Stunning revelations raise serious questions about late lawmaker’s honesty, morality, character and decisions
Presiding over his own father’s funeral, Father Paul Scalia showed that God isn’t the only one who can condemn family members before, during or after death, saying, “We are here to pray for God’s inexplicable mercy for a sinner, to this sinner, Antonin Scalia. Let us not show him a false love and allow our admiration to deprive him of our prayers.” The “inexplicable mercy” bit was a nice touch, implying that God bends the rules if sufficient prayers are offered, which of course flies directly in the face of the long established, statistically lousy track record of the Big Bopper answering any prayers.
At the service, held at the Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception (another whopper in the “you-better-believe-it-cause-it’s-in-a-book” fable) the young Rev. Scalia went on to demonstrate why it’s a bad idea for people to attempt to apply logic to such a quaint cultic belief as “everyone’s born a sinner”, since even the lifelong efforts of the otherwise deep thinking Justice Scalia obviouslyweren’t sufficient to allow him to escape the condemnation of the “Father in heaven”, let alone his own son. Speaking of which, Father Paul right away let it be known that he “personally” knew one “Jesus Christ”, someone for whom there is zero historical record, and thereby modestly inferring that, like the myth, he was about 2,000 years old himself (and, if I may say so, looking absolutely marvelous).
What’s this Thing Called Sin?
Apparently both Scalia’s were unrepentant to the point of avoiding revealing to anyone, each other included, exactly what egregious sins they had committed. “He had found himself in my confessional line and he quickly departed it,” the reverend said. “As he put it later, ‘Like heck if I’m confessing to you.’ The feeling was mutual.” So, while such confession is good enough for the obsequious and faithful flock, the Scalia’s felt they were above any such accountability, perhaps the guilt for which the younger Scalia was now hoping to relieve himself of by condemning his father. Since confession may be one route to gaining forgiveness of one’s sins (never mind that a third party is magically absolving you of your own self-responsibility for possible harm you’ve done to someone else) the Scalia’s must not have been thinking ahead to this day of reckoning.
With the definition of sin including “an immoral act considered to be a transgression against divine law”, and with divine law presumably being higher than manmade law, obviously the late justice was, quite simply, a criminal. This certainly will call into question decisions by Scalia and may open the door for review of many, if not all, of them.
It’s also pretty certain that a devout Catholic who dies at 79, and is publically, officially condemned as a sinner, wasn’t just guilty of eating meat on Fridays, when that was still on the list. Since the good reverend left out all the juicy details, we are left to ponder what sins Scalia had committed, meaning was he among those who were:
Fornicators, idolaters, adulterers, male prostitutes, sodomites, thieves, the greedy, drunkards, revilers, robbers, etc.?
Bad Babies
And because we’re talking about people who declare that they are “born in sin”, exactly which of those or other sins had Baby Antonin managed to already pull off?
Catholics don’t accept the concept of reincarnation, so how is it that innocent babies*, just showing up here presumably for the first time, are actually cosmic criminals, sinners who, by definition have already committed some or all of those terrible things?
It may relieve you to know that the element of forgiveness associated with the quaint, cannibalistic ritual involving not only symbolically munching down the “body of Christ” but “drinking the Blood of Christ” may be the earliest cultic version of what’s today known as “drinking the Kool-Aid”, which may be available with artificial sweeteners for those with blood sugar issues. There’s more about it here, among other places.
Please don’t drive or operate heavy machinery while contemplating this stuff.
For those who may find even the symbolic association troubling and illogical because they, somehow, avoided having all their brain cells killed off by either religion or alcohol, we’re assured here that:
“Although they still look like bread and wine, they have, by divine power, actually changed into His Body and Blood. How can we know this? It requires faith. It is a mystery which, like love, we will never fully understand.”
“Never fully understand”? You can say that again, in Latin if you like.
The Necessity of Higher Temperatures
Carrying on with the culinary theme, the young Scalia, perhaps plucked these words from The Catholic Cannibalism Cook Book, “Christ was not yet perfected in him, we are here then to lend our prayers to that perfecting … in freeing dad from every encumbrance of sin.” Hidden in such sweet sentiments is the suggestion that perhaps higher temperatures are still needed to “perfect” Antonin, further suggesting that his ticket was punched for a southbound departure, rather than the cooler, northern nether regions with its delightfully dewy, fluffy clouds and endless harp plucking, etc.
Naturally, I wonder if papa Scalia ever considered that filling his young son’s head with incoherent mush – all of which would be inadmissible in any legal proceeding – would ultimately result in a surprisingly scathing send-off, demonstrating that the kid really got the message, as well as perhaps inspiration from a celebrity chef. And are any of the faithful concerned that the younger Scalia – obviously a major league sinner in his own right (or wrong) – was unrepentant himself when outing pops, like a consummate magician directing the attention away from himself?
Perhaps such concerns were overshadowed by Glenn Beck’s chiming in recently to put another nail in Scalia’s coffin, when he suggested God’s displeasure with the dearly departed justice was in evidence, showing that even the brain-dead can engage in religious delusion in their lingering afterlife.
They Got a Whole Lot of ‘Splainin’ to Do
It’s too bad that we never heard the eloquent and erudite Justice Scalia explain his belief in, and adherence to, all these gems of Catholicism before he was appointed, or even after he was safely sequestered for life when espousing this superstitious hodge-podge couldn’t result in cries for his removal from the bench, or compulsory psychiatric examination.
Presiding over the cesspool of debauchery and defilement that is the institution (read: big business) perpetuating all this hokum is Il Papa, the Big Potato himself. As a side note, if the Pope is the “Holy Father”, is he an unwed father or a bigamist? If the mothers of the Pope’s “holy family” don’t remember marrying or divorcing him (that’s a no-no in Catholicism) what about all the billions of illegitimate children in this “holy family” – many of whom were also magically fathered by the previous pope(s)! – are they un-savable bastards; just how does all of this work, logically speaking, of course?
And should anyone actually be troubled by this Holy Father thing, fortunately we have this:
What we have here is a classic example of eisegesis (reading into and imposing one’s views and biases upon a passage) as opposed to exegesis (drawing out the meaning of a passage from its full and proper context).
I think the actual definition of eisegesis may be “thinking through illogical nonsense for oneself” and the definition of exegesis being “making up stuff to explain mind-numbingly goofy theology”.
Lest the Mind Be Boggled
I hope this also clarifies why I unhesitatingly tell people that I have absolutely no respect for their precious beliefs…and that I hope they feel the same way about mine, should they detect any. I do respect people, especially those who demonstrate through their actions that they live good, true, higher values – like peace, love, freedom and harmony – however they’ve come to embrace and embody them. Some may want to point out that I have fudged the fine points of this belief system, its Halloween costume-wearing, wealth-seeking leaders, etc. But as we approach Easter with its savior rising like yeast in the east, with thoughts about bunnies and rolling painted eggs across the lawn, let’s reflect for a moment how heads now also actually roll in retribution for the Christian Crusades, as the adherents to another wacky, bloodthirsty cult has its eyes set on the Church, its “clerics, priests, bishops, cardinals and many others” as ultimate targets.
Before we snicker in contempt for so-called modern people still awed by mumbo-jumbo muttering minions, still carrying out the superstitious traditions and symbolism of a blood-sacrificing ritualistic cult whose motto should be, “Et Quaestus Pedophilia in Perpetuum”, the more forward thinking slave masters already have a splendidly seductive program moving right along to capture present and future generations who, in this age of instant gratification, may be more readily seduced by the flashing lights of technology, as a read of this document, and numbers 40. and 127. quite presciently foretold.
What’s the antidote to all this insanity and irrationality, how do we decontaminate ourselves from all of this?
Quite simply by a self-responsible study and testing of the non-religious, belief-free, logical spiritual teaching. Of especial, immeasurable value, for fast relief from confusion and insanity, I also recommend The Might of the Thoughts and The Way to Live.
*The problem with all these very bad babies is compounded by what’s suggested here:
“2) Before the Sin, a person must have been mindful of the serious wrong, having reflected on the gravity of the situation, with SUFFICIENT REFLECTION, beforehand.”
Why those little devils, who knew that babies were even remotely capable of mindfulness and reflection?
And troubling as this is for babies, how hypocritical Scalia must have been by this definition:
“3) A person must have freely chosen to commit the Sin, with the full consent of the FREE WILL, in spite of possible coercion.”
See also:
We can trust the Catholic Church to do the right thing!
Cardinal George Pell (3rd highest ranking behind Pope) refuses to return to Australia for child sex abuse cases.
“Victoria Police refer leak of investigation into Cardinal George Pell to IBAC”
http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/victoria-police-refer-leak-of-investigation-into-cardinal-george-pell-to-ibac-20160222-gn0gd5.html
I didn`t even watch this stupid crap on Scallia`s death! “As far as I`m concerned,religion,god, politics etc, have NO place in MY book! What a bunch of PHONEY CROKED FOOLS!”
Terry the pope Francis got good advice from Mr. Donald Trump the zillionaire talon counter about the IS knocking on the pope’s draw bridge back door that also houses a pope Benedict who is interdependent to the Vatican. My advice is to everybody that Billy Eduard Albert Meier is telling the truth!
This article is superb and one of the best I’ve read in awhile.
As I was reading through it all I could think of was this was an expression of the epitome of high intelligence that demands of the reader to muster whatever intelligence one can wring out of oneself in order to understand it thereby helping oneself to also become intelligent in the process.
It’s amazing how you can write so much filled with golden nuggets from so little.
Scale Liar thanks for providing the impetus.
The trouble with arguing about religion is that to do it, you have to first understand the religion, so as to pick holes in it.
I have noticed that many religious texts are set up to go in circles. As soon as you pick one hole, you are immediately pointed to another hole as an explanation for the first hole. When you pick a hole in that, you are led to a fourth, then fifth, on and on – until you usually arrive back at the first hole, which is now being argued in a different context, so is therfore no longer a hole.
The end result is that people go in circles, become confused, become exhausted, and have their mind paralyzed.
Basically it’s just a meat grinder for logic via analysis paralysis.
Personally I would avoid any such conversations altogether.
Besides, I think that the most important issue here is that Scalia was probably killed so as to push through some sort of enslaving laws. Those laws, or at least the behaviours of the police who will enforce them, hence the impact on real human beings, probably affects outcomes on this planet more than the beliefs of a single person. Just my opinion.
George what makes you think that judge Scalia was murdered.
Was it because people have reported that he had a pillow over his face or that he was bumped off to usher in a new judge more compatible with the so called Dark Order plan?
matt lee,
Without turning this into a full blown analysis, in short, when you see something very convenient happening that benefits nasty, murderous people, coupled with “coincidences” stacking up that perfectly fit together in another narrative, then on the basis of probability, it was likely an intentional thing.
Scalia kept on blocking various enslaving laws that the powers that be wanted. His not being there would benefit them greatly.
When he died, no autopsy was performed, which is very unusual for a person of his social and political stature. As a matter of course, when that kind of important person dies, you do an autopsy anyway.
He was embalmed immediately, again out of order, which is exactly what would be done to make analysis/detection of certain poisons etc impossible.
The person who declared that he had died of a heart attack of natural causes had no medical training, and so was unqualified to make that determination. Again, out of order.
Heart attacks are not pleasant things, which quite often result in severe pain/contortion etc, which is out of line with how the body was found. The body was allegedly found perfectly prone, straight, and with sheets unrumpled.
The behaviour of the people telephoning the authorities about the death was deceptive, in that they did not name the deceased, and various other irregularities. Sort of like if Obama died, and his bodyguards called the paramedics saying “there is a black guy here who died, can you just send whoever is on shift?”
Not to mention that the government itself, knowing how out of order the events were, ought to have countered any potential conspiracy theories by being upfront and honest via various press statements etc, which they very loudly did not do.
Automatically choosing conspiracy over incompetence isn’t the best thing for normal people to do, but the likelihood of so many different people being that incompetent in the same moment, in a way that paints, perfectly, another picture that also perfectly fits the political narrative of the day…is improbable.
All very true George. An autopsy is ALWAYS performed on a person who did not die in a hospital, to rule out homicide. ALWAYS. Irregardless of what religion they are. That’s one of the first things that are done and you have the results of the autopsy within 3 days.
Shelia, My father died at our home but mu mother died in a hospital. I would think Scalia died in a hotel room suddenly probably lieing down on a pillow with another pillow behind him not on tip of him. Some people such as myself lie down on more than one pillow watching TV or trying to fall asleep so I would assume the same thjing happened to Scalia wich probably meanshe must have had a hearet attak or just died naturally since he was 79 years older, who knows? and wh cares!
Terry Carch,
The reason you care is because there are certain lunatic people in the world who want to make laws that enslave everyone, including you.
For example, this Scalia guy allegedly kept on refusing to pass laws allowing the US government to take everyone’s guns away.
If, for example, the US government wanted to do something really awful to people, and didn’t want them to be able to defend themselves with guns, then this Scalia guy was in the way.
His being removed by murder is therefore something that everyone ought to concern themselves with, because it means that it just got easier for lunatics to do lunatic things, to you and everyone else.
Scalia also passed some horrible laws, meaning that he wasn’t exactly the best person in the world. If even someone like that didn’t agree with whatever they’re trying to do, it means that whatever that thing is, it was unacceptable to a guy who was, say, 50% deranged already – so they need someone even more deranged to go along with it.
Being unconcerned is therefore irresponsible, in my opinion.
Sheila my uncle Wilbert was killed by barbarians and the police only took those statements from the guilty ones and presumed an accidental death. Geeesh!
Speaking of the Papacy, Quetzal has spoken QUITE CLEARLY regarding the status of this figure and it’s context with regards to the immediate future.
http://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_Meier/Contact_Report_215
Quetzal: Quetzal:
160. Your words are correct.
161. Thus, I will offer Henoch’s prophecies in an understandable form.
162. So listen, then:
163. If the human being of Earth continues to live in the same way as he has done up to now—forming his thoughts and feelings in the same manner, indulging in the same actions as he has hitherto—then the words of the prophecies of Henoch could not be any clearer.
164. The point in time at which these prophecies will begin to be fulfilled will be when a Pope will no longer reside in Rome.
165. All of Europe will then fall victim to a terrible punishment by evil powers.
166. The Christian religion will collapse and the churches and monasteries will end up in ruins and ashes.
167. Monstrous forces will be created by science and will be released by the military forces and armies as well as by terrorists, causing great destruction.
168. Millions and even billions of people will be killed by acts of terrorism, by wars and civil wars; and finally, in some parts of the world, every third human being, and, in other places, every fourth human being, will lose his or her life.
169. The nations of the East will rise against the nations of the West, the West against the East.
170. Many deaths will be inflicted upon the people by fighter and bomber aircraft, and bombs and rockets will destroy and annihilate smaller and larger villages and cities.
171. The people will be completely powerless against all this and will live through 888 days of Hell on Earth, suffering hunger and plagues which will claim even more lives than the war itself.
172. The time will be severe as never before experienced on Earth. Ultimately, nothing can be bought or sold any longer.
173. All provisions will be rationed; and if a human being steals even a small piece of bread, he/she will have to pay for it with his/her life.
174. Many waters will mix with human blood and turn red, as once in the past the Nile in Egypt turned red with blood.
175. And it will be that the fanatics of Islam will rise up against the countries of Europe and all will shake and quiver.
176. Everything in the West will be destroyed; England will be conquered and thrown down to the lowest level of misery.
177. And the fanatics and warriors of Islam will retain their power for a long time.
178. However, not only Europe will be affected but ultimately all the countries and peoples of the Earth, as the great horror expands to a war that will encompass the entire world.
179. After the turn of the millennium, the papacy will exist only a short period.
180. Pope John Paul II is the third from last in this position.
181. After him, only one additional pontificate will follow.
182. Then a Pontifex Maximus follows who will be known as Petrus Romanus.
183. Under his religious rule, the end of the Catholic Church will come, a total collapse becoming inevitable.
___
This current pope certainly looks like the last one given the fact he is appearing to be this great bridge builder of sorts jabbing at Trump for not building bridges. Remember folks, “no longer residing in Rome” could mean he can retire the office of the Papacy himself rather than exterior forces removing the Vatican. AND, it coincides with the “end” part that I put as a snippet here of the prophecies. We’re in for some pretty grim times if that is the case considering the Pope has done things whose “religious rule” has the following:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extraordinary_Jubilee_of_Mercy
Ned Duke,
From memory, in one of the contact reports talking about pope john paul, it was indicated that this particular pope is the second last, with the last prophesized to take the name Petrus Romanus.
As for what you said about what “reside” means, I agree. I also viewed it as simply meaning “when the pope isn’t there that day”.
Not to mention that Italy appears to be setting itself up for serious conflict. These popes are not particularly robust fellows. I would expect that at the first sign of trouble (or a mouse) they would run off somewhere right away for sanctuary and, likely, appeal for (other people’s) money. Perhaps the conflict is the predictor to look at presently.
I was under the impression that the pope will no longer reside in Rome not because of Islamic terrorists over running the Vatican and Italy but because of the coming earthquake underneath Rome and the eruption of Mt Vesuvius.
If this natural disaster happens whilst the pope is still in the papacy then it makes sense that he’ll reside elsewhere because the smallest state on earth is unliveable.
No?
matt lee,
Could be. These contact reports are sometimes a little vague.
War, volcanoes, scary mouse infestation, lots of overseas catholics spontaneously winning lotto who might donate lots of money…all good reasons to not reside in Rome for awhile.
Or, this Jesus figure returns as another possibility. After all, the papacy exist (servant of the servants of Christ) because Jesus is not here (upon this rock I will build my church). Therefore, the office itself could also mean the pope willingly abolishes when Jesus returns, a la Steven Greer’s space guru-ascended masters meetings, or whatever other reason like we’re all popes as one religion while singing Kumbaya.
Just putting the other possibility out there.
Since Ben Carson has a painting of himself with Jesus, I would ask Ben Carson haha.
Ask Steve Greer what kind of mental link he gets between himself and two military flares. He’ll probably tell you how “enlightening” it is lol.
And here’s what good, God-Fearing’ Crunchtians wanna do.
Wow MH. I would hope that bill never passes as it tramples on people’s civil liberties. It’s a slippery slope when religion is held in higher regard than people’s rights for equality. You can thank Scalia (from the grave) because he was always against giving homosexuals equal rights. Plus you can blame overpopulation for not allowing the spirit form to spend its proper amount of time in the ether and coming back too soon. I personally would never dream of turning away gays and I have a few gay clients myself. Why would I treat them any different than anyone else? We are all human. Oh Georgia, get a grip.
He’s not known as “Petrus Romanus”, though. He’s known world-wide as “Pope Francis”.
Give it time. He’s pretty unshakeable about his bridge building (Pontifex Maximus) which he already fulfills.
The truth can only be found when it appears! The supervisors/
space faring Pleiadians can tell the truth, however we can not know the truth because of cause and effect. Why not take Billy Meier’s advice as genuine good natured and truly good advice/advice?
I’m sure I’m not the first to do this but I checked the definition of believe and wondered if anyone from any religion ever checked it too?
be·lieve
bəˈlēv/
verb
1.
accept (something) as true; feel sure of the truth of.
“the superintendent believed Lancaster’s story”
synonyms: be convinced by, trust, have confidence in, consider honest, consider truthful More
2.
hold (something) as an opinion; think or suppose.
“I believe we’ve already met”
synonyms: think, be of the opinion that, have an idea that, imagine, suspect, suppose, assume, presume, take it, conjecture, surmise, conclude, deduce, understand, be given to understand, gather, fancy, guess, dare say; More
How was I such a fool to accept something unproven? I wonder if the believers feel the same way but feel there is no other alternative? I wonder how many of them, if they were to read Semjase’s spiritual teachings would be changed forever?
I know for me, my life has forever changed after reading the teachings… I’m in such a more pleasant state knowing I’m not going to hell… But my point is that there is an alternative to religion that is not known to the masses… I used a lot of the christian belief system to live my life. Tried being a good person, love my neighbors, etc. It was so refreshing after reading the spiritual teachings and knowing this is the right way to be. Knowing there was another way to live… It seems like before I came upon this case, it was either believe in god or be a evil person…. This was my ignorant way of looking at things… And I wonder how many others think the same way? If only we could sling the spiritual teachings like a drug… Follow a christian down a dark alley… Pop out of the shadows and say “pssst! I got something that’ll make you feel good! And it’s free!” Then give them a copy not the spiritual teachings… Lol
*of the spiritual teachings. Damn auto-correct!
I can’t believe God hasn’t shut down this website already 🙂
He’s too busy answering other prayers.
Back in High School ( John F. Kennedy Catholic High) was the last time I challenged someone who was considered my instructor in all things religious, my challenge (that is how it was received anyway) was to ask about confession. I asked Father Batterberry (also my football coach, go figure) what happens to those whom I have sinned against after I am absolved of sin and gave the scenario where others were punished for a crime I committed but lied (very convincingly) in order to be perceived as innocent. What he told me has stuck with me for 36 years, he said that we can not be responsible for the wrong actions that we were guided to undertake while under the influence of Satan, and that Satan is the real cause for all of our transgressions, therefore the innocent must toil through what Satan has in mind for them as well, and only when those who were exposed to the evil of our sins make reparations themselves, with their forgiveness be granted.
This was not the first time I asked this question of my “cult” advisors, for I was in a parochial education system from 1st through 8th grade, and was very independent in my thoughts, but every time was either a similar answer, or punishment for even questioning the will and word of “god”.
You would not believe the answers when I asked how come Angels have belly buttons.
Help. It’s even worse than I thought.
Sorry Michael,
sometimes it’s a difficult decision to laugh hysterically or shake my head in horror, six of one half a dozen of the other. Sadly there are many young ones who would like to express their true thoughts, ask meaningful questions, and find real answers, but are raised in a family that have no tolerance for independent thought. I consider myself fortunate that although my parents were very deeply “belief” oriented, they allowed me to be me and they never discouraged my independent thought process.
Hi Tim I’m curious what the responses were concerning the angel’s belly button. Good question btw.
Today I told one of my co-workers that there was no such thing as god and why the hell hasn’t he struck me dead for saying that out loud in a public place? No answer.
Hi Sheila, the first time I asked that question I was in the third grade, and Sister Elizabeth said that God created the Angels in our image as well and decided that they should have a belly button so we would know that they were just like us. That answer only led me to ask how come we all do not have wings then, and her response was that the Angels had to have wings to do God’s work all over the world and that the wings were necessary so that they could get from place to place much faster. The second time I asked this question was in the sixth grade and Father Long said that this was simply a interpretation of the artists and that they didn’t really have belly buttons, so I then asked how come all the Angels were white and I got the same answer, that that was just the artists interpretation, so when I asked how come all the Apostles, Jesus, Mary, and all the other characters in the stories of the Bible were also white and did the same artist paint all the images, I got sent to the office. It seemed to me that the artists who were doing all the paintings in all the books and all the churches everywhere were racists, this led to my question as a junior in high school when I asked Father Bowen if God made us in his image, was he white as Jesus was and if so when did he decide to make black, yellow, and red man, and why were none of them in any of the artists renditions, I was sent to the Dean of Disciplines office for that where I was assigned to weekend work crew for the next three weekends. It became rather clear to me then that all educators in the parochial school system were not prepared to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, because they either did not know, or were not taught well enough to make up more plausible answers to why so much ambiguity exists in the catholic church and their teachings.
Last year when I was in my last schooling year, I remember there being conversations about religion and all the kids said they weren’t religious at all and that they thought religions were idiotic. Kids I knew from other schools thought the same, obviously not 100% of them. I also remember a teacher showing us pictures of ufo’s and having conspiracy theory talks with teachers about secret USA machinations. Some parts of the world are f#cked, others not.
A few months ago a religious-knock-on-door-person came to my house with brochures and said that Christianity was dying out. He then asked for my opinion, and I told him about Meier etc. and he listened and didn’t have objections to what I explained. (Crazy, I know)
Anyway, don’t lose hope haha.
This is unimportant and kinda unrelated but I’ll share it anyway.
https://www.facebook.com/Talisman-Menswear-165337020392/
A clothing company is using the same picture at the top of this blog (homepage) for their advertisements. You’ll have to scroll down a little on the given link.
Hi Wyatt,
Thanks for highlighting. I’ve made FIGU aware of the use of the photo.
If anyone finds any potential infringements of FIGU copyrights, please alert them by reporting it here, ta: http://www.figu.org/ch/verein/kontakt
They label themselves as Christians Wyatt because they don’t realise that they are human beings only expendables because of believing in those criminals advertising recruiting of innocent people to join their gang cause of death and destruction by using the narcotic thought of religion to inflate their believers with false ideas so that the criminal can profit in destroying good.
criminals with their bottom line/goals.
“You would not believe the answers when I asked how come Angels have belly buttons.”
You can’t leave it there Timothy. Do tell!
Heehee.. I’m curious now too. Please do tell us
I am in total agreement with MH’s analysis. I have studied the contacts and material on theyfly.com and have come to a complete agreement in their teachings. Having been in the pastorate, evangelism and Bible College instructor I am completely at peace with the instructional material of Billy, Michael, Semjase and others of her group. My Doctorate in Apologetics gives me an excellent opportunity to spread what I call the “Gospel of the Ancients” and introduce others to a peace and rightful perspective of life never felt before. I have been “hood-winked” for years in Christian rhetoric and now I want to lift that same “hood” from others.
Hi Ron don’t fail to mention to them the actual source – Billy Meier.
Yeah, I hear ya. And, hello there. You appear to me like you’re new, so have a warm welcome.
I’ll just get on with it here. I want to give people the opportunity, at least, to take these wise, empowering materials in, as well .. but as of now … I’m not exactly stumped, but I’m not really seeming to be successful here either.
…
Well, it’s nice to have a biblically taught man come around, in any case.. Is that “self-taught” by the bible, then?
I hope you’ll share your insights with us, within reason .. At times I’ve said too much when I could have been satisfied saying a little, and it ended up reducing some of my own personal power somehow. Though I wonder now if that just had to do with jostling loose some buried doubts that have yet to be cleared away through intellect.
Oops. And, I feel like a blabber mouth here again. So, yeah … welcome, heh heh.
In keeping with the cutting of the sarcasm with a knife… an idea which appears to be going on here: An example of great writing my son… (a condescending example of Exo-political positioning here) too bad you are inferior from birth… I like the innuendo about the Big Whopper… being the sexual undertones of the National Monument… which… of course (!) was Immaculately conceived… (she was a virgin… meaning she was young) and how the suspended disbelief is twisted and turned for all to NOT see… but of course we turn our heads… or we are “supposed” to… anyway… Makes sex all that much more interesting doth-int-it?
Almost hypnotic?… in fact even some here replying have “drunk the cool-aide”… and are taken in by the subtle psycho-subliminal coding… oh he must be bad… he had (more-than-me) POWER… and true… Gewalt: which is a very much different (no English word for it) yet a very subtly powerful attribute: we know nothing of: because we have not un-pulled the wool from our eyes… to see what is the truth because they spoon feed us every SUN-day sharp! To cannibalize the truth… and confess our mortal sins… (implying… mortality or re-incarnation) which because we are not allowed to do them (on SUNday) these supposed sins (… we all subliminally want… (I.E. reverse psychology… )) Everybody wants what they can’t have… even at the confessional… cause the clergy does some of their best work… on their knees… for prayer I mean… (what were you thinking?)… and notice they say all men… why not women… too? What shall we call them: nones… or nuns… they still feel those that bring life to the world as inferior… subliminally, disrespectfully… sarcastically.
In the churches… even masturbation is a sin… something to NOT (Sin: without) do… when indeed that may be better than ruining your life by having a “quicky” under the bleachers of a best friends girl friend… sly these sinners… because there is not choice… you ARE one automatically.
I especially like it when… after the ceremony they make like trees spreading their branches to the SUN / Son and holding out their outstretched limbs… to bring in the real-thing… then… shake hands and say “And also with you…” and “peace be with you…” the peace sign is made like the tree yet they draw the sword of petrus (the peter… sort-of-like the Oscar… no? Is there some kind of similarity there… I think there is…) which is the sign of death… and looks like what most folks think the true peace sign is… no wonder the Vietnam war took so long to become peaceful again… As to the starting of that war… is was suspicious… Like the last world war… ulterior motives of human guinea pigs… underhanded ideas for “our national security”… it sort of goes in line with the if you #$%# up… that is: go against the will of someone you cannot even see (less chance of rebuttal there)… (who if you’re Catholic tends to be hung prominently up as a warning) you will go to a place of fire, to suffer continuous torture and live till eternity… but… “we love you” and… “we need the money.” “we need money”
Don’t you think it would be better to cultivate friendship and logically and reasonably attempt peace rather than getting yours $$$… and then covering your @$$…? Maybe sharing the limited resources of this small world of which we find ourselves due to going forth and multiplying…
Nice article… fun and interesting… thanks.
Good one Randy
It was a nice change.
As George Carlin used to quip “God needs money and lots of it”.
But hell when I need the money why doesn’t the Catholic church give me any or was God getting greedy.
I thought about my dire financial predicament and came to the conclusion that heck if I want to become rich I am better off starting my own church.
Screw God I am keeping the money all to myself.
Matt I never believed in hypnotic persuasion and still do not because that is simply the way I can in my evolution stop the effect. I now know, however that hypnotic persuasion is real/true. I now create a new idea and use this invention to my own good/use like I will/want to thus it no longer lingers in a cultish delusional feature that causes me harm.
Well good on ya Darcy
That was hip not tick.
Yup Matt you make me feel like Chester/Festus Hagen on Gunsmoke with Matt Dillon!
Darcy, you really must see a hypnotist performing to see hypnotism in action. Years ago a friend of mine went on stage and afterwards could not remember what he had done. Slowly he started to remember bits and pieces only because we were telling him. He never did gain full memory of it all. Or just go to a Pentecostal church when they have faith healers performing, for a good laugh. Um, you can still laugh in church or has this been banned yet?
Gunsmoke…loved that show. Back in the day when a series showed good values.
Now , my son was in a 50/50 french catholic school . He asked way too many questions and the first time I went to get him he told me.
I was in the back of the class room and I thought I heard the priest say ,( we all have assholes). So I started laughing and was in trouble of course..
The priest said we all have a soul.
The second time , My son asked the priest , how can we be born in sin if we are created in his image. They tried to answer I guess but my son was not happy with there answer.
I think they were arguing with a 7 year old and couldn’t win. Needles to say , we took him out of that stupidity . Put him in a English public school and he was fine. Many friends and great memories.
I think we should all be like children and ask what we want. We will find the answer.
Klyde
Nice one Klyde, go figure cause and effect.
Ha-ha-ha-ha… stop Michael, stop, please; You are killing me! Yes, it is true; at these times there is so many crazy and retarted people out there that, even if I try my best, it is hard to be competitive because competition is just to damn strong. When we consider what the Truth really is, and how hopelessly deceived and crazy people are and how far from the Truth they are, and how it is impossible for most not only to hear and recognize the Truth least deal with it, it is best to look at it with humor. We know we are “going to hell”, but if me must and if we can not do anything about it anymore, lets go with a big laugh. Things are so crazy these days that it isn`t sad anymore but rediciously funny! LOL
Just the right nut job to become the last president of USA…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVzW9X9DMkg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MNJmtGMHRDQ
… one of the reasons why it is going to be the last one…
It is really, really hard to be considered crazy these days because competition is just so very hard!
Just think of those shocks you’ve got
And those knocks you’ve got
And those blues you’ve got
From that news you’ve got
And those pains you’ve got
(If any brains you’ve got)
From those cellular phones.
So Missus C., with all Eleanor’s trimmings’,
Can broadcast a bed from Simmons
‘Cause Bill knows
Anything goes!
(yes it is from Cole Porter)
I agree with you Anthony, I too am feeling like laughing lately due to the stupidity of the way this world is behaving! I once heard someboady say ” Remember that this was or is a thousand years ago in other world what is happening on Earth now is really a thousdand years ago. What we are doing now is or was a thousand years ago. My reason for laughing intsead of cring and feeling sorry is to look at what is going on now on Earth to see just how quaint everything is now and just laugh at how stupid most peoples brains are getting,cloudy and mushy what with all the stupid things people on Erth do when must people theses days are just getting dumber and dumber etc,etc,etc! Very often I keep[ wondering what the hell am I doing here on Earth what with all this degeneracy going on when we should ALLlearn from Billy and the P`s of which most of the people of Earth will not learn the lessons Billy has taught us! As MH has said many times “We Were Warned!” Michio Kaku once said on c2c some time ago we were once like the Q of Star Trek, WE LOST IT Kaku said we might gain Q sttis and power once again but without Q`s trurpiness (“IF we ever get there in our lifetime,who know?”)
The results of an incorrect religious passage: “go forth and multiply” http://ca.figu.org/Population_Statistics.html For the human being, life itself is the unknown, which must be fathomed, learned and lived responsibly, which is why one must comprehend that: irresponsibility never pays… it is irresponsible to overpopulate our planet if we are truly civilized…
Maybe his son knew something about his father…
Scalia was a pedophile according to SRA (Satanic ritual abuse) victim David Shurter.
Shurter is yet another in the long line of victims who have suffered Satanic ritual abuse. He tells how he was groomed in MK Ultra fashion until the age of 10. When he was 18, he went to Omaha, Nebraska to live with his biological mother, and soon got caught up in the massive international child sex slave and Satanic pedophilia network there.
Senator John DeCamp, Ted Gunderson and others famously exposed the Omaha child sex ring in the 1990s, including in such books as The Franklin Coverup: Child Abuse, Satanism, and Murder in Nebraska.
The documentary Conspiracy of Silence gives an overview of the issue. Like other victims such as Cathy O’Brien, Shurter names former NSA chief, colonel and open Satanist Michael Aquino as one of his abusers.
Shurter not only claims that Scalia was a pedophile, but that Scalia was the head of the “cult” (i.e. the Satanic pedophilia ring) and that the abuse he perpetrated was just as extreme as Aquino’s.
Read the entire article @
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2016/02/25/accusations-former-victim-claims-scalia-was-a-pedophile/
I really think we have to be very careful about these kinds of claims, rumors, etc. While it’s long been both rumored and known that many powerful people are involved in pedophilia, etc., it’s still not certain that all those suspected, accused, etc., are in fact involved and guilty. And Scalia was never charged, as far as I know, and he isn’t alive to answer or defend any such accusations.
My former catholic boss grew up in Italy and when he was a child and went to the local swimming hole, he said there was always a pedophile there offering money or candy. I was shocked. He claimed it was normal. I told him if that had happened here, there would have been a lot of fathers grabbing their shotguns and heading to that waterhole. The sickness of the Catholic Church is astounding.
Unreliable and totally unsupported accusations (in contrast perhaps to those of e.g. Cathy O’Brien or the exposed Jimmy Saville-related case in England). Scalia was more likely a closeted homosexual in my opinion. Actually there are more homosexuals than pedophiles in this kind of blackmail-ring. You’d be surprised to find out that even Nixon and J. Edgar Hoover may have been homosexuals.
Yes, the Franklin Coverup was definitely real, although again there was not very much verification of specific perpetrators and no charges or suspects. However, there is actually in contrast a lot of evidence for closeted homosexuality among many “conservative” politicians, which could easily be used to blackmail them. I think also that this is more realistic than a vast child-prostitution network.
When Nixon was recorded speaking ill of the Bohemian Grove, he did not say “they are raping children”, but “it’s the faggiest goddamn thing.”
Scalia is a very sad case of how Catholicism destroys one’s humanity. He was a deeply cynical, cruel man, who advocated for the death penalty because he believed that the Christian sky god demanded it as punishment, and that he, God’s representative, must faithfully execute his sky god’s wishes. Naturally, his “morality” came from his sick, sad church, which has always equated corporal punishment with purity.
Scalia dehumanized gay men in America and deprived us of our rights for as long as he possibly could, until the majority of other justices no longer agreed with his degrading beliefs. Death could not have come quicker for such a rotten man. It is fitting that Scalia’s own son would condemn him with the same religious rot that elder Scalia condemned American citizens. The Scalias wouldn’t know justice and benevolence if it struck them on their heads.