Donate Button
Tuesday, March 19, 2024

The Billy Meier UFO contacts singularly authentic ongoing for 80 years the key to our future survival

Apocalyptic Consequences of more Arctic Methane Release

Corroborates Billy Meier’s 1989 information on methane danger

In Dahr Jamail’s most recent of several articles dealing with the danger from methane gas, he discusses a recent report warning about the potentially apocalyptic consequences of more Arctic methane release.

Mr. Jamail has been doing important investigative work in this field for some time. His article also quotes Natalia Shakhova, whose comments immediately establish that she too understands the dire nature of the situation and the danger from large, “non-gradual” methane releases. Neither of them appear to have compromised their interest in the truth for material considerations, such as is the case with so many scientists (and others) who are climate change deniers, etc.

This article serves to bring their work to our attention, as well as to inform them of Billy Meier’s specific, prophetically accurate scientific, environmental, astronomical, etc., information.

The People Were Warned

Those of us who’ve long been familiar with Billy Meier’s environmental warnings – he’s the first person to specifically warn of manmade climate change and global warming in the 1950s – also know that he’s provided specific information on the danger of atmospheric collapse from a variety of contributing factors. He also warned about methane gas being released by the thawing of the permafrost, first pointing out that methane was even more damaging to the ozone layer than CFCs in 1989*.

As is the case with so much of the scientific information provided to Meier by the Plejaren, we find that our scientists unknowingly corroborate the information anywhere from a few years to several decades later, with their “new discoveries”.

Perhaps, because of the nature of his other political works, Mr. Jamail would be interested in Meier’s warnings about the two US-Iraq Gulf Wars – and many other things – that he published in 1958. And it is to be hoped that both he and Ms. Shakhova would likewise be courageous enough to carefully examine Meier’s information and its implications.

Our Future Survival

I would be glad to provide them with any further information they need so they can inform other credible, non bought-off scientists who are also truly concerned with helping humankind to assure our own very threatened future survival.

* Contact 229, July 31, 1989:

Billy: 
Thanks, your explanation says more than I expected. Then I still have another question regarding CFCs. Concerning this, you once told me that certain gases, which are stored under the bottom of the sea and which rise up, cause even greater damage to the ozone layer than CFCs. Now, I no longer know what gas this was and out of what it arises.

Quetzal: 
54. It concerns methane gas, which is stored as methane hydrate under the sea.

See also:

The BP Disaster: Science slowly Catching up to Billy Meier

UPDATE: New Report Confirms Billy Meier’s BP Disaster Information

The Bermuda Triangle Mystery Solved…Meier Proved Right Again!

Thanks to Bruce Lulla for Mr. Jamail’s article.

 

Order the new translation of the Talmud Jmmanuel here!

Please allow 10 – 14 days for delivery because we are receiving a lot of orders. We will              let you know if there are any differences in cost for international orders, as prices vary to different countries.

BONUS:

While supplies last we are giving a FREE $20 Salome Peace Meditation CD with every order!

Click here to order the new translation of the Talmud Jmmanuel !

Closing Sale:

Scubbly is going out of business at the end of this month. Get digital downloads of DVDs and ebooks about the Meier case – here – as soon as possible!

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

45 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dolly Worby

I just read this article on what’s happening in my country in regards to permafrost

http://www.cbc.ca/beta/news/canada/north/it-scares-me-permafrost-thaw-in-canadian-arctic-sign-of-global-trend-1.406917

Andrew Darroch

Just read this article regards the Chinese managing to extract ‘combustible ice’ from the sea floor

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.rt.com/document/591eda0cc36188bb688b4581/amp

Needless to say that this will spell disaster for our already badly suffering planet should the Chinese intend using as a fuel supply for their ‘global energy revolution’
When will the so called responsible ones wake up?
The people were warned etc..

John Webster

It’s very ok with me if Trump exits his presidential experience by way of impeachment. It’s NOT ok with me if he continues his complete contempt for our planet. As his term of institutionalized presidential b.s. comes to its close, the spirit essence which causes him to be on Earth will unfold completely different events in another life never to be known.
“Methane is especially dangerous, as it can warm the earth 86 times as much as carbon dioxide over 20 years in the atmosphere.”
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/10/08/russian-scientists-find-powerful-ever-methane-seep-arctic-ocean/

Melissa Osaki

Would you mind clarifying what you mean by this… “the spirit essence which causes him to be on Earth will unfold completely different events in another life never to be known.”

John Webster

In rereading my own text, yes, Melissa, I can understand your question. So, I accept, that as with any physical individuated human life, there’s an [essence] residing in the human form which is [the connection to Creation.] So, obviously Trump is no exception. He will eventually exit this current life experience, and the essence that has resided in his human body, known as Trump, will [at some point in time] appear in another human body, to live out a completely different sequence, which would be an UNknown.

John Webster

Melissa, I would value your response [anyone else?] to my answering your request to ‘clarify’.

Melissa Osaki

Hi John,

I now understand what you were saying. It wasn’t completely clear in the original comment, but your clarification was on point. Thanks.