Donate Button
Sunday, April 28, 2024

The Billy Meier UFO contacts โ€” singularly authentic โ€” ongoing for 80 years โ€” the key to our future survival

The Apollo 11 and 13 Hoaxes

A new, in-depth exploration into the evidence that both the first moon landing and another NASA mission were sophisticated hoaxes, resulting in the deception that fooled the world

Francisco Villate’s Thought-provoking New Video:

All of the conversations, referred to in the video between Billy Meier and the Plejaren about how the hoaxes were perpetrated, can be read here:

Apollo 11 Moon-Landing: HOW It Was Hoaxed

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

15 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Phil Marshall

That was a good expansion of the info in the CRs, thanks!

The Apollo 11 moon rock that was just petrified wood:

https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna32581790

“โ€˜Moon rockโ€™ in museum is just petrified wood

The Dutch national museum said Thursday that one of its prized possessions, a rock supposedly brought back from the moon by U.S. astronauts, is just a piece of petrified wood.

The museum acquired the rock after the death of former Prime Minister Willem Drees in 1988. Drees received it as a private gift on Oct. 9, 1969, from then-U.S. ambassador J. William Middendorf during a visit by the three Apollo 11 astronauts, part of their “Giant Leap” goodwill tour after the first moon landing.”

Andrei Palatkas

Francisco is such an asset for the mission, I do not have enough praise for this fellow. I mean he proved that the wedding cake photos were indeed genuine trough light rays simulations, maybe in the future children will learn how light reflects and refracts trough his videos .

David Kamada

A well-researched and riveting video that deserves thorough consideration. Kudos to Francisco Villate for an outstanding work. Thank you for publishing this.

David Bozman

Speaking of moon rocks. There seems to be too many rocks in Billy’s Plaque.

D.

SSSC.jpg
Rhal Zahi

Or maybe too little rocks? What about asteroids, comets, and minor planets beyond Pluto?

Robert Dawson

In FIGU Bulletin 009, Billy answers a reader’s question which might shed some light on possibilities for the extra planet shown on the plaque:

Billy’s Response: According to information from the Pleiadians/Plejarans, several planets exist in our solar system in addition to the nine known to terrestrials: Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, and Pluto. For example, close to the sun exists a planet called Vulcan or Volkano of which terrestrials have spoken for centuries. Furthermore, the so-called Transpluto orbits the SOL far beyond Pluto. Beyond SOL a planet also existed about the size of Earth, but a few years ago it was thrust into outer space by one spiral arm of a black hole. Regarding this topic, Ptaah and I held the following conversation on February 3, 1992:
Billy: “Regarding your information on the planet, which is racing at great speed behind the sun…
Ptaah: Your question refers to the planet, which cannot be seen from Earth because it orbits the sun at such a high speed that it always remains hidden behind it. What do you wish to know about it?
Billy: There exists some confusion about its enormous speed. Isn’t it correct that, normally, the greater the distance between a planet and the sun, the slower the planet orbits around it? Why does this not apply to this planet? [The planet was far beyond customary planetary orbits. Billy] Why is it so much faster than it is supposed to be, and what is its name?
Ptaah: This planet is truly a curiosity with regard to its enormous speed. Even we were only able to learn about its secret just over 76 years ago. And here as well we were compelled to realize that in this instance the Destroyer Planet had brought its dangerous forces into play. According to our records the planet hidden behind the sun is called KATHEIN. It was touched by and then later wrenched into the Destroyer Planet’s gravitational field when the Destroyer was making its tenth-to-last passage through the SOL-system. Kathein was able to free itself from the Destroyer’s field of force to the point where it was able to establish and maintain nearly its normal orbit around the sun again, albeit, at an incredibly increased velocity, while the Destroyer continued on its predestined trajectory and entered the SOL-system, where it generated destruction and change in many regions. Ever since that time, the planet Kathein itself has orbited the sun in the described manner at an abnormally high speed. It is slowly increasing its distance from the SOL-system, however, and is migrating into the gravity of a dark hole’s wandering spiral arm, which will ultimately draw the planet into its own force sometime this year. This is the same spiral arm whose influence wrenched sand and dust accumulations from Planet Venus.
Billy: Is Kathein one of the two planets we have yet to discover and which we call UNI and Transpluto?
Ptaah: No, planet Kathein has nothing to do with this and it is devoid of any life-forms.

https://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_Meier/FIGU_Bulletin_009

Phil Marshall

Really interesting. So the Destroyer comet was responsible for the enormous increase in the speed of Kathein. But how did this happen? Maybe through repeated slingshot effects as Kathein was pulled along by the Destroyer? And how is Kathein able to maintain its normal orbit given that gravity with the Sun does not create nearly enough centripetal force to maintain its orbit given its speed? My wild guess is that due to the very high orbital speed of Kathein it has accumulated a huge amount of charge from the very high rate of collisions with particles, space dust, and the solar wind (the same way a plane will accumulate charge while flying through the air). And this charge, combined with the magnetic field of the Sun, along with the enormous orbital speed (about 6% the speed of light), generates a very strong magnetic Lorentz force sufficient to keep it in orbit. Kathein (aka dark planet) is also discussed in CR 238 and 544

David C

This was very well done. Thank you Francisco.

Eusebio Apellido

So a question now becomes, do all astronauts wear the same shoe size?

Jamie

NASA still gives us fake footage. Especially from the iss. I’ve got several of the videos. Will be in 0 gravity and stuff falls to the ground. Space walks with their thumb exposed. Green screen glitches. Space walk with a slip of a scuba diver caught in the reflection of the helmet. The list is long.

Grigori Disputin

wow.
PUTIN TOLD THAT GOOGLE NEURAL NETWORK SAYS MOON LANDING PHOTOS ARE FAKE
https://www.bitchute.com/video/eZRD9hJCL9cS/
34 second video

Wery interesting.

moon ai says fake.png
Norm

Need to update it now. It was pretty much confirmed in a recent Contact Report that Stanley Kubrick was involved in the hoax. https://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_Meier/Contact_Report_853

Vincent Zack

In the original broadcast of the moon landings they did not take into account the time it takes to communicate from the Earth to the Moon and back. Even in todays modern live news reports there is a delay between satellite and the news anchor team. Dead give away.

Phil Marshall

Spot on. A round-trip signal takes about 2.5 seconds. This should be the minimum time gap between communications between Apollo 11 on the moon and Houston on Earth.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RONIax0_1ec

During the descent stage on the moon, from time 4:17 onwards, some of the communication lag is much less than 2.5 seconds. How odd!

Vincent Zack

Correct. When the Space shuttle would perform it’s re-entry there is a blackout period.