Or why aliens just may not be making pretty designs in our fields

Several years ago, I asked Billy Meier about the crop circle phenomena. In the late 1990s, I had expressed my opinion in a UFO magazine article that they seemed like they were made by “somebody”, meaning extraterrestrials, who were giving us some lessons in the creative use of power without doing harm.

Since the appearance of crop circles, there’s been much conjecture, outright hoaxing, mysterious lights, certainty among some that there are very intelligent, extraterrestrial beings sending us encoded and/or cryptic messages, etc. Billy Meier and the Plejaren are on record as saying that most are manmade, which has certainly aroused some ire. Also, Ptaah had once remarked that if any are being made by extraterrestrials, they are a very indirect, ineffective way to communicate anything important, as opposed to directly contacting the people of Earth and telling us just exactly what they have to say.

But getting back to my conversation with Meier, he told me something rather interesting. He said that the Creation itself sends out certain kinds of impulses that are picked up by highly sensitive, artistic people, who are thusly inspired to create these designs themselves, which accounts for the majority of the crop circles.

I had a hard time with that explanation…until I discovered the fancy fin work of the little Puffer fish. As I watched in awe as that marvel of Creation single finnedly made its little undersea masterpiece, I thought that it just may be possible that human beings with far more resources available to them (hands with fingers, boards and ropes at the very least, comrades and computers, etc.) could use their abilities to bring the impulse inspirations to complete artistic expression. And while working in grain fields may have its own challenges, I wonder if a human being could actually make such a delicate masterpiece undersea, as the Puffer fish does so naturally and almost effortlessly.

Of course, we do know a man with only one hand who’s not only remarkably prolific but who also has created a very revolutionary, clear design and firm foundation for the most profound evolution in human consciousness. So perhaps we can take a little inspiration from both the little Puffer fish and the prophet and be creative, productive and…do no harm.

54 comments on “The Little Fish that Could

    • Tony,

      Didn’t you know that Jmmanuel fortold and prophecised about these in the TJ?

      Chapter 3:
      17. “So it shall be when humankind begins to comprehend, and when the
      chaff is separated from the grain.

      18. “It will be at the time when your false teachings will be laughed at and humankind discovers the truth.

      19. “This will come to pass when humankind builds singing lights and
      chariots of fire, with which they can escape into the cosmos, as is done by God and his followers, the celestial sons,

      20. “namely those who taught us the wisdom and knowledge of Creation,

      21. “and who urged us to obey the laws of nature and live according to
      them.

      22. “Oh you renegades, you brood of vipers, get away from this place,
      because you are impure and cursed in your false teachings.

      23. “Get away from this place, because I can by my own accord baptize
      you into repentance only with water; but he who comes after me is
      stronger than I, and I am not worthy of removing his sandals. He will
      baptize you with the knowledge of the spirit and with the fire of truth.

      24. “He has his winnowing fork in his hand; he will sweep his threshing
      floor and gather the wheat into his granary, but he will bum the chaff
      with unquenchable fire.

      25. “The lie can never withstand the truth, which destroys evil in its fire.”

      26. As John the Baptist thus spoke, behold, Jmmanuel of Galilee then
      approached John at the Jordan, to be baptized by him.

      27. John, however, refused him and spoke, “It is I who need to be
      baptized by you because you possess greater knowledge than I. And you
      come to me?”

      28. But Jmmanuel answered him, “let it happen so now, because it is
      fitting for us to fulfil all justice, since we are both sons of the Earth.”

      29. So John consented and baptized him.

      ___

      Who would have thought literally what and chaff with crop circles?

        • Sheila, think of it this way … I would NOT feed and rather burn the types of wheat stalks that Dyson has mentioned with regards to crop circles from those clearly done with the board and rope amatuers. I don’t know if it’s healthy or not but I wouldn’t take a chance to put into the food chain if I see circular holes in the wheat, varying levels of growth as if the wheat got pulled, and growing laterally in a circle thanks to some fancy energy discharge.

          • I’m pretty sure that wheat already made it into the food chain, it was cut down and processed over 3 years ago. But understand where you are coming from. I’m far more likely not to eat it due to it being a GMO round up ready wheat with all that dioxin embedded in it and I’m allergic to dioxin 🙂

          • It’s been deliberately concentrated and experimentally eaten and is reportedly harmless, but bad-tasting (burnt).

            They want us to PLANT it. (See above Levengood paper)

  • Michael,

    You wrote:

    “Meier and the Plejaren are on record as saying that most are manmade, which has certainly aroused some ire. Also, Ptaah had once remarked that if any are being made by extraterrestrials, they are a very indirect, ineffective way to communicate anything important, as opposed to directly contacting the people of Earth and telling us just exactly what they have to say.

    But getting back to my conversation with Meier, he told me something rather interesting. He said that the Creation itself sends out certain kinds of impulses that are picked up by highly sensitive, artistic people, who are thusly inspired to create these designs themselves, which accounts for the majority of the crop circles.”

    I’m sure that’s the truth.

    Whose explanation are you going to accept, the P’s and Billy’s, or a couple of translators. Translators are a dime a dozen, and can never compare to the Ps and the great Billy Meier.

    • I don’t think that should be the sole criteria. We have to think it through and keep evaluating on our own. More than likely Meier and the Ps are correct. Of course they could amend their information. And let’s remember it’s the translators who made it possible for us to know what they’ve said…so far!

      • Of course, I always think everything through. I’ll go with the Ps and Billy. Yes, I appreciate the work of the translators, but because they have done that work, doesn’t mean they know what they’re talking about. Translations are a very easy job, any college graduate could probably do it.

        I for one, have no doubt, the Ps and Billy are correct.

        • Tony,

          Despite being a college grad, I am finding translating to be extremely difficult. Albeit, I’m probably not the sharpest tool in the shed. But, unlike Anthony, it bothers me that I only have access to 5% of the oh-so-precious Meier information. Since you find it so easy, perhaps you’d be willing to make a great contribution to mission and translate a book?

          • Tony writes, “Translations are a very easy job, any college graduate could probably do it.”

            So THAT’S why my co-workers and I all find translating Billy’s texts so very very difficult and time consuming!

            I only just barely graduated from Medford (MA) High School – shortly thereafter identified in a TIME magazine cover story, about the appallingly low standard of USA’s public school system, as, “one of the two worst public schools in the entire country”.

            I knew that.

            Cheers!

            🙂

          • I second that!!! I’m a college grad as well and don’t even know where I would begin!:)
            Well, I guess if one went to college speaking English and majoring in German? Or some sort of degree in translating therein… might make it a little easier.
            Yet, you will never get away from the basic flaws found within religion and earth life in general. These things will always find there way through no matter the so called “education” given out these days.
            I digress rapidly sometimes… just read within last few months that American college students just passed the trillion dollar mark in out standing loans.
            Put people in debt for life, with little chance to use what was learned for anything other than paying it all back. Bollocks!!

  • Here are some examples of my ignored qualified statements recently misrepresented to Billy. And a few links and thoughts on the matter.

    March 16, 2010 (FIGU forum)

    “the Zeta Reticulans(?) who I think are responsible for the genuine (not the hoaxed or corrupted) “crop circles'”

    “Just to clarify: I don’t know for sure that the crop circles are ET, per se, since they might be from interdimentionals or time travellers, etc. But they are NOT (all) from regular (or Dark Order) Earthlings.”

    http://forum.figu.org/us/messages/12/11009.html#POST48357

    And me, again in reply to MH, March 18th, 2010, two days later.

    You continue, (I’m quoting you quoting me now) “and then ‘I don’t know for sure that the crop circles are ET, per se, since they might be from interdimentionals or time travellers, etc. But they are NOT (all) from regular (or Dark Order) Earthlings.’ is a bit confusing, as well as a bit self-contradictory.”

    This one is easier. It’s in the same way that various know-it-all skeptibunkers have split hairs with you and claimed that even if these so-called Plejaren zoom around in flying saucers which people can see and photograph, provide metal and sound samples for analysis and so on and so forth, THAT – in and of itself – does not PROVE that they are EXTRATERRESTRIALS, since they might be interdimentionals or time travellers, etc. I was simply trying to avoid falling into that one with you. Do you remember what Marcel Vogel said to the Japanese television interviewer who asked him – after Vogel explained what he’d found in the Plejaren metal samples he’d looked at – “So, then, are they … extratestorials?” Vogal smiled and said, “Well, they’re not from around HERE!” Maybe the gigantic field forms aren’t from ETs? But whoever or whatever is doing the “real” ones – well, they’re not from around HERE!

    http://forum.figu.org/us/messages/12/11009.html#POST48448

    A forum search of crabwood or chilbolton will unearth more if anyone’s interested.

    In a deliberate act of journalistic provocation – taking a leaf from Michael’s book where he used the unqualified statement, “The World’s Leading Expert on UFOs” as a clever way to prompt much-needed debate – on November 16, 2013, I mentioned the Reticulans here without mentioning that it was my own tentative and seemingly common sense conclusion based on all my many years of work.

    https://theyflyblog.com/the-hillary-raimo-show-decoding-the-billy-meier-material/11/08/2013

    It got no response.

    So, on February 1st, 2014, I deliberately tried again on Michael’s new thread where he effectively calls me a liar, in publicly headlining my Disclosure Project witness testimony as “BOGUS”. – meaning: “not genuine or true (used in a disapproving manner when deception has been attempted).”

    https://theyflyblog.com/pretentious-profiteering-purveyor-of-all-that-is-bogus/01/30/2014

    http://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_Meier/gaiaguys/radar.story.htm

    It seems to me, since I’m not trying to be Meier’s media representative, that I should enjoy the same privilege – of being able to state my conclusions about CCs as “my truth” – like the astrology fans do here about their conclusions, which, unlike mine, seem designed to mix the Plejaren science of astrology with the Earth-type which Billy condemns. The difference I see between these two issues, neither of which Billy supports, is that only one of them (CCs) has any logical scientific substantiation (not to mention common sense) behind it.

    I welcome and encourage people not to dogmatically believe Billy as if he’s a tin god to be worshiped, and I’m sure he wouldn’t want that.

    On February 3rd, 1997, Billy wrote, “They [“a worldwide group of certain earth humans”] are also not inactive in matters relating to the COUNTERFEITING of crop circles, and indeed in the most differing countries.” [my caps for emphasis]

    http://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_Meier/gaiaguys/meierv7p438-444.htm

    “COUNTERFEITING”?

    The fervour in which Billy’s ludicrous boards and ropes statement is being wielded against in-yer-face scientifically established hard physical evidence to the contrary, and Billy’s own statements about “grain circle counterfeiting” (“Kornkreisfälschungen”) – shows to me that we still have a very long way to go before we get over the idea that what “the book” (or Billy) says IS TRUE BECA– — USE “the book” (or Billy) SAYS it’s true.

    Cheers!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *