For 15 years, the disgraced, shameless poster boy for the unscientific, truth-hating, cult of Skepticism has perpetrated the REAL “Billy Meier UFO hoax”
For the past 15 years, skeptic Derek Bartholomaus has indulged in a form of stolen valor, fraudulently misusing my brand name, TheyFly, and Billy Meier’s name, by putting up fake Billy Meier websites, (theyfly.net, theyfly.org and billymeierufocase.com) to confuse people into erroneously thinking they were legitimate, like www.theyflyblog.com and www.theyfly.com, which feature Meier’s authenticated evidence and hundreds of his specific, error-free prophecies and predictions.
Instead, Bartholomaus’ sites are mean-spirited hit pieces, filled with long-debunked lies and distortions, existing only to deceive people…and to defame Meier.
Bartholomaus’ blatant, vindictive thievery and falsifications reflect the arrogance and nastiness of an unprincipled, cowardly weakling who, when defeated, tried to do as much harm as possible to those who – at their own expense – gave him his best chance to prove his claims. Of course, the loser blames his own failures on other people, instead of his own stupidity and irrational, unscientific skeptical prejudices.
Derek Bartholomaus
Because Bartholomaus couldn’t substantiate his false accusations against Billy Meier and his evidence – and had to admit his failure publicly – he set out to malign Meier and me. Altering an email of mine to make it look like I’d lied, he published it on a skeptic website and in a press release…which the PR company promptly cancelled when made aware of the Bartholomaus fraud.
Unapologetic and without morals, disgraced, defeated, blinded by hate and envy, Bartholomaus underhandedly tried to extract revenge for his own failures, further bringing shame upon himself, his wife, children and family.
The Real “Billy Meier Hoax”
Bartholomaus’ unscrupulous behavior reveals how threatened he feels when confronted with the most important discovery in all of science and human history…and to what lengths he will go to try to prevent the world from knowing the truth.
He has thoroughly destroyed his own reputation, through his relentless plagiarism, lies and defamation against Billy Meier.
The real “Billy Meier hoax” is the one perpetrated – for 15 years – by an angry, failed human being named Derek Bartholomaus. Anyone who would conduct this kind of a vendetta – against someone he doesn’t know, has never met, and who’s never done anything to harm him – is beneath human dignity.
The Cult of Skepticism
Like other unscientific, fundamentalist cults, the skeptical organization with which Bartholomaus was associated, CFI, is riddled with agenda-driven adherents who avoid all facts and freely bend the truth. Like Bartholomaus, they’ve also had to retract their false claims. Some years ago they removed their nonsensical, so-called “Billy Meier investigation” from their Investigations/Tests section, leaving two, short, disinformation-filled articles in their place. CFI now mainly focuses on soft targets who make easily debunked paranormal claims.
Other skeptics who’ve suppressed, and/or made unsubstantiated attacks against, the Meier contacts include: Michael Shermer, Kal Korff, Phil Plait, Mick West, Steven Novella, Stuart Robbins, the late James Randi, SETI, so-called “UFO experts“, organizations like MUFON, and pseudoscientists like Avi Loeb, Jonathan Jiang, Robin Hanson, etc.
See also:
The Deceit and Dishonesty of Derek Bartholomaus
Professional Skeptics Group Proves UFOs Real!
Regarding IIG’s Retraction of Defamatory Claims against Billy Meier
Their garbage journalism, if you want to call it that, is rag crap like the Star or other junk writing’s you see at the grocery checkout. Once you just look at the BS put on the front page like “Aliens killed Princess Diana”, you automatically know the people writing that garbage have no ethical, moral or truth leg to stand on! It’s all garbage and garbage in is garbage out! These kinds of people are only after the pennies and dimes they can shake out of ignorant and Stupid people who buy into their lies, slander and falsehoods!
The brass neck of him. It’s got to the stage where where the space folk need to intervene and de ball these freaks with a butter knife.
A bit impossible, for to be de-balled one must first HAVE the balls. In this day and age no one outside the Meier case has any balls, in other words, a backbone to stand up for what’s right in order to save humanity and promote a brighter future for all of humanity, Earth’s lifeforms and Creation’s creations.
Only those who acknowledge and promote the truth in Eduard’s mission and the Creational teachings have any backbone, in addition, balls, fact.
Salome,
Charles
P.S. Obviously, the balls reference is no way intended as a sexist statement, you good folks know where I was going with my statement and opinion.
If you visit the UFO museum in Rosewall, NM, you will notice all characters like Derek have been mentioned and represented except Billy and his works. Billy, I noticed in a corner of an exhibition, last time I visited about 4 years ago, has been motioned as a hoaxer who is selling expensive books; that is all there is about him in that museum. One must ask why is that.
The UFO museum is essentially entertainment. The Meier case isn’t. So the museum cooperates with the suppression of the truth and people can keep on chasing lights-in-the-sky, all of which assures that the museum can keep on doing business…with the approval of the military, government, etc.
“I totally agree with you MH. This world is getting stupider and stupider!”
Why even visit the Roswell Museum in the fist place when they justs stuff Billy to the side in a corner like that? “That to me is very very mean!!!
Very true Terry.
Considering what the Eduard Albert Meier case is about, as we all here know, I would state that it’s inhumane to suppress ANY information from Meier, the Plejaren, the mission, etc.
Truthfully, any suppression of the information in the case and mission is a crime against humanity, my opinion of course.
All as one brothers and sisters!
Salome,
Charles
I was expecting an honest representation of cases involving the UFO’s but at the end I was very disappointed. Obviously, a comic representation of the matter is what this establishment wants. And that is what the museum was about.
Just looked for a moment at his website, which he has copied 3 times in 3 different URLs. These debunction-attempts are ridiculous, short and not based on scientific knowledge. About 15 years ago i finished successfully my studies and diploma-degree in electrical engineering with major in microelectronics. In the laboratories of my university of applied sciences, we had a million dollar expensive scanning electron microscope (REM) i worked also with in a practical seminar with other students and a physics professor. For example we coated several metal probes with gold for better conductivity and investigated e.g. metal samples which had failures or had mechanical breaks. The theoretical background and physically functionality of a REM i do know and also how to interpret the REM spectral energy lines (REM-EDX-analysis) of atomic elements with its resonance waveforms, which are normally also evaluated by software. All that Marcel Vogel had said in his metal-probe-analysis-video about his ongoing investigation is understandable, scientific and honest.
Furthermore: you can search every Patent-database for the at least 32 lifetime patents of Marcel Joseph Vogel (Marcel J. Vogel), who worked mostly as a senior scientist for IBM.
Getting down to the bottom of something is what the controversy is all about. The negativity serves to feed the subject matter because it calls attention to the subject and will eventually lead others to gain true cognition. Where they will want to get to the bottom of everything. There are many many people that have first been introduced to the subject in a negative wise. Only to experience years later that the negativity was in actuality a seed being planted. Among the consciousness weed’s of their everyday life lo and behold there is a seed of knowledge yet to be cultivated.
So therefore negativity servers the subject. We may applaud the errand boys and girls of the negative for doing this work for the mission. As seed is a seed whether is it delivered by a hurricane or an idle breeze. This understanding is comforting.
Bartholomaus is a psychopath. A few years back, I commented on some of his debunking videos with “Get a life!” He got so mad and angry, that he tried to track me down. After his unsuccessful attempts, he ended up disliking my whole profile. I laughed so much about it, because I have written much worse stuffs about others, and they responded with a smile. Since then, I never bothered watching his videos anymore. I think everyone should just ignore this guy. He is not worth arguing with.
There is no need to argue with him, he had his opportunity to try tomato his skeptical case.
Now I’m simply informing any and all who may be interested and bringing his disgusting behavior to light.
“DITTO!”
Re Quetzal’s photo of Billy holding the mic up in a vain attempt to catch the sound that DB claims was made by spinning a wire ball around in a little cage. The time exposure on the Olympus 35 ECR model that had such exposure has a maximum of four seconds exposure. In the photo part supplied it is not possible to see the top of the rings of fore/sparks/discharge so how many there are is not clear. If you try spinning something like DB’s set up a cycle will take about a second. Interestingly, there are four observable rings in Billy’s photo, but there might be more. It’s just another case of a possible “out” for those who don’t want to consider whether the experience was genuine. If you can find a better picture, Michael, it would be good to know exactly how many rings there are in it. We can say there are at least four. Could there be five or six? Or even more, making a time exposure of swinging iron wool for the requisite number of revolutions impossible to complete in four seconds? Four seconds was the maximum time exposure of the particular 35 ECR that had that function.
Derek Bathomomaus is a proper c**k, an idiot at that. Like all the other UFO experts, he knows nothing about which he speaks/states. When it comes to Derek and others like him, they (i.e. Derek) hate him (i.e. Eduard) because they ain’t him (i.e. Eduard), fact.
Near the beginning of my discovering Eduard’s case and delving further into it, the situation you’re describing is/was one of the first tests I attempted to validate whether even just one aspect of Eduard’s case was real. My result, Eduard is/was truthful, as are all his claims. The man has no reason to lie.
Long story short, Eduard’s hands would’ve been blurred/blurry had he been the one swirling the steel wool on fire, his hands were steady and static in the photo as he was merely holding the microphone.
I performed this test quite a few years ago and in the photos one can see that I duplicated the fire circles above my head, HOWEVER, my hand(s) were blurry as shit and one could tell that I was twirling something above my head, even at night one could tell. I have the photos somewhere in my numerous archives, just not sure where. Hopefully I’ll be able to track them down and relay them. My point is that my test proved to me, through direct factual evidence, that Eduard didn’t hoax anything, furthermore, evidence would’ve shown that his hands were moving and in truth, they were not.
I’ll do my best to track them down here, it might take me quite awhile, but I’ll do my best. Once I locate them I’ll try to remember to post them here. Even if I can’t track them down, the test is so damn easy to perform, as described below.
For anyone interested in re-creating my/the test, it’s a rather easy test to perform, safety first though. Take some steel wool (like a steel wool pad one uses for dishes), attach it securely to a non-flammable string/cord, light the steel wool on fire, make sure you’re performing the test at night, twirl the lit steel over your head and take the photos; two people will likely be needed to perform said test, obviously. Honestly, it’s rather easy to see that Eduard DID NOT fake the photos in any fashion.
NOTE:
Make sure you’re in an open area where the sparks from the lit steel wool will not catch anything on fire, let alone yourself.
I’d like the skeptics try to explain that if Eduard did in fact hoax this with steel wool, why are Eduard’s hands static, non-moving and clear then whilst the sparks are moving in a circular fashion?
Skeptics never win, truth does.
Salome,
Charles
Found them. I apparently performed the steel wool test on 04/18/2010, actually quite a few years after discovering Eduard and the mission. I performed this test my brother. He twirled the steel wool over his head in the same manner I did; stand still, twirl the lit steel wool over your head, remain still, etc. I’ll see about creating a little collage with the test photos I took so that I can upload them here.
In the meantime, I inverted Meier’s photo and one can clearly see that Eduard’s arm/hand is static, holding a microphone in the center of the fire circle; no blurriness, no movement from his hand, etc. Furthermore, his body is static as well.
As mentioned, I’ll try to combine my test photos into one photo and upload it here later, for now, Eduard’s inverted photo is attached to this post.
Salome,
Charles
Last post here.
I quickly created a collage of the 4 photos, 3 from my test and 1 inverted photo of Meier standing in the circle of fire. Zooming in one can see that Eduard is absolutely static in the photos, absolutely no motion from him at all.
My opinion:
No matter how one looks at the photos, whether the fire circle is directly horizontal over someone’s head or not, the photos prove that there is no way anyone can hoax any of this while your arm/hand is static.
I’m sure newer field tests can be performed to provide a bit more clarity for clearer pictures, but I’ve done the test and I KNOW Eduard couldn’t have hoaxed/faked any of it.
Salome,
Charles
Here’s the photo in question that DB states is faked/hoaxed.
Even without adjusting for clarity, better exposure, etc., one can see that Eduard’s hand is still/static.
Still looking for my test photos.
Salome,
Charles
Does anyone know someone with the last name of Bartholomaus?
Derek would love to hear about people with the same last name. On his website he asks to send him an email if you know about his last name and to tell him about yourself.
I will email him and ask him why he has put very little efforts on researching the origin of this old last name. If his work on his personal genealogy is banal what does that tell you about his other work?
His personal email address is: Derek@Bartholomaus.com
And his work email address is: derek@post-guy.com