The devilish deception revealed in the details
In 2009, I corresponded with Phil Langdon, a skeptic and model maker in the UK who was trying very hard to debunk Billy Meier’s UFO evidence.
When Langdon sent me his first effort to debunk Meier’s well-known Pendulum UFO film, I pointed out that his version didn’t reproduce the moment when Semjase’s craft moved to the left and hovered motionlessly, at an angle, before resuming the swaying motion.
I then received a video clip where Langdon told me he had attached another wire so he could manipulate it and create the pause the way he believed Meier had “hoaxed it”, an effect that most likely required…two hands.
Skeptics like Langdon who are in denial of the reality of Meier’s UFO photos, films and video, work overtime to concoct theories about how they believe Meier must have “done it”. Then in their desperation, they also reveal their failures and their…dishonesty.
The Devilish Deception Revealed in the Details
I grabbed some images from Langdon’s videos a couple of years ago; I don’t know if they are still online. I’ll include my comments.
Langdon proudly includes some hardware he used to try to duplicate Meier’s films. Of course, he provides no evidence that Meier ever used such things:
It’s well-known that Billy Meier has one hand but, in his enthusiasm to deceive, Langdon reveals that – despite all his claims – he used…two hands to manipulate his model:
So, we already have clear evidence that Langdon lied about only using one hand to make and photograph/film his models. Of course, Meier did use his only hand to…press the button on his camera when the ship appeared.
In his haste, Langdon makes sloppy mistakes but, since he’s appealing to people who want to believe that Meier hoaxed his incomparable evidence, they may not pay close attention to such blatant things. For examples, here are details of Billy Meier WCUFO photo, number 808, and Langdon’s attempts to duplicate them.
The top of the WCUFO:
Phil Langdon’s version:
The smoothly-machined WCUFO:
Here’s a detail from the corresponding area on Langdon’s model:
Meier’s photo, taken in 1981, shows three horizontal ridges encircling the craft, between the bottom rim and the top portion, which on Langdon’s model curves away noticeably from the crystals, unlike on the real WCUFO.
Langdon’s model clearly used a different object, with only two horizontal bands and it also shows signs of having been “put together” in the area with the horizontal protrusion*.
The area just in front/below the red crystals on the actual WCUFO also bears no resemblance to Langdon’s sloppy fake.
Langdon didn’t even attempt to duplicate this, even with 27 years to try:
Melissa Osaki’s precise analyses below reveal additional details that further put to rest any claims of hoaxing on Meier’s part, as you will see.
Will imitation crystals and metal alloy capture and absorb the light correctly? You be the judge.
Color Inversion
Color inverting an image means flipping the colors to their opposites on the color wheel. The greens will become pinks, reds will become teal or turquoise blue, yellows will turn blue/violet, etc.
Usually, when an image is inverted, the objects that are light colored will change to a grey or black shade and the darker objects will change to shades of white. When we invert genuine crystals or metal alloys, the light that they absorb causes them to invert to the correct opposite color. Any object that has enough light will invert to the correct opposite color, but crystals will invert to the correct color even in low-light settings. That’s because they absorb light and convert it to energy. The stunning brilliance should also be noted.
Click to see full resolution
Which came first, the car or the beamship?
I’ve seen this analysis over the years and set out to do my own research on some of the WCUFO images. The following analysis can be found on this “debunking” website: http://thebiggestsecretpict.online.fr/ufo_et.htm
This is what they had to say about the below image:
“This pict (below) comes from the same series as the previous picts. If the previous analyses didn’t convince everyone yet, then this pict should to the job. It’s surely the ultimate “smoking gun”, proving willful deception by Billy Meier, as it can clearly be seen that the object shown is hanging in front of the car!! Ooops…
It’s a fact that due to the bad (i.e. low) resolution of the available original picture, and due the confusing lighting of object and car, one could easily oversee this fact. But after enlarging the pict several times, it becomes blatently obvious when looking at the area indicated by the red line, that the craft is with 100% certainty in front of the car, and is therefore much smaller than the car! Consequently it must be of similar dimensions as those calculated for the previous analysis! This pict was posted with the photo-“analysis” by James Deardorff mentioned earlier (page has been saved by us in its entirety in case it gets modified), which should be an indication of how “qualified” he really is to confirm the “authenticity” of these picts…”
However, thanks to a process called photo fringing, I’ve discovered that what they think they are seeing is merely an optical illusion. I hypothesize that we are seeing a reflection of the ship bouncing off the top of the car.
Photo fringing is a process where an outline is formed around the clear edges of objects in a photo. The program can’t create an outline for something that isn’t there. Any good photo editing software will include a fringing application.
The pixels tell the truth.
If the ship was actually a model sitting in front of the car, the program would easily outline the right bottom section of the ship’s undercarriage. The ship is in focus in the image, the vehicle is not. It doesn’t (can’t) outline the bottom right undercarriage because it’s not visible, it sits behind the vehicle.
This next image below is turned up to full intensity for the fringing.
You’ll notice that the top of the vehicle isn’t clear enough to provide a sharp edge. That is indicative of an object being blurred in the foreground while having the object in the distance clearer and more focused.
Blurred foreground is indicative of someone standing close to the object in the front while the object in the back is further in the distance. They call it depth of field in photography.
Original image
The Real Hoaxer Is Phil Langdon
There is no wiggle room here, different is…different, not the same. While the skeptics and other amateurs, self-professed “experts”, etc., will settle for sloppy, cynical work to try to make their bogus cases, it’s clear that the actual “hoax” is the one perpetrated by people like Phil Langdon.
The fact is that no matter how good a model he could’ve made, it would still just be a…model of a real object, and whether he used one hand or two actually wouldn’t matter. Meier simply used one hand…to press the button on the camera when the ship came, as he’s said.
Langdon’s was a deceitful, dishonest effort to try to discredit a good and truthful man, and his real evidence.
By his own admission, Phil Langdon’s had over 27 years to study Meier’s photos, films and to experiment with making models. Part of his fervor and desperation to try to debunk Meier’s evidence may stem from Phil’s deep immersion in delusional religious and metaphysical beliefs, replete with irrational, manmade, imaginary gods, saviors, etc. Whatever the case may be, in his desperation to do so he reveals his own obvious failures and deep dishonesty.
The Question No Skeptics Ever Answer
Ironically, while we know where Phil Langdon gets photos of real UFOs to try to duplicate, former USAF OSI/Dept. of Defense supervisor, Joe Tysk, posed a question that no skeptic ever attempts to answer:
“Now the first question in everyone’s mind should be – where did Billy Meier get a photo album with dozens of UFO photos back in 1964? There obviously were no ‘UFO Photos R Us’ stores in India at that time, so how and where could he have accumulated all these photos if he didn’t take them himself as he said?”
………..
“There is also much more corroborating evidence to support the Billy Meier case that is not covered in this article but can easily be found at various sources on the internet. Of course, none of this will ever be enough for the die-hard skeptics. Once people take a side or stance, as they often do with politics and religion, literally nothing will change their position, no matter how strong the evidence that is presented.”
*The Harco garbage-can lid that caused the skeptics to claim Meier used it to create a model actually has three ridges:
…raising the question: why didn’t Langdon use it? However, the far more intricate, still irreproducible details, discovered and described by Melissa Osaki, confirm the irrefutable authenticity of Meier’s WCUFO evidence.
It is too obvious that “looks similar” does not prove “is the same”. This is not a scientific method. I can make, or use, a small model of a F16 craft, hanging it from a cord and take photos of it with clouds in the background. And it will “look similar” to a flying F16. Does it means the F16 is fake?
The WCUFO in Billy´s front yard is 3.5 meters in diameter. This is a scientific fact nobody has debunked. The Pendulum UFO moves the tree top of a real tree that we find 30 years later; this is a tree from the future. Can a skeptic replicate this effect? The movement of the Pendulum UFO does not follow the laws of physics, because the pendulum period changes all the time. Langdon test shows the pendulum period does not change in his demonstration. Langdon model follow the laws of physics but not the UFO we see in Meier film.
“The Real Hoaxer Is Phil Langdon”
Have you watched the test he did with two metallic bells hanged from cords and the sound they produce that is very similar to the beamship sound Meier recorded? The beamship sound was analyzed by sound experts. But Langdon test sounds are identical, without explaining why they are the same. Any cord has a unique sound frequency, depending of the length of the cord and the tension in the cord. If they produce any sound, as Phil Langdon showed in his video, they must be only two frequencies, one for each cord, but not several frequencies changing all the time. Clearly he is faking his evidence. If his experiment of hanging two metallic bells, instead of the bells we hang sun glasses we will hear… Elton John singing?
Can you tell me how long the twiggs at the crown of a firr tree need to be if the WCUFO would be 22-25 feet in diameter as claimed by Meier?
Hey everyone,
This comment is by the schizophrenic skeptic who spends his life futilely posting delusional comments – supporting Langdon and other defeated nut cases – under a dozen different names.
It appears that he’s now going into the tree-trimming business.
Is it your goal in life to Debunk the Truth. “Book of OM 32:1979. “To bury the truth, there are not enough shovels.”… “And those who try end up digging their own graves….” I whish you all the best in the future.
Billy has one arm . The camera was set just short of infinity, and the view finder was broken. So for the ship to be clear the Plejaren would have to be exactly where the camera could get a clear shot . Billy has this ship fly over his farm house , over his vehicle , next to trees , over a road at night , etc. Again a clear photo from a broken camera that has no focus adjustment. The ship has to be just far enough away to be clear in the shot. No way to hoax his photos. They are real .
Phills fotos look like “POOP” to me. Lol
Get ready for the next US UAP Congressional Hearing.
The House Oversight Committee will hold a hearing on UAPs on Wednesday, 7/26.
It will be no better than:
Governmentt censorship: bit.ly/3IC0UiU
youtu.be/1nbL6Ixwpq4
From past performance, the U.S. UAP Congressional Hearing is only a smoke screen to appease the public. This issue will drag on and on, nothing will come of this. There is still a massive coverup and distortion of the truth going on.
Well, I have to applaud Phil Langdon and his hard work in proving that the WCUFO in Billy Meier’s photos are authentic.
Contact report 254 :
Ptaah:
1. Certainly, because I considered the matter important enough that I should concern myself about everything immediately.
2. A quick clarification was necessary, because not only are you impacted by the matter, rather also the photographic evidence that you have prepared according to our direction, in that you have photographed the pertinent flying device.
3. Now these are the circumstances:
4. We already worked with those flying devices, which you call the cake-ship, in the twenties, but it was indeed only at the end of the seventies that they were brought to the required status for their use on the Earth.
5. The form of these flying devices was specially thought up for the Earth, for which reason we made the effort to transmit the entire necessary specifications for the design to terrestrial scientists through impulse-telepathy so that, out of that, flying disks could be developed.
6. This impulse-telepathic information went predominantly to aerospace technicians, as I will designate these persons, whereby especially German engineers were included for this, to whom we transmitted exact plans for the external form as well as certain technical particulars which were responsible to transmit.
7. Thereby the German scientists also actually experimented, whereby they could construct halfway suitable flying disks, which according to our thinking at those times should have been used to constitute an air power through which an early-brought-about world peace should have been achieved.
8. However, the political machinations changed very quickly into a war-based direction, for which reason we brought an end to further impulse-telepathic information to the German scientists and allowed the project to expire, whereby we, however, initially transmitted false information so that the flying disks could not be created specifically for warlike purposes.
9. However, the plans existed furthermore in isolated copies because we could not obtain them all.
10. Which was, however, no longer bad, because these still-existing papers were extremely incomplete, and disappeared in this form.
11. In practice, these drafts were only available as sketches which only showed the outer ring and the underside of the flying device while the extension underneath and the construction of the top were no longer available; and it is exactly these sketches, of the outer ring as well as its underside, which survived for several decades and reappeared in the middle of the sixties.
12. Though this happened without our knowledge, because, since the disappearance of the sketches which had become useless, we concerned ourselves no further about that until just now, when you called Florena and communicated to her that you discovered that the forms of lids for large containers exist, which, in their configuration and construction, are made exactly the same as the lower ring and its underside, of our flying device and show the same structure more than only approximately.
13. And because you gave one of these kinds of lids to Florena in order to provide clarification, it was easy for us to compare it with the construction of the flying device, which made the astonishing sameness clear to us, which also gave us occasion to dedicate our attention to the matter.
14. Therefore we cleared everything up very precisely, and thereby found out that the sketches which surfaced again were evaluated in industrial firms and found application, and that these same sketches were utilised for the design and manufacture of forms of lids which were completely atypical, because, until then, the designers usually only ever drafted forms of lids which showed simple lines, however never forms which could be called futuristic and complicated.
15. Thus came about the form of the lids for the container named by you, whereby the form of the lids, as I already said, is deceptively similar to the area of the lower ring and its underside, as is shown by our flying devices which relate to this.
*no one should be surprised that the possibility of the first beamships noticed in contact report 39 in which they from their exterior appearance resembled the spaceships from the Orion tv show.
“357. billy these elves already master space travel! S
Semjase:
358. Sure, they also have about 500 years more development behind themselves than the Earth-humans of your time, which I already said”
But their internal drive(s), meaning their propulsion(s) may in fact resemble the wedding cake UFO.
This person says:
… If the previous analyses didn’t convince everyone yet, then this pict should to [sic] the job. It is the ultimate “smoking gun”, proving willful deception by Billy Meier, as it can clearly be seen that the object shown is hanging in front of the car!!
With these words, they reveal themself as blind, utterly incompetent at describing what is seen in an image, but worse, that it is they who are willfully deceiving. He has willfully distorted that golden WCUFO image by poorly attempting to extend its base over the car. Langdon’s lunacy here is that he knows with Meier’s camera, closer things are out of focus, and more distant things beyond 4-6 metres away are in focus because the camera is stuck on infinity focus. So he actually proves the WCUFO is clearly behind the car, which cuts off the WCUFO base’s bottom right side. Again, Langdon has known the details of Meier’s camera for over 20 years, so here he is involved in blatant attempted deception and image manipulation, and what a pathetic attempt it is. A mistake is one thing, but Langdon has repeatedly spewed out this deception.
I would like to say, that all attempts to hoax Billy’s photo’s are going to fall flat, even by the best model makers in the world, for one very simple reason: PRECISION. Precision is one of the earmarks of advanced technology. For instance, the standard level of precision for making a semiconductor computer chip in 1989 was 800 nanometers(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/800_nm_process), but the first 7 nanometer transistor wouldn’t be made until 2015(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_nm_process), which is a full 114 times smaller than 1989. It would have been impossible to make a computer chip with 7 nanometer sized transistors in 1989, since the required PRECISION was lacking. Machining at that scale was just not there. This applies to ALL of our technologies that exist today. Even internal combustion engines that are built today, are more precise in their manufacturing tolerances than they were a century ago. So, if you want to model a ship built by an advanced race, you must match their level of precision with machining and manufacturing.
Phil’s photos clearly lack this precision in every regard. If one looks at the spheres on the WCUFO(Shouldn’t it be WCIFO, since we know its identity? Anyway..) you can see that they were made with a very high level of manufacturing precision. There is not a single defect in any of the metal on the WCUFO, at all! The spheres are all EXACTLY the same size, and even the pattern on the metal between the top group of spheres and the one under it, follow a very precise pattern. All of the dimples on the metal are exactly the same size and go around that tier in exactly the same way. This is all very precisely done, not because it is aesthetic, but because it is NECESSARY for the functioning of the craft. Decorative items don’t need to be precise, since they lack any real function. Even if we don’t know what that function is, it is clear that it is following some very specific rules.
All of this fine machining and high manufacturing tolerances, evident in these pictures, lend themselves to one inescapable conclusion: they were made for a reason by highly advanced technological means. In Rhal Zahi’s analysis of the reflections of the spheres, you can see that all of the reflections are the same. Yet in Phil’s photos, the reflections are distorted by surface imperfections of the spheres he used(which look to be stainless steel ball bearings to me). There is even a glaring defect in the fourth sphere from the left, on the second row of spheres in Phils photos that look like a steel casting defect, caused by gases escaping from the metal once it is poured in the mold, surface defects in the mold, or inclusions from impurities in the casting metal(sorta like this
). This says nothing at all of the terrible plastic lid that he used for the base of his model! There are tons of injection molding defects in the plastic. All of these defects are absent in Meier’s original photos. Maybe, because they aren’t models?
But hey, any one armed man with a terribly limited budget, lack of a machine shop, specialist equipment, formal training, and all of that could make Billy’s photos! I mean, hell who hasn’t glued a bunch of steel ball bearings to a trashcan lid to make photos that are irreproducible for decades and decades, even into the digital age? It’s the sorta thing everyone does! Haha! Now we can just have AI fake the photos for us….as soon as it can figure out how HANDS WORK
).
Excellent points, thanks.
I’ve frequently posted the close-up of area with the blue, green and red crystals also because of the precision.
I sent this around to various skeptics and people supposedly interested in UFOs on Twitter. We’ll see if any of them – especially the UFO/UAP wannabes – dare utter a word.
The Truth always percolates to the surface. These people just have no clue. The teachings have almost nothing to do with Beamships. The Earth Is crying out. It’s moaning because it is being treated like garbage. Raped of it’s resources it needs to survive. The Earth has a consciousness. If we managed to survive these future days Billy said Deep Down in the Earth we can find an endless supply of clean energy. Geothermal will not harm our home. There is no such thing as free energy. We need to create Geothermal Plants. Reduce population in a safe and responsible way. “Whatever human beings do, they shall do with the awareness of Creation’s presence. But a human being shall never attempt to force the truth onto another, because then it would only be worth half its value”…Jmmanuel. When our only home decides enough is enough humanity will be in awe at the power it can and will most likely unleash.
Wow, that’s amazing, with inverted light, all the colours of the stones and jewels etc are so cool. Never knew this. Thanks Melissa
Thanks Simon, it’s very beautiful and interesting. Even without the fancy colors, the WCUFO is obviously made with precision. It’s not some cheap model with plastic parts and Christmas ornaments. It’s easy to see that with the naked eye. The skeptics and religious folks will never admit it because it forces them to reexamine everything.
One other thing to be mentioned. Is that Langdon cannot produce at first sighting and first photos of the new Wedding Cake at a moments notice. Given that single person such as Mr Meier, gets called and has to be at a location with in a limited time period makes setting up wires to fake a demonstration quite impossible to achieve.
I think we can all stop calling an “UFO” since it has been identified long ago.
Looking at the WCUFO photo in front of the house and the close-up night time photo of the WCUFO you can see that the reflections in the front bottom row of spheres is a bit crisper (more in focus) than the reflections in the front top rows of spheres. This makes sense because the distance between these two rows of spheres is between 1-2 meters (the beamship diameter is 7 meters). The reflections in a small model would show almost no difference in crispness of reflections in the different rows of spheres because of its small size. But for an object with real size, the difference becomes apparent. You can also see this difference along the bottom row of spheres, as the reflections become more blurry as you go from the frontmost spheres to the ones along the sides (which are further away). As the distance from the camera to the spheres increases, their reflections become more blurry. The most in-focus spheres are the ones closest to the camera which are on the frontmost bottom row.
The film Contact which showed an analysis of Billy’s photos had a lab analyze the photos and they said something similar, where there were areas on the beamships which were more in-focus than others, which can only be due to its large size.
Mr. Horn, or anyone else who knows, what is the make and model of the Mercedes in the picture with the WCUFO?
Does anyone know what the make and model is of the Mercedes in the picture with the WCUFO?