Why Do They All Want to Steer the Ship of Fools?

The sudden proliferation of groups, “societies”, etc., who use the term UAP reveal their dependence on the “official narrative” 

There have always been overly-ambitious, unqualified, self-promoting, profit-motivated people in UFOlogy. With the recent worldwide interest in the topic, there’s been a flood of new, “instant experts” who use the also newly coined term UAP  to…identify themselves as gaseous quacks, charlatans, pretenders and poseurs.

As I see it, the dilution of the original term, which incorporated “flying objects”, to “anomalous phenomena” serves to scatter the focus away from solid, tangible evidence, discourage any real critical thinking, and to usher people away from the singularly authentic, evidence-rich Billy Meier contacts. Of course, like so many stupid, delusional trends, it seems to have first appeared in America.

I Should Have Known Better

When I came upon what seemed might be a group of serious scientists interested in the evidence for extraterrestrial life, notwithstanding the name of their group, I sent this email invitation (with some of Billy Meier’s independently authenticated, still irreproducible UFO photos) to Prof. Michael C. Cifone and the other members of the Society for UAP Studies:

Dear Society for UAP Studies,

In the process of seeking intelligent terrestrial lifeforms who are interested in finding the truth about the (once strictly tabloid) UFO and extraterrestrial life topics, I found your information online. I invite you to discover the Billy Meier UFO contacts, still ongoing in Switzerland…for over 81 years.

Independently analyzed and authenticated by a wide array of independent scientific experts, Billy Meier’s hundreds of still irreproducible, pre-digital UFO photos, films and other evidence, have withstood decades of well-orchestrated attacks from numerous skeptics, debunkers and disinformation-promoting intelligence agencies, etc. This is the evidence that no one else can provide.

The Question

The Meier case also answers the always unasked question in UFOlogy:

“If these contacts are authentic, what’s the…reason for them?”

The reason isn’t for us to chase lights-in-the-sky, it is to help us assure our very threatened future survival.

The Higher Standard of Proof

An even higher standard of proof than Meier’s stunningly clear UFO evidence is to be found in the over 250, specific, error-free examples of prophetically accurate scientific, geopolitical, and other information, verifiably published before all “official discoveries”, as corroborated by the internationally recognized standard of proof of first publication, i.e. copyrights.

We are strictly non-theoretical, relying on proven facts and evidence and continue to add new corroborations as they are “discovered” by scientists and the media. I think you will also appreciate, and want to scrutinize, some of the many examples that meet scientific and legal standards of proof of space travel and…time travel.

I look forward to hearing from you at your earliest convenience and to creating a fruitful, cooperative relationship for the benefit of science and humankind. All questions, challenges, etc., are welcomed.

Oh boy, did I get a…warm welcome:

Dear Mr. Horn,

While you’re free to email any one of us, please refrain from sending our Board of Advisors mass-style emails with solicitations to examine this or that particular research or researcher. We understand you may be enthusiastic about some particular body of work, and want to direct our attention to it, but this should be done privately. As an academic and professional association, we take no specific stance regarding particular bodies of research; rather, our concern is on thinking about best practices in UAP Studies, and the nature and scope of UAP Studies as a serious academic area of research with both empirical and humanities-oriented aspects.

Best,

Dr. M. Cifone

Dr. Michael C. Cifone

Founder & President

Phone 213-510-**** | Mobile 202-746-****

Email director@societyforuapstudies.org

Web http://www.societyforuapstudies.org

Los Angeles, CA

By golly, I couldn’t resist:

Dear Prof. Cifone,

When I received your imperious, bureaucratic response, I realized that, in my enthusiasm, I was remiss in not thoroughly researching your qualifications, and of those in your newly-formed group, before erroneously assuming you had any.

While I saw that many of your members may be prominent in their fields of study, I didn’t find any who were seasoned, respected UFO researchers and investigators, of course including yourself. I may have missed something but, in my 45 years of research, etc., I’ve also never personally encountered any of them, nor have I seen any documentation pertaining to their examination – let alone discovery – of even one piece of actual, independently analyzed and authenticated physical evidence, and/or scientific and legal standard of proof of space and time travel, etc.

The sudden proliferation of groups, “societies”, etc., who use the term UAP (the “A” referring to the equally vague, intangible Aerial and/or Anomalous) reveal their dependence on the “official narrative” (disinformation and distraction) and their own profound ignorance of the singularly authentic evidence they purport/pretend to be seeking.

Since you were freely offered this unparalleled material but responded with ignorance and arrogance, it’s unlikely that you will proceed any differently than the others who chase lights-in-the-sky, proclaim their unfounded “expertise”, and are also only interested in self-promotion, self-aggrandizement and profit.

As for your discomfort with my sending the information to your group members, don’t worry, so far none of them responded to me, perhaps out of modesty when realizing their own inadequacies, or maybe because they gave the material a brief glance, sufficient for them to deservedly feel that they were not only out of their league and over their heads but on a collision course with professional embarrassment if they proceeded with any aspirations of sudden fame and, pardon the pun, stardom.

As you can see, I am openly sending them this message, though I won’t send any further information without request. However, I will be glad to respond to any questions, challenges, etc.

Sincerely,

theyflyblog.com

Of course, none of the members supposedly involved in “UAP studies” commented on Billy Meier’s amazing UFO photos, including Prof. Cifone, who seems to be a text book example of the kind of esotericists described by Meier in About the Fluidal-Energy, page 294:

*Thanks to Leon Rubenhold for coining the apt term, “mumbo-jumbology” to describe various quacks, phonies, fakes, charlatans, poseurs and esotericists such as those now spreading like contagions in UFOlogy, so-called spirituality and other fields. We are reminded that interest in a topic doesn’t automatically equal expertise.