* Duty to science and survival must supersede superficial considerations*

In light of our recent publication of Harry Lear’s *Open Letter to President Trump, *it’s timely also to link to this article, by Christian Frehner, documenting the discussions between Meier and the Plejaren, from *1980, *about the true value of Pi, and also from 2017, regarding Lear’s historical new information.

You’ll also see that that, in 1995, Meier specifically pointed to the coming correction of Pi, in Contact 251.

**Science over Celebrity**

Of course, of especial relevance is the emphasis on preventing the impact of * Duty to science must supersede superficial considerations *on Earth, in either 2029, or 2036. Hopefully, a good number of scientists have matured sufficiently to elevate their duty to *science* above concerns about funding, tenure, online/TV celebrity, etc. As we’ve learned time and again by their refusal to acknowledge, let alone even investigate the abundant, irrefutably and singularly authentic Billy Meier UFO contact case, *many* things are subservient to the attention and profit seeking of various people who call themselves scientists.

Many are also the paid-off deniers of manmade climate change, who *choose* to see no connection between oil extraction and earthquakes, A-bomb testing and the ozone damage, and all of the various manifestations of human irresponsibility and overpopulation, as first warned about by Billy Meier and the Plejaren… *72 years ago*.

**A Plait too Phil**

Please see this edition of Phil Plait’s skeptical blog, from 2009, for examples of overconfident, arrogant and misguided pseudoscientific comments, from a supposedly professional scientist, and his followers, regarding UFOs, the Billy Meier contacts,as well as Apophis, etc. You’ll see that, when challenged, Plait mysteriously disappeared, apparently unable to respond to the kind of evidence he was, quite insincerely, requesting. I’ll forward this blog to Plait as well and await his acknowledgement and corrections.

As is often the case, some people who attain positions of power, celebrity, etc., succumb to believing their own hype and work harder to maintain their position than to search for the truth.

**Your Participation on Our Show**

As announced on our recent show, we are inviting onscreen viewer participation for future shows. We actually plan on initiating that on our February 7 show. If you’d like to participate, please send Jedi an email at: jedaiahx@psiraise.com. Additionally, we’re looking at doing a live show at a time that will make it easier for our European and Asian audience to view, and participate in. I’ll be updating you via this blog.

**See also:**

**USAF OSI Investigator Concludes Billy Meier UFO Case Real**

**NASA Engineer: The Billy Meier UFO Case Is Real**

**Former Operations Director/VP, Orbital Flight Systems Group, on The Billy Meier Case**

**Billy Meier UFO Case: Beyond a Reasonable Doubt**

**The Real UFO Films The Pentagon Hid From You**

Seth,

After seeing this last night, it was on my mind to properly respond. My initial response wouldn’t be sufficient because I didn’t really have the time last night for a full response. Now, I do.

Thank you for your deep analyzing, though there are flaws to your comment that I’d like to point out. First, with words, particularly English, it’s easy to misinterpret and misread intent unless you are specifically trained to identify word combinations and the psychology relating to it. To do that, however, sometimes requires using certain psycho-analytical tools (one of which you referred to as taunting), that is an acquired discipline one can use when engaging others online.

This is a tool (much like a gun) to unravel, decipher and understand what type of person you are dealing with, and can be used as a negative mirror against the attacker. It’s nothing personal and it’s a part of the self-defense arsenal. We speak of neutral, then one must also identify the neutrality in usage of tools. It’s easy to think I had something against Matthew, but rest assured, I didn’t, and still don’t.

Now, I want you to consider a couple things.

1 – Intent

2 – Situation and Execution

3 – Self-Defense

The situation with Matthew, where his nature turned out to be a raging, hard-headed, delusional, convoluted, racist, was more than enough to rattle anyone. However, I was personally not rattled at all. I could’ve handled that situation very differently and be much, much, much harder on Matthew. To be completely forward, the more I think back on it, the more I notice the heavy restraint on my part.

One must consider the situation and context. While what you typed concerning my flaws are in an idealized situation, reasonable, in that one with Matthew, it’s not. Human to human interaction is variable, and what must apply in one situation may not be the case in another. Some earth humans need a “harsh word”, or frankly, a slap to the face, to sometimes wake them up as it’s read in Decalogue / Dodecalogue.

You must also consider the balancing of forces. Deeply negative situations, humiliations, defeats etc. can be an amazing life lesson to change people for the better. Matthew led us to those grounds, and thus, his learning had to come about in such way because of the situation.

It was nothing personal as it was identifiable that he had taken a dark turn only once we got into the conversation — something I previously did not know. However, that does not mean you should baby people, especially in such a wrong circumstance. The deeper the negative, the more the pushback, especially in regards to self-defense. This isn’t an excuse to go calling people names etc., but situations as it was with Matthew, does happen sometimes, and is acceptable based on the form, situation and the intent.

IE: Billy punched someone in the nose to calm them down, we can easily nitpick why this is a flaw, but in the situation, it worked.

As discussed, my intent was simply to unravel his true nature to the world — which causes many to be stirred since we are induced into a society of wearing masks. The next part is that we are human. The true problem with these idiotic online arguments is that it’s unrealistic in human-to-human settings, and it’s why we have been lessening on the bickering as time goes on here on the blog.

You don’t go up to a human being and speak for 5 minutes before letting them respond. This is exhausting. It’s not regular human behavior to have books-worth of information being tossed at them for conversation. It’s disintegrating casual human to human relations and causing some of us to be keyboard warriors due to various factors, insecurities, self-defense, etc. and altogether, the whole thing can be avoided in many ways which is in part our own faults for allowing such seeds to germinate.

Hi all,

Just a heads up — Seth and I met on video which was 1000x times better than prolonged blog posts. It was awesome and Seth is a great guy!

Hi Jedi,

I appreciate your response. While I do not agree with all of what you have stated with this, I do agree, up to a point, that continuing back and forth by way of our keyboards isn’t necessarily the most genuine means of understanding the real points we are trying to make clear to one another. Therefore, I’ll leave it to your discretion whether or not you’d like to contact my Email, and arrange a video chat (I am also interested in perhaps interacting on a future MH-live episode if you’d like to kill two birds with one stone).

Great response Seth. Well thought-out and absolutely appropriate. Appreciate hearing your thoughts on this matter. 🙂

Salome

Golden Pi = 3.144605511029693 is the correct value of Pi and this fact can be proven by almost anybody that has sufficient knowledge of the principles of the Kepler right triangle including the creation of a circle with a circumference equal in measure to the perimeter of a square.

The correct value of the Golden ratio will determine the correct value of both the square root of the Golden ratio and Pi. Traditional Pi 3.141592653589793 is also false because it is based upon a false value for the Golden ratio for example traditional Pi 3.141592653589793 can also be gained from 4 divided by the square root of 1.621138938277405 = 1.273239544735163. The ratio 1.621138938277405 can be gained in Trigonometry through the formula Cosine (35.84839254086685) multiplied by 2. The ratio 1.621138938277405 is a very poor approximation of the real Golden ratio of 1.618. The correct value for the Golden ratio is Cosine (36) multiplied by 2 = 1.618033988749895 and the correct value for the square root of the Golden ratio is 1.27201964951406. 16 divided by traditional Pi 3.141592653589793 squared = 9.869604401089357 results in the False value of the Golden ratio 1.621138938277405, while 16 divided by Golden Pi 3.144605511029693 squared = 9.888543819998317 = 1.618033988749895. Remember that 1.618033988749895 is the real Golden ratio and NOT 1.621138938277405. We do not even need to use any of the Pi values to determine the diameter of a circle or the circumference of a circle instead we can use the Square root of the Golden ratio = 1.27201964951406. If we multiply 1 quarter of the circle’s circumference by 1.27201964951406 then the result is the correct measure for the circle’s diameter. If we already know the length of the circle’s diameter but we do not yet know the measure for the circle’s circumference then all we have to do is divide the measure of the circle’s diameter by 1.27201964951406 and the result will be 1 quarter of the circle’s circumference. Multiply 1 quarter of the circle’s circumference by 4 and obviously we have the value for the circumference of the circle. If we use 1.27201964951406 to get the length of the circle’s diameter or the measure for the circle’s circumference and then we divide the measure for the circle’s circumference by the measure for the circle’s diameter I guarantee you the result is 3.144605511029693.

The Kepler right triangle has so much wisdom encoded in it.

The Kepler right triangle is proof that 3.144605511029693 is the correct value for Pi.

3.141592653589793 as Pi has already been proven to be false by the aid of computer software that demonstrate that the curve of a circle can never be filled completely by polygons so the assumption that the gaps in the circle’s curve will disappear is false and thus proves that the multiple Polygon method for deriving a value of Pi is flawed because the multiple polygon method can only give us approximations for Pi while the Kepler right triangle gives us the exact value of Pi and that is 3.144605511029693. For example if the second longest edge length of a Kepler right triangle is the same length as the diameter of a circle then shortest edge length of the Kepler right triangle is equal to 1 quarter of the circle’s circumference. So if the shortest edge length of the Kepler right triangle is multiplied by 4 and the result divided by the second longest edge length while we use 1.27201964951406 then we can get the correct value of Pi and again that is 3.144605511029693. The Kepler right triangle is also the key to squaring the circle with equal perimeters and also equal areas. So almost anybody can get the right value of Pi by just constructing a Kepler right triangle and also a pocket calculator. Remember that the hypotenuse of a Kepler right triangle divided by the shortest edge length produces the Golden ratio of Cosine (36) multiplied by 2 = 1.618033988749895, while the second longest edge length of a Kepler right triangle divided by the shortest edge length produces the square root of the Golden ratio 1.27201964951406.

Pi can be also be calculated from a Kepler right triangle if the measure for the perimeter of the square that is located on the shortest edge length of the Kepler right triangle is divided by the measure for the second longest edge length of the Kepler right triangle. Pi can also be gained if the measure of the perimeter of the square that is located on the second longest edge length of a Kepler right triangle is divided by the hypotenuse of the Kepler right triangle . Traditional Pi = 3.141 can also be gained from a Kepler right triangle that has a hypotenuse with a measure of 34 while the shortest edge length of this Kepler right triangle is 21 and the second longest edge length of the Kepler right triangle has a measure that is equal to the square root of 715. 34 and 21 are both numbers that can be found among the Fibonacci sequence that progresses towards the Golden ratio Phi of Cosine (36) multiplied by 2 = 1.618033988749895 when any of the numbers that are next to each other in the Fibonacci sequence are divided by each other resulting in an approximation for the Golden ratio-Phi of Cosine (36) multiplied by 2 = 1.618033988749895. 34 divided by 21 = 1.619047619047619. 1.619047619047619 is an approximation for the Golden ratio –Phi of Cosine (36) multiplied by 2 = 1.618033988749895. 21 multiplied by 4 = 84. 84 divided by the square root of 715 = 3.141421886428416. 3.141421886428416 multiplied by the square root of 715 = 84. The real value of Pi = 3.144605511029… and can be gained from a Kepler right triangle that has a hypotenuse that has a measurement of 9227465, while the shortest edge length of this Kepler right triangle is 5702887 and the measurement for the second longest edge length of this Kepler right triangle is 7254184.3229584. 9227465 and 5702887 are numbers that are both featured among the Fibonacci sequence that moves towards the Golden ratio-Phi of Cosine (36) multiplied by 2 = 1.618033988749895 when any of the numbers that are next to each other in the Fibonacci sequence are divided by each other resulting in an approximation for the Golden ratio-Phi of Cosine (36) multiplied by 2 = 1.618033988749895. 9227465 divided by 5702887 = the Golden ratio-Phi of Cosine (36) multiplied by 2 = 1.618033988749895. 5702887 multiplied by 4 = 22811548. 22811548 divided by 7254184.3229584 = 3.144605511029667. 3.144605511029667 multiplied by 7254184.3229584 = 22811548. 3.144605511029…….. is the true real value of Pi.

Traditional Pi 3.141592653589793 has been proven to be Transcendental in addition to being irrational. Traditional Pi 3.141592653589793 is Transcendental because Traditional Pi 3.141592653589793 does not fit any polynomial equations. Squaring the circle with equal surface areas becomes possible and easy after traditional Pi 3.141592653589793 has been rejected and replaced with other values of Pi that are NOT transcendental. Golden Pi = 3.144605511029693 is irrational but Golden Pi is NOT transcendental because Golden Pi = 3.144605511029693 is the only value of Pi that fits the following polynomial equation:

4th dimensional equation/polynomial for Golden Pi = 3.144605511029693 (x4 + 16×2 – 256 = 0).

(https://www.tiger-algebra.com/drill/x~4-16x~2-256=0/)

https://houseoftruth.education/en/teaching/mona-lisa/theorem-5-kepler-triangle-in-the-great-pyramid

https://www.goldennumber.net/triangles/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Kepler_Triangle_Construction.svg

https://m.facebook.com/TheRealNumberPi/

http://www.measuringpisquaringphi.com

Download for free and keep and read The book of Phi volume 8: The true value of Pi = 3.144, by Mathematician and author Jain 108: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-octave/2016-07/pdf1s8_jmqrL6.pdf

Thanks for your comments. For the future, please use your first and last name.

Thanks.

To get the correct measure for a circle’s diameter and to prove that Golden Pi = 4/√φ = 3.144605511029693144 is the true value of Pi by applying the Pythagorean theorem to all the edges of a Kepler right triangle when using the second longest edge length of a Kepler right triangle as the diameter of a circle then the shortest edge length of a Kepler right triangle is equal in measure to 1 quarter of a circle’s circumference. Also if the radius of a circle is used as the second longest edge length of a Kepler right triangle then the shortest edge length of a Kepler right triangle is equal to one 8th of a circle’s circumference:

Example 1:

The circumference of the circle is 12 but the measure for the diameter of the circle is not yet known. To discover the measure for the diameter of the circle apply the Pythagorean theorem to both 1 quarter of the circle’s circumference and also the result of multiplying 1 quarter of the circle’s circumference by the Golden ratio of Cosine (36) multiplied by 2 = 1.618033988749895. Divide the diameter of the circle by the square root of the Golden ratio = 1.272019649514069 to confirm that the edge of the square that has a perimeter that is equal to the numerical value for the circumference of the circle is equal to 1 quarter of the circle’s circumference.

Multiply the edge of the square by 4 to also confirm that the perimeter of the square has the same numerical value as the circumference of the circle.

Divide the measure for the circumference of the circle by the measure for the diameter of the circle to discover the true value of Pi.

Multiply Pi by the diameter of the circle to also confirm that the circumference of the circle has the same numerical value as the perimeter of the square.

The second longest edge length of a Kepler right triangle is used as the diameter of a circle in this example. 12 divided by 4 is 3 so the shortest edge length of the Kepler right triangle is 3. The hypotenuse of a Kepler right triangle divided by the shortest edge length of a Kepler right triangle produces the Golden ratio of Cosine (36) multiplied by 2 = 1.618033988749895.

According to the Pythagorean theorem the hypotenuse of any right triangle contains the sum of both the squares on the 2 other edges of the right triangle.

The shortest edge length of the Kepler right triangle is 3 and since the ratio gained from dividing the hypotenuse of a Kepler right triangle by the measure for the shortest edge of the Kepler right triangle is the Golden ratio of Cosine (36) multiplied by 2 = 1.61803398874989 then the measure for the hypotenuse of a Kepler right triangle that has its shortest edge length as 3 is 4.854101966249685. 4.854101966249685 divided by 3 is the Golden ratio of Cosine (36) multiplied by 2 = 1.618033988749895.

The square root of the Golden ratio = 1.272019649514069

4.854101966249685 squared is 23.562305898749058.

3 squared is 9.

23.562305898749058 subtract 9 = 14.562305898749058

The square root of 14.562305898749058 is 3.816058948542208.

Remember that the second longest edge length of the Kepler right triangle is used as the diameter of a circle. The measure for both the second longest edge length of this Kepler right triangle and the diameter of the circle is 3.816058948542208.

Remember that the shortest edge length of this Kepler right triangle is 3 and is equal to 1 quarter of a circle’s circumference that has a measure of 12 equal units.

Circumference of circle is 12

Diameter of circle is 3.816058948542208.

Diameter of circle is 3.816058948542208 divided by the square root of the Golden ratio = 1.272019649514069 = 3 the edge of the square.

3 multiplied by 4 = 12.

The perimeter of the square = 12.

12 divided by 3.816058948542208 = Golden Pi = 3.144605511029693144.

4/√φ = Pi = 3.144605511029693144 multiplied by the diameter of the circle = 3.816058948542208 = 12.

The circumference of the circle is the same measure as the perimeter of the square.

4/√φ = 3.144605511029693144 is the true value of Pi.

PYTHAGOREAN THEOREM: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagorean_theorem

Egypt SHOCK: Giza’s Sphinx ‘may have had face of a LION’ and is MUCH older than thought: https://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/1091417/egypt-shock-giza-pyramid-sphinx-lion-face-theory-spt

Hmmm, where have we read about the Sphynx aligning with Leo before?

“British team who claim they solved one of history’s most puzzling riddles in 2008… …claims the amount of water erosion the Sphinx has experienced indicates a construction date no later than the 6th millennium BC or 5th millennium BC, at least two thousand years before the widely accepted construction date and 1,500 years prior to the accepted date for the beginning of Egyptian civilisation.”

Compare the above with what Meier published in 1996 (translated into English in 2006):

“96. The great pyramid was together with the others already in the early days and then also for the last recreation aligned on the Orion constellation, but the Sphinx according to the guidelines of Chephren on the Leo constellation.

97. 4,500 years ago, the pyramids and the Sphinx were built solely by human beings of the Earth, whereas in the first construction 73,300 years ago, non-terrestrials were also involved, partly using telekinetic powers.”

Source: http://www.futureofmankind.info/Billy_Meier/Contact_Report_625

Thanks Matt, it’s funny how these discoveries are always made years after Billy first made the information available. If more scientists and researchers would put away their stubborn attitudes, it’s likely they could quickly make some very valuable “new” discoveries. Salome

Correction: The dates I listed for CR 625 are wrong as this contact report was published in 2015.

The 1996 / 2006 dates I included came from CR 256, which does mention the Sphinx, but, not the year it was built. I had too many tabs open and was rushed. Sorry for the error.