How scientists respond may well determine if we do indeed survive
Regarding the first episode of How Did He Know BEFORE the Scientists?, we should consider that if a very advanced extraterrestrial race chose to contact us they wouldn’t use the complex means of doing so imagined by various sci-fi fantasists and groups like SETI who, as Billy Meier’s ongoing contacts show, falsely believe that they will be the “official” discoverers of, and the contact people for, intelligent extraterrestrial life.
The clearest way to contact us would not be “in the language of mathematics”, or with cryptic blips and primitive radio signals from outer space, it would be in one of the languages spoken on Earth. Any extraterrestrial race advanced enough to master traveling huge distances in space would certainly be capable of learning a language foreign to them as well. The Plejaren race, with whom Meier’s been in contact for over 77 years, have chosen German because its comprehensiveness, specificity and accuracy doesn’t exist in any other terrestrial language.
What we also learn from the information in the Billy Meier contacts is that they don’t resort to the kind of specialized language that our scientists do to describe things…and to elevate themselves above non-scientists.
The Plejaren speak to us in the real language of…science.They provided Meier with literally hundreds of examples of specific, impeccably accurate scientific information pertaining to discoveries, events, etc., that we would only confirm from years to decades later. They are contained in Meier’s books and documents, their ironclad authenticity assured by copyrights, the internationally recognized proof of first publication. Copyrights don’t assure the accuracy of the information. This was left to our own scientists who have – unknowingly – confirmed and corroborated hundreds of examples of them.
So, any scientist who tries to dismiss, ridicule or ignore the unprecedented factual reality of actual contact between an earth man and extraterrestrial human beings, should first debunk Joe Tysk’s definitive authentication of Meier’s evidence, as well as all other independent expert analyses and authentications done over the past 40 years.
While scientists, like most other human beings, have their own expectations about what should happen in life and how and when it should happen…life often has other ideas.
The abundant, still irreproducible, ironclad physical and informational evidence is here. The time is now to come to terms with it. Having seen this information, any scientist not deigning to respond, should they disagree without providing a credible rebuttal, is simply intellectually dishonesty and cowardly. It doesn’t change the facts. But it could relegate one to insignificance, as the dismissiveness towards the evidence would ultimately and deservedly be directed at them.
The real scientists have been spoken to in the language of science. It is intended to help us assure our own threatened future survival, which should override all lesser considerations about funding, tenure, credibility, rank, popularity, ego, etc.
How they will respond may well determine if we do indeed survive.