If it pops back up on YouTube – which says it’s a “strange” situation – the issue may be resolved
As I reported in this earlier article about doing my interview with 16-year-old radio host Natalie-Marie regarding the Billy Meier UFO case, we experienced unprecedented technical difficulties for about 2 ½ hours. Strangely enough, the technical difficulties didn’t stop there. Not too long after the interview was posted online comments from some viewers on the YouTube channel weren’t getting posted or visible.
It was obvious that Natalie-Marie wasn’t responsible for these difficulties, as she also assured us. Then, suddenly, the interview itself was no longer available online.
This was posted on Natalie-Marie’s Facebook page:
“I did a interview on Michael Horn. YouTube has informed me that there is strange activities happening with his interview. If you could not see this interview at the moment I am sorry for this inconvenience.”
The unexpectedly, just received good news is that Andrew Grimshaw captured the interview, which you can now watch here. If the interview suddenly reappears on YouTube – which itself admits the “strangeness” of the situation – the whole matter may be resolved. It may be a rather benign situation after all.
Natalie-Marie had gone to great lengths to also post many of Meier’s clear, daytime UFO photos, which was only part of the reason that they came here. There may be certain parties who don’t want the Billy Meier’s information to be made available to vast numbers of young people, in Canada as well as in other countries, in order to keep them ignorant of the real, harsh realities about the world that they are inheriting…and the efforts of the Plejaren extraterrestrial human beings to help us assure our future survival.
Obviously, since Meier’s information and evidence, etc., have been vigorously suppressed for 65 years, and various parties have gone to great lengths to attempt to discredit and harm him, such nefarious machinations are not outside of the realm of possibilities.
Should this entire incident be nothing more than an anomaly, any conspiratorial concerns would be allayed. Nonetheless, this may be an example of what happens when real, and urgently needed, information about the only authentic UFO contact case is suddenly made available to a new, young audience.
So long as people do interviews with the so called “UFO experts”, not a one of whom brings forward any significant, relevant information or authenticated evidence, the status quo – meaning deliberate disinformation – is a safe and unwelcome commodity.
In a forthcoming article, I will speak about my recent efforts to engage such people as Richard Dolan, the Mirage Men, etc., and to have them come forth to help reveal the real UFO cover-up, which is solely about the Billy Meier UFO contacts.
Anomalia Mystery! We will see!
I have just listened to the Natalie Marie Hart/Michael Horn interview thanks to Don and Andrew Grimshaw. It is the best interview I’ve heard and I’ve heard many interviews with Michael Horn (not that you don’t do a great interviews Michael all the time) . This young lady is awesome with her questions.
At the moment, this appears to be the only remaining evidence of the interview:
http://crystallightkidsradioshow.blogspot.ca/2016/09/natalie-marie-hart-michael-horn-billy.html
I’m sure it will be gone soon too. Took some screenshots(for posterity).
They don’t want the truth to come out! Keep doing what you do!
Thanks VERY much Hakeem. Please also use your first and last name (even though I know you!) and certainly feel free to continue to post comments.
Best regards to the family.
Suppressed… like the truth… welcome to the future! Help put an end to Phantasmagoria!
I have downloaded the Youtube interview with Nathalie-Marie and Michael. Does anyone want it? The file size is 143 MB.
I have uploaded the interview.
It is now linked in the blog, The Hope of Tomorrow
https://theyflyblog.com/2016/09/25/the-hope-of-tomorrow/
Oops, it’s not at that link.
It is in this blog.
Scroll back up.
🙂
It`s high time we start to shout at the rooftops to get our message out otherwise we will surely fall into this stupid MuFON trap all over again while the powers that be try to cover up their asses with the same old broken record of fear mongering and reckless disregard for the REAL TRUTH as we ALL know is comming from Billy and the Plejarens.
Seems to me even Youtube is afraid of loosing their own statis trying all the time to keep lying to the public with non-essential ufo mufon Steven Gree,Stantin Friedmqn,John Pedesta, Paul Hellyaer, Peter Devanport “Lights In The Sky Nonsence,etc,etc,etc!” So much for cronisms and business as usual etc!
Just a suggestion take it for what it’s worth but, the same way a back up was available…perhaps it’s best to have a 2nd for these interview due to the historical nature of them…just sayin Michael…wouldn’t hurt. If I’m correct these “experienced difficulties”…have happened before
Michael FYI the link in this sentence is turning up 404 errors up to But to warn us and to teach us.
From:-Natalie-Marie had gone to great lengths to also post many of Meier’s clear, daytime UFO photos, which was only part of the reason that they came here.
Matt,
For me the first link comes up with the Henoch Prophecies and the second one to:
http://www.scubbly.com/item/99200/
For the sake of accuracy around 11:34 mark you said there are around 634 or 643 skin colours in the universe.
According to my recollection it was 343 different type of skin colours Creation has created in this universe..
Can somebody here verify exactly what the contact note number is for this particular information?
You may be right about 343. Someone will surely find it.
It’s interesting how the universe repeatedly revolves around the concept of the number 7.
For example, 7 creation belts, and 343 colours.
343 = 7*7*7
3+4+3 also simply equals 1.
https://theyflyblog.com/2015/01/09/they-came-here/
Oh now I realise what’s happened Michael.
If you open the above link with your pc it returns link to the images you’ve got to press which in this case brought up 404 error whereas if you use your smartphone the images automatically pop up.
Maybe the webpage is configured for smartphones better than a pc.
Anyway no big deal
hi everyone, hope all are well. in reading these comments, I see the parallel(s) in how you tube is behaving with regard to (possible) censorship of what many here term “the powers that be”. others have encountered the same types of “problems” disseminating their information to the masses so as to give everyone the benefit of more correct decision-making due to the possession of true accounts and factual information that (as with the meticulous documentation by mr. meier and the plejaren) allow for true, positively directed change. who are those “powers” (individuals/groups) that be? who benefits from the premeditated, carefully thought out and purposeful division, schisms, and chaos? they are the true fire that creates the smoke, ashes, doubt, conjecture, speculation, etc., that we all are noticing to one degree or another but for years now (at least for me) no one has identified the culprit(s) to any satisfactory level (again, at least for me) in terms of how these individual human beings (this is perhaps too kind) are functioning in a group that is an organized, systematic “entity” that can and does perpetrate the various deeds you all speak of. for me, it is not so much how it’s done, but rather by whom. and “who” benefits? “qui bono”? how are these “individuals” connecting as a group. who has the answer to that basic question? I believe Karen hudes does by virtue of the position that she holds (world bank counsel and overseer mandate trustee to the global debt facility- i.e., humanity’s wealth held in the Global Debt Facility) and by virtue of the information she is privy to. meticulous documentation just like meier. mainstream media blackout just like meier. what she asks of all (and I do mean all, everywhere) is to look at her material in a critical, discerning way, and then form discussion groups to collectively digest that information. “who benefits”? if this basic question does not become clear to us, then it will surely not be us. please look into this. thank you for listening. peace to all————-antonio
Please feel free to bring this information to her attention. It’s actually more important that a lot of this outreach comes from people who are interested in the information, like yourselves, rather than mainly from me as an official representative of it.
The Who
I think the Who are many;
The Committee of 300
Zionists
&
Neocons
are at the top of the list
As for, Who benefits?
No one on our present trajectory, for some time
In the end, we ALL do.
Have some respect for the idea and thought that made us so.
to protect this happenning agaain, you can upload video on https://rutube.ru/ or http://rutube.fr/ you have just to translate page when needed with google trad
Dear Michael Horn,
This was posted by Natalie-Marie Hart on her website. It was HERSELF who deleted your interview from Youtube.
*********
Natalie-Marie Hart
7 hrs
“I saw that somebody posted the interview that I deleted on Michael Horn. I found his supporters lacking respect since I told them that that, “there is a safety issue.” Michael Horn disrespected me by reposting the interview on his blog through onedrive. If you want to listen to the interview feel free but remember don’t believe everything you see or hear.”
http://crystalkidsradio.com/natalie-marie-hart-michael-horn-billy-meiers-ufo-case/
Hi Barreto and everyone who’s submitted comments about the video.
Here is the latest comment from Natalie-Marie (as of now):
“YouTube has a wonderful feature “approve comments” which means that I must review it and approve the comment. Remember, this show is directed to teens and I don’t like bad language. Yet, Michael’s Horn interview was quite unique. Obviously, Michael did not understood that you can approve comments. Billymeierinfrench and They Fly Tv (Michael’s official YouTube channel) were having a correspondence with each other even though the comments were invisible. How did he know? Watch the screenshot for more: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDr5FMCCDN0”
…and my response to it:
“I think there was some unclear communication. I’m not responsible for what people say on other blogs, videos, etc. Of course on my own blog, channel, etc., I can and do also approve – or block -comments. I must say that the feedback on the quality of Natalie-Marie’s interview, on my blog, has been extremely favorable. And I agree with this people who are impressed with the quality of her work. Of course I was not aware of any, still unexplained “safety issues” – nor was there any disrespect intended in making the interview available as provided by one of my readers.”
So if you don’t see your recently submitted comment about all this, let’s see if anything else develops. I’ve sent several emails to Natalie-Marie’s producer to try to get clarification regarding any “safety issues”, etc. Again, if you don’t see your earlier comments, this is what we currently know.
I will add that if there are any safety concerns on her part about the interview being available now, I will ask that it be removed.
So a snapshot of comments has been uploaded onto her YouTube page… I wonder the purpose? Is it to bring attention to why the interview has been “removed by user”?
I can’t even read the comments on the snapshot, can you? Whoever can read them please post what they say.
Sheila, here are the original comments :
Taro :
Hmmm…why are my comments blocked from this page?
Natalie-Marie Hart :
We don’t block comments.
Adrian Martinez :
Taro although I accept this case as truth, it doesn’t stop there. Every day I read something in the Meier material that blows my mind. For those that are curious, this isn’t a case where you check it out for a few minutes to come to a conclusion. This case is controversial for a reason. One day you may come across something that you just can’t accept… After days, weeks or months of pondering, you may come to accept it as truth or not. But individual thinking is a very important part of this case. It’s not for everyone. Some people are not ready for this, and that’s ok. No money is needed. The only thing wanted is your time. Your time to research all of the information which is completely free for all to read. FREE! You can buy books, movies, etc but they’re just there to help further explain things that are freely available for you to digest. All you have to lose is your time. And you stand to gain more than you could ever hope to gain. The main point of this case is a life teaching….a teaching that can change your life for the better. But make up your own mind. There’s a lot of debunkers claiming a lot but when you dig deep into their theories, you realize they’re wrong and it further solidifies the truthfulness of this case.
Taro :
Thank you, Natalie-Marie. I had suspected Google’s oppressive ghost-banning policy. In any case, thank you for the confirmation. I believe you replying to my comment released it from Google’s comment limbo. It appears to be more common with controversial topics such as the Meier case. This is the world we live in now.
Taro :
…and there it goes again, back to limbo. Well, it was fun while it lasted.
TheyFly TV :
I can see them all…
Taro :
Thanks. I see them now, too— in duplicate. I’ve been watching this thread and many of the comments first appeared in duplicate. Something very strange is going on here on this page. Maybe the “spooks” are monitoring.
Taro :
+Adrian Martinez Thanks. No argument from me. I’ve been studying this case for years and constantly learning new things. Even about the evidence which is what I’ve been focusing on. A good question to consider is: How can one man mastermind a hoax so intricate and voluminous and at the same time so balanced in controversy? It seems something that is more likely a possibility only for a group of advanced beings.
BillyMeierInFrench BM :
It seems both our comments have disappeared above …
Taro :
+BillyMeierInFrench BM We’ve both been ghost-banned. I can now see all of your comments, but their visibility is pretty much random: Unfortunately, Google refuses to comment on ghost-banning…
Taro :
“The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum…” ~Noam Chomsky
BillyMeierInFrench BM :
Yes very good quote. It can be applied to the medias or govts propaganda.
But I have been studying the Talmud of Jmmanuel lately and it is clear this technique has been used also in this case. And we can see how powerful it is, in religious fanaticism.
TheyFly TV :
Please know of course that it isn’t Natalie-Marie doing it.
BillyMeierInFrench BM :
Yes, it certainly isn’t due to Annie Marie’s fact. We just happened to have beeeeennn immmm….prisooonnnneed In aaaa Spaaace tiiiimmmmme…. Coonnntinnuuuu…uuummmm whiiiiich deeeellllaysssss oooooouuuurrrr commmmmmmeeeeents sevvveeeralll hoooouuuurrrrrssss ……..
But the question is : how come ?
I must say it is really strange there may be an intervention on a video with such a “small” audience (compared to others of course).
Another comment went like this :
ALL FAKE
Taro :
None of it has ever been proven fake.
BillyMeierInFrench BM :
The usual suspects as always with the Billy Meier case ;-)
Taro :
+BillyMeierInFrench BM You mean me? I suppose it’s true.
BillyMeierInFrench BM :
+Taro
I was talking about the usual trolls polluting posts. When they can”t debunk, they have to discredit with brainwashing techniques.
(No argument but repeating constantly the same sentences if you see what I mean)
Taro :
+BillyMeierInFrench BM Ahh, gotcha. Also, there is something desperate about writing in all caps. All volume, zero substance. Every (unmoderated) Meier page has at least one.
BillyMeierInFrench BM :
In Contact Report 85[7] Ptaah explains how Billy should take better care over observing the violet coloured aura that surrounds someone called Mr Glanzmann. How it corresponds to a very low level of evolution, despite popular belief and false teaching saying otherwise.
BillyMeierInFrench BM :
You see Taro, our comments don’t appear anymore. … Isn’t that magic ?
I mean they appear in “ghost” mode. Only you or me can see our own comments. But not everyone….
(Note : Adam Holmes had put 8 comments all in Caps, 7 of them contained the word ‘FAKE’. His logo appeared as a violet square)
I think that was David Holmes, someone I actually know.
It was this gentleman:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZXUhmTEO0nl0OzpK-bUGUQ
Right, I’ve known him for 30 years. He’s kind of lost in imaginary things like channeling, the “flat” Earth, etc.
Flat Earth?? Oh dear. That explains everything.
That is no gentleman Taro. But funny he deleted all his info. Great Gotcha! Moment. Good job Taro. Btw where is all the bad language and bullying that Natalie-Marie’s mom was cranky about? Because there doesn’t appear to be any. Did she just make that up? Just like she made up all those questions that she got Natalie-Marie to ask Michael Horn?
Oh, I was just trying to be polite. Not sure if he deleted his info, though. Many skip the details of their account page. As far as, “bad language” is concerned, my best guess is they needed to find an excuse to pull the plug. Maybe Lolo’s sttrreettchhed oouuttt words was the best they could come up with. I really don’t know. It makes no sense.
Also I asked Natalie Marie (or her assistant) in a private conversation on facebook about the delays in the comments and I was answered they didn’t block comments.
Thank you Lolo for posting these. Are you by chance the infamous BillyMeierinFrench BM?
Yes, I am the infamous. Sorry about that.
I will shut up next time and let the trolls pollute any video about the Billy Meier’s case since it seems to be the rule 😉
I love reading your comments. Do not stop. I especially love reading Taro obliterate those that comment “Billy Meier is a hoax” on any YouTube video about BEAM without any backup. Or even with back up. He shuts them up with facts. I feel those “debates” are especially important to those unfamiliar with the case. Taro wins when the name calling begins. Almost every “debate” he has with them are finished when they start calling him names. It’s hilarious.
Thanks, Adrian. I’m just doing what comes naturally to me after extensive study of the evidence. And it does not come without its price: I’ve had one death threat so far.
Lolo, I wouldn’t say you need to, “shut up next time”. Just keep in mind that the words of a “skeptic” and the words of a “follower” are held to VERY different standards, EVEN where it would appear to be balanced and fair. Unfortunately, that double-standard is more common than not. There will always be those looking for an excuse to shut you down. If you stick to facts as much as possible and let the hoax theorists make asses of themselves before you do, reasonable people coming across the discussion will notice it.
Thanks Adrian and I appreciated your comments too.
We all shared some experiences. It looks like it was too much for “them”.
No worries Lolo, you didn’t say anything wrong. I was just making sure that all the posters on that blog were different individuals. Just in case false accusations are spread that all the comments were done by one person. So we nipped that rumour in the bud. So thank you again for that and please carry on…
Being infamous is not such a bad thing.
I think I was a little harsh in my wording. I’m still working on letting go of my sport style competitive nature. Like rah rah Meier, boooooo debunkers!! Obliterate…cmon. That’s a pretty extreme way of saying you win at all your debates. And that’s not very neutral positive… What I really feel is that those that read your debates with the “Meier has been proven a hoax” people that dare respond to you, is that the facts speak for themselves. How you say that it takes a thinking mind to sort through all of the information, while providing the evidence, to come to your own conclusion…I’m sometimes in amazement that most of the time they resort to the “it’s my opinion” argument and then you bust them out for the trolls that they are accusing you of being. Because you’re kicking straight facts. It’s hard to lose when you know all the facts that can’t be refuted. And the conclusion when you think with a mind that’s ready for the truth is that the case is…real. And I can’t tell you how many times I’ve read some of your debates where I’m left feeling that much more confident in speaking about the case because my knowledge of the facts are becoming second nature. Like I just know the facts, and the details within those facts that makes this case real. Which further solidifies my truth. Which is all that really matters. That’s a long way to say good job. Keep up the good work sir! You’re doing a lot for this case… Maybe more than you know…
Thanks again, Adrian. This actually started out as a way to find the best hoax theories for myself. I was 99% sure from my research at that point the case was genuine but if I had missed anything, the skeptics would surely let me have it. A few times I came across areas that I missed and required some further digging. So, the experiment did in fact work. But each time I equally found more refutations for the hoax theory. If I am good at this it’s only because of practice as well as very specific research guided by the “skeptics” themselves. Plus, I consider this a mental exercise in logic as well as careful and concise wording. The key is to never let them shift the burden of proof: Whoever makes the claim holds that burden. Trying to prove the Meier case genuine is very difficult. It was never meant to happen with only one photo or one film etc. The proof is cumulative and spread across the collective evidence. The probability of hoax continually approaches zero as more and more evidence is validated free of hoax. But it does take personal work to actually see this. So, since many try to claim the case a proven hoax I just hold them to that claim, forcing them to try and prove it. Which of course they can’t. So, they usually try to change the definition of “proof” or call me names or resort to death threats. In any case, I as well as they know very well any reasonable individual reading these debates will ultimately question their hoax conclusions about the Meier case. It happened to Matthew Wieczkiewicz, it can happen to others 😉
Michael,
She deleted the video for “safety reasons”. I will not question or assume her reasons, but if it was her video we should repect that. I noticed in her facebook page she is not comfortable that it is distributed. I am right? With young people we may allow them to diggest new information at their own pace. Any way, the inteview was very good, and the way you answered the question was excellent and respectful. I sense she was feelling a lot of pressure after that.
Real,
Yes, please see the response I just posted about all this.