Not everyone appreciates or fully understands why the Plejaren would only allow films and photos prior to the digital age. When one investigates and gets into the nitty gritty of photo and film analyses, then they will truly understand. Frauds and charlatans are ubiquitous in the modern field of Ufology, which only amounts to half of all the problems in that community. In hindsight of what the UFO field would become, the Plejaren knew all too well that it would be absolutely useless to produce any photo or video evidence after the dawn of the digital age. The F-117 video footage is no exception. It was recorded in 1981 with pre-digital technology, and well before the launch of the first digital video recorder. We will have to wait to learn the details about Wendelle’s camera, but I suspect that it was older than 1981.
When did digital video recording hit the scene? (emphasis added)
“The video technology you see today first arrived in 1995, when Panasonic and Sony brought digital recording to life. The first Digital Video camcorder kick-started a fast-paced evolution in digital film, and things have never been the same. Truly.“
Source: OUR DIGITAL ERA
The F-117 flight video was uploaded to YouTube on September 12, 2017, which was more than 3 years before Wendelle’s photographs were ever known about. Michael Horn found the photos on October 8, 2020 and first revealed them 7 days later on October 15, 2020.
A copy of the first flight video was downloaded and saved on April 24, 2022. It was sent to one other person in the event that the original YouTube video was taken down. The craft-like object that appears beneath the F-117 was in the video when it was first examined back in May 2022. The objective now is to rule out digital manipulation and show that the object was likely an original component of the video.
The screenshot below is used to show (in the event that it gets deleted) that the YouTube publish date was indeed September 12, 2017.
Forensic Analysis
The following images are from an analysis of the object that appears beneath the Stealth jet. Forensic tools can be used to find anomalies that aren’t apparent to the naked eye. While they are most often used for detecting anomalies in photographs, they can also show hints of digital manipulation in a screenshot. It’s always best to have the original image, but we can still glean some information from the screenshots. We are looking for digital alterations and manipulations that might have happened after the film was made. Something that was digitally inserted will leave clues. In order to rule out digital manipulation, we must exhaust all available resources.
We know that the Plejaren have a unique manner of positioning their beamships, which at times can seem peculiar and also appear as an optical illusion. If the object beneath/behind the F-117 is indeed Asket’s beamship, then once again we see a very unique and clever positioning of the craft.
Noise Analysis
Objects should have a similar contrast and appearance. Digital manipulations or inserted objects will often stand out and look out of place in the noise analysis.
In this next image, we compare a screenshot of a faked UFO image, which was made for the purpose of this analysis. The fake UFO was cut out of another image and then inserted into the image below. A screenshot was then taken of the faked image. I’m using screenshots to show that you can detect visual anomalies in copies that are not the original file. The original file is always the best option, but not always necessary.
You’ll notice that the colors on the UFO are brighter and have a different scheme. It looks a bit out of place with the rest of the photo. It’s suspicious, but can it be ruled a fraud?
The screenshot of the fake UFO image:
Here is one of Wendelle’s images for comparison. Notice how everything just blends together in a uniform fashion. It blends so well that you can barely see the jet and Asket’s beamship at a glance. The objects in this image are in harmony with the background.
Level Sweep
This tool enhances the edges of objects and makes it easier to notice if something was cut out and fraudulently inserted or digitally altered.
If you examine the pixels along the edges of the jet and the craft-like object, they are similar in appearance and size. We see a consistent pattern across the edges of the jet and the craft-shaped object.
Luminance Gradient
This follows a similar logic to fringing. The clearer and more in-focus the object, the clearer and sharper the outline. It can help determine the position of an object relative to other objects. Here we see more consistency across the entire image.
Based on these images, it appears that the object is behind the jet rather than directly underneath. We can see the turquoise outline going under the bottom of the wheel from the left. There is also a very faint pink outline on the right underside of the wheel. The bigger clue is the clear break in the blue line on the top left side of the craft-like object. It would indicate that the object is behind the wheel and further away than it appears. The likelihood is very high that the Stealth jet is in the foreground and the craft-like object hovers somewhere in the background.
I haven’t determined how far away or how close it might be. If someone wants to make a relative determination based on the known dimensions of the F-117 and Asket’s beamship, the dimensions are listed below. The DAL Universe ship is over a third of the size of the F-117 — roughly 39.8%. It’s improbable that it would be underneath based on the size ratio in the image.
F-117 Nighthawk Dimensions: Span 43.3 ft, length 65.9 ft, height 12.4 ft.
DAL Universe Beamship: 8 metres in diameter, 26.24 ft. (The actual beamship that Asket was using remains unknown.)
An image submitted by David Hurlburt gives us a general size comparison.
Artifacts
Artifacts are the result of degradation, dust, scratches, blemishes, etc. that exist on the outside of the film. Artifacts can appear on top of the real objects in a film or photograph. If the craft-like object was indeed an original component of the film, we should see an indication that the artifacts move on top of the object. If the object was digitally inserted at a later date, we would expect to see an anomaly where the artifact and object meet.
Principal Component Analysis with Depth Projection
In this first image, a small bit of depth is added so we can first look at the wheel in relation to the object. It becomes even more noticeable that a section of the craft-like object is hidden behind the wheel.
Here we look at artifacts in the film. You’ll notice the lines going up and down at various intervals during the film. Those lines are artifacts that the original film would likely not have had. Here we investigate whether they are on top of the objects in the film.
It may be hard to see without a magnifier tool, but the lines are indeed found on both the jet and the object.
The area on the left side of the object has what appears to be a reflection on it.
Principal Component Analysis
When an object is fraudulently inserted into an image or frame, it tends to stand out from other objects in the frame. It’s not always easy to notice this unless we change the contrast and compression rates. Inserted objects will often resist compression and retain the same or similar appearance as before being compressed. This becomes noticeable when we look at 2nd and 3rd level compression.
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Everything appears even and congruent throughout level 2 and level 3 compression.
In these next images, we look at the fake UFO image once again. You’ll notice how the UFO doesn’t compress at the same rate as its surroundings.
Not all images will look this obvious, but in order to understand the evidence, you have to first understand what you’re looking for and how anomalies, however small, can add up across the different modes of forensic analyses. The objective is to find consistency or inconsistency across multiple stages of the process. A thorough investigation of all aspects of the case should accompany the forensic research and physical evidence. Once you have collected all the evidence and supporting facts, it is then that a logical conclusion can be determined.
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
We can rule that this UFO image is highly suspicious.
The reason these images are so interesting is because film can also be manipulated or altered if someone has the technology and understanding to do it. We recently learned from Ptaah in contact 875 that a forgery will occur with Semjase’s films. It seems that it will happen at some point in our future. The details were unclear, but it goes to show that our primitive tests are no match for advanced races.
After thorough examination using all the available tools, the craft-like object appears consistent with its surroundings. It remains congruent across different forms of testing and shows no obvious signs of being digitally inserted in a fraudulent manner. Both the F-117 and the craft-shaped object appear to be part of the original content. If an alteration was made, it was achieved with higher and more sophisticated technology that is capable of such precision and deception.
The Undercarriage
I’ll leave you with one final piece of evidence which may actually be the most stunning piece to date.
There have been a lot of questions and controversy regarding the landing gear and why we can’t see it in Wendelle’s photographs. I’ve had a number of people tell me that it couldn’t have been the first flight because the landing gear was never retracted during that flight. We know from Hal Farley’s interview that he took the F-117 up to 10,000 feet (almost 2 miles/1.6 kilometers) on that first flight. Let’s take a moment to consider how unlikely it would have been to capture a clear image of the landing gear with old camera technology. Visibility would have been affected by the sun, wind, shadows and other atmospheric effects as well. Nevertheless, Asket and Wendelle didn’t take a trip to the future for no reason. And that’s why no stone has been left unturned. Just as the camouflage paint scheme was an open secret waiting to be found, so too was the landing gear.
This one detail has been a source of contention that deepened the mystery around the flight date laid out by Ptaah in contact 759. This final piece of evidence takes us from speculation to acknowledgement. Asket and Wendelle Stevens took a time-travelling journey to the future to Groom Lake, Nevada. He photographed the first top-secret test flight of the F-117A in June 1981. The landing gear was retracted on the 2nd test flight, which was on July 1, 1981.
This final piece of evidence further corroborates the details given by Ptaah and Billy.
Final Thoughts
Studying this case has shed a lot of light on the roadblocks and ill-considered attitudes that Wendelle Stevens faced in his field of research. Not only did he attract the wrath of the U.S. government for his collection of evidence relating to UFO’s and extraterrestrial life, but also because he discovered the real truth of the entire matter. He absolutely knew the truth and the government became aware of this fact. They were never going to let him continue with the knowledge he had and that is why they sent him off to prison. Wendelle very likely knew more than they did about everything and also how everything would turn out.
In the end, Wendelle kept his silence as the Plejaren and Asket always knew he would. The U.S. government along with the military and intelligence services should feel ashamed and disgusted for the role they played in trying to disgrace such an honorable and good human being. They not only drug him through the mud, but they tried to tarnish his name and ruin his reputation. Even then he still kept his silence because he knew that the alternative would have been much worse. We can ask ourselves how Wendelle knew so much, but I would hope that the answer to that question is obvious at this point.
Below is an excerpt from a letter that Wendelle sent to his friend from prison.
Knowing what I know about Wendelle Stevens, he would be proud to know that his research and hard work led to many others searching for answers as well. The wheel keeps rolling along as The Silent Revolution of Truth continues.
Thanks to Scott Baxter for Wendelle’s letter.
Another excellent post, Melissa; follow several past ones in the same or similar genre>
Awesome article Melissa. Lots of work put into this one. We appreciate all your work and obviously Michael’s as well.
I was wondering if someone who has some of Billy’s books, that have predictions in them, could make a video or take some photos of the publisher and copyright dates at the beginning of the books (If the dates are there. Not all books have them). I feel it would be highly beneficial to help spread the info to newcomers and those who doubt. One thing I am very sure on is that people love clues to interesting mysteries. It draws them in.
I wanted to make the video mentioned above with the book I have/had, but I have misplaced it. I’ve read it twice and was actually going to donate it, a while back, to someone here who didn’t have it, but I failed to find it.
Perhaps a video of those important dates could find its way to Redacted and get more airtime.
D.
The analysis of the photo and video was exceptionally detailed, scrutinizing every aspect from composition to minute details, providing a comprehensive understanding of the possible incident.
Funny thing about the Billy Meier material. Although there nothing to believe, there is always reassurance that you are in the right path as time goes by.
This is no exception.
Thank you very much to all involved for sharing.
Incredible Melissa… Absolutely incredible.
“DYNAMITE WONDERFUL”:-))))
Great analysis Melissa..
Thank you for sharing your insights and working so hard to assist in clarifying The Truth..
Salome
Wow amazing article! EVIDENCE like this is what keeps my bs detector from going all into the red like most of the other ufo photography out there.
Also, I just want to thank the level-headed responses I got from my post in the comments section of another article here. The fact that I got such non-“how dare you challenge the validy of the BEAM case” responses and actual thoughtful and logical responses have really helped ease any cult vibes I’ve been having regarding BEAM and FIGU. I even was flat out ENCOURAGED to “question every word”.
If it was a cult, FIGU members would be responding to me in a more over-protective manner. Real cult members hate it when you “ask too many questions” lol. That didn’t happen and that surprised me and it was a relief to have such a logical and cool-headed response. 🙂
Great job Melissa.
Is there enough material to prove that Wendelle time travelled to the future?
Are there more photos Wendelle took from this series of this particular event out there that hasn’t been discovered yet?
Could there be some selfies that Wendelle took with the F117 or Asket craft in the backdrop maybe?
These photos alone cannot conclusively prove that Wendelle time travelled to the future based on the mainstream standards as detailed knowledge of FIGU material is essential for which the mainstream will not take the time to study it to get the full context in order to arrive at the truth.
Is there a possibility that Asket and Wendelle visited that exact time period twice, one from the 60’s for the timetravel and one from June 1981 for Wendelle to see himself taking those photos and then to process those photos in real time during 1981?
Thanks Matt,
I would hope that someone in the mainstream would do their due diligence and investigate the case, but it’s unlikely that they will. The first question people should ask themselves is how did Wendelle Stevens even know about a top-secret test flight at Groom Lake? How did he waltz into Area 51 and photograph a top-secret test flight without getting shot on the spot? How did Ptaah get the details right before the evidence showed that it was the first model F-117? How did Michael know where to find the photographs?
I think that we can safely say that the evidence is only for individuals who are thinking for themselves. Someone who is enslaved to religions or beliefs will be too deluded to come to a logical conclusion. Those people will have to find their way to the truth at their own pace.
I personally think that Bob Lazar made up his whole story. One thing that makes me think it is 100% fake is that his so called sport model ufo is an exact description of one of the beamship types that I’ve seen in the beamship gallery. Even models made of his ‘sport model’ are exact copy of the saucer in the beamship gallery. Has anyone else noticed that?
I think he has been the subject of manipulation, I would say he believes what he says because he has been conditioned to do so, fed with misinformation and I would bet some sort of mind control.
He did a piece on Joe Rogan and he suffered from extreme migraine, are these the tell tale signs of manipulation, just like the emotional outbursts / instability under questioning that the Apollo astronauts all seem to suffer from? He was obviously authorised to speak in some manner, If he wasn’t surely he would been silenced along time ago? you need to ask yourself who benefits from this and how does it further their appearance and agenda.
This is from FIGU Bulletin Number 3, in June 1995:
For some time now, a man named Robert Lazar has been appearing in the USA, reporting many things about UFOs and dead extraterrestrials that he has seen in Area 51 etc. What do we make of this? What do we make of this?
Answer:
Caution is also advisable here, because many things in his statements are not correct. Here too, at least in the case of certain claims, it could be a case of deliberate and purposefully controlled disinformation that can be traced back to certain American organizations. It is also extremely suspicious that Bob Lazar, as an alleged whistleblower, is left unscathed by the American security forces and intelligence services when he openly divulges alleged secrets. This is particularly strange in America, considering how radically against traitors, etc. are being dealt with in this country. But he remains and has remained scot-free to this day, as has the alleged Falcon etc.
The voice of reason says that one must be as careful with the statements and claims of Robert Lazar as with the statements and claims of Falcon and as with the Roswell incident movie, etc. Many mysterious things that happen especially in America in the matter of UFOs and extraterrestrials must be enjoyed with extreme caution, namely alleged abductions by UFOs or extraterrestrials and brainwashing by extraterrestrials as well as alleged animal massacres by extraterrestrials etc. etc., which are carried out in many ways by certain secret organizations and other forces of a similar nature of an earth-human nature and which truthfully have nothing to do with extraterrestrials.
Im just imagining the “higher ups” scrambling to do their very own analysis on the films after seeing these articles, and subsequently scratching their heads what to do about it. I would think it very unlikely that the video would be taken down at this point, it would only draw more attention, you would more likely see testimony from “experts” in the comment section convincingly trying to debunk any evidence as well as upvoting anyone casting doubts using a botnet.
Fantastic job Melissa, I can see there is many hours of research and hard work gone into this. Thankyou.
CNN press conference…
“It was Armadillo flagellant lens flairs interacting with the heated sand particles”
CGI Film at 11:00
D.
Hi Melissa, This is a great piece, congratulations to a work well done. However, I am of the opinion that the photo that hints to the disappearance of the landing gear is not strong enough, because the image is fully distorted with too much additional portions allround. Yet, I guest there might be a good reason for the disappearance of the landing gears within this photo – the gears may be hiddened under the plane’s right wing, because the right wing of the plane was not in horizontal position, but inclined towards Wendelle who was taking the picture.