firearms etc. in a hospital, which they then allegedly found and had photographed by war journalists, with the untruthful claim that these weapons had been stored there by the other side. And that atrocities were also committed by the Israeli army, as well as by the attackers, which you have observed together with me, so you know what is really happening. And it continues to happen on a large scale, with the ‘great leader’ Netanyahu, as a paragon of Adolf Hitler, fuelling the whole thing in full hatred. That is what corresponds to the truth.

Billy:
That is probably the case, besides, we behave neutrally, consequently we do not favour one party or the other, also not when we tell the truth regarding a person, his behaviour and actions etc.. And telling the truth about a human being does not mean that we are therefore biased, but that we are only speaking the effective truth, that which we have established very precisely ourselves and which does not contain any assumptions, but only the pure truth. And it is precisely this truth that does not suit one or the other partisan, which is why this human being then unleashes accusations and insults and invents slander. Especially those who are biased towards Ukraine and Russia, who supply weapons to Zelensky and thus do not put an end to the war, do not want to see this, just as they invite Russia to continue the damned war. And the same is happening in the Middle East, where Israel is exalted to the heavens and Hamas is wished the devil on its neck. These misguided in their partisan thinking do not want to admit the truth and are only on the side of Israel, only see it and defend it with their big mouths. This is despite the fact that the Israeli military is just as atrociously murderous and destructive as Hamas. This happens in exactly the same manner on both sides, while on this side only Hamas is cheered with pro and hurrah and huge demonstrations are organised in a completely fanatical manner. But when these partisans hear what you have just said, it is determined by their low intelligence and unreasonableness and will certainly be interpreted as anti-Semitism again, even though these idiots do not even know what the whole concept is all about. I said as much in our last recalled and written conversation. But, as it is, no matter how much is said and explained to the Earthlings, it is not thought about and consequently also not understood. When talking and explaining something, it is the case that something is only understood completely correctly if everything is thought through precisely, impartially and according to correctness and recognised as it truly is, and it is only through this learning that understanding effectively comes about. There is really no other way, as it is also with every thing that is said or explained, that it must first be seen and experienced before a decision can be made about its falsity or reality. It therefore means that something can only be effectively recognised as truth when everything has been worked through by faith-free, absolutely neutral and also truthful thoughts. This, just as the effective truth is only recognised and understood when a thing is first experienced for itself.

Now, if I now say something again about anti-Semitism, then it is not a matter of xenophobia resp. a fear of foreigners, but rather a hostility towards strangers that has arisen from this, whereby it is not actually a religious and social prejudice against Jews. Basically, today it is a specific phenomenon that expresses an anti-modern world view that is fundamentally based on pathological thoughts of existential fear, which sees the existence of the Jews as the cause of all evil, but especially in cultural, religious, social and political problems that are said to emanate from the Jews. This is despite the fact that the unfounded hatred of Christianity and Islam is fundamentally and originally based on the fact – which is denied by those supposedly ‘in the know’ – that Jmmanuel, who in Christianity is lyingly and falsely called Jesus Christ against all truth, although his name was never such, and who was born approx. around 2,028 years ago (Note: According to today’s Gregorian calendar, the year of Jmmanuel’s birth is 5 years before our chronology or B.C. The indication of the year of birth as 2 B.C. is a typographical error that has unfortunately not yet been discovered.) So the worldwide hatred of Jews, resp. the anti-Semitism that has been rising again and again for a long time, but has subsided again after a certain time, is more than ‘just’ xenophobia or a religious or social prejudice, because if everything is considered correctly, it is absolutely recognisable that it is a crazy and fanatically distorted view of the Jews of the so-called modern age. Although today’s term of accusation ‘anti-Semitism’ was only brought out of the box of old Jewish insults again – if I am not greatly mistaken – around 1880, but as I already mentioned in the last contact conversation, this term already existed in the times of Noandakan, when in the old Hebron language the enemies of his son Shem were insulted as Semitic or as Semites, precisely by anti-Semites. This term has survived for thousands of years and was apparently ‘dug up’ again somehow and somewhere and, as I said, reappeared around 1880 and quickly spread worldwide. I do not remember exactly what the term ‘semfeindlichen’ was in Hebronese at the time of Noandakan, but when I search my memory, something like ‘Shemnaka’ or something like that comes to mind. I cannot swear to whether that is correct, though.

The anti-Jewish human beings are confused in their thinking, namely that the existence of the Jews is the cause of all the problems, indeed the actual cause that there are any problems at all. This gave rise early on to a racially based rejection of the Jews. However, if this is to be understood in its various forms, I must briefly refer back to the history of hostility towards Jews: When an evil image of the Jews was created, it was all based on old prejudices that had long since been forgotten, but had been re-imagined in a negative manner. The result was that the Jew was insulted as a usurer from time immemorial, but this expression changed with the ‘modern age’ and was turned into the financial capitalist, although the old definition of insulting the Jews had not yet emerged.

The newly emerging modern political currents and orders emerged after the First World War – which is mendaciously declared to have been a seven-year war and was effectively the fault of America. These currents then also gave rise to the democratic movements, communism and liberalism, as well as various supranational organisations. This also led to various economic developments, as well as financial capitalism and globalisation, certain inventions that brought disaster and were blamed on Jewish evil purposes and are still unjustifiably attributed to this day. The delusion of all the many Jew-haters in this regard even goes so far as to claim that evil destructive inventions, mainly weapons, have been forced upon certain nations by the Jews as necessary and indispensable. In practice, the whole thing of this kind got out of hand, so that Hitler then used all means at his disposal to put an end to the evil through the Holocaust.

Well, anti-Semitism will remain a permanently modernised complex of idiotic convictions for a very long time to come, namely those of lunatics and other crazy people, whereby mainly religious aspects of Christians and Islam play a part – which is of course vehemently denied against all truth. These are believers who hate Jews, as well as lousy and evil religious leaders and religious representatives who present themselves to the outside world as absolute and ‘loyal’ supporters of ‘accepting Jews’, but who are in fact die-hard anti-Semites and enemies of other religions and faiths. They form a secret collective towards Jews, which does not express its bad convictions to the outside world, but which has become ingrained in individuals as prejudice. They wisely know how to hide their ideology and their religious, individual and possibly also collective and always secret attitudes, actions and machinations, as well as their secret social and nasty discrimination and secret political mobilisations against Jews, which are aimed at distancing themselves from the Jews and driving them out and even destroying them.

I have already explained what originally concerned the earliest religious hostility, mainly of Christianity, towards the Jews, and that was because of the crucifixion of Jmmanuel, but so-called ‘modern’ anti-Semitism no longer has anything to do with it. Nowadays there is also more and more talk of ‘anti-Judaism’, which leads to a disparagement of the Jewish people and their faith, as a result of which the Jews are also accused of being blind to the truth and generally obdurate and warlike. For this reason, he says, there is also hostility towards Christians and Islam among the Jews, which God has ordained and wants to have so that the Jews are to be protected from Christianity and Islam in this wise, which of course does not suit the Jew-haters.

Quetzal:
But Netanyahu, this warmonger, is directing the whole war effort in such a manner that the hatred of Jews flares up all the more.

Billy:
Yes, of course, because the anti-Semites find that his murderous actions only confirm everything that is being lied about the Jews. Everything is really just lies and deceit and has absolutely nothing to do with the truth. For my part, I have got to know many believers in the Jews, and they were all human beings like we all are. Their religion plays no role and has never played a role for me. And they also made no secret of the fact that I do not belong to any faith. At the very beginning, when we came here to the Centre, three Jewish persons visited me when they went on a holiday trip up to Germany. Unfortunately, they were quite elderly people who have since died.

And if I want to say something else: there may now be a war between Israel and Hamas, but not all the people on both sides are in agreement with this warmonger and murderer Netanyahu and on the side of Hamas, whose leadership wields a sceptre of death and the complete destruction of human achievements. I also think that the part of the people who want him out of office are those who think rationally and do not want war. It will also be the same in Ukraine and Russia, because as I experienced and learnt as a boy in the German Reich together with Sfath, only a fanatical and murder-obsessed section of the population that is enthusiastic about war is ever on the side of the war-mongering rulers, while the others turn away from the war, but as a rule can do nothing about it and must remain silent, otherwise they themselves will be murdered. This is certainly the case in the war in the Middle East, as it certainly also is in Ukraine and also in Russia. That is certainly not to be doubted.

Quetzal:
That is indeed as you say, there is absolutely no doubt about it.

Billy:
Good, then that is also clear.

Quetzal:
What I am interested in now, though, and maybe you can explain to me what it was that happened to me when I observed something south of the Sahara yesterday, but it suddenly disappeared and was obviously not real. I have never seen anything like it.

Billy:
Like what?

Quetzal:
There was suddenly a piece of a landscape visible in the distance, but it disappeared again after a short time. That is inexplicable to me.

Billy:
Well, it was probably a mirage.

Quetzal:
What is that?

Billy:
You do not know that?

Quetzal:
No – ?

Billy:
Well then, I also experienced that once with Sfath, when I was zipping through a desert with him. We saw a city for several minutes and then it just disappeared again because it was just a mirage, which is also called a Fata Morgana. As Sfath explained to me, this involves a beam of light being refracted to create it, whereby the light expands in an arc and radiates through the layers of air at different temperatures and manifests itself somewhere visibly as a reflection, a mirage that is reflected like a real object. There are records and claims about this, such as that a large sea vessel was suddenly seen in the middle of the desert, for example, as claimed around 1878 or 1880 by a man named Custer, who allegedly saw a large ship in the Mojave Desert in southern California that was said to be carrying large quantities of gold, which is why he launched several ‘expeditions’ to find the ship. But it was all a lie, as Sfath explained, because the man was fibbing about the alleged sighting of the mirage, because as a gold prospector he invented the story to find people who had travelled with him several times to find a vein of gold. However, this is said to have never happened.

Quetzal:
A strange method of lying.

Billy:
Of course, it is illogical, but countless Earthlings just act illogically when it comes to gold or money etc. which is why a lot of things also escalate into crime and delinquency.

Quetzal:
Then I would like to discuss some things with you now that relate to me personally, and that is …

Billy:
Of course – I want to be all ears for that. But I would like to say that I am very honoured that you …

The following is attached, which was announced privately by me to Quetzal, which Michael promised to get the article for me.

Sunday, the 19th of November 2023 Private Contact = No Contact Report,
as Usual with Purely Private Visits and Private Conversations

And here is the article that Michael just sent me.

Speech by Dr David E. Martin in the European Parliament
on 3rd May 2023 at the 3rd International Covid Summit

Automatically generated transcript from English on YouTube

It is a particularly interesting place for me to sit today given the fact that over a decade ago I sat in this very place, in this very chair here in the European Union Parliament and at that time I warned the world of what was to come.

During that conversation, hosted at the time by the Greens and the EFA and a number of other parties, the European Union and various representations, we discussed whether Europe should adopt the United States’ policy of allowing patents on biological products of derived materials. And at the time, I urged this panel to do so, and I warned human beings around the world that weaponising nature against humanity would have dire consequences.

Tragically, I sit here today with the unfortunate words that I hate to say, “I told you so.” But the fact is that we are not here to retaliate for past decisions. We came here once again to actually look human nature in the face and ask the question of who we want to be and what we want humanity to look like. And instead of seeing this as a task of practising futility, which is very easy to do from time to time when you are in the position that I am in. I actually do not see this as an exercise in futility, I see it as one of the greatest opportunities that we have, because we now have a public conversation that is now front and centre in the minds of human beings.

When this was an esoteric conversation about biological patents, nobody cared. But when it was talked about at home, the conversation turned it into something that people can care about. So I am actually quite grateful for the opportunity and I thank the Members of Parliament for hosting this event and I thank the translators, to whom I apologise for using terminology that is probably very difficult to translate.

I would also like to recognise the fact – which many of you know – that I owe my involvement in this cause in large part to the great work of my wonderful wife Kim Martin, who encouraged me in the early days of this pandemic to get in front of the camera and talk about all the information that I was sharing with very small groups around the world. It was actually her encouragement that put me in a position where many of you are hearing what I have to say.

Ironically, the world I come from, which used to be very popular, was my CNBC and Bloomberg presentations that aired on mainstream media outlets around the globe to an audience that I have lost. I can confidently say that Covid has diminished my fame. But I can also confidently say that I would rather be among the human beings I stand here with today than those who were part of that former world. This is a much better place for me.

My role today is to put our conversation in a historical context, because it did not just come up in the last three years and it did not just come up in the last five or six years, but it is actually an ongoing issue that probably started here in Europe in the early mid-1900s, but certainly between 1913 and 1914. That is when this discussion started right here in Central Europe.

The pandemic we have had in recent years is also not something that happened overnight. In fact, this very specific coronavirus pandemic started at a completely different time. Most of you do not know that the coronavirus was isolated as a model pathogen in 1965. The coronavirus was identified in 1965 as one of the first infectious replicable viral models that could be used to modify a number of other experiences of the human condition.

It was originally associated with the common cold. But what is particularly interesting about the 1965 isolation was that it was immediately identified as a pathogen that could be used and modified for a whole range of reasons, and you heard correctly, that was 1965. By the way, these slides are generally free, feel free to look at each one, any comment I make is based on published material, so check out these references.

In 1966 the very first COV coronavirus model was used as the basis in a transatlantic biological experiment for manipulation of human beings and you heard correctly, the date is 1966.

I hope you understand what I am saying. This pandemic did not break out overnight, it is something that has been a long time in the making. The year before I was born was the first transatlantic coronavirus data exchange between the United States and the United Kingdom. And in 1967, the year I was born, the first trials to vaccinate human beings with modified coronaviruses were carried out.

Is not that amazing? 56 years ago! An overnight success of a pathogen that had been in development for 56 years. I want you all to be able to relate to this. Where were we when we allowed this to happen against biological and chemical weapons treaties? Where were we as a human civilisation when we thought it was acceptable to take a pathogen of the United States and then infect the world with it? Where was this discussion and what should it have been in 1967? There was no such discussion!

Ironically, the common cold was turned into a chimera in the 1970s. And in 1975, 1976 and 1977, we started to figure out how to modify the coronavirus by implanting it into different animals – into pigs and dogs. And not surprisingly, in 1990, it was found that the coronavirus as an infectious agent was an industrial problem for two main industries, namely the dog and pig industries.

Dog breeders and pig breeders realised that the coronavirus caused gastrointestinal problems and this became the basis for Pfizer’s first spike protein vaccine. The patent was filed in 1990 and you have been ready since then.

Did you hear what I just said? 1990! Operation Warp Speed! I am sorry, where is the warp and speed? Pfizer, patents the very first spike protein vaccine against the coronavirus in 1990. Is not that fascinating? Is it not fascinating that we were told that the spike protein is something new that we just learnt was the problem? No, not only was it found out that it is not the problem now, it was found out in 1990, but the first patents for a vaccine with the coronavirus spike protein were filed in 1990. Who would have thought that Pfizer is clearly not the innocent organisation that does nothing but promote human health? Clearly Pfizer, the organisation that has not bought votes in this chamber and every chamber of every government around the world, not Pfizer! Surely they would have nothing to do with it. But yes, they were!

In 1990, Pfizer found out that there was a problem with the vaccines. They were not working. Do you know why they were not working? It turned out that the coronavirus is a very malleable model that changes and changes and mutates over time. In fact, every single publication on coronavirus vaccines from 1990 to 2018 concluded that the coronavirus escapes any vaccine impulse because it modifies, changes and mutates too quickly for vaccines to be effective. From 1990 to 2018, this is the published scientific evidence, ladies and gentlemen, this is the science. According to the science, it is their own indictment that their own programmes are not working.

There are thousands of publications on this topic, not just a few hundred and not just from companies paid by the pharmaceutical industry, but also publications, from independent scientific research, that clearly show (including the chimera modification efforts of Ralph Barrick at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill) that vaccines do not work against the coronavirus.

This was shown by science and these results were never disputed, but then came an interesting development in 2002 (this date is very important because the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill patented it in 2002). I quote: an infectious replication of a defective clone of the coronavirus.

Listen to those words, infectious replication defective! What does this sentence actually mean? For those of you who are not familiar with this language, I will reveal the meaning: ‘infectious replication defective’ is a weapon. It means to make a person a target, but to have no assurances of causing no harm to other individuals. That is what ‘infectious replication defective’ means. This patent was filed in 2002 for work by Anthony Fauci, funded by NIAID (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, North Bethesda, Maryland, USA) from 1999 to 2002. This work was mysteriously patented a year before SARS 1.0 (first SARS outbreak in 2003) at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill.

Interjection: Dave, are you saying that SARS 1.0 did not come from a wet market in Wuhan? Are you saying that it might have come from a lab at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill?

No, I am not saying that, I am telling you, these are the facts. We developed SARS, SARS is not a naturally occurring phenomenon. The naturally occurring phenomenon is called the common cold. It is called a flu-like illness, it is called a flu-like infection, it is the naturally occurring coronavirus. SARS is the virus developed by human beings, a living system model that can be used as a weapon to attack human beings – and they patented it in 2002. (Applause)

In 2003, big surprise, the CDC surprisingly filed a patent on the coronavirus isolated from human beings, again violating treaties and laws regarding biological and chemical weapons that we have in the United States.

I am very, very specific on this point, the United States likes to talk about its rights and the rule of law and all the nonsense that we like to talk about. But we do not ratify treaties about the defence of human beings. It is striking that we avoid that. We have a great track record of advocating for human rights and to advocate for them and then deny them when it comes to actually being part of the international community, that is somewhat problematic.

Let me make one thing very clear: When the CDC filed the patent application in April 2003 on the SARS coronavirus that had been isolated from human beings, what was done? They downloaded a sequence from China and applied for a patent on it in the United States. Any of you who are familiar with biological and chemical weapons treaties know that is a treaty violation. It is a crime and is not an innocent ‘oops’. It is a crime and the United States Patent Office even went so far as to reject the patent application twice until the CDC decided to bribe the Patent Office to overrule the Patent Office man and finally grant the patent in 2007 on the SARS coronavirus.

Do not miss this, because it turned out that the RT-PCR (real-time quantitative PCR) was the test we were supposed to use to identify the risks associated with the coronavirus. This test was identified by me as a bioterrorist threat in the European Union-sponsored events in 2002 and 2003. 20 years ago! That happened here in Brussels and across Europe.

In 2005, this virus was specifically labelled as bioterrorism and bioweapons platform technology. This is not my terminology that I am using here, but it was actually labelled as a bioweapon platform technology in 2005. As of 2005, the virus was actually officially categorised as a biological warfare agent. I do not know if that sounds like public health to you? Does it? Biological warfare technology does not feel like public health, it does not feel like medicine. It feels like a weapon designed to wipe out humanity. That is what it feels like and it feels like that because that is what it is. We have been led to believe that the EcoHealth Alliance and DARPA and all the other organisations that we point to are for public health. But we have been specifically asked to ignore the fact that through Anthony Fauci’s cheque and a side-by-side ledger – where NIAID has a balance sheet exclusively on biological warfare – over $10 billion has been funnelled through covert operations – dollar for dollar matching that no one in the media is talking about and has been since 2005.

Our moratorium on capability expansion was actually intended to freeze all capability expansion efforts. In the autumn of 2014, the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill conveniently received a letter from NIAID stating that the coronavirus gain of function in Vivo should be suspended because of the moratorium. But because their grants were already approved, they received an exemption. Did you hear what I just said? A bioweapons lab at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill was granted an exemption for functional research so that by 2016 the article could be published in the scientific press stating that the SARS coronavirus was about to emerge in human beings in 2016. And in case you are asking, Dave, which coronavirus would emerge in human beings? It was W, I, V, one, Wuhan Institute of Virology virus 1. ready to emerge in human beings and discussed in 2016 at the National Academy of Sciences meeting. In 2017 and 2018, the following phrase entered the common parlance of the community that there would be an accident or an intentional release of a respiratory pathogen. The operative word in this phrase is, of course, ‘release’.

Does that sound like a leak? Does it sound like “A bat and a penguin went to a bar in Wuhan market, hung out and had sex and lo and behold, we have SARS COV2”. No, accidental or deliberate release of a respiratory pathogen was the terminology and was used four times in April 2019.

Seven months before patient number 1’s allegation, four patents were amended by Moderna in the patent application to use the term ‘accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen’ as justification for making a vaccine for something that did not exist. (Applause) If you have not already, please make sure you point out the intentionality of this act in any investigation, because it was in September 2019 that the world was informed that there could be an accidental or deliberate release of a respiratory pathogen, so in September 2020 there was a global acceptance for a universal vaccine bill. Those are their words, right in front of them on the screen. The intention was to get the world to accept a universal vaccine template and the intention was to use the coronavirus to get them there.

Let us read that because we need to put that in the records everywhere I go: Until an infectious disease crisis is real and the emergency threshold – which is often largely ignored – and funding base beyond the emergency situation, there needs to be public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures such as a pan-influenza or pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver for this is the media and the economy will follow the hype. We need to use this hype for our own purposes. To get to the real issue: Investors will follow if they see profit at the end of the process. Does that sound like public health? Does that sound like the best for humanity? No, ladies and gentlemen, this was premeditated domestic terrorism, declared at the 2015 meeting of the National Commission of the Academy of Sciences and published by them. This was an act of biological and chemical warfare perpetrated on the human race and it was admitted in writing that it was financial robbery and financial fraud: Investors will follow if they see profit at the end of the process.

Let me conclude with five very brief recommendations. Nature has been hijacked. This whole story began in 1965 when it was decided to hijack a natural model and manipulate it. Science was hijacked when only questions could be asked that were allowed under the patent under the protection of the CDC, the FDA and the NIH and their corresponding organisations around the world. There was no independent science, there was only the hijacked science and unfortunately there was no ethics committee to prevent the violation of all the codes we stand for. There was no financially disinterested independent review board for the coronavirus, not once since 1965.

We have not convened a single independent IRB to review coronavirus research. So morality was suspended for medical countermeasures and ultimately humanity was lost because it was decided to allow it. Our work today is to say that we do not want any more functional gain research, no more weaponisation of nature. And most importantly, no more corporate paternalism of science for the vested interests of the pharmaceutical industry, unless they take 100 per cent product liability for every injury and death they cause. Thank you very much.

(Applause)

Sources:
https://rumble.com/v2qeic8-riveting-speech-by-dr.-david-martin-at-the-european-parliament-may-3-2023.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfLycFHBsro

For the original German and English translation, please click here.