That many UAP aficionados are young and/or inexperienced isn’t something to criticize but being interested in something doesn’t automatically bestow expertise
While the shift of focus from the term UFO to UAP might seem innocuous, it’s another indication of how people are encouraged to shift their attention away from delving deeper into substantial things, specifics and tangibles, to instead become preoccupied with more vague, ephemeral, undefined things like various phenomena. Whether this is deliberate or not, it’s not only a sign of these short attention span times but also serves to diffuse focus, diminish discernment, critical thinking and investigative skills, encouraging less disciplined people to enthusiastically participate in yet another online…phenomenon.
More people today are immersed in and accustomed to, indeed, raised from a very young age with, technologies that have certain fairly wondrous aspects previously unknown to us. They are rapidly assimilated by people who, in many cases, lack certain abilities that were formerly possessed by people who graduated elementary school, i.e. basic competency in reading, writing, and arithmetic. Now one can get by without well-developed skills in many areas because of easy-to-learn technologies.
Instant Experts
While UFOs have appeared throughout history and prompted all sorts of theories, mysteries, conjecture, tabloid entertainment, etc., suddenly, growing numbers of people publicly present themselves as being serious researchers and investigators of what’s now widely referred to as UAPs.
Just as has been the case in so-called ufology for a long time, there are no real scientific standards, no requirement for credentials, actual research and investigation experience, publication of findings, etc., for the UAP conversation. Instead, anecdotal reports, and dubious quality photos and videos suffice, replacing hard evidence and objective, independent analysis, and authentication.
Like their counterparts in UFOlogy, this new herd of amateur, self-described UAP “researchers” eschew challenges and criticisms. Anything that would disturb and distract from their unrelenting self-promotion, gaining followers and viewers online is also dismissed and avoided.
Among these dabblers are not just a few supposed scientists who’ve found a fertile field in which to theorize – often wildly – and pontificate, using their existing, unrelated credentials to assume, presume, or portray expertise in an area where the real experts aren’t teaching ongoing university classes and where, consequently, no degrees can be bestowed. That hasn’t stopped them from trying to profit through self-promotion, publishing meaningless books and trying to become “instant experts”.
Refreshing
That many UAP aficionados are young and/or inexperienced isn’t something to criticize but being interested in something doesn’t automatically bestow expertise.
So, I found it particularly refreshing to interact with a group of younger people interested in this overall field and who seemed more open to exploring and learning, than in self-promotion and suppressing evidence they were unfamiliar with.
In fact, as you’ll see, they freely expressed their interest, doubts, awe and questions when we began to review Billy Meier’s UFO photos, which some of them were apparently seeing for the first time. This may seem surprising but consider how controlled this field is by various government, intelligence, media, UFOlogy and other disinformation-spreading parties. The fact is that most people who are interested in the overall topic don’t yet know about the Billy Meier contacts.
Perhaps, if this interaction is any indication, many more soon will.
Michael Horn Unveils UFO Contacts, Environmental Research, and More!
DON’T WAIT…SHIPPING NOW!!!
The 45th year anniversary edition of the photo book that started it all:
UFO…Contact from the Pleiades Volumes I & II combined
For the first time—forty-five years after their original publication—the two photo-journal volumes of UFO…Contact from the Pleiades are combined in one book for a modern audience, with a new foreword written by Shirley MacLaine, a prologue written by Mexican journalist Jamie Maussan, and a new introduction and preface written by Brit Elders.
This photo-journal presents the unique contact case of a Swiss farmer, Billy Meier, who claims to have met with the Pleiadians hundred of times, compiling many layers of evidence including notes on their conversations, hundreds of photographs, movie footage, audio recordings of the craft, landing tracks of the spaceships, dozens of witnesses, and even metal samples of the craft itself. The quality and amount of evidence was convincing, making this unlike any case previously seen.
UFO…Contact from the Pleiades takes the reader back to a time before home computers, digital photography and easily accessible photo enhancement programs. Yet the evidence—analyzed in laboratories around the world—could not be easily dismissed and supported the claims of the contactee, Billy Meier. The breathtaking images, profound words of the Plejaren, and the extensive investigation that spanned seven years are as relevant today as they were forty-five years ago.
Absolutely Riveting, a fantastic video with Conscious Phenomena, And for sure the Semjase snowball is getting bigger, thank you Michael.
Salome
Just seeing this post now. Will spend some time with this. Truly pleased to see that this is now available.
I just noticed a fascinating detail about the video and photographic evidence of these beamships after watching the videos/photos of the weddingcake and other beamships next to or over trees: No downward wind! Or at least a very minimal downward wind.
For example, helicopters. Even if the world’s smallest helicopters were hovering as close to those trees as these beamships, they would be blowing those trees and gravel everywhere. The downward draft of helicopters is so severe that special edges have to be put on the ends of the rotor blades for helicopters hovering/landing in desert enviornments.
The only indication of a downward helicopter-like wind I found was the video of the beamship that was doing circles and other maneuvers over a treetop and it BARELY blew that tree around. Would have been much-MUCH more dramatic “tree flopping” if it was a helicopter doing the exact same thing.
It’s already been demonstrated that they have a proverbial muffler that they can switch on and off. Maybe they have an equivilent for minimizing downward wind from whatever they are using to generate thrust?
This other proverbial muffler could be something as simple as a low powered warp field (mass reduction field) so that it requires much less thrust to hover/fly than is required for a helicopter. It would explain the the insanely low-amount of “thrust wind” shown in the video of the ufo doing a dance over/around a tree.
does a magnet generate a wind when it is placed in repulsion against another magnet or conductive matter and hovers above it? of course not, so there is no prerequisite for this effect to happen with every propulsion / levitation device, so it may not be needed at all. The only thing I could imagine would be the electrical charge that would accumulate around a metal body that was not at ground potential, if it was different to the surrounding air then an attractive or repulsive equalising force would result.
Observing these fine individuals made me remember the first time I was introduced to the BEAM material, eager to know yet not knowing ‘how to know because I, like these individuals and many in the western world, seem to present, want to “believe” rather than want to “find out and strive” for real knowledge, comprehension and understanding.
Back then , it did not really take me to understand that “belief” and “perception” were two different things, and it seems that everywhere from those who have podcasts, to doctors and nurses in medical offices, to techers and scholars in schools, to jury, bailif, and judges in courtrooms, to talking heads in mass media, social media, alternative news media, etc., that the question to get at some truth today always relies on getting to “believe” something, rather than to “discern” or “think for one’s self ” to get at the truth. Belief, and rather, to ask a question on whether someone believe this or that, does not get one to understand or comprehend sommething that eventually evolves one’s thoughts and feelings in a neutral-positive manner, rather it is getting to something that goes truly nowhere. Because asking someone do they believe this or that does not move the conversation in a positive manner because it seems to be a logic that only goes in circles. And yet we all want to know the truth, so the question may not be posted as “do you believe” but rather “what is the truth of this or that”. Whereby in Billy’s material one can ask what is the truth of the Billy Meier case? Which then also leads to one of the basic question that we of common man do not know truly, which is what is the “truth” and how should we go about figuring this thing out.
Which leads to what Billy describes in the Goblet of what truth is, in chapter 15, line 4, as:
(quote)
Wahrlich ist die Wahrheit eine einzige, die gegeben ist durch die Gesetze und Gebote der Allmacht (Schöpfung), doch sie zu erkennen bedarf grosser Aufmerksamkeit, denn sie ist gegeben durch Zeichen (Beweise), die für euch erkennbar sind, wenn ihr das Aussehen (Natur) genau beobachtet und alles erfasst (wahrnehmt), was darin an Verborgenem ist; Wahrheit ist Gewissheit in Erkennung der Wirklichkeit.
Truly, there is only one truth which is given through the all-mightiness (Creation), but it takes great concentration and perception of real substance to recognise it, because it is given through signs (evidence/proof) that you can recognise if you observe the appearance (nature) precisely and comprehend (perceive) everything that is concealed in it; truth is certainty in recognition of reality.
(unquote)