The real solution far exceeds manmade philosophies, political machinations, hi-tech fantasies, is found in the non-religious, belief-free, Creation-energy teaching
In 2021, Henry Kissinger and Google founder Eric Schmidt were interviewed by Time magazine about a, then new, book they wrote with the dean of MIT Schwarzman College of Computing, Daniel Huttenlocher, titled The Age of AI.
One of Kissinger’s observations was:
“We live in a world which, in effect, has no philosophy; there is no dominant philosophical view. So the technologists can run wild. They can develop world-changing things, but there’s nobody there to say, ‘We’ve got to integrate this into something.’”
And Schmidt later stated:
“I think that the first thing is that this stuff is too powerful to be done by tech alone. It’s also unlikely that it will just get regulated correctly. So you have to build a philosophy. I can’t say it as well as Dr. Kissinger, but you need a philosophical framework, a set of understandings of where the limits of this technology should go. In my experience in science, the only way that happens is when you get the scientists and the policy people together in some form. This is true in biology, is true in recombinant DNA and so forth.”
Ironically, Schmidt also said:
“Everything’s getting faster. The thing we don’t want is weapons that are automatically launched, based on their own analysis of the situation.”
Recently, Kissinger wrote another article, How to avoid another world war, in which he further emphasized his increased concern about the dangers posed by autonomous weapons that could “start their own war”:
“Once the line into this realm is crossed and hi-tech becomes standard weaponry – and computers become the principal executors of strategy – the world will find itself in a condition for which as yet it has no established concept. How can leaders exercise control when computers prescribe strategic instructions on a scale and in a manner that inherently limits and threatens human input? How can civilization be preserved amid such a maelstrom of conflicting information, perceptions and destructive capabilities?
“No theory for this encroaching world yet exists, and consultative efforts on this subject have yet to evolve – perhaps because meaningful negotiations might disclose new discoveries, and that disclosure itself constitutes a risk for the future. Overcoming the disjunction between advanced technology and the concept of strategies for controlling it, or even understanding its full implications, is as important an issue today as climate change, and it requires leaders with a command of both technology and history.”
It’s interesting that when asked what he would want to be most remembered for, Kissinger said:
“That I made some contribution to the conception of peace.”
While some may not see Kissinger as fully informed on, or acknowledging the true dynamics of the Russia-Ukraine situation, and not agree with Asket’s description of him, from 1953, as an “Angel of Peace”, he eloquently conveys the dangers of AI and the lack of any unifying moral philosophies to deal with it.
Schmidt sees misinformation an intrinsically intertwined, co-developing concern:
“And the way you solve that is by essentially knowing where the information came from cryptographically and then ranking so the best information is at the top.”
Both Kissinger’s and Schmidt’s concerns are quite warranted and both should appreciate the descriptions of the developmental processes of the AI (computerized) weapons – and the projected outcomes – published by Billy Meier, in 1987 (emphasis added):
205. If the Third World War will actually happen—as calculations and observations appear to indicate to be probable now and also during the approaching few decades—then, as now, the civilian population will above all have to bear the brunt of the enormous suffering in tremendous numbers in this entire catastrophe and, last but not least, the fault of the irresponsible scientists who by cloning will create human machines for military purposes, devoid of conscience and feelings, and will create immensely deadly and all-annihilating computer-like weapons.
227. Even when the North American continent will be stricken by the most terrible catastrophe which has ever been recorded, evil military powers will wreak havoc with computerised and nuclear, biological and chemical weapons, whereby it will also happen that computerised weapons become independent and cannot be controlled any longer by human beings.
256. Destruction of war will descend on the northern countries as strong military forces will invade them from the East and will pillage and murder as well as use bombs and missiles, like hail coming down, and hitherto unknown weapons of laser- and computer-controlled types which will destroy and annihilate everything, whereby the first target will be Hungary and after that will follow Austria and northern Italy.
275. Not only nuclear, biological and chemical weapons will be used en masse, but also enormously deadly systems of computer-controlled weapons that are only in the beginning stages of development today, or will be invented and constructed during the third millennium.
As Old as the Universe Itself
While both Kissinger and Schmidt are obviously concerned, I doubt if either of them have foreseen the horrific scenarios described by Meier, or the real solution, which is as old as the universe itself.
Far exceeding any manmade philosophies, political machinations, and hi-tech fantasies, it is found in the non-religious, belief-free, Creation-energy teaching, in Billy Meier’s many books, now also available in English.
Perhaps Elon Musk would like to give some of these books to Kissinger and Schmidt, and read them himself. Certainly they could have an interesting conversation that could be published in Time, hopefully soon, because time is…running out.
GET THEM HERE!
Arahat Athersata
As we are nearing the full effect of the golden age I have recently in the past weeks as the year is ending noticed a huge change in people.Anyone else?
Agreed . . and to add, I’ve observed that many people [adults?] display their silly fantasy attitudes towards the end of ANY year . . the whole ‘glorified commercialism’ thing . . people wrapped up in phony well wishings of meaningless repetitive merry xmas’ and a happy new year crap. I try to remain neutrally objective . . but ’nuff’s enough.
Also another thing. If I remember correctly some evil aliens relased negative energy around the earth which affects people. Maybe if we can somehow use our counciousness snd overpower the remaining artifically created negative energies and soak it up together so maybe we can prevent some disasters.
Good idea.
https://theyflyblog.com/peace-meditation/
Thank you, Michael/Melissa. Artificial Stupidity birthed from Natural Stupidity is such an imminently critical topic. On the growing list of old but, burgeoning threats.
Adam, golems, Frankenstein’s monster, 2001, cylons, replicants, terminator, west world, etc., ad finitum… It is the oldest earth story of creation, with the seemingly unavoidable earth human twist of fear, aggression and patricide.
Very interesting and well done cyborg digital graphic heading for this article. You think he’s down with that artistic license?
Kissinger the peace maker ,haha yes that was funny. Hes a terible war criminal and terible wicked person. Its like with Obama. Both killed more humans then Hitler but lets give then a noble peace price right !!
This is why i get so angry with some of the information of the Ps and mr Meier.
Its looks like they always protect this group
The source of this man of peace is in Asket’s Explanations – Part 2Maybe she has been played by this fake angel of peace,like most of us are played by him and his pupil Obama.
Anyways i already know ,the Ps and you people here never admit it when you where wrong. You guys and girls are so smart that you will give it a spin or blame it on self responsibilty.
All the people killed by peace maker Kissinger and Mr noble Obama,where responsible of being killed thereselfs.
its their own stuppid choice,right
Perhaps you don’t understand that most people who’ve researched the Meier material are aware of what Asket said about Kissinger. And, if you were paying attention, and not just looking for an opportunity to mischaracterize the people who study this material, that this article was pointing out that Kissinger was now echoing what Meier published decades ago.
In fact, I said this:
“While some may not see Kissinger as fully informed on, or acknowledging the true dynamics of the Russia-Ukraine situation, and not agree with Asket’s description of him, from 1953, as an ‘Angel of Peace’, etc.”
Try not to make obviously incorrect, stupid statements just to make a point.
you are defending Kissinger and its not the first time. The same goes for supporting Mr Obama.
Like i said before you are a hypocrite and blind follower that doesnt know how to think for himself
Why do you feel the need to constantly make things up? Do you not understand the concept of neutrality? Writing something factual about someone does not equate to defending them. This is beyond stupid and idiotic. You’re an angry and hateful person.
Do you not understand the concept of neutrality?
But do you and Michael?
We only have to go back to the Trump accusations by you guys and the Ps !
Here is a nice one for you unthinking people,maybe you learn something of somebody else but Mr Meier ! And i dont make up things ! But im not afraight to call out untrue things either.
The support of people like Obama or Kissigner is just wrong,very ver wrong.
Ohh and btw i belief in the Meier contacts,the only thing that i dont understand is to constant defending of a certain group,and thats why i stopped being member of Figu
I don’t think you understand it since you’re still making the same tired claims, which aren’t based in reality. Retelling something that is true is not equivalent to giving someone support. Neutrality is like the truth, it doesn’t take sides.
Hi MH. I’m going to make a stupid statement too because I couldn’t find any reference to “Kissinger” or “Angel of Peace” in the 1953 info. That’s why I asked for the link (thanks for sorting) as I searched the blog and FoM with those search terms but couldn’t find any info. Am I misreading your statement?
Hi Matt,
Here’s the contact where you’ll find it.
Asket:
85. Various things will also develop in the world itself at that time which will be of very great significance.
86. An American man of peace named Kissinger will do big things in the times to come, yet peace will not favour him.
87. Then, soon after that, a serious misfortune will befall him.
88. He will be named “Angel of Peace”, yet he will not be able to prevent a violent war breaking out between Israel and the Arabian countries towards the end of the year 1976.
89. All this must happen because, after the averting of the great catastrophe, new paths will already be trodden again to place terrestrial peace in question.
https://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_Meier/Asket%27s_Explanations_-_Part_2
Thanks Melissa. You probably already know but just in case the 1953 hyperlink above goes to Part 1 which doesn;t mention Kissinger not Part 2 which does. That still doesn’t explain why when I searched “Kissinger” on FoM yesterday there were only 3 results yet today there were 8 including Part 2, but it’s not important.
That is weird, but I’ll fix it on our end. It’s equally strange for the FoM issue because those Asket contacts have been on there for as long as I can remember. I’ll add it to our unsolved mysteries file. 🙂
Thanks. Interestingly, Microsoft translates paragraph 86. in Part 2. slightly differently, as:
“86. An American man of peace named Kissinger will do great things at that time to come, but peace will not hold for him.”
In other words, Asket may have actually been explaining that Kissinger didn’t remain peaceful although had intentions to, like Obama, Trump or anyone else who get full of themselves. Possibly then another, ‘English is bullcrap’ mishap.
Hi Matt,
Sorry for the confusion, Melissa came to the rescue again!
Interesting..:)
Please can the “1953” hyperlink be added to the blog above, thanks.