Donate Button
Sunday, April 28, 2024

The Billy Meier UFO contacts singularly authentic ongoing for 80 years the key to our future survival

Does the Future Prove the Past?

In light of all the interest and enthusiasm with Wendelle’s and Asket’s journey to Groom Lake, I’ve put together a short video highlighting the 3 most prominent objects.

The remainder of my research will focus on the objects that seem to hop around to several locations. I’m sure there are other interesting objects in the footage, like the image below for instance, but I want to focus on a different aspect for now.

What is it

I’d also like to thank everyone who took the time to analyze the video for themselves and submit their images. Your observations and contributions are greatly appreciated. A special thank you goes to Dan Williams and Scott Baxter for their outstanding efforts and observations.

The real reason for the Billy Meier contacts is the Creation-energy Teaching, so as we enjoy ourselves with this investigation, let’s remember that the Teaching remains the most valuable aspect and far more important than UFOs or lights in the sky.

New Video

For the original investigations, see: 

Future Existence of USA Depends on Congress Acknowledging UFO-Stealth Fighter Photos

Wendelle Stevens and the Secrets at Groom Lake

See also:

Billy Meier, Time Travel and Groom Lake

The UFO Stealth Photos that Could Prevent WWIII

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

29 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Orion

Does the past prove the Future?

Anton Koch

Not likely! (see below for an exemption) If we have not experienced the future (using observations in the present ie investigating the reality as it is now) we do not have anything to compare/observe/record that we can then present to others, as evidence, which they must use their logic & reason to “prove it to themselves” The only exemption to this would be if all making the observations would travel to the future, but then they would still be making observations in their current reality, only in a future time. But when the evidence/observations would be brought back to everyone else, all the others whom did not travel to the future, would have to wait (until the future time where the evidence was gathered) until it happened, so they too could observe & “prove it to themselves”! The past could inform us of what may come in the future, but not prove it! We can only prove it to ourselves through our own reality based observations, and then using our own logic & reason!

Terry Carch

Quetzal woul alway state that we must ALWYS THINK, ACT AND USE LOGIC AND RESON of which most earthwarms WON`T even consider!

Chris Lock

It didn’t prove it for them in their time, but it does for us who view both times as the past in our present.

Chris Lock

My immediate impression of the first object above the Stealth is that it is most likely a bird flying towards the camera in the general direction of the bottom right corner of the frame shot. I don’t know why you conclude it obviously isn’t that. Judging from other dirt evident on the film I don’t think that can be ruled out either. The object appearing at the bottom right at around 3:04 (?) is however very interesting. This shows a definite metallic reflection of what is probably sunlight on its upper right side. Reflected light there correlates with the light on the Stealth wheels, showing the source of light is similar. That object definitely looks like an authentic UFO.

Chris Lock

And I don’t say I think it IS a bird, just that it wouldn’t surprise me.

Brigitte de Roch

I have large black vultures where I live, and when they fly they barely use their long wide wings. They make good use of the wind in an elegant and peaceful way, use little energy and never struggle in the air.
Their bodies and legs are slender and barely noticeable when flying. When they are about to land (close to the ground) the legs are then in front of the wings and the body.

The one on the picture above doesn’t look like one of those large birds.
If it is a bird, it looks handicapped, and since I have never seen an handicapped bird fly I cannot say how it would behave when in the air.

Brigitte de Roch

Then it’s not a bird. The birds I see don’t do that. They circle around and around. Today one landed on the compost because I had thrown a little bit of fish skin from the Japanese tempura dish I made.

Savio

Where were the landing gears? It seems that during the first test flight of the F117, the landing gears are always in operation position, as seen within the disclosed video  and as mentioned by the pilot Hal Farley. However, we cannot locate anything that looked like a landing gear of the F117 within Wendelle’s pictures. This leads to a question: Was Wendelle taking pictures of the 1st test flight? Or there is information that not yet disclosed?

Chris Lock

In the reproduced (video?) frame shot, we can see the light on the wheels comes from the upper right, just as it does for the metallic-like reflection on the unidentified flying object.

Savio

Hi Chris,  I cannot locate any sign of the landing gears within Wendelle’s photos, even through  picture enhancement processes. My logic is that the landing gears are big equipment as compare to the plane itself, they are not easy to diaappear from the pictures without a logical explanation. While there is no mention of  “maiden flight” nor “18 June 1981” within the CR, together with “no landing gears “, it could be deduced that Wendelle’s pictures was taken during one of the test flights but not the maiden flight on 18 June 1981.

Savio

 Hi Melissa, Thank you for the information that there was only one test flight of the F117 in June 1981. I have tried hard but failed in searching for a time table of the 10 test flights of that camouflaged F117, can you show me the way to get that information?

Savio

Hi Melissa, Thank you for the information, this is a really wonderful paper 🙂 In that case, I will have to find out the reason of the disappearance of the landing gears.  Perhaps allowing so called: Plausible Deniability? Any input will be much appreciated 🙂

Savio

Hi Melissa, It is quite obvious that Wendelle’s photos were taken during one of the ten test flights of that camouflaged F117. While the landing gears cannot be seen, it is doubtful if it was really the : “first test flight” and not one of the rest nine test flights. Is there any information within the CR that mentioned Wendelle was there during the “1st test flight” of the F117 on “18 June 1981”?

David B

It was a test flight. They test all new planes in both modes. Landing gear up and down during flight. When Wendelle took his photos the gear was up.

Savio

Hi David,  According to the pilot Hal Farley, the landing gear was always in operation position during the maiden flight. This is a most reasonable practice, because the situation of a maiden flight is actually unpredictable, an enmergence landing could always be implemented when situation arises.

Simon Walsh

That’s great Melisa, wow.
The fact that Wendelle’s photos are real and exist makes this clip a definite for me. Obviously they won’t release all of the test flight footage as it must show much more of Asket’s ship. Great footage and great eyes for all who first spotted it. No question that there’s something there, and most likely it’s Aslet’s ship, popping in and out, in different places. More than likely. This is brilliant. Thanks guys.

Dakar

Milisa you deleted my comments because you have alex jones fanatics visiting your blog
Am just saying so much for truth

BigSalUpNorth

I am quite new to this knowledge, but have been reading the books and teachings after initially stumbling onto Michael’s work and this site. Firstly, Salome! I would ask the following question in regards to this video and the other proofs. This has become a question or prevailing thought which seems to repeat for me. I have been reading Billy’s book Death and Dying. I’ve been immersing myself in the teachings through resources and videos on the web. How much do the UFO photos and videos matter? How important is that to sharing the message? What I mean when I ask that is this.. I find the teachings thus far to be common sense to anyone that wants the Human Race to flourish and grow. I find myself embracing these life concepts more than the photos or videos which to me almost detract from the greater message. So, I’ll ask the group.. Have you found in your experience that the UFO photos and videos have marginalized the message given how most people would respond to anything which conflicts with their long held beliefs? And… any thoughts as to how can that be overcome? Sal

Brigitte de Roch

Hello Sal –

In the beginning of my journey with TheyFlyBlog I could not understand how people could not see what the pictures clearly showed to them. I also could not understand how people in the UFO community could argue so much with Michael Horn to the point of being rude, unrespectful, arrogant, unwilling to learn and cooperate.  I thought of leaving the blog because of it. However, I immobilized myself and listened to all the interviews.

Personally, I also had my own challenges. The UFO photos are one thing, but the case and all that it contains is another thing. I found myself having to face myself on a deep level. I remember it well because it took me some time before removing the plastic that protects the creation-energy teaching books. I knew that once I opened them I would see things about myself that I may not be ready for or would reject and thus fail. 

Today, I understand why it’s difficult for people to accept the case. There may be a combination of knowing that what is presented is true which somehow also tells the person to also start the process of becoming true to oneself. In other words, the case brings along a process of cleaning oneself internally if one is to engage with it. This can be challenging. 

Then there is the practical aspect of it where it is necessary to catalog and document all the contrarians to the case so that people in the future can easily refer to it when studying. It’s like organizing your sock drawer or as Billy says it’s the way the clock works; one second after the other.

This is my reasoning as to why the photos, films, analysis, etc. matter.