But profiteering “scientist” wants to talk about “other things” to avoid humiliation
After the recent article about Robin Hanson was published, Andrea brought to my attention a reference of his to an article in The Washington Post about “gigantic jet” lightning. I searched the hundreds of Contact Reports online to see if, and when, Billy Meier might have written anything about this phenomenon.
Some information, in Contact Report 230, from October 1989, seemed very close but, because Meier published it a few months after the gigantic jet lightning was officially reported, I didn’t cite it.
However, scrolling down the page a little I saw the following information:
Billy: Then a question regarding the black holes: On my Great Journey Ptaah made me watch a huge and fantastic structure. It was about two black holes orbiting each other with tremendous speed. The whole thing looked like two water strudels*, each of which while self-rotating also rotated with each other and already merged into each other. I explained to Ptaah that it would certainly be understandable if I named the structure twin-black holes that eat each other up. He commented that this hit the nail on the head. Later he took me to an area where I could observe another phenomenon of a similar kind, except that the structure looked like a triangle because it consisted of three black holes. Both phenomena, according to Ptaah, would be rare, but given. The question on that is whether the earthly astronomy scientists already know such structures? But how does a black hole actually develop unless there is first an explosion of a sun and only then everything collapses, which of course also occurs? Sfath also told me that even an outer space nebula might turn into a black hole.
Quetzal:
750. To your first question:
751. No, that is not the case, and it will probably take until the third millennium before they will discover such objects.
752. The normal formation of a black hole occurs when a sun turns around itself faster and faster until it collapses due to its own gravity.
Searching online to see if there was any information already in print about twin, let alone triple, black holes I found this, from March 2022:
“If the findings are confirmed, PKS 2131-021 would be the second pair of binary black holes ever discovered — and the tightest-knit pair scientists have found. Scientists discovered the universe’s first known black hole binary candidate in 2020 in a galaxy about 3.5 billion light-years from Earth. However, those black holes orbit each other every nine years, suggesting there is a much greater distance between them than there is between the two members of PKS 2131-021.”
According to the article, the first pair was discovered in 2020. That’s 31 years after Billy Meier discussed first seeing them, in Contact Report 31, during his Great Journey, which began on July 17, 1975, fully…45 years before the twin black holes were “officially discovered”.
………………………………..
UPDATE & CORRECTION
Jamie Liu just forwarded me this link with a quote from Stephen Hawking, in 2016:
“‘Gravitational waves provide a completely new way at looking at the Universe. The ability to detect them has the potential to revolutionise astronomy. This discovery is the first detection of a black hole binary system and the first observation of black holes merging,’ he said.”
So, this official discovery is “only” 27 years after Billy Meier describing them in Contact Report 230, not 31 years, as previously reported above.
However, in the same article it’s said:
“Scientists are claiming a stunning discovery in their quest to fully understand gravity.
They have observed the warping of space-time generated by the collision of two black holes more than a billion light-years from Earth.
The international team says the first detection of these gravitational waves will usher in a new era for astronomy.”
But it appears that Billy Meier may have first described the phenomenon in July 1988, 32 years earlier:
“You mean that when two black holes collide and merge with one another, then structural quakes will result in the levels of space and time or even structural convulsions, if I understand that correctly?”
………………………………..
Further searching revealed three supermassive black holes had been discovered, “officially”, in late August 2021,…46 years after Billy Meier described them.
Human beings are very wary of being “fooled” – unless of course we consider religion, politics, conspiracies, cryptocurrencies, channeling, etc. They are highly suspicious of Meier’s claims of meetings with extraterrestrials for more than 80 years, despite his independently authenticated physical evidence and, especially, volumes of prophetically accurate information.
Hard-core skeptics, incapable of thinking clearly and overcoming their prejudices and beliefs, are quick to say that Meier “must have” back-dated his scientific information. In very rare cases, they may find a discovery I claimed was first published by Meier was indeed previously published by a scientific source.
Those official discoveries usually only precede by a few weeks to a couple of months, Meier’s publication, back in the 1970s and 1980s, long before the internet existed. They first appeared in rarified scientific journals and papers that were then unknown to Meier – and most everyone else in the world, except the scientists and educators who were subscribers, etc. And, at the time we were searching for prior “official publication”, the articles hadn’t been uploaded from the academic sources and weren’t yet online.
Anyone who still proffers unsubstantiated “he could’ve” theories to explain Meier’s knowledge or foreknowledge should read former USAF OSI/Dept. of Defense investigator/supervisor Joe Tysk’s article, which explains how to apply the methodology of Means, Motive and Opportunity to determine the facts in important matters, like suspected crimes, hoaxes, etc.
“How Did This Man Know This Before ANYONE Else?”
Beginning in 1975, Meier’s Contact Reports were sequentially numbered, and also published in other languages, making the information impossible to back-date. Many people still have original copies of the earliest Contact Reports, including Contact Report 31.
Before the existence of new telescopes, such specific, previously unknown, subsequently “officially corroborated”, scientific information, was absolutely inaccessible and unknowable to anyone without the means to directly observe it, as Meier did…with the help of the space-traveling Plejaren, extraterrestrial human race.
So:
“What do scientists think of this historically unprecedented and unparalleled evidence?”
Robin Hanson, in his blissful narcissistic arrogance, generously and shamelessly provided the, unfortunately, ubiquitous answer. Unknowingly also speaking for all the other poseurs, who think of themselves as “scientists” and “experts”, and who freely dabble in the topic of UFOlogy and extraterrestrial life, Hanson proudly declared:
“I am not interested in further discussion of ‘the evidence and information from Billy Meier’. I’m more open to discussing the other topics. Is there a qualified third party that might join us in such a discussion?”
For Hanson, any and all factual evidence is irrelevant, an inconvenient distraction from his own inane utterances and ambition to elevate himself to stellar levels of egocentric esotericism.
What “other topics” have any significance…other than to give Hanson the opportunity to censor, suppress, disinform and distract from the immense factual truth?
Any truly open-minded, critically-thinking human beings need only spend a couple of minutes to see what Hanson – and the rest of the envious, profiteering charlatans – are firmly set against discussing and having to acknowledge, lest they be utterly humiliated.
Of course, Hanson could invite Lex Fridman to be his “qualified third party” and they could certainly conduct an in-depth and enlightened conversation about:
UFO Contactee Films Himself and UFO!
*Other English translations for the word strudel: whirlpool, swirl, vortex
Great article, Michael! It’s another piece of evidence in a long line of corroborations. Those who hang onto one piece of evidence, while using it as their entire basis for claiming a hoax, are clearly unable to think, let alone think critically.
They will truly be the last ones to board the train and pull themselves out of their own misery.
The appeal to a scientist for the BEAM Contact case must go through a study the scientist has already completed with papers/books published summarizing their research and conclusions to make possible for the scientist to relate to an aspect of the BEAM case.
For example consider the Kolbrin published by The culdian trust.
The Kolbrin was first introduced by independent scientist James McCanney in his book ATLANTIS TO TESLA THE KOLBRIN CONNECTION because it was telling a story relating to his theoretical work on the Plasma Discharge Comet Model (PDCM) and the effects observed in the heavens independently by many ancient (Earth) civilizations. CR005 tells a story relating to the subject matter in the Kolbrin.
McCanney had already completed work on the PDCM back in the late 70’s with his papers appearing in astrophysics journals during the early 80’s. His theoretical work was confirmed by direct measurements in 1986, 1996, 2001, and 2002. His papers can be found in the appendices of his books. See PLANET-X COMETS & EARTH CHANGES and and PRINCIPIA METEOROLOGIA THE PHYSICS OF SUN EARTH WEATHER.
McCanney was at the centre of the Hale-Bopp controversy that raged between 1995 and 2003 that the authorities desperately tried to cover-up and subvert for many reasons one of which was that Hale-Bopp was aimed directly at Earth on a collision course when first discovered by Robert S. Harrington of the Naval Observatory in 1991 on contract form the Vatican who thought Hale-Bopp was “Wormwood” that the BEAM case calls “The Destroyer Planet/Comet”. The “authorities” were unfamiliar with the details of McCanney’s work that described the “tail drag” of comets that is responsible for changing the orbit of comets together with their orbital periods with each pass near the Sun and this ignorance was responsible for their “terrified” state. But more than that, they did not want McCanney’s work to gain traction as it lead to vast foray’s into space by people of the Earth and is the reason why McCanney refers to outer space as the birth-right for humanity that is denied them. Such ventures left no place for authoritarian rulers nor global dictatorship enslaving humanity because it required humanity to take responsibility for all the limits and to cooperate in ventures that would guarantee their survival from many possible catastrophes including a planet-sized comet collision with the Earth taking from the example of the asteroid field that McCanney believes was the result of a direct collusion.
Chapter 5 of his book ATLANTIS TO TESLA THE KOLBRIN CONNECTION has a paper on the design of ancient spacecraft published in 1987 copyright 1982 that was presented at AIAA/DGLR/JSASS 19th International Electric Propulsion Conference held in Colorado Springs in May of that year. It was also presented as an invited Faculty speaker at the Air/Space America ‘88 Air Show and conference sponsored by the U.S. military and American military manufacturers (to be in direct competition with the very large international French air show).
In his weekly Science Hour podcast, he has mentioned that he also knows how to create the shielding (that he has not released) to allow spacecraft to venture beyond low-earth orbit. The spacecraft designs he talked about publicly required a power source. However, his understanding of the PDCM allows for the design for a spacecraft that is powered directly from the environment of space and within Earth atmosphere near certain locations on Earth that have a strong connection to the vertical electric field which the people of Atlantis utilized for their spacecraft and laser defenses to keep Earth mariners from venturing into their territory. In one of his podcasts, he described a journey to Pluto in the span of a day traveling half the distance at half light-speed before turning the spacecraft around and breaking during the remaining distance. He mentioned caution of traveling at light-speed or higher within the solar system. He mentions interstellar travel through energy conduits that connect stars where the spacecraft becomes a focus for cosmic energies. Some of this information is present in CR004. McCanney has also discussed the fine-matter energy flows present in all living beings with him having direct experience.
So, before approaching a scientist, it is important to understand related subject matter the scientist has authored and to prepare a concise but detailed document that relates to their work so that the scientist will take interest. This is not a trivial exercise if one studies the papers published in the appendices of McCanney’s books.
Are you saying that the scientists are too arrogant to understand the Meier material without adding something they have researched or are interested in? That sounds like a bad case of egoism to me. I think the scientists will need to do the same thing as the rest of us. THINK for themselves. It’s so easy to observe the truth that it pains me to see such mental gymnastics.
I’m sure that if I familiarize myself much more with McCanney and his works I’ll learn some interesting things.
But one needn’t go to extraordinary means to to inform a reasonably intelligent person that their house is on fire. While I DON’T know that it’s the case with McCanney, any scientist that demands already expertly analyzed and authenticated evidence needs to be “re-formatted” so as to arbitrarily conform to their preferred science or discipline isn’t a true scientist.
Melissa, MH,
Researchers usually have anywhere from a dozen to two dozen projects that they are working on simultaneously as they are trying to gain insight into problem areas that are not well described. One cannot expect them to leave everything to consider something not directly related to an area they are involved in such as the vast BEAM case that spans many disciplines and require years if not decades of research to delve into any given aspect.
These researchers are literally working from scratch through the stages of cognition, working experience, knowledge acquisition, re-cognition, and self-disclosure in wisdom.
An Yvonne Whiteman or Mark Gaffney at a much lesser extent than an independent scientist such as McCanney.
True researchers and arrogance don’t mix.
McCanney has stated on his podcast (not exact words) that everyone has a limit on what one can study in detail at any time. So have to pick and choose. And this is usually related to insight and interest. His advice to students is quite time of at least four hours a day outside of other daily activities. Students at college require even more time.
Next time something requiring one’s immediate attention and action, a fire, flood, car accident, emergency, etc., occurs, I think they should employ this very “scientific thinking”, i.e. dismissing the incident because of the inconvenience which, of course will…uncreate it.
McCanney once operated an archery business producing very accurate equipment that the military shut-down because they didn’t want the public having access to such covert and deadly weaponry.
Car accidents happen and people involved adjust. This is not the same as a researcher switching course unless there is something that warrants such action.
Well, of course, the most important, independently authenticated information and evidence in all of science and human history, isn’t enough to get the average, stupid “scientist” to take notice.
What was I thinking?
Independent scientist James McCanney has recommended following the work of Yvonne Whiteman who studies the Kolbrin together with historical accounts to write articles and books.
Here is another possible vector for introducing aspects of the BEAM case to a researcher and those who follow this researcher. But it is important to be very familiar with the Kolbrin and the works of Yvonne Whiteman before creating a concise document relating to the Kolbrin and the researchers works.
May the Planetary Logos take a liking to you and Light you up real soon.
45 years and counting forever now blazing across my brow.
“…any scientist that demands already expertly analyzed and authenticated evidence needs to be “re-formatted” so as to arbitrarily conform to their preferred science or discipline isn’t a true scientist” hits the nail squarely on the head, Michael.
Thanks Chris, and a…square head it is!
Nice find Michael!
I have found this news article saying about binary black hole:
“Gravitational waves provide a completely new way at looking at the Universe. The ability to detect them has the potential to revolutionise astronomy. This discovery is the first detection of a black hole binary system and the first observation of black holes merging,”
The article was dated [11 February 2016]
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-35524440
Hi Jamie,
Thanks, I corrected and added some other info. Please check.
They deny the Meier information because its not them who will or could profit from it. To deny its existence is the same as sticking your head in the sand to refuse to see the sun revolving round the earth.
Salome.
One would think NASA might want to speak with Billy instead of waiting 11years, or 20, or 45 years to discover something about space.
Another science opportunity to suggest the emergence of Creation from Nothing (no description) into description and back into Nothing in endless cycles.
There is also a link to the Tewari “Free Energy” Generator. For those who balk ate the term “Free Energy” you are correct. There is no such thing as “Free Energy”. However, there is something better called “Freely Available Energy” and in the video, Tewari speaks of the vast ether that the device is tapping into to extract more energy than what is input.
Independent Scientist McCanney is not a believer in “free energy” devices but is aware of vast energy output of the Sun that can be tapped into through the vertical electric field and he has created such a device called the McCanney WING Generator that is very efficient at capturing the energy of the wind.