Maybe he should ask the Swiss air force how many unidentified radar sightings occurred between 1975-1980 ? Or talk with retired UN diplomat Phobol Cheng ? Of Billys neighbors that heard the ships ? Or explain the oval laser holes ? Or the six finger hand prints ? Or look at Askets photo and Michele Delafava who are clearly two different people . How about the postage stamp shot , or the blue file teleported to Wendle.

OMG, I could hardly listen to this idiot for 5 minutes. Anybody with half a brain that reads a couple pages of the information presented by BEAM will know that it is based on reality. Michael does not have to convince anybody. People simply have to desire to know truth.

Its almost like the earth is under a spell where the vibration of truth is reflexively attacked by distraction or distortion.

Its a climate and an atmosphere where anything which wants to break through is subject to being repelled, distorted or absolutely downcried.

I really am starting to believe that there are fluidal forces like algorythms that permeate our mass consciousness which distort and repel anything that is true and good.

Just like kids with bowls of greens we scream for junk food and howl like demons at an exorcism if the truth comes anywhere near our table.

These human psychic forces may have been generated by thousands of years of perpetuated deceptions, to the point where we can react violently to the truth, like demons at an exorcism.

I think you will find it a lost cause presenting any data sheets to Robin Hanson. He wants oceans of data that prove the case beyond any doubt, and that is not what the Plejaren have given, by design. Anything short of proof will not be enough. He will want more and more and more, and like any sceptic will look ONLY at data sheets, of which, for him with the Meir case, there will never be enough.
Probably the best data sheets or charts would come with the photography but he would claim he is not a photographer so he cannot comment and then want endorsement from a gaggle of professional photographers, who scared of losing their reputation, wil never endorse Billy’s photos despite their being now proven legitimate.
The closest one might get to reaching this data closeted individual is by treating the Meier case like a murder case investigation: one subject, Billy, one issue, the witnesses and how it would then be judged in a court of law. But even then Hanson will probably be too concerned for his position to take any side, and again would argue that even in a court of law some jurors could disagree with the verdict or the wrong verdict could be given, so without incontrovertible evidence the case must be dismissed, which is what he does and will, it seems, always do.
More success should be found taking him to task on his absurd notion that any space travelers would have populated the known universe, based probably on his conformity bias of we having populated our planet to the full before we travel into space. Problem there is we haven’t begun travelling into space and only those that have learned to control their own population would ever make it out there. He also assumes that there are abundant planets just waiting for madly copulating humans to arrive, when life forms are more likely to develop as the planet does, making planetary emigration far more difficult than he imagines. After all, so few planets are capable of supporting life, and if ours is anything to go by, there’s a very high risk that unless they control their population over many generations and learn not just the benefits but the necessity of having a controlled population then they will merely destroy their planet through their shere numbers before they have a chance to do the same to the universe.
I guess he’s unaware of the fact that on average we have already destroyed 25% of all fauna and flora on Earth in merely the past 70 years, and that is scientific consensus. Another 50 years of the same insane kev of planetary destruction and, because we are at the top end of the population numbers for those past 70 years, we should have achieved the unenviable goal of making the earth incapable of supporting human life. There are natural checks and balances to overpopulation on a planet and these will obviously exist in outter space too. He needs to question hard some of his basic theoretical principles.

How is everyone’s hot summer going?

In reaching out of the people who interviewed the hyperactive and snotty ‘adult’ Robin Hanson, I found that he just provided the definition of what an adult should be on his website. It reads as follows:
Adult: “a mature, fully developed person.
Mature: “fully grown physically” “developed mentally and emotionally and behave in a responsible way” “a lot of careful thought”
Responsible: “liable to be called to account” “able to answer for one’s conduct and obligations; trustworthy” “involving important duties, independent decision-making, or control over others.”
Source: https://www.overcomingbias.com/

Then from his bio:
I also have a rather critical style. I beat hard on new ideas, seek out critics, and then pledge my allegiance only to those still left standing. In conversation, I prefer to identify a claim at issue, and then focus on analyzing it, rather than the usual quick tours past hundreds of issues. I have always asked questions, even when I was very young.

I have little patience with those whose thinking is sloppy, small, or devoid of abstraction. And I’m not a joiner; I rebel against groups with “our beliefs”, especially when members must keep criticisms private, so as not to give ammunition to “them.” I love to argue one on one, and common beliefs are not important for friendship — instead I value honesty and passion.
Source: https://www.overcomingbias.com/bio

Based on what is listed above, I can testify that only the opposite is true. Though one may come to the same observation by watching the latest video linked on this blog page, I spent many hours listening to all the babbling of this person. If anyone happens to find one ‘set of data’ that matches what he says, please do let me know.

Thank you!